EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.12.19

At the EPO Money — Not Quality — is King

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:12 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

EPO FLIERNo. 50

The EPO-FLIER wants to provide staff with uncensored, independent information at times of social conflict

Part 2: Financiers are ruining quality

 

“’I know this would take a lot of planning, but the alternative of rushing the build is far riskier,’ the manager wrote. […] However, Boeing did not slow its rate of production.”1

About 20 years ago, journalist Jerry Useem wrote that “Boeing has always been less a business than an association of engineers devoted to building amazing flying machines.2 In 2015, Boeing nominated a financier as its CEO. Unfortunately, financiers often focus on short-term profits and tend to loot the corporations they run. The Boeing engineers lost power to the financier, who increased prices, laid off workers, reduced quality and spent cash buying back stock – while the company lost its ability to make safe airplanes.

There are many parallels between Boeing and the EPO. A former colleague observed a few years ago that scientists and engineers are always more efficiently led by scientists and engineers3. But the EPO, a public administration whose priorities were once set by the European Patent Convention and implemented by qualified and motivated engineers and scientists, is now in the thrall of bean counters.

The Battistelli administration introduced an anti-career system which generated enormous regular surpluses by reducing salaries and other staff benefits. But these measures ruined the quality of our services. The surpluses have been transferred to the dubious EPOTIF4 investment fund. President Campinos presented a fudged and heavily biased Financial Study to justify the implementation of further cuts in staff benefits.

Similar to the executive team at Boeing, our top management may be quite skilled at generating cash but they seem to understand little about running a public administration. In the past, our activities were focused on delivering high quality search reports and valid patents, now all that matters is increasing output. Production numbers count, not quality.

“’You have a systemic problem in your company. You’re driving profit. You’re not driving quality [...]’” the California Democrat John Garamendi told the Boeing chief executive1.

The EPO is not a company and its budgetary responsibility is not that of a company. Its mission is not to pile up mountains of cash but to serve the public. But the Administrative Council rewards top managers for EPO productivity increases with higher bonuses. The new career system translates these false incentives for managers into false incentives for staff. It has reduced the share of fair pensionable rewards for good work. Now, only (very) high individual output is rewarded – no matter what the quality is. False incentives reward cheating on quality while demotivating everybody who tries to serve the public. As a result, a public service organisation has been turned into a cash-generating machine.

The new career system is not working. It has increased the gap between rewards given to the top producers and the many others who do a good job. Since there is no positive motivation for the majority of staff, the most powerful means left to motivate them is intimidation. The new career system and management by fear have split the staff and destroyed teamwork. Measure 5, as proposed in the EPO’s recently published Financial Measures, would further reduce the share of staff who receive a pensionable reward from 60% to 40%5. These planned additional cuts in benefits will further deteriorate the attractiveness of the EPO as an employer and the quality we deliver to the users of the patent system.

Boeing obtained permission from its regulators to partially certify the safety of its own airplanes. The drive for efficiency led to less safety, which is the major quality aspect of an airplane. At the EPO, the quality of granted patents is measured by the Department Quality Audit (DQA) which reports directly to the president6. In other words, the quality the president is responsible for is certified by himself. And it is the Office which decides who can carry out surveys on applicant satisfaction. Manipulation of the results is easy under the conditions.

Patent applicants have few real alternatives to filing their patent applications with the EPO. That’s why cash continues flowing in. But there is a problem. We are losing our ability to deliver valid patents. If we were in genuine competition, we would lose market share. And if we were to build airplanes, our planes would fall from the sky.

In 2014, when Mr Battistelli led the Office, a former member of our organisation put it like this:

‘”We used to have the spirit of the M.I.T., now we have that of Lehman Brothers”’3

Unfortunately, under President Campinos, the situation continues to deteriorate.

________

3 EPO-FLIER No. 26 Moral compass and management’s loss of it (13.06.2016)

4 From patent office to investment bank? (07.12.2017)

SUEPO proposals on the New Career System (SUEPO Munich, 26.11.2019)

Internal Audit: A New Quality” (CSC, 30.08.2019)

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. [Humour/Meme] Wear the Red Hat as the Open Org Becomes Openwash

    IBM is changing Red Hat and not for the better; sooner or later IBM will become another Microsoft and changing from one to the other will be like swapping 'masters'



  2. IBM is Imposing Non-Free, Privacy-Infringing Tools and Patent Tolls on Red Hat Staff

    There are signs that Red Hat under IBM will be more like assimilation to IBM, not IBM assimilating to the 'Red Hat way' or the so-called 'open org'



  3. They Tell the Free Software Community That It is Racist While Saying Nothing at All About Trump's Racism (Because He Gives Them Government and Military Contracts)

    While their president compares 'foreign' people to a virus (using innuendo, dog whistles and racist rhetoric reminiscent of the Nazi era) the big US corporations (American surveillance giants) turn their attention to rather innocuous words inside people's code (which almost nobody sees anyway)



  4. LibreOffice 'Personal Edition' Seems Like a Marketing and Communication Fluke

    Had LibreOffice developers (and the Document Foundation) communicated these changes more openly, they would have averted/avoided some of the FUD



  5. It Almost Feels Like Microsoft Has Already 'Bought' Canonical

    Canonical's disturbing trajectory and betrayal of the community continue unabated; one can easily get the impression that Ubuntu exists to help Microsoft at some level



  6. Update to GNU Project Bleeding into Microsoft

    Update



  7. Microsoft is Going to Get Tired of Whining About “GAFA” and Accept That It's Just as Bad If Not a Lot Worse at Privacy

    Microsoft is being treated by the US government as if it's not abusing anything, let alone people's privacy; if anything, this demonstrates the degree to which Microsoft infiltrated or 'vendor-captured' regulatory branches



  8. Links 6/7/2020: LibreOffice 7.0 RC1, MX-19.2 KDE Beta 1, Linux 5.8 RC4

    Links for the day



  9. ZDNet's 'Linux' Section: Linux is Full of Problems and It Loves/Embraces Software Patents

    Software patents promotion and GNU/Linux FUD; your daily dosage of 'news' from the tabloid known as ZDNet...



  10. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, July 05, 2020

    IRC logs for Sunday, July 05, 2020



  11. Links 5/7/2020: Slackel 7.3 Mate Beta and GNOME Gingerblue

    Links for the day



  12. Technological Progress? Only If We Assume The Wrong Things...

    When we're told that we're all dumb we're being given increasingly dumb technology (and they tell us dumber is better)



  13. Linux Foundation Still Owned and Controlled Largely -- and More Over Time -- by Surveillance Companies (Openwashing Services for Bad Practices and Bad Actors)

    The Linux Foundation‘s growing role in spying or the focus on data-mining operations is an eternal reminder or warning that the Foundation follows power and money, not freedom or ethics (it began as a salary-paying venture, crowdfunding among large corporations which conduct mass surveillance)



  14. Sharing is Caring, as Those Who Share Usually Care

    Going back to our human roots, people who cooperate and collaborate are vastly more likely to survive and thrive; Free software is almost guaranteed to become the norm when/once everyone demands it (proprietary software is too divisive, supremacist and even racist)



  15. Systems Can Crash and People Can Die by Changing Language (Even in Parameter and Function Space) to Appease Activists

    It seems clear that Intel takes the lead in trying to change Linux not in technical means but purely social means; even when (and where) that can compromise the robustness of the kernel (Intel is nowadays known for profoundly defective chips with back doors)



  16. António Campinos Should Speak to Peasants, Not Litigation Lawyers

    Mr. Campinos does not work for campinos but against campinos; he represents the people who sue or threaten them using ludicrous patents that should never have been granted (e.g. in Ethiopia)



  17. Christine Lambrecht (German Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection) Ignores the Fact That Even Patent Experts Reject the Unitary Patent (UPC)

    The debacle single-handedly caused by and attributable to Christine Lambrecht, who is eager to appease litigation lawyers, is made yet worse by the fact that people in this domain/profession reject what she's trying to ram down people's throats



  18. [Humour] The Linux Foundation is Not Even Using Linux

    The Linux Foundation does not support Linux except in name; it is important to remember that



  19. Microsoft Loves Power

    An explanation of why Microsoft says it loves this and that; Microsoft lacks the capacity to love or to express empathy as it's always about self gratification or coercion, nothing else



  20. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, July 04, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, July 04, 2020



  21. Indoors Society, Shut the Windows

    Times are changing in all sorts of ways; it seems like GNU/Linux and other Free/libre operating systems may emerge as winners when the 'dust settles'



  22. Allegation That Microsoft Adopted the Mentality of Suicide Bombers Against Linux, Leaks Reveal

    Looking at leaked E-mails from around the time Microsoft used Cyanogen as a 'proxy', we're finding some stunning admissions or speculation about the real motivations



  23. [Humour] A Union in Whose Interests?

    The union-busting 'yellow union' (the one that helped Benoît Battistelli marginalise SUEPO) is unable to represent staff any longer



  24. FFPE EPO Has Rendered Itself Obsolete by Liaising With Benoît Battistelli

    FFPE EPO has been left out of staff representation, demonstrating that liaising with the oppressor is a self-deprecating move which must be avoided (the only remaining potent union is SUEPO)



  25. Links 4/7/2020: LibreOffice 7.0 'Personal Edition', Atari VCS Coming Soon

    Links for the day



  26. [Humour/Meme] The 'New' Edge (Chrome Copycat) is Already Dead, So Microsoft is Trying to Just Kill the Competition

    Edge market share is so minuscule that it doesn’t even make it into this chart (it’s in “other”); no wonder Microsoft now bullies Windows users into using it, for users reject it even after months of endless advertising/AstroTurfing and aggressive exploitation/appropriation



  27. Fourth of July in the United Kingdom and the United States

    In these bizarre times Independence Day is still being celebrated, even as so many people are out of work, running out of hope and being fed xenophobia in social control media with a racist 'celebrity' president (the "user in chief")



  28. [Humour] Bigger is Always Better When You're a Deluded Maximalist

    The EPO totally lost sight of its mission; it's just speeding everything up, very carelessly, not minding quality and accuracy/certainty/legal validity



  29. 'Managing Intellectual Property' Managing to Become Uncritical Parrot of EPO Management

    Managing to amplify the EPO's lies isn't hard; one just needs to copy, paste, edit a little; then they call it 'journalism', irrespective of the proven track record of EPO management lying to staff and to the media



  30. IRC Proceedings: Friday, July 03, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, July 03, 2020


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts