Breaking the competition rather than competing
Summary: Microsoft's Hyper-V is reportedly being used to cripple and marginalise -- artificially -- guests that are running GNU/Linux
MICROSOFT apparently has not gotten enough advantage with UEFI exclusion of GNU/Linux from new PCs. We recently learned that a lot of new computers (without Windows XP) will simply refuse to have GNU/Linux installed and/or running. Even some technical people in JoinDiaspora say that they are unable to install GNU/Linux on such computers (not OS-agnostic machines anymore, as per Microsoft's manipulative legal requirements).
Adding insult to injury, Microsoft now uses
Hyper-V, the proprietary hypervisor which is
strictly attached to an
NSA honeypot (Microsoft Windows), for something that resembles
AARD. iophk called it "AARD again" and it should be treated as a serious antitrust violation.
Citing the original report [1], Susan Linton
writes: "The Register is running an article explaining how Microsoft is trying to sabotage Linux."
The article begins by stating that "Hyper-V was found to treat Linux guests as second-class citizens" and it should not be too shocking given that Hyper-V drivers for Linux were originally a GPL violation (Microsoft was forced to comply). This is one of the things that Microsoft paid Novell to help with (others being .NET, Moonlight/Silverlight, OOXML, patent FUD, and more).
With
the death of Windows XP it is possible that the common carrier for desktops/laptops will soon be no more. FUD games like
these ones are only to be expected from the thuggish, criminal company.
⬆
Related/contextual items from the news:
If Microsoft's Hyper-V was found to treat Linux guests as second-class citizens, the resulting storm of controversy would probably generate enough heat and light to make a dent in some climate change models.
