12.03.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

‘Social Dialogue’ at the EPO Broke Down, Team Campinos is Totally Delusional

Posted in Europe, Patents at 7:05 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Mirror mirror on the wall…

Mirror

Summary: Team Campinos is speaking to itself, reaffirming its own decisions, but it’s trying to give the impression of consultation with staff; unfortunately for them, staff isn’t gullible enough and there’s good understanding of the false pretenses

The staff union of the EPO was crushed by Benoît Battistelli, but at least two of the people Battistelli aggressively ousted are now back in the union (SUEPO) and António Campinos shows that Battistelli’s agenda remains in tact. Is there peace? ‘Social dialogue’ as Campinos likes to call it?

“As we noted last month, nobody was ever punished for what had been done to Laurent Prunier.”Well, no.

To establish real peace and not a piece of PR more than smiles would be needed. It’s reported that Campinos has temper tantrums, which show how detached he is from reality. Better shouting than screaming, right? Well, at least he was sober. Or so it seemed (remote working enables all sorts of things).

SUEPO Central ‘met’ Campinos a fortnight ago (a webchat) and then called it “Regress instead of progress” in a new publication, summarised as follows:

Mr Campinos showed again no interest in union rights and proposed a Memorandum of Understanding far below all expectations in International Organisations. Mr Campinos also vainly tried to minimise the flaws of his new salary adjustment procedure. The overall feeling of the participants is that Mr Campinos is only interested in ticking the checkbox that he met with SUEPO before the next meeting of the Administrative Council and to increase the KPI of his number of “social dialogue” meetings.

Here is the full publication (dated Tuesday):

01 December 2020
su20037cp – 0.2.1

Report on the SUEPO meeting with the President on 18 November 2020

Mr Campinos showed again no interest in union rights and proposed a Memorandum of Understanding far below all expectations in International Organisations. Mr Campinos also vainly tried to minimise the flaws of his new salary adjustment procedure. The overall feeling of the participants is that Mr Campinos is only interested in ticking the checkbox that he met with SUEPO before the next meeting of the Administrative Council and to increase the KPI of his number of “social dialogue” meetings.

Salary adjustment procedure – Broken promises

On litigation
SUEPO has organized the filing of appeals by a group of test-appellants against the general decision CA/D 4/20 putting in place the EPO’s new salary adjustment procedure with a capping mechanism at Eurozone inflation + 0.2%. Mr Germond from Employment Law confirmed during the meeting that President would apply of the outcome of appeals to all staff as written in the reply letter1 of 22-09-2020. However, later in the meeting Mr Campinos emphasised that appeals are purely individual and it remained unclear whether he would apply the outcome of individual appeals on the salary adjustment procedure to all staff. This attitude confirms once again the lack of consistency and reliability of Mr Campinos. The appeals against the first implementing decision of the application of the salary adjustment procedure for the year 2020 will need to be filed early 2021. The statements of Mr Campinos confirm that SUEPO should always adopt a careful approach to secure the rights of all staff.

On the first results
Earlier this year, SUEPO had warned Mr Campinos that the new procedure would result in a loss of purchasing power for all staff and pensioners. Nevertheless, Mr Campinos ignored our arguments and pushed his reform after being ill-advised by his close advisors and consultants2. By refusing to involve in the reform experts in salary adjustment procedures of International Organizations, Mr Campinos has now provoked an industrial accident which materializes immediately. Indeed, the results for 2020 are such that instead of adjustment of about 3.8% in July 2020, EPO staff and pensioners get 0.5% in January 2021 (in NL and DE) and 0.36% instead of 2.7% (in AT). This is equivalent to a pay cut of about one step. The savings are well beyond all expectations (see slides3 of the General Assembly in Munich) and the EPO scores again far below all standards in International Organizations (the adjustment will be +4.2% in the Coordinates Organisations).

_______
1 “Legal action against the new Salary Adjustment Procedure” (re20034cl) by Mr Campinos (22-09-2020)
2 Directorate Compensation & Benefits under PD4.3 and Mercer
3 “The EPO salary adjustment procedure: Why it is not fit for purpose and how to fix it” (sc20021mp) by LSC Munich (19-11-2020)


In the meeting, we demonstrated that the results show that all the promises made in his Communiqué of 09-04-2020 are now broken: a reform “with the lowest intensity” and that there was “no desire to cut staff purchasing power or impose unnecessary savings”. This will deepen further the lack of trust in EPO management and destroy the engagement of staff in his Strategic Plan SP2023. Even worse, staff will now have to pay again for the mistakes of his services.

Mr Campinos replied: “Maybe we did something wrong, but at least we generate savings.” This statement already contradicted what Mr Campinos said in the meeting with the Central Staff Committee (CSC) a few hours before: “It is producing the results we wanted.”

We insisted that there are ways to repair the EPO salary adjustment procedure and referred to the CSC letter4 of 17-11-2020. This must be done as early as possible to avoid another disaster next year.

Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) – Regress instead of progress

SUEPO filed in 2014 a draft proposal5 for a Memorandum of Understanding. At the time, Mr Battistelli refused to even consider it as the starting point of a negotiation. Instead, Mr Battistelli tabled a counter-proposal6 which actually binds unions to respect all circulars that the President can change at will and in particular the illegal strike regulations currently in place. In our view, the text is actually endangering unions rather than recognising unions.

After the beginning of his mandate, Mr Campinos tried to revive the topic and promised in a meeting in October 2019 that he would table “within 3-4 weeks a new proposal based on the text applicable at the European Commission”. This statement gave hopes that dialogue with SUEPO would be given a fresh start. Unfortunately, Mr Campinos never sent the promised text. In the latest meetings, Mr Campinos said that the only text on the table was the one of Mr Battistelli and declared: “I have the duty to listen to you. Not to negotiate with you.” Mr Campinos goes one step backwards and this change of attitude shows regress rather than progress.

Appeals Committee opinions – Bad faith and self-contraction

The Appeals Committee provides the President of the Office with legal recommendations which are either unanimous or made by majority. We recalled that for our internal justice system to make sense and to reduce litigation, the President of the Office should follow all unanimous recommendations.

On SUEPO facilities
Mr Campinos stated that he follows 95% of the unanimous recommendations. Interestingly, among the 5% remaining features a unanimous recommendation in favour of SUEPO concerning its facilities and access to Office premises. In the meeting, Mr Campinos argued that if he were to follow the recommendation the consequences would be too far reaching also for other appeals but did not bring any further details. Mr Campinos only expressed his willingness to “settle” the case, namely to give SUEPO less than what the appeals committee recommends

_______
4 “Proposals for repairing the EPO new salary “adjustment” procedure” (sc20172cl) by the CSC (17-11-2020)
5 “Draft Proposal for a “Framework Agreement” (su14020cl) by SUEPO Central & “WG on recognition of trade
unions”
(su15182cl) by SUEPO Central (29-05-2015)
6 “What is wrong with the EPO Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)?” (su16063cp) by SUEPO Central (31-03-
2016)


and concluded: “In any case, if SUEPO wants back access to mass-emails, it would be only in the framework of a Memorandum of Understanding. SUEPO will lose in Geneva anyway.” Bad faith won’t help to convince us to sign an already flawed text.

On excessive strike deductions
The discussion moved on to the topic of excessive strike deductions over weekends. Mr Campinos followed the recommendation but in a letter so far refused to generalise the outcome to all staff on the basis that only a small minority of staff was concerned (sic!). When attempting to defend his position, Mr Campinos replied that there should be no incentive to strike on Fridays and Mondays and that it was therefore good to deduct over weekends. Mr Campinos actually contradicted his own decision which was actually not to have deduction over weekends. This constitutes yet another example of regress rather than progress.

Disciplinary cases

In the meeting, we maintained our long standing claim for a solution concerning the two disciplinary cases of Appeals Committee nominees Aurélien Pétiaud and Michael Lund. Mr Campinos stated again that he refuses to re-open these cases on the basis that they are res judicata: “It is a matter of principle. I am a man of principle.”

We note that with the planned reform of the Education Allowance, Mr Campinos is actually re- opening the SUEPO supported cases lost by nationals on the topic (Judgment 2870). This shows that when there is a will, there is a way for Mr Campinos to re-open cases which have the force of res judicata.

Mr Campinos can now trumpet in front of the Administrative Council that he met with SUEPO. The quality of the meeting was however far below all expectations.

SUEPO Central

We intend to publish some more documents related to the crushing of staff and defunding based on a lie. Later this month we can hopefully be done with that.

“It is a matter of principle. I am a man of principle,” Campinos is quoted is saying. What principles? The ones that motivate Donald Trump to sack everyone who says truths which embarrass him? Those are the “principles” of “revenge”…

Since the above letter mentions Aurélien Pétiaud and Michael Lund, let’s recall an old Laurent Prunier letter [PDF], sent about a year before the settlement.

“SUEPO is concerned that the Office does not appear to have contacted Laurent Prunier to reach an amicable settlement,” said the SUEPO Web site under “Letter to the President about the situation of Laurent Prunier” (emphasis below is ours).

Laurent Prunier letter

As we noted last month, nobody was ever punished for what had been done to Laurent Prunier. In fact, one of the bullies still works with Campinos. Not a manager but an unqualified bully, assured to ruin the very department entrusted to handle (crushing humans, draining resources).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. [Meme] Sounds Legit

    When not cheating on the wife, the EPO‘s “doyen” cheats in the exams and makes it into the epi Council, in effect working “[t]owards a common understanding [sic] of quality” with “patent attorneys nominated as “assessors” by the EPO, epi and BusinessEurope” (notorious lobbyists for dictators, litigation, and monopolies, neither business nor science)



  2. [Meme] Mayoral Patent Office Chief

    As it turns out, political 'double-dipping' isn't just a thing in North Macedonia, Austria, and EPOnia



  3. Romania's Patent Office (OSIM): Nine Different Chiefs in Just Eight Years

    The Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trademarks (OSIM), being the equivalent of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in the sense that it covers both patents and trademarks, is a very flaky institution with no shortage of scandals; for our English-reading audiences we now have a summary of a decade’s worth of blunders and leadership changes



  4. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIV: The Balkan League - Romania

    Romania’s patent office has been in flux this past decade, occasionally led by people with no relevant experience, but rather political connections (like EPO President António Campinos) and sometimes forged documents and fake degrees



  5. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 25, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, October 25, 2021



  6. [Meme] “Social Democracy” at the EPO

    Some comments on the current situation at the European Patent Office from Goran Gerasimovski, the new EPO Administrative Council delegate for North Macedonia and Social Democratic candidate for mayor of Centar (a municipality of Skopje)



  7. [Meme] António Campinos Visits the OSIM

    António Campinos visits OSIM Director-General Ionel Muscalu in February 2014



  8. [Meme] [Teaser] Meet the President

    Later today we shall see what Romania did for Battistelli



  9. Links 26/10/2021: Latte Dock 0.10.3 and Linux 5.15 RC7

    Links for the day



  10. Gemini Protocol's Originator: “I Continue to Care About This Project and I Care About the Community That Has Formed Around It.”

    'Solderpunk' is back from a long hiatus; this bodes well for Geminispace, which grew fast in spite of the conspicuous absence



  11. Bulgarian Like Bavarian Serfdom

    Bulgarian politics seem to have played a big role in selecting chiefs and delegates who backed Benoît Battistelli‘s unlawful proposals, which treat workers almost like slaves and ordinary citizens as disposable ‘collaterals’



  12. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXIII: The Balkan League - Bulgaria

    Today we examine the role of Bulgaria in Benoît Battistelli‘s liberticidal regime at the EPO (as well as under António Campinos, from 2018 to present) with particular focus on political machinations



  13. Links 25/10/2021: New Slackware64-current and a Look at Ubuntu Budgie

    Links for the day



  14. Links 25/10/2021: pg_statement_rollback 1.3 and Lots of Patent Catchup

    Links for the day



  15. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part III — A Story of Plagiarism and Likely Securities Fraud

    Today we tread slowly and take another step ahead, revealing the nature of only some among many problems that GitHub and Microsoft are hiding from the general public (to the point of spiking media reports)



  16. [Meme] [Teaser] Oligarchs-Controlled Patent Offices With Media Connections That Cover Up Corruption

    As we shall see later today, the ‘underworld’ in Bulgaria played a role or pulled the strings of politically-appointed administrators who guarded Benoît Battistelli‘s liberticidal regime at the EPO



  17. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 24, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 24, 2021



  18. Links 25/10/2021: EasyOS 3.1 and Bareflank 3.0

    Links for the day



  19. The Demolition of the EPO Was Made Possible With Assistance From Countries That Barely Have European Patents

    The legal basis of today's EPO has been crushed; a lot of this was made possible by countries with barely any stakes in the outcome



  20. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXII: The Balkan League - North Macedonia and Albania

    We continue to look at Benoît Battistelli‘s enablers at the EPO



  21. Links 24/10/2021: GPS Daemon (GPSD) Bug and Lots of Openwashing

    Links for the day



  22. Links 24/10/2021: XWayland 21.1.3 and Ubuntu Linux 22.04 LTS Daily Build

    Links for the day



  23. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 23, 2021

    IRC logs for Saturday, October 23, 2021



  24. Links 24/10/2021: Ceph Boss Sage Weil Resigns and Many GPL Enforcement Stories

    Links for the day



  25. GAFAM-Funded NPR Reports That Facebook Let Millions of People Like Trump Flout the So-called Rules. Not Just “a Few”.

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission



  26. Some Memes About What Croatia Means to the European Patent Office

    Before we proceed to other countries in the region, let’s not forget or let’s immortalise the role played by Croatia in the EPO (memes are memorable)



  27. Gangster Culture in the EPO

    The EPO‘s Administrative Council was gamed by a gangster from Croatia; today we start the segment of the series which deals with the Balkan region



  28. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XXI: The Balkan League – The Doyen and His “Protégée”

    The EPO‘s circle of corruption in the Balkan region will be the focus of today’s (and upcoming) coverage, showing some of the controversial enablers of Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos, two deeply corrupt French officials who rapidly drive the Office into the ground for personal gain (at Europe’s expense!)



  29. Links 23/10/2021: FreeBSD 12.3 Beta, Wine 6.20, and NuTyX 21.10.0

    Links for the day



  30. IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 22, 2021

    IRC logs for Friday, October 22, 2021


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts