EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

03.03.10

Analyst Expects Microsoft Bid to Buy Novell

Posted in Deals, Finance, Microsoft, Novell at 7:42 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Novell blinded by money

Original image from Wikimedia

Summary: Richard Williams from Cross Research believes that Microsoft or even its ally SAP might attempt to buy Novell for approximately $2 billion

LAST NIGHT we wrote about Novell's possibly inevitable fate as a private company, taken over by another. We have not prepared any detailed posts on the subject yet, but here is some food for thought:

Elliot offers to buy Novell Inc. for $2bn; Novell stock surge

[...]

“The deal price is on the low side compared to recent deals that were transacted in the enterprise software space,” said Cross Research analyst Richard Williams.

[...]

William said there could be more companies who would offer a similar bid for Novell as Elliot’s. HP, SAP, and Microsoft are expected to be the possible suitors.

Microsoft, already having a strong business partnership with Novell, sells Novell’s version of Linux to its customers.

This whole episode may explain why a lot of executives quit the company recently. At this stage, it seems unlikely that Novell will stay NOVL this year.

“Now [Novell is] little better than a branch of Microsoft”

LinuxToday Managing Editor

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

12 Comments

  1. Danielh said,

    March 3, 2010 at 8:04 am

    Gravatar

    I cant imagine the antitrust being stupid enough to allow Microsoft buying Novell. Its the only serious competitor to Microsoft in the realm of LDAP, policy management and file services.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, but Microsoft can enclose Novell using a shell like Elliot and SAP, whose interests can better align with Microsoft’s.

  2. JohnD said,

    March 3, 2010 at 4:26 pm

    Gravatar

    The only two areas of Novell that are worth a premium price tag are Identity Management and it’s patent portfolio. The legacy stuff isn’t worth the dough (even though I wish someone would buy and revive Netware). Groupwise doesn’t have enough market share to make it worth the money for IBM or M$. Anyone wishing to enter the space probably wouldn’t have enough cash for a serious bid. Groupwise also doesn’t have any real cutting edge technology to make it worth buying either. The only parts of the Linux area you can sell are support and the client list/support contracts. I think it’d be far cheaper to just generate FUD and go after the clients directly then to purchase the contracts. Identity is a hot topic these days so there would probably be more than a few companies interested in that piece. The real concern should be – where will the patent portfolio end up? Chances are it won’t be with OIN. Sometimes better the devil you know than the one you don’t.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    I worry about the SCO lawsuit, the WordPerfect lawsuit, and other issues too.

    JohnD Reply:

    If the bean counters run the show, you can watch them disappear. Unless they are convinced that winning will more than cover the cost of litigation, they will find a way to end them quickly. Elliot’s only concern is cash – not long term consequences. Despite their assertions that they “know” about technology companies I really don’t think they have a clue what they are getting into. This situation is precisely why I never supported the boycott – you never know just how things are going to play out. We may not like the deal, but the industry needs Novell. Without it, M$ gets an even firmer grip on the industry. Now it’s up to the Novell directors, if they think they will do better by waiting they will say no. If they don’t they will take the payday and walk away.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    Yes, there is that issue too, I acknowledge that. Remember that a boycott strives to change behaviour, not necessarily to destroy.

    JohnD Reply:

    Yes usually by depriving the offending party of something – usually money. Petitions, open letters, email and snail mail campaign can do the same thing without the financial impact. The colonies petitioned the king before they resorted to revolution. More recently there was the “Nuts” campaign by the fans of the TV show Jericho – the inundated the corporate offices with cans of nuts in an effort to keep the network from canceling the show. It worked if only for a season, but they did get a last episode that wrapped up the story. These other measures may have had a more positive, and possibly profound, impact on Novell. It’s doubtful that they would have backed out of the agreement, but they may have changed other practices going forward.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    John, I could use your opinion on something. Do you know who’s behind the bid?

    http://hattie.typepad.com/hatties_web/2007/11/paul-e-singer.html
    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Paul_E._Singer
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/22/us/politics/22singer.html?_r=3&oref=slogin

    I’ll write about this tomorrow. See what you can make of it.

    JohnD Reply:

    As a rule anyone who gets involved in politics has an agenda. It may be good and altruistic, or self serving, but they have an agenda. While this is just a snapshot of the man it seems that his focus is on making money at any cost. That he’s interested in Novell reinforces my opinion that Novell isn’t doing a poor as some (including financial pundits) seem to think. He’s offered 2 billion, but really it’s only a “risk” of a little over a billion because of the $900+billion in the bank. Quarterly revenues are around 200 million so they are bringing in around 800 million/year. Right now they are retaining about 10% so profit/net income should be around 80mil/year. If it goes private they will be making decent money while they figure out how to break it apart. I seriously doubt they will infuse capital in order to bolster it’s market position against M$ and Apple. They probably think the Linux stuff is something they can sell when in reality all they can sell is the support dept and contracts – I can’t see anyone forking over serious cash for that. Identity and patents are the best areas and I can’t see them going for over a billion dollars.

    Roy Schestowitz Reply:

    It’s not just politics though. I’ll show you tomorrow.

    JohnD Reply:

    I didn’t mean to suggest it was about politics, but more that he has an agenda even if it’s not completely clear yet.
    Get some sleep.

  3. uberVU - social comments said,

    April 7, 2010 at 9:07 am

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Identica by schestowitz: Analyst Expects #Microsoft Bid to Buy #Novell http://boycottnovell.com/2010/03/03/richard-williams-on-novl/

What Else is New


  1. Links 9/12/2019: Linux 5.5 RC1, EasyOS Buster 2.1.9

    Links for the day



  2. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 08, 2019

    IRC logs for Sunday, December 08, 2019



  3. Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

    In an age of substitution — where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts — it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents



  4. Once Upon a Time Banter Was Allowed on Mailing Lists

    Hours ago Torvalds announced RC1 of the next Linux (kernel) release; it has been a while since he last said something ‘controversial’ (following his month at the penalty box); free speech deficit can make us weaker, not stronger (advantage to those who work in the dark)



  5. Links 8/12/2019: Debian Init Systems GR, NomadBSD 1.3

    Links for the day



  6. Can We Quit Celebrating DRM in GNU/Linux?

    Over the past couple of days various news sites and "Linux" sites expressed great satisfaction [1-5] over the passive embrace of Disney's DRM ploy (Disney+), even when Disney itself rejects DRM, seeing the harms practically caused by it [6,7]



  7. You Know WSL is Bad for GNU/Linux Because Anti-Linux People, Microsoft and Its Propagandists, Want People to Use That

    Microsoft and its boosters (and media partners) haven’t grown tired of spreading falsehoods to stigmatise and take control of GNU/Linux by creating their own versions and traps for it



  8. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

    IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019



  9. 5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

    One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)



  10. Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

    The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?



  11. Things That Cannot Be Said

    The limits on what we can say are mostly defined by what sources permit us to say publicly (for the sake of source protection)



  12. Fake European Patents (on Algorithms) Leading to Fake Embargoes

    Law firms have gotten their way in Germany; instead of supporting the productive workers the patent system is nowadays promoting the litigation 'industry' and it ought to be corrected



  13. From Moderate Advice to FUD and Misinformation: The Case of a VPN Vulnerability (CVE-2019-14899)

    What should have been a trivial bugfix in a variety of operating systems and bits of software — both proprietary and Free software — somehow became anti-Linux FUD, clickbait and worse



  14. Dangerous Thinker

    Society oughtn't be alarmed by people who say unusual things; it should be wary and sceptical of those corporations ever so eager to silence such people



  15. Unitary Patent (UPC) Died Along With the Credibility of Managing IP and the Rest of the UPC Lobby

    It is pretty astounding that Team UPC (collective term for people who crafted and lobby for this illegal construct) is still telling us lies, even in the absence of underlying supportive facts, and pressure groups disguised as "news sites" latch onto anything to perpetuate an illusion of progress (even in the face of a growing number of major barriers)



  16. IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 06, 2019

    IRC logs for Friday, December 06, 2019



  17. Links 7/12/2019: Fedora 31 Elections Results, Lots of Media Drama Over VPN Bug

    Links for the day



  18. Links 6/12/2019: DRM in GNU/Linux and Sparky Bonsai

    Links for the day



  19. The EPO Rejects Innovation

    The EPO ceased caring about the needs of scientists whose work involves invention; instead, EPO management crafts increasingly lenient guidelines that yield illegal European Patents (not compatible with the EPC) that heavily-besieged EPO judges are unable to stop



  20. Startpage CEO Robert Beens in 'Damage Control' Mode, Trying to Get Startpage Relisted After Selling to a Massive Surveillance Company

    PrivacytoolsIO is being lobbied by the CEO of Startpage to relist Startpage, based on no actual refutations at all



  21. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 05, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, December 05, 2019



  22. Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

    Links for the day



  23. Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

    The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019



  25. Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

    Links for the day



  26. Google Tightens Its Noose

    Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs



  27. Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

    Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)



  28. We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

    Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)



  29. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 03, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, December 03, 2019



  30. Links 3/12/2019: elementary OS 5.1 Hera, Plasma 5.17.4, Firefox 71

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts