EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

01.01.09

Microsoft Sends Its ‘Partners’ to Prison

Posted in Asia, Law, Microsoft at 5:20 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“It’s easier for our software to compete with Linux when there’s piracy than when there’s not.”

Bill Gates (2007)

FROM TODAY’S news about China:

A court in Shenzhen, China, sentenced 11 members of a software counterfeiting operation Wednesday, with the defendants getting between one and a half and six and half years in prison, according to Microsoft.

[...]

Microsoft applauded the PSB and FBI for their work in the case. “Software counterfeiting is a global, illegal business without borders,” David Finn, associate general counsel focused on piracy at Microsoft, said in a statement. “Criminals may be on the other side of the globe and may not even speak the same language, but they prey upon customers and partners all over the world. This case is a testament to the importance of Microsoft’s commitment to close collaboration with government bodies and local law enforcement agencies around the world to bring these criminals to justice, wherever they may be.”

PSB raids in July 2007 lead to arrests and the convictions. The PSB, with tips from Microsoft and the FBI’s Los Angeles bureau, found about 55,000 copies of counterfeit software and traced them back to the same syndicate, based in the province of Guangdong.

Microsoft sure loves calling them “criminals” — a word that it repeats several times in the official statement. Again, regarding China specifically:

“It’s easier for our software to compete with Linux when there’s piracy than when there’s not.”

Bill Gates (2007)

Why the sudden change? Here is what Gates said about China:

“They’ll get sort of addicted, and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.”

Bill Gates

Microsoft needs money now. It’s imploding. These crackdowns are good news to Free software.

Related posts:

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

29 Comments

  1. Diamond Wakizashi said,

    January 1, 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Gravatar

    “Microsoft sure loves calling them “criminals””

    Shouldn’t Microsoft be HIRING them?

  2. Jose_X said,

    January 1, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy, this is a great post. Great title.

    Could you imagine, eg, Matt Asay, who speaks frequently about how distributing FOSS online is part of marketing (leading to paying customers later on), turning around and then trying to get those hosting the FOSS distribution servers (or running online FOSS for-profit businesses) arrested?

    I guess Microsoft no longer wanted the services of these guys. My question is: did Microsoft first offer to move them over to a different MS division, or did Microsoft simply push for the slammer from the get-go?

    Can you find out for us, Roy? Maybe someone from the NY Times or from the W Post can ask Gates personally. How does the mind of a financial genius tick? I’d buy their paper just to learn.

  3. Jose_X said,

    January 2, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy, I have noticed ads on the side for microsoft. The domain names vary and would not be identifiable [MS probably has millions of such names disposable, ask godaddy.] The recent one I am looking at is for the B&M Foundry (Gates is great golly gee).

    No number of clicks could match the value of some of these ads to Microsoft (and I doubt Microsoft money keeps this nonprofit site going). I see them as off-topic and providing a negative service to many readers and to this site. I don’t expect you can do much about them, but at least you have my opinion.

    While I’m off-topic myself, let me mention this thread about compiz “stagnation”: http://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/2009010200235OSSW

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 2, 2009 at 2:04 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks. I saw that comment of yours earlier and wrote about it.
    http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/02/amd-novell-friction/

  5. Jose_X said,

    January 2, 2009 at 2:07 pm

    Gravatar

    Update: After posting prior comment, I now find another pro-Microsoft ad to replace the other one (it might even be in the same position as the last one .. 3rd spot out of 4). This one is about “Bill Gates scholarship”.

    It must be great to have so much money (by hook or by crook as the need arises) to be able to buy significant influence into the future career directions of so many promising young minds.

    Hey, this comment about fostering addictions to the billionaire’s product line is on topic!

    Why pay taxes when you can spend a fraction of that money buying influence (hope Washington state, the Feds, and scholarship applicants are paying attention).

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 2, 2009 at 2:09 pm

    Gravatar

    I have a post about this coming shortly. Microsoft has been doing a lot of ‘donation’ recently (drugware) and it’s very proud about it… for the cameras.

