EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.08.18

Forward Pharma an Example of the Devastating Effect of Granting Patents in Error — A Problem Appeal Boards Must Correct

Posted in America, Europe, Patents at 8:21 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When examiners make errors someone will need to correct these, but at what (and whose) cost?

Forward PharmaSummary: When companies live or die based on their patents the quality of patent examination is ever more crucial; the US seems to be finally getting it, whereas the EPO (Europe) reaches for the bottom of the barrel

EARLIER THIS year Forward Pharma’s shares crashed due to low patent quality at the EPO (as Battistelli had sabotaged examination), which means that patents get granted in error and then the Opposition Division corrects it. Sometimes.

Forward Pharma’s value was nearly halved overnight; now they appeal to the Boards, the Technical Board of Appeal in this case, having just issued this press release:

Forward Pharma A/S (Nasdaq:FWP) (“We” or “Forward” or the “Company”), today announced the filing of a notice of appeal of the decision of the Opposition Division of the European Patent Office (the “EPO”) that revoked EP2801355 (the “’355 patent”), written reasons for which were received on March 22, 2018. The notice was filed to the Technical Board of Appeal (the “TBA”) of the EPO.

“With the notice of appeal filed, we officially initiate the process to get the decision of the Opposition Division overturned and have the ‘355 patent reinstated,” said Dr. Claus Bo Svendsen, Chief Executive Officer of Forward.

“Over in the United States things have been improving. AIA and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) marked the end of the ‘David Kappos era’ at the USPTO.”We’re not against patents. We never were. We just think that quality of the patents is crucial and patents must never be granted in error. In doubt? Then do not grant. The burden of proof (for novelty, not prior art) should be on the applicant. As we shall show soon (probably later this week), the Inventor Award isn’t just being offered to literal frauds but to people who were granted a patent they did not even deserve. That’s the EPO anyway. This is the EPO under Battistelli.

Over in the United States things have been improving. AIA and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) marked the end of the ‘David Kappos era’ at the USPTO. Yesterday a site of patent maximalists noted that “the Board [PTAB] found GHC’s claims corresponding to the count to be unpatentable for failure to satisfy the written description requirement.”

This is about pharmaceuticals (General Hospital Corp. v Sienna Biopharmaceuticals) and Kevin Noonan explained the petition’s basis:

The Board construed the word “about” in GHC’s claims to mean “within 10%” of the value recited, equivalent to between 5.94 x 1011 and 7.26 x 1011 particles per mL of the composition, under which construction Sienna argued the claims failed to satisfy the written description requirement. The specification of GHC’s ’575 application defined nanoparticle concentration with regard to optical density rather than in particles per mL. Under the conversion coefficient proffered by Sienna’s expert and accepted by the Board, there was no disclosure in GHC’s ’575 application of nanoparticle concentrations between 5.94 x 1011 and 7.26 x 1011 particles per mL of the composition. Hence, the Board found GHC’s claims corresponding to the count to be unpatentable for failure to satisfy the written description requirement.

Robert Jain has, in the meantime, given another new example. Disarming another patent troll, Unified Patents wrote about Beacon Navigation. Owing to PTAB, the patent in question may soon be history. Quoting Jain:

On May 4, 2018, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 6,178,380 owned and asserted by Beacon Navigation, GmbH, a well-known NPE. The ’380 patent claims a “vehicle location display of a navigation system” that provides a navigation display that includes a first map with a first scale and a second map with a different scale. This patent has been asserted in 33 district court litigations against various automotive companies such as Toyota, Suzuki, Volvo, Nissan, Daimler AG, Hyundai, and Honda.

The response from patent extremists was more or less the usual. Watchtroll has just released another anti-PTAB piece (“PTAB Reform: An Urgent Request on Behalf of Independent Inventors”) and the patent trolls’ lobby, IAM, goes a week back (“webinar last Monday”) to distract from Oil States (quite frankly as usual). To quote the outline outside the paywall:

The Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute v Iancu and the subsequent guidance from the USPTO on how it will be applied has sent PTAB practitioners scrambling for their IPR playbooks. Oil States, the case before America’s highest court which challenged the constitutionality of inter partes reviews, left the controversial post-grant procedure intact, but the majority opinion in SAS promises to have a significant impact on how petitioners, patent owners and their advisers plot their post-grant strategies. On a webinar last Monday, Chief Judge of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PRAB) David Ruschke, along with vice-chief judges Tim Fink…

Remember that the above site, IAM, is the main source of Battistelli’s lie that EPO patent quality remains high. The EPO lies about it so routinely that it has become truly comical.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Chairman of the Board of Red Hat Explains He Was Introduced to GNU/Linux When It Helped His Regime Change in Haiti

    General Hugh Shelton, Chairman of the Board of Red Hat, explains (keynote in 2011 Red Hat Summit/JBoss World) that he was introduced to the system as part of a military campaign; it basically helped war, not antiwar



  2. The Faces of 'The Cloud' (Surveillance in Clown Computing/Clothing)

    Consolidation of the world's computers/servers and the stories told by photo ops; we're particularly interested in IBM's relationship with Condé Nast, which owns The New Yorker and Wired



  3. Microsoft is Now in the Technical Advisory Board of the Linux Foundation

    Techrights politely takes note of the growing role (or roles) of Microsoft employees inside the Linux Foundation; there are now at least half a dozen people



  4. Two Things IBM and Microsoft Have in Common: Layoffs and Fake Hype Like 'Clown Computing' and 'Hey Hi' (AI) as Perceived 'Opportunity' for 'Growth'

    The infamous pair of monopolists, Microsoft and IBM, are both suffering during the COVID-19 lock-downs (no matter how hard they try to spin it and/or distract from it)



  5. IBM (Red Hat) Lectured FSF That It Needed More Diversity, But Was It Looking at the Mirror? IBM and Red Hat Are Even Less Diverse.

    Techrights examines Red Hat’s (IBM’s) hypocritical claims about the Free Software Foundation, founded by Richard Stallman back when IBM was the “big scary monopolist”; IBM employees were prominent among those pushing to oust Stallman from the GNU Project, which he founded, as well



  6. IRC Proceedings: Friday, June 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, June 05, 2020



  7. Guix Petition Demographic Data, by Figosdev

    That old anti-RMS letter, which called for his removal (or resignation) from GNU (RMS is the founder of the GNU Project), as characterised by metadata of signatories



  8. When You Realise People Who Don't Support RMS Do Not Really Support GNU, Either

    The (in)famous letter against Richard Stallman (RMS), which was signed by many Red Hat employees with Microsoft (GitHub) accounts, doesn’t look particularly good in light of recent revelations/findings; it increasingly looks like IBM simply wants Microsoft-hosted and “permissively” licensed stuff, just like another project it announced yesterday and another that it promoted yesterday



  9. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part III: What Happens When You Tell the Truth About Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation

    One might not expect this from a so-called 'charity'; the Gates Foundation's critics are often met with unprecedented aggression, threats and retribution, which make one wonder if it's really a charity or a greedy cult of personalities (Bill and Melinda)



  10. Links 6/6/2020: Bifrost Meets GNOME, Wine 5.10 is Out

    Links for the day



  11. Links 5/6/2020: LibreELEC (Leia) 9.2.3, Rust 1.44.0, and Hamburg's Pivot to Free/Libre Software

    Links for the day



  12. This Article About GitHub Takeover Never Appeared (Likely Spiked by Microsoft and Its Friends Inside the Media)

    And later they wonder why people distrust so much of the media (where paying advertisers set the agenda/tone)



  13. Raw: How Microsoft and/or the EPO Killed an Important EPO Story About Their SLAPP Against Techrights and Others

    Spiking a story about spiked stories about corruption



  14. The Linux Foundation 'Bootcamp' -- Badly Timed and Badly Named in June 2020 -- Only Uses Linus Torvalds Like a 'Prop' (for Legitimacy) While Promoting Militarised Monopolies

    Sometimes a picture says a lot more than words, especially in light of political events in the US and a certain Chinese anniversary we cannot name (Microsoft censors mentions of it)



  15. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, June 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, June 04, 2020



  16. The Gates Press (GatesGate) -- Part II: When Media That You Bribe Calls All Your Critics 'Conspiracy Theorists' (to Keep Them Silenced, Marginalised)

    The assault on the media by Bill Gates is a subject not often explored by the media (maybe because a lot of it is already bribed by him); but we're beginning to gather new and important evidence that explains how critics are muzzled (even fired) and critical pieces spiked, never to see the light of day anywhere



  17. GitHub is Not Sharing But 'Theft' by Microsoft

    Microsoft buying GitHub does not demonstrate that Microsoft loves Open Source (GitHub is not Open Source and may never be) but that it loves monopoly and coercion (what GitHub is all about and why it must be rejected)



  18. The Huge Damage (Except for Patent Lawyers' Bottom Line) Caused by Fake European Patents

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps granting fake patents that cause a lot of real harm (examiners are pressured to play along and participate in this unlawful agenda); nobody is happy except those who profit from needless, frivolous lawsuits



  19. Red Hat/IBM Got 'Tired' of RMS. Is It Getting 'Tired' of GPL/Copyleft Too?

    After contributing to the cancellation of Richard Stallman (RMS) based on some falsehoods perpetuated in the media we're seeing the sort of thing one might expect from IBM (more so now that it totally controls Fedora and RHEL)



  20. Links 4/6/2020: Proton 5.0-8 Release Candidate, GNU Linux-libre 5.7

    Links for the day



  21. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, June 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, June 03, 2020



  22. Social Engineering of Free Software, Based on Corporate Criteria

    What "professional" nowadays means in the context of coding and honest assessment of technical work



  23. Weakening GNU/Linux by Disempowering Its Leaders and Founders, Replacing Them With Microsoft Employees and GNU/Linux-Hostile Moles

    The coup to remove (or remove power from) Stallman and Torvalds, the GNU and Linux founders respectively, is followed by outsourcing of their work to Microsoft’s newly-acquired monopoly (GitHub) and appointment of Microsoft workers or Microsoft-friendly people, shoehorning them into top roles under the disingenuous guise of "professionalism"



  24. Sword Group Violates Its Own Commitment by Working for the EPO

    The European Patent Office (EPO) keeps outsourcing its work to outside contractors (for-profit private entities) to the tune of hundreds of millions if not billions — all this without any oversight



  25. In 2020 Canonical No Longer Fights for Freedom

    Freedom requires a GNU/Linux distro other than Ubuntu, which seems unwilling or unable/incapable of speaking about and promoting the ideals of GNU/Linux



  26. We Need to Use the F Word (Freedom) to Promote Adoption of GNU/Linux

    "People get the government their behavior deserves. People deserve better than that." -Richard Stallman



  27. People Who Want to Explore GNU/Linux With Ubuntu See This Today

    "Wait, am I in a GNU/Linux blog or another Windows blog," a visitor might think... or, is Microsoft 'taking over' messaging at Canonical? (Same with code)



  28. Links 4/6/2020: Septor 2020.3, Nextcloud and Blender 2.83

    Links for the day



  29. Hey, Where's Red Hat (IBM)?

    Red Hat is conspicuously silent at these critical times (in its home country); Must be too busy hailing and cashing in on Trump's military (state) while dishing out shallow and self-contradictory diversity PR/fluff…



  30. Microsoft's Latest Vapourware About Supercomputers

    Microsoft has spent almost two decades dropping supercomputers vapourware on the media, but those misinformation dumps always turn out to be 100% hot air, no substance


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts