Bonum Certa Men Certa

Microsoft FUD Alert

Novell coupons
Image from Wikimedia



MATT Asay and the usual trolls from ITWire continue to show their utter contempt for desktop GNU/Linux. It's the usual suspects and, suffice to say, the latter case is deliberate provocation that had us pondering a 'link embargo' on ITWire (or particular writers from there).



Elsewhere on the Web, what seems like Vista 'advertising' is almost disguised under the teaser headline "Hasta La Vista, Microsoft Vista." It tries marketing the unwanted operating system using the "inevitability" tune. This relates to a former Microsoft tune, which goes like: "computers are only desktops, and therefore Linux is not important." It's total nonsense and a case of aligning one's statistics to suit an agenda [1, 2, 3].

Another noteworthy item is Microsoft's choking of Xandros at ASUS, having tied them up [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], brought back XP, and begun selling it for very little, some say $0 (i.e. anti-competitive dumping).

One of our readers, Slated, remarked on such tactics yesterday:




> The plundering of the Earth by those that we call "businessmen" is a > fact that more people should be aware of. It seems that all sorts of > immoral, selfish, back-stabbing behavior is forgiven, if the result > is money made.

But just to be clear, I'm not anti-business. I'm anti-monopoly and anti-Corporatist, certainly, but I have nothing against legitimate business. In fact, as I've pointed out many times before, it's the Corporatists who are anti-capitalist, since they seek a state of monopoly which suppresses the Free Market Economy. This is nothing more than State-endorsed racketeering, just like any other form of monopoly (e.g. patents).

Microsoft are not unique in this regard, in fact they are not even the worst culprits, but in the context of Free Software they are the biggest threat to the kind of equal opportunities conducive to Freedom and choice.

> Could it be denied that Bill Gates and his cohorts "zealously" > perused their goals of dominating the markets that they participate > in?

Given that a "zealot" is merely a derogatory term for someone with absolute intolerance for others' ideals, then yes, it is perfectly accurate to describe right-wing extremists like Microsoft (or even any other Corporatists) as zealots. Their goals and principles are the antithesis of the Free Software community's, and they (Ballmer in particular) have made it perfectly clear in word and deed, that they utterly despise everything we stand for.

The flip-side of this is, of course, that since I am diametrically opposed to Microsoft's goals, and absolutely committed to opposing their right to pursue those goals, then it is technically accurate to describe me as a zealot too. But, as I said, it is a derogatory term, so I'd only expect to be denounced as a zealot by anyone who opposes my ideals. Given that those ideals are just the opposition of something immoral, it's highly inappropriate to describe such a position in a derogatory fashion, unless those making such comment are themselves immoral. Hence my assertion that "zealot" is a term which is only used in a derogatory sense, since intolerance is not in and of itself necessarily wrong, if that which is not tolerated is immoral.

And Microsoft's goal of monopolistic dominance is most certainly immoral, since this is not merely about making money; but they aim to make that money by denying others the opportunity to do so, and they accomplish this unworthy goal using the most depraved methods the law will allow (and even break those laws on occasion). That's not business, it's racketeering; totalitarianism; Corporatism. And worse still, having achieved this position of dominance, they then abuse it to force others to buy their products. This precludes the need for them to compete at all, and so they become complacent, to the point that their products become grossly substandard, but they have a captive audience who must accept these substandard products without choice. This situation may be improving with the emergence of products like Netbooks, but this tends to be an exception to an overwhelming rule of pre-installed Windows systems; bundled by OEM vendors who are bribed to do so, then bribed again to lie that the "[Vendor] Recommend Windows". Again - that's not business, it's an immoral means of securing profits; synonymous with racketeering.

There's business ... then there's "bizniz". I'm not opposed to the former, but I am certainly opposed to the latter. If that makes me a "zealot" then so be it. I suppose the EU Commission; the US DOJ, and I, all bear the the same "zealot" hallmark.



Thoughts are as welcome as always.

Comments

Recent Techrights' Posts

When Abusive Law Firms (Working for Microsofters Against Us) Assert That Someone Writing in Social Media About Himself is Confidential Information
There was no reason to throw "GDPR" into 2 SLAPPs; they know it, but the goal was to increase the cost of a Defence and lessen the incentive to challenge the SLAPPs
 
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, June 15, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, June 15, 2025
Gemini Links 15/06/2025: Rainy Season and OpenDocument Format (ODF)
Links for the day
Links 15/06/2025: Military Games, Parade, and Actions
Links for the day
Links 15/06/2025: Windows TCO, Openwashing, and Wars
Links for the day
Gemini Links 15/06/2025: "AI Fatigue and Crappiness"
Links for the day
Microsoft Attack Dogs Against Watchdogs and Guard Dogs in Software
Last year Microsofters hired attack dogs or "guns for hire"
Slop Cannot Replace Domain Expertise
All this "AI" hype (it's not even intelligence, it's all a misnomer, as many of us have insisted all along) will fizzle and be written off as a failed experiment
IBM's Fresh 'PIPs' (Action Before Layoffs)
At times like these, even once-reputable employers resort to PIPs and other procedures/tricks for denial of workers' rights
Microsoft is a Problem Not Just for Denmark
Every country should consider what Denmark is doing, why Denmark is doing it, and then do the same
The Slopfarms' Self Detonation
If more sites like BetaNews go under, then maybe we can still salvage some of the Web
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, June 14, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, June 14, 2025
Links 14/06/2025: FDA Changes Priorities, Cassette Data Storage From The 1970s
Links for the day
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Steam Next Fest and Thoughts on Gemini
Links for the day
Site/Datacentre Maintenance Next Week
speed things up
Bulgaria: GNU/Linux Near 10%
The Bulgarian market seems to be changing
I Never Spoke to BetaNews. But BetaNews Wants to Ensure I Never Will, Either.
Sometimes just the reluctance to talk about it can say a great deal
Throwing Money at Lawyers Can't Stop Us (It Never Did)
Even just trying to censor things can result in the opposite of the desired outcome
Online Search or Large Search Engines Aren't Working Anymore
business models that directly compete with interests of Web users
Holidays and Breaks
I've hardly taken any long breaks since I got married
Danish OpenDocument Freedom
"year of Linux"
Links 14/06/2025: Wars and L.A. Distortion Effect
Links for the day
BetaNews Has More or Less Died After Experiments With LLM Slop, Is Linuxsecurity Next?
It doesn't seem like BetaNews knows what it's doing, let alone what it talks about
Gemini Links 14/06/2025: Historic Ada Design and GeminiSpace.Club to Expire
Links for the day
Links 14/06/2025: India Plane Crash and Middle-Eastern War
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 13, 2025
IRC logs for Friday, June 13, 2025