EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

11.20.15

In an Effort to Counter EPO Staff Narrative (After ~2,000 of Staff Protest) EPO Management Portrays Staff as Violent But Provides No Evidence

Posted in Europe, Patents at 9:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Projection by the growingly-militaristic EPO management?

Selective coverage cartoon
Cartoon source

Summary: The EPO’s management has a poor record on accuracy and truth and the latest staff-shaming tactics serve to reinforce that track record

ACCORDING to reports from the local German media (translation to English would be very much appreciated), the protests on Wednesday were massive. This serves to show that EPO is indeed experiencing a meltdown. We are glad to see this type of coverage crossing over the channel and reaching Britain as well (credit goes to Münchner Merkur, which regularly covers these issues, e.g. [1, 2, 3]).

“SUEPO is winning here (the staff is more loyal to SUEPO than to the EPO).”As British media put it, “Anti-EPO demo attracts 2,000, union member has ‘nervous breakdown’” and to quote from it: “Jesper Kongstad, chair of the AC, has allegedly implied previously that his organisation is looking to resume “trilateral talks” between EPO management, the AC and SUEPO.

“However, SUEPO has said that “meaningful discussions” cannot happen while the four members remain suspended.”

SUEPO is winning here (the staff is more loyal to SUEPO than to the EPO). It’s not getting any better for the EPO’s high-level managers and one must inevitably wonder who was even left inside the building at times of recent protests, other than Battistelli and his ilk. The question increasingly becomes, who does not demonstrate against the management and why not?

“Sources of ours said that even Directors attended the latest protest!”There is some ‘damage control’ here and it says that “2,000 people attended a demonstration at the Isar building in Munich in support of the suspended members and another is scheduled for December 10.”

That’s one week before my birthday. Let’s hope that they can get virtually everyone in the office to come outside. Sources of ours said that even Directors attended the latest protest!

We were very much disturbed to see the crudest ‘damage control’ from the EPO’s management. This was posted by WIPR and it’s claiming “threats of violence” from staff. To quote the part about the EPO’s spokesperson: “The spokesperson added that over the past two years the EPO has unveiled instances of serious misconduct including cases of fraud in the EPO’s healthcare system, violations of data protection, the leaking of confidential information, and harassment.”

That’s not “threats of violence”. Well, maybe — just maybe — there was some anonymous comment somewhere (perhaps IP Kat), maybe even ‘planted’ by the party that desires it (the agent provocateur tactic). But we’ve never seen such a thing and therefore we must conclude that the EPO’s management cannot quite produce a single example of “threats of violence”. If there is such an example, then they’ll need to show something. Be specific.

“We think this qualifies as a collective daemonisation/character assassination tactic.”This seems like a clever PR ploy. For all we know, there are no threats of violence. Remember the judge whom the EPO’s management (probably illegally) suspended for speaking about VP4. They tried to paint him — without any oversight while the I.U. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7] did its possibly framing-esque gig — as some kind of an armed Nazi [1, 2, 3], The guy is not German/Austrian but an Irishman, based on the German media (it is now considered public knowledge). Is this where the “threats of violence” are supposedly coming from?

Reading through the article from WIPR, we don’t see even one example of threats of violence and we saw no such thing in any flyer, publication etc. We think this qualifies as a collective daemonisation/character assassination tactic. The EPO management now wants to paint its very own staff as violent savages. What a terrible PR move. “Don’t believe a word! That’s only typical double EPO Leader language,” wrote one person yesterday. Well, the EPO’s management does not have a good track record when it comes to truth and accuracy.

In other news, IP Kat‘s Merpel has revealed some truly fascinating details about the suspended judge. “We knew that the EBA had rejected Mr Kongstad’s request,” she wrote, “for Mr. Battistelli was driven to write a memo to the AC asking it to bypass the EBA and simply fire the Board Member, since the EBA had (he said) shown itself to be incapable of fulfilling what was a simple administrative request. In other words, the EBA’s only job (he believed) was to rubber stamp the AC’s request (see Merpel’s post “Ignore the Enlarged Board, EPO President tells Administrative Council” if you want a fuller reprise).”

Techrights articles are now more censorship-resistant as some readers decided to mirror the site’s articles and even maintain them, fork them, etc. on Github.”Read on for more details. It’s rather jaw-dropping. What kind of a rogue organisation has the EPO become?

Prof. Dr. Siegfried Broß, a former judge of the Federal Constitutional Court, recently spoke out against these actions by the EPO's management. Merpel has, usefully enough, just gotten a hold of this translation of the article from Juve. “Merpel notes,” she said, “that by coincidence, Juve has today published a rebuttal of the interview below, with EPO Vice-President Raimund Lutz.”

But sticking to the original article which quotes Broß, here is what Merpel wrote: “He has been interviewed by Juve (a leading German magazine for lawyers), in an interview published a few weeks ago. Juve have kindly permitted Merpel to republish an English translation, which may interest English-speaking EPO watchers. The interview was conducted by Christina Geimer and Mathieu Klos from JUVE, Germany. Merpel is responsible for its translation, for which she thanks a kind reader.”

For future record we have decided to reproduce this translation here as well. Techrights articles are now more censorship-resistant as some readers decided to mirror the site’s articles and even maintain them, fork them, etc. on Github. Here is what Broß had to say about the EPO’s actions against the Irish judge:

Juve – 29.10.2015

EPO Disciplinary Proceedings:

“The actions of the Administrative Council and Battistelli are devoid of any legal basis.”

The European Patent Office (EPO) suffers from a fundamental structural problem. Only a Diplomatic Conference of its Member States can help one of the world’s largest patent offices to emerge from its current crisis. This is the view expressed by Prof. Dr. Siegfried Bross, a former judge of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and the Patent Division of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichthof) in an interview with JUVE

JUVE: Two years ago, as a legal expert for one of the parties in a complaint before the Federal Constitutional Court, you analyzed the question of the independence of the EPO Boards of Appeal. What conclusions did you come to at that time?

Siegfried Broß: The EPO Boards of Appeal are not an independent court. We are dealing here with a self-evident intermeshing of the roles of the President of the Office and the supervision of the Boards of Appeal. Therefore, the Boards of Appeal cannot be considered to possess the character of a court.

Juve: A lot has changed since you issued your legal opinion. The President of the EPO has imposed a house ban on a Member of the Boards of Appeal. In addition to that, Benoît Battistelli’s reform proposal is now on the table. What conclusions do you draw today?

SB: These developments, especially the reform proposal, do nothing to alter the fundamental
incompatibility of the EPO’s structure with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and rule-of-law-based democratic principles. The President still remains at the head of both the administrative and the judicial departments of the EPO and can exert influence on the Boards in terms of staffing and material issues.

Juve: What needs to be done to remedy this unsatisfactory situation?

SB: The Boards of Appeal should be completely separated from the EPO and provided with their own management and budgetary resources. Furthermore, all personnel links to the EPO President should be severed. In addition, the European Patent Organisation should introduce life tenure for judges. These are matters which require action on the part of the Member States. They cannot absolve themselves from their obligations to uphold fundamental rights guaranteed by international conventions and/or by national laws merely on account of their participation in an international association of states. As a matter of fact, Germany should never have been allowed to participate in the European Patent Convention in its present form.

Juve: In the context of disciplinary proceedings against the suspended judge, the Administrative Council has recently requested the competent Enlarged Board of Appeal to make a proposal for his dismissal. What is your opinion about this?

SB: To begin with, it is must be noted out that the disciplinary proceedings initiated in this case do not comply with the rule of law but rather have been conducted in a manner comparable to criminal proceedings. Therefore, generally recognised principles such as the presumption of innocence under the ECHR and Charter of Fundamental Rights apply to those affected. Ab initio the EPA procedure has not been conducted in a proper manner because it has been directed by the President. According to rule-of-law principles, disciplinary proceedings against judges should be conducted exclusively by independent judges. From this perspective, these disciplinary proceedings are pre-destined to collapse.

Juve: The EPO published the main allegations against the accused person in a Communiqué. Is this compatible with international principles?

SB: In a disciplinary procedure the principle of confidentiality is of fundamental importance, in particular having regard to the presumption of innocence. That does not mean that press releases are prohibited, but any kind of polemical content should be avoided.

In addition to this, in an internal e-mail to all EPA employees, a copy of which was provided to JUVE, Battistelli has publicly disseminated further accusations of a personally denigrating nature against the judge.

Such behavior is unacceptable. From the very outset, the actions of the President were devoid of any legal basis.

Juve: The basis for the Administrative Council’s decision was, a report by an external investigation unit. Can this be used as a basis for the disciplinary tribunal?

SB: The deployment of this investigation unit provides the clearest possible confirmation that the disciplinary proceedings is not based on an approach which complies with the rule of law. The course of action which has been adopted could not be more flagrantly at odds with the international conventions to which all the Member States have subscribed.

Juve: What possibilities does the Enlarged Board of Appeal have now?

SB: They should reject all the requests of the Administrative Council and terminate the proceedings in order to draw attention to the fundamental abuse of procedure.

Juve: What impact might these problems have on the upcoming unity Patent?

SB: The Administrative Council must ensure that the EPC contracting states adhere to rule-of-law-based democratic principles and enforce an organisational separation of the administrative and judicial departments of the EPO. This is all the more urgent, because the Agreement on the Unitary Patent couples the EU in a blatantly unlawful manner to these structures. The regulations governing the Single Patent only provide effective legal protection in the case where a patent application is successful. If the EPO in its capacity as the competent administrative instance rejects an application, then the applicant cannot submit this decision to an independent judicial review. Such a state of affairs is contrary to Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and, likewise Articles 6 and 13 ECHR.

Juve: Could a potential complaint against the Unitary Patent, for example before the Federal Constitutional Court, be based on such considerations?

SB: Yes, of course. Due to the fact that it is only the owners of rejected patents who enjoy no judicial protection, there is additionally a violation of the right to protection of property enshrined in the ECHR. In additional, there is no objective reason for this omission – the formulation of the [Unitary Patent] Agreement is arbitrary in this respect.

Please stay tuned as we have a lot more to come regarding the EPO. Pierre-Yves Le Borgn’, a French politician who formed somewhat of a political ‘coalition’ against a largely French EPO management [1, 2, 3, 4], is getting involved again (translation from French required). There is coverage in several other languages, including German and Dutch (English translations would be very much appreciated, for future record and publication/dissemination across the Web).

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 17, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, February 17, 2020



  2. Links 18/2/2020: Linux 5.6 RC2, Wine 5.2, GNU Social Contract and Sparky 2020.02 Special Editions

    Links for the day



  3. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, February 16, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, February 16, 2020



  4. Links 16/2/2020: MX Linux 19.1 and MyPaint 2.0

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 15, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 15, 2020



  6. Guest Article: Au Revoir, GNU/Linux

    "Funny how OSI just ended up being another vehicle for their takeover of the computing world..."



  7. Former Microsoft Employee: ZDNet is Owned by Microsoft (and Others) in Some Senses

    A noteworthy message we've received from someone who knows Microsoft from the inside



  8. Links 15/2/2020: Blender 2.82, Qt 5.15 Alpha and NetBSD 9.0 Released

    Links for the day



  9. Microsoft Views 'Open Source' as a Zero-Cost Heist Opportunity (Making Proprietary Software/Spyware Using Other People's Free Labour)

    Making GPL-licensed (copyleft) software and hosting it outside Microsoft’s jaws is the best way to counter the abusive monopolist, which still says it “loves” what it is actually attacking



  10. Did Microsoft 'Buy' ZDNet?

    A look at what ZDNet tells its readers (screenshot from this morning) and a rare look at how its writers are censored/suppressed



  11. Anatomy of a Crime and Protection From Prosecution

    It’s hard to forget what António Campinos hides for his friend



  12. Today's EPO is a Fraud Managed by Frauds

    Beneath the scandals associated with systematic abuse against staff, union-busting (silencing whistleblowers) and en masse granting of invalid patents — the hallmark of grotesque maladministration — lie a bunch of even greater crimes



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 14, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, February 14, 2020



  14. One Need Only Look at ZDNet's 'Linux' Section to Understand It's a Microsoft Propaganda Operation

    A timely new snapshot (or screenshot) that demonstrates what ZDNet became after hiring Microsoft employees as ‘journalists’ and censoring on behalf of Microsoft, defaming Free software figures and so on



  15. Links 14/2/2020: New Release of KStars, OpenSSH 8.2, Rhythmbox 3.4.4, Flatpak 1.6.2

    Links for the day



  16. The Uselessness of Social Control Media and Why We Need RSS Feeds' Resurgence More Than Ever

    Social control media became pure noise or misinformation, usually in pursuit of financial expansion alone, and it is also a censorship machine which discourages not falsehoods but unconventional thinking



  17. Another New 'Clown' for the UPC 'Circus'

    A former writer of IPPro Magazine (which seems to be defunct now) reports another shuffle -- perhaps the fifth in a few years -- of "IP" [sic] Minister for the UK; it doesn't bode well for the Unified Patent Court (UPC)



  18. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 13, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 13, 2020



  19. Links 13/2/2020: Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS, Septor 2020, Endless OS 3.7.7, Wayland 1.18.0, KDE Plasma 5.18 and GTK 3.98 Released

    Links for the day



  20. The Microsoft Propaganda Model

    Classic new examples (real screenshots) of how Microsoft-funded media entraps people looking for information about "Linux" to actually push Microsoft talking points and marketing, cover-up, face-saving lies etc.



  21. What's Evil is Forcing People to Use Something They Don't Want and Typically Dislike

    The difference between Google Search and Microsoft is that many people actually want to use Google (and don't have to)



  22. 2020: The Year Microsoft Became Honest... About Being Corrupt and Criminal

    Microsoft is destroying any past attempts to portray itself as a reformed company or 'recovering criminal'; nothing is really changing and everyone has noticed



  23. Free Software is Being Abandoned by Opponents of Software Patents and It's Being Attacked by Patent Trolls

    The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is rotting away as an advocate against software patents; Patents on algorithms are still being granted (even when courts repeatedly reject these) and Red Hat's Chief Patent Counsel remains Manny Schecter, one of the loudest proponents of such patents (citing the likes of Adam Mossoff this week, in effect Koch operatives); this is a very big problem because Free software projects come under a barrage of lawsuits, using patents like those IBM lobbies ferociously to legitimise



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 12, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 12, 2020



  25. Links 12/2/2020: KDE Neon 5.18, Tails 4.3 and WordPress 5.4 Beta

    Links for the day



  26. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 11, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 11, 2020



  27. Links 11/2/2020: New Firefox and KDE Plasma

    Links for the day



  28. Sometimes ILO-AT is Good for Nothing But Law Firms in or Around Switzerland

    ILO-AT’s latest judgements are out. But ILO — and by extension the UN — are still morally deficient and they give the impression that don’t care about people (or that ILO is in bed with the same businesses WIPO (UN) serves, i.e. no better than WB/IMF).



  29. The European Patent Office Continues to Violate the European Patent Convention (EPC) With Impunity While the European Commission Lets That Happen

    The European Commission (and Union) can be seen as increasingly complicit in the EPO's abuses; this means that the EPO has become a liability or source of accountability for the integrity of Europe as a bloc



  30. IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 10, 2020

    IRC logs for Monday, February 10, 2020


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts