IN part one, part two, part three, part four and part five we wrote about ways in which the media was suppressed by Gates Foundation 'philanthropy'. The context of one incident was Africa (see how the Gates Foundation harms Africans), another was my own.
"Remember how Intel and Microsoft viciously attacked children's education in Africa. It's not a theory; this is well documented."Previously, a former Microsoft employee sent us the video "Exposing the Gates Agenda in Africa" (even people from Microsoft are aware of their 'prodigy child' doing bad things). Well, Mr. Gates has long sought a way to personally profit a lot by depopulation (no altruism there, just God complex and greed). We wrote about it a great deal one decade ago (lots of misleading media coverage at that time; much of it was paid for by Gates, under the guise of "supporting journalism"). Remember how Intel and Microsoft viciously attacked children's education in Africa. It's not a theory; this is well documented.
Back in June this former Microsoft employee wrote to us about "Bill Gates and Monsanto". "It’s funny," he said, that "back in 2010, Bill Gates bought like 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock worth roughly 23 billion dollars with the goal of “feeding the world.”. However, something completely overlooked is how similar the Microsoft and Monsanto business models are in that they are predicated almost entirely on their ability to lock businesses into their products. Regardless of what Bill Gates says his justifications are for investing billions into probably the most unethical and damaging company of the post-modern world, it seems as if his true motivations can be reduced to the simple act of game respecting game. I truly think Bill Gates invested in them because they’re basically the Microsoft of the agriculture industry."
"At this point it's uncertain whether we have the time or the deep desire to piece together pieces spiked by Mr. Gates."We had some more urgent stuff to show at the time, based on Seattle PD's disclosures (the second installment will apparently arrive quite soon). It's partly redacted, as one can expect, so some guesses were needed. We had to explain caveats.
At this point it's uncertain whether we have the time or the deep desire to piece together pieces spiked by Mr. Gates. It would take too much effort and it happened years ago, so recollections are too distant in terms of time. This means that, for the time being, we walk into the subset, hoping that prior parts have already shed sufficient light on the machinations at play. ⬆