Bonum Certa Men Certa

Why Steven J Vaughan-Nichols (SJVN) is Wrong About Microsoft and Doesn't Understand GitHub Vendor Lock-in/Network Effect Among Other Issues

Not an attack on SJVN but a factual response to his arguments, such as the ones below:



Summary: Instead of becoming de facto 'parrot' of the Linux Foundation and OIN/LOT, Mr. "Linux journalist" ought to listen to constructive suggestions or analyses from people who use, care about and really understand Linux (unlike the Linux Foundation and OIN/LOT); the big money isn't where the truth is and comments that he receives are most likely far closer to the truth

Steven J Vaughan-Nichols (SJVN) is a nice and amicable person. Over the years he supported us and I don't want this article to seem or 'feel' like an attack on him. It's an expression of disagreement; I also disagree with the FSF on some issues and I'm not shy to admit this because blind loyalty would be the death of civil discourse and productive communication.



"Steven J Vaughan-Nichols (SJVN) is a nice and amicable person."Please read the whole post before wrongly assuming that it's an 'attack' on SJVN. It is not.

Two posts this morning have already mentioned [1, 2] what Microsoft hopes to do to every competing project, in effect entrapping it under Microsoft's proprietary wing (GitHub), which is a big piece of the company's strategy against Software Freedom (to the point of subsidising this attack at a loss). As we explained before, Microsoft is rightly unique among GAFAM. The previous post mentioned again how copyleft works (in Torvalds' view). What he doesn't seem to 'get' (or git) is that the Linux Foundation (in 2020) in many ways works against him and against his projects (both of them), just like ZDNet does (constantly posting anti-Linux stories in their "Linux" section and promotional openwashing puff pieces for GitHub). This ZDNet video from less than a year ago reveals the 'useful' ignoramus SJVN, who uses the words from people like Greg K-H and Torvalds to pretend all is well. ZDNet is clearly concerned that, at least in comments (the feedback section, not the hand-picked editors who are Microsoft boosters and apologists), people call SJVN a sellout and foolish among other things. They're not wrong. But SJVN, citing Microsoft boosters (and colleagues like Mary Jo Foley, a Microsoft stenographer), basically participates in Microsoft psychological operations/ads/PR/spin like "Microsoft loves Linux..."

"Once the kernel (Linux) is on Microsoft's proprietary platform, the monopolist will have far more leverage over everything, ranging from discussions (censorship) to things like mass surveillance of developers (profiling)."He's wrong and it is very simple to rebut this, as we shall do here. In the interest of Fair Use doctrine/exemptions we've cut just a one-minute portion of what he said (2m:40s - 3m:40s) and it doesn't need much dissection to rebut. Basically, Microsoft has already bought key seats in the Linux Foundation, including some of the elevated (almost highest) seats. Now it's starting to push the discussion towards, "let's move all this to GitHub" (i.e. to us).

This was of course inevitable. Once the kernel (Linux) is on Microsoft's proprietary platform, the monopolist will have far more leverage over everything, ranging from discussions (censorship) to things like mass surveillance of developers (profiling). This is strategic. Torvalds has long rejected a move to GitHub (maybe for shallow and short-sighted practical reasons), but he's only virtually in charge now; several of his bosses work for Microsoft and are salaried by Microsoft. He was already attacked by the media and pretty much forced to take a break, so there's a "warning" or a "strike one". No, Mr. Torvalds, you are not really in charge anymore. The trademark isn't enough anymore; it's too late.

I understand that SJVN needs to make a living somehow. He should also understand that he's participating in a chronically anti-Linux site (not that he's anti-Linux himself; in fact, days ago he openly complained in a column about security FUD which his very own employer had been spreading non-stop for years).

"I understand that SJVN needs to make a living somehow. He should also understand that he's participating in a chronically anti-Linux site (not that he's anti-Linux himself; in fact, days ago he openly complained in a column about security FUD which his very own employer had been spreading non-stop for years)."Going back on topic, what SJVN does not seem to understand is that the licence is under attack, the leadership is under attack, the development platform is under attack and there are emerging trends/threats like "clown computing". What he says may well be appropriate and applicable if it was still 2005. But goalposts have moved, including the patent war on Linux, and he has not adapted accordingly. When I mentioned to him that Microsoft blackmailed a large OEM (Foxconn) over "Linux" patents as recently as last year all he could reply with was a bunch of completely irrelevant Foxconn bashing. This, to me, said that SJVN had no counterargument whatsoever. He was simply in denial.

Upton Sinclair once said: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

That's SJVN as an employee of the defunct CBS (parent entity of ZDNet, formally defunct two months after the video above was published).

