EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

02.03.17

Team UPC Continues to be a Premier Source of Fake News About Unitary Patent in the United Kingdom

Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 9:41 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Bristows LLP is just one of many in Team UPC, which has become like a cult

Keltie Fake News
Kat-lie or Kel-tie?

Summary: The peddling of lies regarding the prospects of the UPC, or the dissemination of “inevitability” claims (self-fulfilling prophecies tactic), cannot withstand scrutiny, as people who don’t lie for a living rightly point out

THE EPO we’re already accustomed to hear nothing but lies from; but a growing number of law firms, including some that are based in London, tarnish their reputation by making false predictions that are politically and financially (self gain) motivated. These false predictions — if not outright lies and blatant falsehoods — can cost their clients dearly, as these clients are being fooled if not lied to, e.g. regarding the 'benefits' of UPC to SMEs.

One source of rebuttal to these lies has been Dr. Ingve Björn Stjerna, a Certified Specialist for Intellectual Property Law in Düsseldorf. Florian Müller has just amended his article to say: “The author of this guest post has now published a new article on the recent political statements as regards a ratification of the UPCA in the United Kingdom and their legal implications.” In Twitter he called it out as well, as follows: “just added a small update at the end of the recent guest post on Europe’s Unified Patent court…”

This is about the UPC in the UK — merely a hypothetical/theoretical idea that is extremely unlikely to ever materialise. But if one listens to CIPA, a bunch of lobbyists (front group) for the patent microcosm in the UK, fake news are abundant.

This tweet from CIPA says: “Kevin Mooney tells our UPC Seminar the process will be smoother if the UK can ratify the Court Agreement before the Govt triggers Article 50″

Another says: “Kevin Mooney on the question: Can UK stay in UPC post-Brexit? Refers to Gordon/Pascoe opinion that there’s no legal/constitutional barrier”

They are merely expressing their wishes rather than what will actually happen. And law firms from the UK nonetheless repeat this nonsense as though it is fact. “According to Kevin Mooney at @TheCIPA meeting on Tuesday,” one of them wrote, “UK may be aiming to ratify UPC before Article 50 is triggered. #UPC #Brexit”

“That means by 9th March,” IAM added (IAM, for those who forgot or don’t know, was paid by the EPO’s PR agency to help set up pro-UPC events, supported explicitly by the EPO).

“UPC Agreement to be ratified in UK before Art. 50 is triggered,” one person told us “i.e. until early March…”

“New assessment regarding the intended UK ratification,” told us this person, was published this week with an English version [PDF] and the following summary in English (it’s also available in German). To quote:

The British ratification paradox,

Article on the recent political statements as regards a ratification of the UPCA in the United Kingdom and their legal implications (02/02/2017)

Most recently, statements with relevance for the ratification of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (“UPCA”) made by members of the British government caused astonishment. While the new British Minister of State for Intellectual Property, Joseph Johnson, underlined the ratification intent, Prime Minister Theresa May shortly afterwards, in her speech on the “Brexit” negotiations, defined a number of objectives which appear hardly reconcilable with such ratification. In this context, it is also of interest that, contrary to the political guidelines set by the previous Prime Minister Cameron and against the broad opposition of the professional circles, the CJEU can be expected to have gained an interpretation competence also in relation to material questions of unitary patent protection, as a consequence of the compromise in the dispute on former Art. 6 to 8 of the “unitary patent” Regulation. The following article describes the statements and their legal implications in more detail.

How long will people be gamed and manipulated by Team UPC with its fantasies? This isn’t the first time that the above author contradicts these false predictions and here is a new comment from IP Kat (“bye bye UK participation in the UPC”):

The Brexit White Paper makes an interesting read:
“We will bring an end to the jurisdiction of the CJEU in the UK”.

So bye bye UK participation in the UPC, then? Or might this not quite mean what it says? The subsequent sentence perhaps gives a clue.

“We will of course continue to honour our international commitments and follow international law”.

I guess that one could characterise the UPCA as “international law”, and so this perhaps leaves the government with some “wriggle room”. However, it will be interesting to see how (if at all) the government manages to “square the circle” where obeying international law (such as the UPCA) requires the CJEU to have jurisdiction in the UK.

Based upon my observations to date of UK politicians, I predict that the mutual incompatibility (with respect to e.g. the UPCA) between the two above-quoted statements will be handled in the usual manner. That is, the government won’t bother trying to explain itself. It will just be evasive and change the topic.

The same approach will be used to handle the question of how free trade with the EU can be achieved without submitting to common rules (and the jurisdiction of a court that interprets those rules)… especially as the proposed alternative (a dispute resolution mechanism that does not have direct effect in UK law) is very unlikely to be palatable to the other EU Member States.

We don’t expect the UPC to ever become a reality and as we wrote yesterday, neither do professionals in the area, based on a new poll/survey. We already wrote some long rebuttals to this a few months ago:

Remember that the person who promised ratification in the UK has since then been sacked or stepped down.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 12/12/2019: KDE Applications 19.12, Qt Creator 4.11, New VirtualBox

    Links for the day



  2. Brand Dilution in Action

    Microsoft's proprietary software which spies on people and businesses is getting a "free ride" on the "Linux" brand; and nobody seems to care, nobody seems to notice how perverse that it



  3. At the EPO Money -- Not Quality -- is King

    Financiers are ruining quality



  4. The EPO's Strategic Failure 2023

    Potemkin social dialogue



  5. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 11, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 11, 2019



  6. EPO Promoting Software Patents in Countries Where These Are Illegal

    The EPO's vision of 'unitary' software patents (patents on algorithms in countries that disallow such patents, as per their national laws) won't materialise, but in the meantime a lot of Invalid Patents (IPs) are granted in the form of European Patents (EPs) and this is wrong



  7. We Support GNU and the FSF But Remain Sceptical and Occasionally Worry About an RMS-less FSF

    Richard Stallman (RMS) is not in charge of the FSF anymore (it's Stallman who created the FSF) and there's risk the decisions will be made by people who don't share Stallman's ethics or the FSF's spirit



  8. Links 11/12/2019: Huawei Lobbied by Microsoft (Because of GNU/Linux) and Microsoft Still Googlebombs Linux to Promote 'Teams'

    Links for the day



  9. Links 11/12/2019: Edge Native Working Group, CrossOver 19.0 Released

    Links for the day



  10. Instead of Fixing Bug #1 Canonical/Ubuntu Contributes to Making the Bug Even More Severe (WSL/EEE)

    Following one seminal report about Canonical financially contributing to Microsoft's EEE efforts — celebrated openly by GNU/Linux opponentsclosing bug #1 Ubuntu basically decided not that it was fixed but that it would no longer attempt to fix it (“wontfix”)



  11. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 10, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 10, 2019



  12. Today's Example of Microsoft's Faked 'Love'

    “On 7 September 2017, users began noticing a message that stated “Skype for Business is now Microsoft Teams”. This was confirmed on 25 September 2017, at Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference,” according to Wikipedia



  13. Links 10/12/2019: Kubernetes 1.17, Debian Init Systems GR

    Links for the day



  14. 'Cancel Culture' as 'Thoughtpolice' Creep

    Richard Stallman spoke about an important aspect of censorship more than 2 decades ago (before “Open Source” even existed); it was published in Datamation (“Censoring My Software”) 23 years before a campaign of defamation on the Internet was used to remove him from MIT and FSF (censoring or ‘canceling’ Stallman himself)



  15. Microsoft Still Hates GNU/Linux and Mark Shuttleworth Knows It (But He is Desperate for Money)

    We're supposed to believe that a PR or image management (reputation laundering) campaign alone can turn Microsoft from GNU/Linux foe into friend/ally



  16. Actions Against EPO Corruption and Unitary Patent (UPC) Injustice/Lobbying

    The EPO is apparently going on strike again and an action against the UPC is scheduled for later this week (protest in Brussels)



  17. “The Fifth Freedom as a Meme”

    The issue with systemd (or SystemD) has provoked or at least stimulated discussions about the limits of the famous Four Freedoms



  18. IRC Proceedings: Monday, December 09, 2019

    IRC logs for Monday, December 09, 2019



  19. Demonstration Against Unitary Software Patents, Thursday 12 Dec in Brussels

    FFII's call to demonstrate against the UPC



  20. Links 9/12/2019: China on GNU/Linux, Canonical Wants Help to Improve Ubuntu

    Links for the day



  21. Links 9/12/2019: Linux 5.5 RC1, EasyOS Buster 2.1.9

    Links for the day



  22. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 08, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 08, 2019



  23. Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

    In an age of substitution — where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts — it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents



  24. Once Upon a Time Banter Was Allowed on Mailing Lists

    Hours ago Torvalds announced RC1 of the next Linux (kernel) release; it has been a while since he last said something ‘controversial’ (following his month at the penalty box); free speech deficit can make us weaker, not stronger (advantage to those who work in the dark)



  25. Links 8/12/2019: Debian Init Systems GR, NomadBSD 1.3

    Links for the day



  26. Can We Quit Celebrating DRM in GNU/Linux?

    Over the past couple of days various news sites and "Linux" sites expressed great satisfaction [1-5] over the passive embrace of Disney's DRM ploy (Disney+), even when Disney itself rejects DRM, seeing the harms practically caused by it [6,7]



  27. You Know WSL is Bad for GNU/Linux Because Anti-Linux People, Microsoft and Its Propagandists, Want People to Use That

    Microsoft and its boosters (and media partners) haven’t grown tired of spreading falsehoods to stigmatise and take control of GNU/Linux by creating their own versions and traps for it



  28. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019



  29. 5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

    One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)



  30. Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

    The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts