Replicating the Destruction of Dual Boot (GNU/Linux) by Microsoft-Friendly UEFI Implementations
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2014-04-11 12:51:20 UTC
- Modified: 2014-04-11 12:51:20 UTC
Summary: Reports of "loss of Linux dual-booting" due to Windows Update are investigated further; FSF award to Garrett faces opposition
IT WAS recently reported in Reddit that UEFI was used by Microsoft Windows to wipe out GNU/Linux. Windows Update rendered GNU/Linux unbootable and allegedly turned 'secure' boot on to achieve this.
According to
this new analysis from Jamie the UEFI explorer, it's not an isolated incident. He starts by stating: "I can finally report that yes, there is a problem — but it's generally not as serious as has been reported." He also writes: "While I found that I was able to 'fix' the loss of Linux dual-booting on both of my systems, I am NOT trying to say that everyone who has posted claims about dual-boot being 'destroyed' by Windows Update is wrong. I certainly have enough experience with UEFI boot configuration to know that all sorts of strange things are possible, and it may well be that some systems, with some configurations, really do get more seriously damaged by Windows Update than mine have. One very obvious example might be that the Linux items could get deleted from the boot object list. If that happened you would have to use efibootmgr to put them back again."
But who would know how to do this and how many people would just turn away from GNU/Linux at this stage? This is why UEFI should face a boycott and antitrust complaints against Microsoft get bolstered. I
wholeheartedly disgree with FSF for giving Garrett an award. This can be a PR disaster waiting to happen, a bit like Miguel de Icaza and Theo de Raadt and getting such an award before their FSF bashing. Apparently I am not alone in disagreeing with the FSF;
Sam Varghese expressed similar concerns, having opposed
'secure' boot for quite some time along with many others. He writes: "The Free Software Foundation has given an annual award this year for work that enslaves people to the demands of Microsoft - something that flies in the face of all that the organisation has stood for since its founding."
This has indeed been a bizarre move and it can help weaken existing complaints (in Europe) over Microsoft's UEFI tricks.
⬆