Recent Techrights' Posts

Linux and the Freedom Paradox
Linux is losing freedom if some external actors who only use Microsoft tools for development wrest control
Watch the FSF Party Live (via Livestream)
It's in WebM format, which is widely supported by now
Advocacy of Software Freedom Changed, LUGs Became Less Relevant
The way we see it, support groups like LUGs sort of outlived their usefulness when it became easier to install GNU/Linux
For the Second Time in a Few Weeks Microsoft Lunduke Makes False Accusations Against Senior Red Hat Staff to Incite a Despicable 'Troll Army'
Nothing that Microsoft Lunduke claims or says can be trusted
Compromised by NVIDIA Proprietary Library
Meanwhile in Boston there are "[r]oundtable talk with FSF volunteers (both in-person and online)"
How Software Patents Were Viewed or Their General Status Changed Over Time
A rough summary
 
The Free Software Foundation's Livestream Has Ended, Video/s Might be Online Next
I've asked whether they'll upload video of some of the event; I still wait for an answer
The Register MS Does Not Know the Difference Between Microsoft GitHub and GitLab
At the time of writing (October 5) the article from "Thu 2 Oct 2025" remains uncorrected
"Bullshit Generators" (What RMS Calls LLMs) and Fake Images Already Target the FSF
Why does Google News promote fake articles about the FSF while omitting all the real ones?
Software Patents as a Bubble
Don't invest resources in hype; if you detect a bubble, run away from it
Links 05/10/2025: Political Leftovers, Climate Change, and Security Incidents
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, October 04, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, October 04, 2025
When Microsoft "Integrates" Something With "AI" It Means It's Losing Money and Is Generally Hopeless
how did Bing fare after 36 months of LLM slop being hyped up as "replacement" for search?
Most Certificates Don't Improve Security, They Mostly Increase Downtime (for No Good Reason)
The 'Gemini sites' (capsules) are a growing force
The statCounter Site Has Data Integrity Problems
Maybe we'll get back to statCounter when its data becomes more "stable" again
10 Ways to Combat Software Patents
software patents are loathed also by proprietary software developers
"Just a Little Bit of Meat..."
Free software "absolutism" is not a radical stance, more so if the only "radical" belief the user possesses is that he or she must be in control of his or her software, and by extension his or her computer
Red Hat is Ignoring the Free Software Community, It's a "Fortune 1000" Vendor
Red Hat's blog also participates a lot in promoting of Wall Street's latest pump-and-dump "AI" scheme
Free Software Foundation Party Has Begun
We shall be focusing a lot on software patents today
Former Head of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Lina Khan Knows Whatever Microsoft Touches Will Die
Just like Skype (as recently as months ago) [...] When Microsoft grabs things, or when it buys things, it almost never ends well
Slopwatch: Fake Articles About LibreOffice in Austria and Wine 10.16
very short
Links 04/10/2025: "attempted Coup" Noted in Facebook, Russia Kills Journalists via Drones
Links for the day
Gemini Links 04/10/2025: Anesthesia and Baudpunk
Links for the day
Links 04/10/2025: "Privacy Harm Is Harm", Criticism Outlawed in US
Links for the day
Garmin Uses Linux for Some of the Garmin Products, Now It's Sued by Strava Using Software Patents
Software patents should never have been granted in the first place
Richard Stallman Will Give a Talk in Sweden in 6 Days
Dr. Stallman, despite his battle with cancer is still alive and mentally sharp
FSF Turns 40
We'll be focusing on patent-related topics this weekend
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, October 03, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, October 03, 2025
Gemini Links 04/10/2025: Distro Hopping and "Part Time"
Links for the day
We Are Turning 19 in One Month, FSF Turns 40 in 3 Hours (CET)
For our anniversary next month we still have no concrete plans
Patent Docs (or PatentDocs) Learned the Wrong Lessons From the Death of TypePad
Had they gone ahead with an SSG, they'd become a lot more future-proof
USPTO Patent Bubble Already Imploding, After Decades of Artificial Inflation, Entire Offices Close for Good
we can deduce that financial pressures (lack of "demand" for monopolies) play a role
TikTok is Not Harmless (Being CheeTok in the US Will Advance Orange Agenda)
Social control media isn't "fun and games"; it's a digital weapon that lets hostile groups or nations infiltrate others, then turn them against themselves
Andy Farnell and Helen Plews Explain What "Modern" Tech Does to Old People
Imposing terrible tech "religion" on people is not helping them
Tomorrow the Free Software Foundation (FSF) Turns 40 and Its Web Site is Still Slow Due to DDoS by LLM Slop Bots
For an advocacy group, uptime is important (for its message to remain accessible)
Slopwatch: Google News as a Firehose of LLM Slop About "Linux"
Google News is really bad
Datamation, Where I Used to Publish Articles, Appears to Have Been Sold to TechnologyAdvice Only to Become a Slopfarm
I'd prefer to not associate with that site anymore
Links 03/10/2025: "NPR’s Economics Lessons Come With Neoliberal Spin" and Canada Post at Risk
Links for the day
Gemini Links 03/10/2025: Panic Attacks and Food Adulteration
Links for the day
Links 03/10/2025: Lawyers Caught Using LLM Slop Explain Why They Did It, LibreSSL 4.1.1 and 4.0.1 Released
Links for the day
FSF Board Grew 50% Since Last Year, Has New President, Turns 40 in Two Days
It's a good move for the FSF and - by extension - for software freedom
Links 03/10/2025: Conflicts, Death of TypePad, and TikTok/CheeTok Gives a Boost to Far Right Groups in Europe
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, October 02, 2025
IRC logs for Thursday, October 02, 2025
Slopwatch: Linux Journal, Google News, and LinuxSecurity
They carry on polluting the Web with fake articles
Gemini Links 02/10/2025: Kubernetes With FreeBSD and robots.txt
Links for the day