  7. Neo said,

    January 3, 2009 at 9:28 am

    Gravatar

    been using Ubuntu Linux for 4 years now and have absolutely no interest in Monopoly$oft’s products. i found something better.

    http://www.ubuntu.com
    http://www.openoffice.org

  8. Lyle Howard Seave said,

    January 3, 2009 at 11:53 am

    Gravatar

    Hey Roy,

    Offtopic/ ..
    Just wanted to wish you the best for 2009.

    Boycott Novell is still my number one source for Linux news.
    I enjoy the articles and the research you put in but your links are the biggest and most complete (and easy to navigate) of any free software promoting site.

    My top 3 Gnu-Linux sites of 2008 where:

    1. Boycott Novell
    2. Linux Outlaws (podcast)
    3. Groklaw (and I despise lawyers)

    I have this weird feeling that you will be in the top 3 for 2009.

    All the best for the upcoming year.

    PS: I know time is a problem for all but ever thought of doing a monthly recap podcast to go over what happened in the last month?

  9. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Gravatar

    Lyle,

    Thanks a lot. Yes, I thought about it, but in order for it to be worthwhile it requires preparation ‘on paper’, which is time consuming and can be delivered as text (which in turn gets indexed).

  10. ObiWanKenobi said,

    January 3, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Gravatar

    Great post Roy, keep on doing it!

    By the way do you know who the real pirates are? The operate off the coast of Somalia, East Africa.

    Another one: do you remember who started all this with “software piracy”?

    Many years ago they were running whole page ads in the computer journals. The top left would read: “Software piracy is a crime.”. Bottom right carried on: “How to tell. Phone xxx-xxxx xxx.”

    With so much money they have changed the language and caused a lot of confusion.

  11. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 3:43 pm

    Gravatar

    Even calling it “theft” is incorrect because nobody actually loses a copy.

  12. ArthurDent said,

    January 3, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Thanks Roy, for all the information. Thanks to all of you.

    I was playing with the idea of using Mono, but I increasingly realise that it’s a tricky issue.

    I’ve decided for Java now.

  13. darryl said,

    January 3, 2009 at 4:38 pm

    Gravatar

    It was not MS who made the arrests, it was the FBI, and personally i would trust that the FBI would look for criminials, and if they were arrested and imprissioned, i would call that criminal.

    Piracy is a criminal act, period

    be it on the high seas, music, software, IP, pictures, books. Its taking or selling something that does not belong to you, thats criminal.

    If it occured with Red Hat enterprise server, and it was Red Hat who applauded the FBI what would you then say ?

    DO you condone criminal activity ?? or do you condone it as long as it’s your hated MS that agreed with the FBI in determining it was criminal. ???

    Red Hat, just like MS have employees and share holders, they need to protect their assets, that means if RH’s products were being pirated they would do what they could to ensure their income stream and revinue, just like MS just like anyone.

    OR would you prefer those at Red Hat lost their jobs?? because their products was pirated and all that good work and long hours was being profited on by a group of criminals ?

    I find this ammusing, it was not even MS or gates who did it, it was the PSP and FBI and the Chinese Government. but BN has to spin it i guess, justify your existance and all

    Good luck with that, but after all this site does more damage to the FOSS movement that good, one day you might see that. but its good for a laugh Elma.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 4:50 pm

    Gravatar

    It was not MS who made the arrests, it was the FBI, and personally i would trust that the FBI would look for criminials, and if they were arrested and imprissioned, i would call that criminal.

    There are many articles about it. They did this at Microsoft’s behest using information that Microsoft supplied. Microsoft even bragged about it.

    Piracy is a criminal act, period

    Piracy is a criminal act, I agree. Murder, rape and abduction of people (or ships/cargo) is an atrocious thing.

    be it on the high seas, music, software, IP, pictures, books. Its taking or selling something that does not belong to you, thats criminal.

    Piracy can only be done at high seas. You seem to be confused by propaganda terms.

    If it occured with Red Hat enterprise server, and it was Red Hat who applauded the FBI what would you then say ?

    Red Hat would love to see its software spreading in China.

    DO you condone criminal activity ??

    Straw man.

    or do you condone it as long as it’s your hated MS that agreed with the FBI in determining it was criminal. ???

    Learn about China’s stance on intellectual monopolies. Laws are not universal.

    Red Hat, just like MS have employees and share holders, they need to protect their assets, that means if RH’s products were being pirated they would do what they could to ensure their income stream and revinue, just like MS just like anyone.

    It can’t be “pirated”. It can be copied, illegally shared, counterfeited.

    OR would you prefer those at Red Hat lost their jobs?? because their products was pirated and all that good work and long hours was being profited on by a group of criminals ?

    It’s funny that Mr. Gates very much endorsed these “criminals” while he needed them.

    I find this ammusing, it was not even MS or gates who did it, it was the PSP and FBI and the Chinese Government. but BN has to spin it i guess, justify your existance and all

    It’s a known fact that Microsoft does this. It’s nothing new nor unique.

    Good luck with that, but after all this site does more damage to the FOSS movement that good, one day you might see that. but its good for a laugh Elma.

    Happy new year. Laugh it up. :-)

  15. john said,

    January 3, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    Gravatar

    Whether you hate MS or not, theft is still theft.

  16. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 5:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Piracy theft

  17. Roy Bixler said,

    January 3, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    Gravatar

    Not to mention, if anyone makes illegal copies of Red Hat, they would be guilty of stupidity in addition to counterfeiting or whatever. If one wants to use Red Hat but doesn’t want to pay for support, it’s certainly possible to use CentOS.

  18. Dave Lane said,

    January 3, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    Gravatar

    Here here, Roy. Excellent – although I’m not sure if you want to say that “It’s Piracy” – that buys into the propagandist terminology… It’s breach of copyright, but nothing more. And copyright with license terms, in this case, is a mechanism for “artificial scarcity“, the way that read-only information producers like Microsoft attempt to treat software like a physical good (and subject it and the market to the same sort of forces) even though it’s demonstrably not, thanks to the fact that it can be copied at effectively $0 incremental cost. That’s something you can’t do with a physical object (except, perhaps a plant or tree – but that’s another topic, and a separate instance of corporate injustice supported by the state.)

  19. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    Gravatar

    http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/08/blog-post_29.html

    Roy Schestowitz said…

       This picture wrong. It’s not ‘piracy’ either. it’s copyrights infringement.

  20. Randie said,

    January 3, 2009 at 9:05 pm

    Gravatar

    no its not theft. copying is NOT stealing end of story…. dont bother arguing about it because you are wasting your time.

    [img]http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/piracy-is-theft.jpg[/img]

  21. darryl said,

    January 3, 2009 at 10:14 pm

    Gravatar

    Copying is Stealing, you copy a music CD, or a book or picture, its theft, you dont own it, but you are profiting off it.

    It takes time and skill to write a book, or software, software is just as physical and real as a book, or a dollar bill. none of which you are allowed to copy and profit from.

    Its THEFT and its criminal,

    I know the really poor argument that software is not physical therefore its “fair game” but thats just a spin so you can sleep well at night.

    No matter how you “spin it” its theft, its criminal, and if you dont believe me ask those that are in prison for it,. im Sure they will agree with me.

    BTW: software is just as physical as the keyboard you are typing on, its not “nothing” and its NOT a free for all, just like a book is, its taken time and effort to write that software, software that was written to meet a markets needs.

    If you like it or not MS Windows is used by MOST computers on the planet, the code did cost money to make, just as it costs RED HAT money to develop their code base.

    You cant get RH server edition “FREE” you have to pay for it, you have to pay for the effort that has gone into that code. So RH would not be happy if i purchased a copy of RH Server edition and make 10,000 copies of it and gave them away.

    That would be criminal, that code does not belong to me.

    Software is 1′s and 0′s on a CD or in RAM they are electronics, they have mass and if you had a scale sensitive enough you could weight it, saying its nothing is a poor excuse for you to steal it, and the LAW says you are a criminal if you do.

    So i dont really care what you say, software piracy and copying is theft, its criminal, and anyone who thinks otherwise does not understand the law.

    So according to you, a radio frequency is not anything real therefore you should be able to use whatever frequency you want, after all according to you its not physical so its fair game.

    Yet companies pay millions and millions of dollars to secure spectrum space, frequencies are auctioned off at great expense.

    IF you decided that its not physical and therefore real, and you started transmitting anywhere you liked, again the FCC would fine you, and if you kept doing it, you would be in prison.

    AS you are breaking the law.

    So dont be a criminal, and dont steal off other people, here’s an idea, come up with your own ideas and compete with MS on quality and service./

    See how that goes for a change, no wonder Linux is only a few % of market share, you cant be trusted.

    i dont know, but isnt it one of the 10 commandments that you should not steal things ??

    what if someone spends $50 million making a movie, and you steal it and pirate it, its only bits on a CD after all, its not like its real.

    Try it, and when you are caught and spend the rest of your life paying fines or in prison, then tell me how that is not theft.

    DONT be a criminal, it does not suit FOSS or the real world, makes FOSS look like a bunch of leaches..

  22. darryl said,

    January 3, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    Gravatar

    What is Software Piracy: The Piracy Problem

    Introduction

    Over the past several years, advances in computer software have brought us time-saving business programs, educational software that teaches basic skills and sophisticated subjects, graphics programs that have revolutionized the design industry, Internet applications that help connect us with other computer users, and an increasingly complex variety of computer games to entertain us. As the software industry grows, everyone stands to benefit.

    Compared to literature, music and movies, computer software is a relatively new form of intellectual property. Nevertheless, software is protected under the very same laws that govern music, literature, movies and other copyrighted content. Copying software illegally is not any different than illegally copying any of these forms of intellectual property — and the punishments for doing so are equally harsh.

    All software comes with a license agreement that specifically states the terms and conditions under which the software may be legally used. Licenses vary from program to program and may authorize as few as one computer or individual to use the software or as many as several hundred network users to share the application across the system. It is important to read and understand the license accompanying the application to ensure that you have enough legal copies of the software for your organization’s needs. Making additional copies, or loading the software onto more than one machine, may violate copyright law and be considered piracy.

    Unfortunately, there are many people who, either ignorantly or deliberately, engage in software piracy. Whenever you use a piece of software that is unlicensed, you are depriving software companies of their earnings. More importantly, you are depriving the creative teams who have developed the software (e.g., programmers, writers, graphic artists) of compensation for the thousands of hours they have spent working on a particular program.

    In a very real sense, software piracy adversely affects the world economy by diverting money that stimulates further product development. Piracy particularly affects the United States, which currently provides approximately 80 percent of the world’s software.

    http://www.siia.net/piracy/whatis.asp

    Less than a month later, Ferrar’s record prison term was shattered when, on September 8, 2006, Nathan Peterson, owner and operator of iBackups was sentenced to 87 months (7 years, 3 months) in prison for his crimes. Peterson had previously pled guilty to two counts of criminal copyright infringement. In addition to his prison term, Peterson was required to pay restitution of $5,402,448 and a $250,000 punitive fee.

    DONT turn FOSS into a low life bunch of criminals with this stupid idea that copying software is “OK” because its not.. its a CRIME.

  23. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 3, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    Gravatar

    Copying is Stealing,

    Copying is copying.

    Stealing is stealing.

    These two word are not synonyms.

    you copy a music CD, or a book or picture, its theft, you dont own it, but you are profiting off it.

    Profiting is not the same as stealing.

    It takes time and skill to write a book, or software, software is just as physical and real as a book, or a dollar bill. none of which you are allowed to copy and profit from.

    I agree.

    Its THEFT and its criminal,

    No, it’s copyright infringement, which is criminal.

    I know the really poor argument that software is not physical therefore its “fair game” but thats just a spin so you can sleep well at night.

    Nobody justifies copyright infringement here. It’s just a two-faced or hypocritical POV of Microsoft that’s pointed out in this post.

    No matter how you “spin it” its theft, its criminal, and if you dont believe me ask those that are in prison for it,. im Sure they will agree with me.

    Copyright infringement is a crime, but this is no “theft”. Don’t mix the words like propaganda wants you to.

    BTW: software is just as physical as the keyboard you are typing on

    Are your thoughts physical too? Is a polynomial a physical asset?

    , its not “nothing” and its NOT a free for all, just like a book is, its taken time and effort to write that software, software that was written to meet a markets needs.

    Yes, that’s what copyrights are for. They protect perceptual things that are complete and unique works.

    If you like it or not MS Windows is used by MOST computers on the planet,

    It depends on your definition of “computer”. Desktops are not analogous to computers and the vast majority of computers (over 97% IIRC) are not desktops.

    the code did cost money to make, just as it costs RED HAT money to develop their code base.

    Yes, so we have copyrights.

    You cant get RH server edition “FREE” you have to pay for it, you have to pay for the effort that has gone into that code. So RH would not be happy if i purchased a copy of RH Server edition and make 10,000 copies of it and gave them away.

    That would be against the licence.

    That would be criminal, that code does not belong to me.

    True.

    Software is 1’s and 0’s on a CD or in RAM they are electronics, they have mass and if you had a scale sensitive enough you could weight it, saying its nothing is a poor excuse for you to steal it, and the LAW says you are a criminal if you do.

    You can’t steal code. You can commit copyright infringement.

    So i dont really care what you say, software piracy and copying is theft, its criminal, and anyone who thinks otherwise does not understand the law.

    There is no software piracy I’m aware of. Those folks in Somalia are not interested in software.

    So according to you, a radio frequency is not anything real therefore you should be able to use whatever frequency you want, after all according to you its not physical so its fair game.

    The spectrum debate is separate. It’s to do with public security (broadcast interferences and all).

    Yet companies pay millions and millions of dollars to secure spectrum space, frequencies are auctioned off at great expense.

    See above. It’s a different debate.

    IF you decided that its not physical and therefore real, and you started transmitting anywhere you liked, again the FCC would fine you, and if you kept doing it, you would be in prison.

    The FCC should be “rebooted”, according to Professor Lessig.

    AS you are breaking the law.

    Me? No. I use Free software.

    So dont be a criminal, and dont steal off other people, here’s an idea, come up with your own ideas and compete with MS on quality and service./

    Are you referring to me?

    See how that goes for a change, no wonder Linux is only a few % of market share, you cant be trusted.

    Actually, Linux dominates with about 94% market share in top computers, about 40% (estimated) in devices and a huge share in servers. It’s used more extensively than Mac OS and Windows, for example.

    i dont know, but isnt it one of the 10 commandments that you should not steal things ??

    Moses was told nothing about copyrights.

    what if someone spends $50 million making a movie, and you steal it and pirate it, its only bits on a CD after all, its not like its real.

    You can’t “pirate” or “steal” a film. You can infringe copyrights. That’s against the law.

    Try it, and when you are caught and spend the rest of your life paying fines or in prison, then tell me how that is not theft.

    Are you referring to me?

    DONT be a criminal, it does not suit FOSS or the real world, makes FOSS look like a bunch of leaches..

    Very much the opposite. FOSS people give their work to others. Leeches are those who only demand.

  24. Dave Lane said,

    January 3, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    Gravatar

    Damn, Roy, it’s a beautiful thing to see someone so misguided (Darryl) get so comprehensively served, all without emotive bs. A pleasure to read. Keep up the good work.

    Dave

  25. G. Michaels said,

    January 3, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    Gravatar

    get so comprehensively served, all without emotive bs. A pleasure to read.

    Unfortunately that seems to be the exception rather than the rule. Most of the time it’s nitpicking, topic drift or just plain ignoring people. Usually when he feels cornered.

    I praise my son when he picks up his toys, which is not that often at this point. He is however, 4 years old, so he needs the constant reinforcement.

    Note: writer of this comment adds absolutely nothing but stalking and personal attacks against readers, as documented here.

  26. Dave Lane said,

    January 4, 2009 at 12:25 am

    Gravatar

    @G. Michaels,

    Apologies, but I appear to have missed your point. Either that, or perhaps you didn’t have one.

  27. ArthurDent said,

    January 4, 2009 at 6:52 am

    Gravatar

    To darryl
    and other advocates of MS:

    Are you comparing RedHat with Microsoft?
    It’s two entirely different things.

    Microsoft has been well known for breaking the law of both the US and Europe, being convicted, forced to comply and paying high fines. However, they keep doing the same stuff, only just a little smarter.

    Also, they have been well known for moving in the gray area between legal and illegal all the time.

    Period.

  28. Sum Yung Gai said,

    January 5, 2009 at 10:31 pm

    Gravatar

    For those misguided people who keep saying, “it’s theft, it’s theft!”, here’s your wake-up call.

    The US Supreme Court says it isn’t theft.

    That’s right, the US Supreme Court says it isn’t theft. Yes, you read that right. That issue has already been ruled on.

    The case is Dowling vs. United States, and a discussion of it is available here. It concerns a bootlegging operation of music albums.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_(1985)

    I have read the Supreme Court’s entire ruling. Bootlegging copyrighted works, be it music, software, or otherwise, is against the law, for sure…but it is emphatically *not* theft.

    Case closed, next subject.

    –SYG

  29. Dan O'Brian said,

    January 5, 2009 at 10:39 pm

    Gravatar

    Wow, for once I agree with Roy. What is this world coming to?

What Else is New


  1. Links 21/9/2018: Cockpit 178, Purism 'Dongle'

    Links for the day



  2. Criticism of Unitary Patent (UPC) Agreement Doomed the UPC and Patent Trolls' Plan -- Along With the Litigation Lobby -- for Unified 'Extortion Vector'

    The Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC) was the trolls' weapon against potentially millions of European businesses; but those businesses have woken up to the fact that it was against their interests and European member states such as Spain and Poland now oppose it while Germany halts ratification



  3. It Wasn't Judges With Weapons in Their Office, It Was Benoît Battistelli Who Brought Firearms to the European Patent Office (EPO)

    The EPO scandals deepen in light of a very major scandal which has occupied the French media for a couple of months



  4. Links 20/9/2018: 2018 Linux Audio Miniconference and Blackboard's Openwashing

    Links for the day



  5. Links 19/9/2018: Chromebooks Get More DEBs, LLVM 7.0.0 Released

    Links for the day



  6. Links 18/9/2018: Qt 5.12 Alpha , MAAS 2.5.0 Beta, PostgreSQL CoC

    Links for the day



  7. Today's European Patent Office (EPO) Works for Large, Foreign Pharmaceutical Companies in Pursuit of Patents on Nature, Life, and Essential/Basic Drugs

    The never-ending insanity which is patents on DNA/genome/genetics and all sorts of basic things that are put together like a recipe in a restaurant; patents are no longer covering actual machinery that accomplishes unique tasks in complicated ways, typically assembled from scratch by humans; some supposed 'inventions' are merely born into existence by the natural splitting of organisms or conception (e.g. pregnancy)



  8. The EPO Has Quit Pretending That It Cares About Patent Quality, All It Cares About is Quantity of Lawsuits

    A new interview with Roberta Romano-Götsch, as well as the EPO's promotion of software patents alongside CIPA (Team UPC), is an indication that the EPO has ceased caring about quality and hardly even pretends to care anymore



  9. Qualcomm's Escalating Patent Wars Have Already Caused Massive Buybacks (Loss of Reserves) and Loss of Massive Clients

    Qualcomm's multi-continental patent battles are an effort to 'shock and awe' everyone into its protection racket; but the unintended effect seems to be a move further and further away from 'Qualcomm territories'



  10. Links 17/9/2018: Torvalds Takes a Break, SQLite 3.25.0 Released

    Links for the day



  11. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Helps Prevent Frivolous Software Patent Lawsuits

    PTAB with its quality-improving inter partes reviews (IPRs) is enraging patent maximalists; but by looking to work around it or weaken it they will simply reduce the confidence associated with US patents



  12. Abstract Patents (Things One Can Do With Pen and Paper, Sometimes an Abacus) Are a Waste of Money as Courts Disregard Them

    A quick roundup of patents and lawsuits at the heart of which there's little or no substance; 35 U.S.C. § 101 renders these moot



  13. “Blockchain” Hype and “FinTech”-Like Buzzwords Usher in Software Patents Everywhere, Even Where Such Patents Are Obviously Bunk

    Not only the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) embraces the "blockchain" hype; business methods and algorithms are being granted patent 'protection' (exclusivity) which would likely be disputed by the courts (if that ever reaches the courts)



  14. Qualcomm's Patent Aggression Threatens Rationality of Patent Scope in Europe and Elsewhere

    Qualcomm's dependence on patent taxes (so-called 'royalties' associated with physical devices which it doesn't even make) highlights the dangers now known; the patent thicket has grown too "thick"



  15. Months After Oil States the Patent Maximalists Are Still Desperate to Crush PTAB in the Courts, Not Just in Congress and the Office

    Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) inter partes reviews (IPRs) improve patent quality and are therefore a threat to those who profit from spurious feuding and litigation; they try anything they can to turn things around



  16. IAM, Watchtroll and the EPO Still Spread the Mentality of Patent Maximalism

    The misguided idea that the objective (overall) should be to grant as many monopolies as possible (to spur a lot of litigation) isn't being challenged in echo chamber 'events', set up and sponsored by think tanks and pressure groups of the litigation 'industry'



  17. Watchtroll and Other Proponents of Patent Trolls Are Trying to Change the Law Outside the Courts in Order to Bypass Patent Justice

    35 U.S.C. § 101 (Section 101) voids almost every software patent — a reality that even the most zealous patent professionals have come to grips with and their way of tackling this ‘problem’ is legislative, albeit nowhere near successful (so far)



  18. Links 16/9/2018: Windows Plays 'Nice' Again, Elisa Music Player 0.3 Beta and Latte Dock 0.8.1

    Links for the day



  19. Slamming Courts and Judges Won't Help the Patent Maximalists; It Can Only Make Things Worse

    Acorda Therapeutics sees its stock price dropping 25% after finding out that its patent portfolio isn't solid, as affirmed by the Federal Circuitn(CAFC); the only way out of this mess is a pursuit of a vastly improved patent quality, thorough patent examination which then offers legal certainty



  20. Patent Trolls Are Still Active and Microsoft is Closely Connected to Many of Them

    A roundup of patent trolls' actions in the United States; Microsoft is connected to a notably high number of these



  21. Advancements in Automobile Technology Won't be Possible With Patent Maximalism

    Advancements in the development of vehicles are being discouraged by a thicket of patents as dumb (and likely invalid) as claims on algorithms and mere shapes



  22. Battistelli “Has Deeply Hurt the Whole Patent Profession, Examiners as Well as Agents” and Also the Image of France

    A French perspective regarding Battistelli's reign at the EPO, which has not really ended but manifests itself or 'metastasises' through colleagues of Battistelli (whom he chose) and another French President (whom he also chose)



  23. António Campinos Needs to Listen to Doctors Without Borders (MSF) et al to Salvage What's Left of Public Consent for the EPO

    Groups including Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) and Médecins du Monde (MdM) have attempted to explain to the EPO, with notoriously French-dominated leadership, that it’s a mistake to work for Gilead at the expense of the public; but António Campinos is just another patent maximalist



  24. The Max Planck Institute's Determination on UPC's (Unitary Patent) Demise is Only “Controversial” in the Eyes of Rabid Members of Team UPC

    Bristows keeps lying like Battistelli; that it calls a new paper "controversial" without providing any evidence of a controversy says a lot about Bristows LLP, both as a firm and the individuals who make up the firm (they would not be honest with their clients, either)



  25. Links 15/9/2018: Wine 3.16, Overwatch's GNU/Linux (Wine) 'Ban', New Fedora 28 Build, and Fedora 29 Beta Delay

    Links for the day



  26. Max Planck Institute Pours More Water on the Dying Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The Max Planck Institute gives another sobering reality check for Team UPC to chew on; there's still no sign of any progress whatsoever for the UPC because even Team UPC appears to have given up and moved on



  27. EPO Seals Many Death Sentences With Acceptance of EP 2604620

    Very disappointing news as EP 2604620 withstands scrutiny, assuring that a lot of poor people will not receive much-needed, life-saving treatments



  28. Links 13/9/2018: Compiz Comeback, 'Life is Strange: Before the Storm'

    Links for the day



  29. Now We Have Patents on Rooms. Yes, Rooms!

    The shallow level of what nowadays constitutes "innovation" and merits getting a patent for a couple of decades



  30. EPO Granted a Controversial European Patent (Under Battistelli) Which May Literally Kill a Lot of People

    The EPO (together with CIPA) keeps promoting software patents; patents that are being granted by the EPO literally put lives at risk and have probably already cost a lot of lives


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts