Bonum Certa Men Certa

Latest News on G 1/21: Another Spanner in the Works

Justice and scales
Latest news about G 1/21.



Summary: Breaking news from Europe's biggest anarchy

As is generally known by now, on Monday, 17 May 2021, an interlocutory decision of the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal was taken in case G 1/21.



"This latest submission from Isarpatent raises new partiality objections and requests a postponement of the oral hearing scheduled for 28 May 2021."This decision focused on partiality objections raised by the appellant, Rohde & Schwarz GmbH, and it resulted in two members of the original panel being sidelined, namely the Chairman Carl Josefsson and a legal member, Ingo Beckedorf.

The interlocutory decision was communicated to the parties on Friday, 21 May, together with an order dated 20 May setting out the new composition of the panel. [PDF]

As previously reported, the new composition of the panel is as follows:

Chairman: Fritz Blumer (CH)

Legally qualified member: Wim van der Eijk (NL) – designated as Rapporteur

Legally qualified member: Tamás Bokor (HU)

Legally qualified member: Richard Arnold (GB)

Legally qualified member: Evangelos Chatzikos (GR)

Technically qualified member: Gunnar Eliasson (SE)

Technically qualified member: Andrea Ritzka (DE)


The following Monday, 24 May, the appellant Rohde & Schwarz GmbH - represented by Isarpatent Patent- und Rechtsanwälte - threw another spanner in the works with a detailed 23-page submission. [PDF]

This latest submission from Isarpatent raises new partiality objections and requests a postponement of the oral hearing scheduled for 28 May 2021.

According to Isarpatent, the change of the composition of the Enlarged Board, and the interlocutory decision of 17 May give rise to new objections concerning the composition of the panel.

EPO objection
New objections raised by Isarpatent in case no. G 1/21.



The submission notes that the present referral relates to "an important legal question, relevant for the future form of oral proceedings, with an exceptionally broad user interest" and that it demands to be "handled with the utmost care and diligence".

However, the EBA opened the proceedings with several orders dated March 17, 2021 and - on the same day - issued summons to oral proceedings scheduled on May 28, 2021. This was just in time to fulfil the minimum two months' notice of the summons stipulated in Rule 115(1) EPC.

The Enlarged Board's manner of proceeding in this case is in stark contrast to the practice in examination and opposition proceedings, where the summons is issued at least four (examination) to six (opposition) months ahead of the day appointed for the oral proceedings.

According to Isarpatent:

The precipitate way in which the Enlarged Board of Appeal handles this important case, which concerns fundamental rights according to Art. 116 EPC, puts the parties of the proceedings, third parties according to Article 10 of the Rules of Procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (RPEBA), and finally the members of the EBoA under unnecessary pressure in view of the complex legal issues to be discussed.


Isarpatent further notes that the interlocutory decision of 17 May has resulted in a substantial reshuffle of the panel a mere five working days before the scheduled oral proceedings and that this has "put the new members under exceptional pressure as they now need to familiarize themselves with the case and discuss the matter with the further Board members within an extremely short period of time."

Accordingly, Isarpatent has requested a postponement of the oral hearing scheduled for 28 May 2021.

In addition to this, Isarpatent has made a whole host of further procedural requests, including a request for interlocutory oral proceedings to deal with its new partiality objections.

In this regard, Isarpatent has requested that Beckedorf be heard as a witness to clarify the roles of Eliasson and Ritzka in the procedure which led to the adoption of the disputed video-conferencing regulation.

They also request the Enlarged Board to provide the parties with copies of the submissions of Beckedorf, Eliasson and Ritzka which are mentioned in the interlocutory decision and to provide information about the members of the "Working group on VICO provision in RPBA", an advisory body which was set up by Josefsson and in which Eliasson and Ritzka are suspected of having participated.

Isarpatent also claims that the selection of Blumer and Bokor as the replacements for Josefsson and Beckedorf was not in conformity with the applicable Rules of Procedure and has requested their replacement "pursuant to Art. 2(1)(b) of the Business Distribution scheme of the Enlarged Board of Appeal".

What is particularly interesting is that on page 21 and 22 of the submission, Isarpatent draws attention to the invisible influence which Josefsson can still exert over the proceedings from behind the scenes.

As already pointed our in the postscriptum to the recent series, Rule 12d(3) of the EPC, introduced by Benoît Battistelli's 2016 "reform", makes all internal members of the Enlarged Board dependent upon Josefsson's goodwill for the purpose of obtaining a positive "opinion" on their reappointment.

This effectively means that all internal members of the reconstituted panel are still beholden to Josefsson despite the fact that he has been officially sidelined from case no. G€ 1/21.

Isarpatent has now had the temerity to point an incriminating finger at this "elephant in the room", and it remains to be seen how the Enlarged Board will react.

All things considered, Isarpatent's submission puts the Enlarged Board in a very difficult situation.

If they choose to take the submission seriously, it's difficult to see how the proceedings scheduled for 28 May 2021 can go ahead as planned.

If they don't, then it's likely to enhance the perception of a "kangaroo court" and confirm suspicions that Josefsson's sidelining on 17 May might just have been a tactical manoeuvre for the sake of "optics".

Watch this space for further updates…

Recent Techrights' Posts

Helping Microsoft 'Hijack' Developers (to Make Them Work for Microsoft, Not the Competition)
VS Code is proprietary spyware of Microsoft. Jack Wallen keeps promoting its use.
 
Outreachy, GSoC-mentors & Debian-Private may soon become public records in federal court
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Links 28/02/2024: Many War Updates and Censorship
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/02/2024: Social Control Media Notifications and Gemini Protocol Extended
Links for the day
Links 28/02/2024: Microsoft the Plagiarist is Projecting, Food Sector Adopts Surge Pricing
Links for the day
Gemini Links 28/02/2024: Groupthink and the 'Problem' With Linux
Links for the day
Android Rising (Windows Down to All-Time Lows, Internationally)
This month was a bloodbath for Microsoft
HexChat Looks for Successors to Keep IRC Growing
IRC is far from dead
[Meme] Just Make Him Happy
Y U no produce more monopolies?
End of a Long February
top 10 posts
[Meme] The EPO's Relationship With Patent Examiners
Nobody is "safe"
New Pension Scheme (NPS) at the European Patent Office Explained at the General Assembly
Investing in the future, or...
Donald Trump & FSFE Matthias Kirschner election denial
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 27, 2024
IRC logs for Tuesday, February 27, 2024
Links 27/02/2024: PlayStation Layoffs and More Oppressive New Laws for Hong Kong
Links for the day
Gemini Links 27/02/2024: Facebook as Containment Field and Depression Driven Development (DDD)
Links for the day
They're Adding Warnings Now: The Site "It's FOSS" is Not FOSS
It's better that they at least explicitly state this
Links 27/02/2024: Nevada Versus End-To-End Encryption, Birmingham Bankrupt
Links for the day
End of an Era
The Web isn't just filled with marketing spam but actual disinformation
[Meme] Onboarding New EPO Staff
You read the patent application and grant within hours
The Legacy Prolific Writers Leave Behind Them
"Free Software Credibility Index" after more than 15 years
The Ongoing Evolutionary Process of News-Reading (or News-Finding) on the World Wide Web
it gets worse
Phoronix in Google News
congratulating or welcoming Embrace, Extend, Extinguish (E.E.E.)
Google Fired Many Employees Working on Google News (Which Had Deteriorated and Became Gulag Noise, Littered and Gamed by Blogspam, Plagiarism, and Chatbot/Translator-Generated Spew), Now Comes the Likely 'Phase-out'
No wonder many yearn for the days of DMOZ and Web directories in general
IRC Proceedings: Monday, February 26, 2024
IRC logs for Monday, February 26, 2024
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
"It's Obvious There's No Future For Any of Us from Blizzard at Microsoft"
The rumours suggest that more Microsoft layoffs are on the way
[Meme] Who's the Boss?
"I thought EPC governed the Office"
Salary Adjustment Procedure (SAP) at the EPO and Why Workers' Salary is Actually Decreasing Each Year (Currency Loses Its Purchasing Power)
outline and update on a years-old blunder
Exposed: FSFE, Legal & Licensing Workshop (LLW), Legal Network & Modern Slavery
Reprinted with permission from Daniel Pocock