01.05.21

Gemini version available ♊︎

InteLeaks – Part IV: At Intel, Developer Experience (or ‘Developer eXperience’ and DX) Means Lots of Microsoft, Surveillance and Proprietary Software

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Hardware at 12:24 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Pentium I

Summary: Intel sure knows how to repel and keep away Free software developers; but it certainly doesn’t want the general public to find out and it’s actively working to gag those who have the hard facts

THIS ongoing series is only getting started (see introduction, Part I, Part II, and Part III). What we’re going to show over the next few days or weeks is that Intel’s attitude towards Linux is mostly faked or half-hearted. People love mocking the lie that is “Microsoft loves Linux”, but what about Intel?

“What we’re going to show over the next few days or weeks is that Intel’s attitude towards Linux is mostly faked or half-hearted.”A person who knows Intel from the inside has told us (earlier this week), “as for Intel, I have seen them insert x86 assembly code into an xorg driver from one release to another so it would stop building on non-x86 architectures [...] until now it wouldn’t matter because only integrated graphics have been available, but imagine them doing this kind of thing with their new discrete GPUs available on PCIE cards [...] so I would say Intel has been doing the Intel ♥ Linux for longer than Microsoft has been doing, but was just not seen as that, because the company was the so-called darling of the Linux world…”

The Linux Foundation and OSDL funding certainly contributed towards this (done for PR purposes, to keep geeks buying and deploying on Intel, based on false perceptions like openwashing).

“I think that Intel entering the market with GPUs is a good thing for the market,” Ryan noted last night. “It’s a duopoly right now where only AMD and Nvidia compete in the discrete GPU segment, and they only have to be good enough to try to outsell the other one, and Nvidia will never release an open source driver. More vendors means more choices. More choices mean better products and more competitive pricing, in theory. Microsoft’s endgame is always that after they defeat the competition, they slink back into the comfortable spot of barely supporting that product, firing 90% of the developers, and letting it stagnate into another rotten mess full of security holes. Internet Explorer 6 went on for more than half a decade before a new version was out….with tabs and some minor improvements to CSS. IE 7 very much still went along with their previously stated policy of delivering new version with new versions of Windows, and making only small changes. They misread what the users of web browsers wanted. They figured “Oh they want tabs. We’ll give them Internet Explorer with tabs. That’ll shut ‘em up!”. For years, they told people on the inside who were asked about tabs that you didn’t need tabs because the Windows shell would eventually group the windows.”

Now, in the case of Intel (another monopolist and monopoly abuser), chips did not improve as much as they could. Lack of competition contributed to this.

Ryan noted again the Windows analogy (regarding “developer eXperience” or DX): “Might note that Windows Store was on the verge of failing completely, filled with fake, fraudulent, and misleading apps that would be removed as violating Apple’s quality standards, until Microsoft made it so that developers could take a plain old Win32 desktop app, with basically no changes, put it in an AppX package, and host it in the store. So there are some real applications now, but they mostly ignore the UWP APIs completely, and they can miss important features. For example, VLC is there and can’t play DVD or Blu Ray discs, and foobar2000 is there, but you can’t add your own components to it, which is like 90% of the reason you’d use it. [...] some KDE applications are in the Windows Store. They suggest making a donation, but if you do it that way then Microsoft will take 30% of the donation away from them. Since the application is completely functional either way, if you want all of the money to go to KDE you should donate directly to KDE through their website. Then they talk of “developer experience”. Even the real applications in their store. You ask the developer “Why put crippleware in the store?” and they go “Some people use Windows 10 in S Mode.” If you want the real, full, application, you have to bypass the store and go directly to the developer. Microsoft’s own policies on the Store are killing their own store. It’s also pressuring people to give up and escape from S Mode because they can’t actually use their computer if they don’t. The whole idea of Windows Store has failed badly. If Microsoft had been more supportive and flexible, who knows? But the web is instead littered with developers recommending leaving S Mode so you can use their real application, not the Store version that doesn’t have various features, or isn’t allowed at all (like Firefox and Chrome). Microsoft, early on, banished other web browsers from their store. Their policies don’t work, the restrictions don’t work, because they have no clout. They’re trying to spend Disney Bucks at Caesar’s Palace, like Rick said in Rick & Morty.”

Now, on to Intel. This is how developers feel about what’s going on inside:

intel2

And notice what tools are being imposed:

intel3

“Additional Intel information,” according to a source, shows that Intel really dislikes Free software. “There was a move from Drupal to Adobe Experience [Manager, Platform, 'Cloud'... Adobe Experience Cloud, formerly Adobe Marketing Cloud] early 2020 and a move from Gitlab to GitHub initiated.”

So this is where Intel basically is headed. “Of course,” the source notes, “that was before COVID-19.”

“The DX report with indication of the DX team not using the required process (git, md, etc) was authored by a consultant who was leaving the same week of report distribution,” the source adds. “The report was not distributed until the week the consultant already knew the contract was ended.”

“The premature disabling of access was an unnecessary action, which I believe was to stop the distribution of the document and possibly discredit the consultant.”

We’re going to spend quite some time showing those things. The ‘meat’ of it is even more severe than anything we’ve shown so far.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

A Single Comment

  1. Canta said,

    January 5, 2021 at 12:57 pm

    Gravatar

    I’m not liking Ryan comments.

    In part 3 he says that using older versions is windows culture. Which I myself pointed out in an article of mine you kindly posted here in Techrights, I don’t remember which one. But my point there was that the constant change is breaking things, and thus we are becoming tired of change and just want to keep our old versions of software. Ryan, on the other hand, seems to imply that not being on the edge of software is somehow being unprofessional.

    Which, if we’re talking about intel, I may concede: they’re a behemoth, not just a guy trying to make a living or just doing their stuff like any of us. Intel has a different responsability, and unmeasurable resources: they CAN do it, and most likely SHOULD do it. So, not a big deal here regarding Ryan’s oppinion.

    However, here in part 4, he talks about competition in the gpu world, and how that could be a good thing because of the otherwise duopoly nvidia/amd, and here I can’t just take it like that. That’s just liberal economic thinking, which is the same thing I didn’t liked to interpret from the software adeaquation before.

    This is the thing: our problem is not “lack of choice”, but lack of regulation. Competition did NOTHING against planned obsolescense, and most likely actually accelerated it with segmentation and always looking for novelties. What we need is stuff like the ones the EU is trying to do with mobile phones manufacturers, not “more players”. I mean: I couln’t care less if there’s a single player, as long as that player behave by the rules of the people. And people doesn’t choose CEOs: they choose goverments to make regulations.

    It’s tricky, I know. Have no idea of how to make that happen. But if something is certain is that the neoliberal common sense is the problem, not the solution.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 03/02/2023: OpenSSH 9.2 and OBS Studio 29.0.1

    Links for the day



  2. Links 03/02/2023: GNU C Library 2.37

    Links for the day



  3. Sirius Finished

    Yesterday I was sent a letter approving my resignation from Sirius ‘Open Source’, two months after I had already announced that I was resigning with immediate effect; they sent an identical letter to my wife (this time, unlike before, they remembered to also change the names!!)



  4. The Collapse of Sirius in a Nutshell: How to Identify the Symptoms and Decide When to Leave

    Sirius is finished, but it's important to share the lessons learned with other people; there might be other "pretenders" out there and they need to be abandoned



  5. Links 03/02/2023: WINE 8.1 and RapidDisk 9.0.0

    Links for the day



  6. Links 02/02/2023: KDE Gear 22.12.2 and LibreOffice 7.5

    Links for the day



  7. Linux News or Marketing Platform?

    Ads everywhere: Phoronix puts them at the top, bottom, navigation bar, left, and right just to read some Microsoft junk (puff pieces about something that nobody other than Microsoft even uses); in addition there are pop-ups asking for consent to send visitors’ data to hundreds of data brokers



  8. Daily Links at Techrights Turn 15, Time to Give Them an Upgrade

    This year we have several 15-year anniversaries; one of them is Daily Links (it turned 15 earlier this week) and we've been working to improve these batches of links, making them a lot more extensive and somewhat better structured/clustered



  9. Back to Focusing on Unified Patent Court (UPC) Crimes and Illegal Patent Agenda, Including the EPO's

    The EPO's (European Patent Office, Europe's second-largest institution) violations of constitutions, laws and so on merit more coverage, seeing that what's left of the "media" not only fails to cover scandalous things but is actively cheering for criminals (in exchange for money)



  10. European Patent Office Staff Votes in Favour of Freedom of Association (97% of Voters in Support)

    The Central Staff Committee (CSC) at the EPO makes a strong case for António Campinos to stop breaking and law and actually start obeying court orders (he’s no better than Benoît Battistelli and he uses worse language already)



  11. Links 02/02/2023: Glibc 2.37 and Go 1.20

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 01, 2023

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 01, 2023



  13. Links 01/02/2023: Security Problems, Unrest, and More

    Links for the day



  14. Links 01/02/2023: Stables Kernels and Upcoming COSMIC From System76

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 31, 2023

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 31, 2023



  16. Links 31/01/2023: Catchup Again, Wayland in Xfce 4.20

    Links for the day



  17. Links 31/01/2023: elementary OS 7

    Links for the day



  18. Intimidation Against Nitrux Development Team Upsets the Community and Makes the Media Less Trustworthy

    Nitrux is being criticised for being “very unappealing”; but a look behind the scenes reveals an angry reviewer (habitual mouthpiece of the Linux Foundation and Linux foes) trying to intimidate Nitrux developers, who are unpaid volunteers rather than “corporate” developers



  19. Links 31/01/2023: GNOME 44 Wallpapers and Alpha

    Links for the day



  20. Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM) and KU Leuven Boosting Americans and Cancellers of the Father of Free Software

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), along with the SFLC one might add, have been under a siege by the trademark-abusing FSFE and SFC; Belgium helps legitimise the ‘fakes’



  21. Techrights in the Next 5 or 10 Years

    Now that I’m free from the shackles of a company (it deteriorated a lot after grabbing Gates Foundation money under an NDA) the site Techrights can flourish and become more active



  22. 60 Days of Articles About Sirius 'Open Source' and the Long Road Ahead

    The Sirius ‘Open Source’ series ended after 60 days (parts published every day except the day my SSD died completely and very suddenly); the video above explains what’s to come and what lessons can be learned from the 21-year collective experience (my wife and I; work periods combined) in a company that still claims, in vain, to be “Open Source”



  23. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 30, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, January 30, 2023



  24. Taking Techrights to the Next Level in 2023

    I've reached a state of "closure" when it comes to my employer (almost 12 years for me, 9+ years for my wife); expect Techrights to become more active than ever before and belatedly publish important articles, based on longstanding investigations that take a lot of effort



  25. The ISO Delusion: When the Employer Doesn’t Realise That Outsourcing Clients' Passwords to LassPass After Security Breaches Is a Terrible Idea

    The mentality or the general mindset at Sirius ‘Open Source’ was not compatible with that of security conscientiousness and it seemed abundantly clear that paper mills (e.g. ISO certification) cannot compensate for that



  26. Links 30/01/2023: Plasma Mobile 23.01 and GNU Taler 0.9.1

    Links for the day



  27. EPO Management Isn't Listening to Staff, It's Just Trying to Divide and Demoralise the Staff Instead

    “On 18 January 2023,” the staff representatives tell European Patent Office (EPO) colleagues, “the staff representation met with the administration in a Working Group on the project “Bringing Teams Together”. It was the first meeting since the departure of PD General Administration and the radical changes made to the project. We voiced the major concerns of staff, the organization chaos and unrest caused by the project among teams and made concrete proposals.”



  28. Links 30/01/2023: Coreboot 4.19 and Budgie 10.7

    Links for the day



  29. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 29, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 29, 2023



  30. [Meme] With Superheroes Like These...

    Ever since the new managers arrived the talent has fled the company that falsely credits itself with "Open Source"


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts