EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

12.25.08

The (Microsoft) Nightmare Before Christmas

Posted in Microsoft, Security, Servers, Windows at 11:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

No, not the film

THIS TYPE OF THING happens almost every year. It’s another familiar ‘emergency Christmas’ that may lead to higher blood pressure.

Data in Microsoft Databases Under Threat

Just before the holiday, Microsoft decided to give people fewer reasons to rest well, having recently patched half a dozen critical flaws.

Desktop users running the Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine or SQL Server 2005 Express could be at risk in some circumstances, Microsoft said.

They have been negligent enough not to fix this in 8 months. Microsoft keeps known flaws to itself until it's too late and damage is being done.

Microsoft Corp. today confirmed that it has been working on a critical vulnerability in SQL Server for more than eight months, but declined to say whether it has had a patch ready since September, as an Austrian security researcher has alleged.

Another emergency patch (almost the third in a month [1, 2, 3]) is likely on its way. Microsoft Fanalysts [sic] are explaining the severity of this as well.

News Analysis. Microsoft has warned of a zero-day vulnerability affecting SQL Server. Do take Microsoft’s security advisory seriously.

Remember SQL Server slammer, which struck nearly six years ago? IT administrators were lucky the worm spread a month after Christmas. The new SQL Server vulnerability could bring coal to your Christmas stocking, if left untended.

Scareware and Fakes

There are other new attacks that piggyback on Microsoft.com.

Miscreants are exploiting weaknesses in more than one million webpages operated by the federal government, media companies, and even Microsoft to trick unwitting visitors into installing harmful software that takes over their computers.

More here:

Fake Antivirus Peddlers Helped by Microsoft, IRS

Just weeks after the U.S. Federal Trade Commission shut down two companies accused of selling fake antivirus software, a new player has moved into the market, aided by glitches in the Microsoft and U.S. Internal Revenue Service Web sites.

As always, there are fake greeting cards too, whose harm is only Windows compatible (where “clicking” translates to “executing”, frequently with full system privileges).

A new worm has emerged that could be much worse than the notorious Storm worm, which ruled the botnet world for nearly two years.

Zombies on the Cloud

We wrote extensively about the threat of zombie PCs. Botnets seem to have recruited almost one in two Windows PCs although most nodes in this network remain unused, so the seriousness remains mostly uncovered — for now. 98% of the Windows PCs out there are potentially ripe for hijacking, according to Secunia, so it’s down to the mercy — or wrath — of botmasters.

This has serious ramifications when it comes to security and the United States too can be crushed by botnets, according to this new simulated attack.

US cybersecurity defences fail to thwart mock cyberattack

The basic scenario involved exercises in electronic disruption accompanying a national emergency, a sequence of events played out in Estonia last year and more recently in Georgia. Defenders drew on established defence procedures but these turned out to be inadequate, for reasons not explained in any detail by participants.

Speaking of security, problems may also be introduced by Microsoft’s so-called ‘cloud’ (Azure), which we remarked on in [1, 2, 3, 4].

Amitabh: Microsoft provides a computing infrastructure on which developers can build applications. It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that their applications, content and services comply with applicable laws and do not engage in malicious conduct. For more information refer to http://www.microsoft.com/azure/termswindowsazure.mspx

Looking at that URL:

# Indemnification.

[...]

You agree to indemnify, pay the defense costs of, and hold Microsoft and its successors, officers, directors and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, liabilities, judgments, losses, expenses and damages (including attorneys’ fees)

[...]

# Modifying the Terms.

[...]

Microsoft may at its sole discretion modify this agreement at any time. You can access the most current version of the agreement via the link

That’s not so reassuring. For similar reasons, we constantly warn about Microsoft's so-called "open source" licences. Microsoft totally controls the way they evolve.

International database

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

7 Comments

  1. Bryant said,

    December 25, 2008 at 11:39 am

    Gravatar

    “You agree to indemnify, pay the defense costs of, and hold Microsoft and its successors, officers, directors and employees harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, liabilities, judgments, losses, expenses and damages (including attorneys’ fees)”

    That passage is standard issue in all Terms of Service. The whole point is that if you’re doing something that gets Microsoft sued, Microsoft should have the right to sue you for the legal woes you imposed on them.

    Amazon Web Services has a similar clause:
    http://aws.amazon.com/agreement/#12

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 25, 2008 at 11:43 am

    Gravatar

    Thank you. I did not know this and it’s valuable to bear in mind.

  3. amd-linux said,

    December 25, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Gravatar

    Hey Roy,

    guess you are aware that MS is sponsoring your site? :-)

    I get a large banner ad for MS Office when I view this page – and of course, I HAD to check out what MS office has to offer for a Linux user (just to find out that it still is not much, compared to OO.org and the price tag…) and clicked on it….

    Merry Christmas to verybody, and thanks to MS for sponsoring :-)

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 25, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    Gravatar

    We’re blocking Microsoft and Novell domains, but this doesn’t prevent their channel partners from penetrating through Google. What was the site’s domain? Let us know so that Shane can add it to the blocklist.

  5. Shane Coyle said,

    December 25, 2008 at 12:38 pm

    Gravatar

    Yup, we’re fully aware – we even have reports of Novell ads here from time to time.

    As evidenced by the comments here, we have a regular community of folks from all sides of the Microsoft-Novell deal – supporters, haters, and some who are indifferent or have not yet made up their mind. If Microsoft and Novell wish to try and make their case, they can feel free.

    Please, as always – do not commit click fraud, if you are genuinely interested in an ad, great. If not, (depending on your browser) you may consider an ad blocker or proxy filter setup in order to avoid the ads altogether – that’s what I do.

    Ads are a necessary evil here, we’ve discussed it before and I still can’t see a way around it, we get alot of traffic, and sometimes we melt the servers with some of the stories that get Dugg or Slashdotted.

    Just recently, technocrat.net fell by the wayside due to similar pressures and inviability, and while we are not in danger of that presently, I was close to broke not long ago and may be once again…

  6. Shane Coyle said,

    December 25, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Gravatar

    For the record, novell.com microsoft.com and moreinterop.com should not come through. After that, it became too tedious to filter in Adsense…

  7. Roy Schestowitz said,

    December 25, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    Gravatar

    I didn’t realise that MoreInterop used to sneak in. Heh. “More Interop”… kind of like “More dead” of “F-” (as though standards are a relative thing)

What Else is New


  1. Links 17/8/2019: Unigine 2.9 and Git 2.23

    Links for the day



  2. Computer-Generated Patent Applications Show That Patents and Innovations Are Very Different Things

    The 'cheapening' of the concept of 'inventor' (or 'invention') undermines the whole foundation/basis of the patent system and deep inside patent law firms know it



  3. Concerns About IBM's Commitment to OpenSource.com After the Fall of Linux.com and Linux Journal

    The Web site OpenSource.com is over two decades old; in its current form it's about a decade old and it contains plenty of good articles, but will IBM think so too and, if so, will investment in the site carry on?



  4. Electronic Frontier Foundation Makes a Mistake by Giving Award to Microsoft Surveillance Person

    At age 30 (almost) the Electronic Frontier Foundation still campaigns for privacy; so why does it grant awards to enemies of privacy?



  5. Caturdays and Sundays at Techrights Will Get Busier

    Our plan to spend the weekends writing more articles about Software Freedom; it seems like a high-priority issue



  6. Why Techrights Doesn't Do Social Control Media

    Being managed and censored by platform owners (sometimes their shareholders) isn’t an alluring proposition when a site challenges conformist norms and the status quo; Techrights belongs in a platform of its own



  7. Patent Prosecution Highways and Examination Highways Are Dooming the EPO

    Speed is not a measure of quality; but today's EPO is just trying to get as much money as possible, as fast as possible (before the whole thing implodes)



  8. Software Patents Won't Come Back Just Because They're (Re)Framed/Branded as "HEY HI" (AI)

    The pattern we've been observing in recent years is, patent applicants and law firms simply rewrite applications to make these seem patent-eligible on the surface (owing to deliberate deception) and patent offices facilitate these loopholes in order to fake 'growth'



  9. IP Kat Pays the Price for Being a Megaphone of Team UPC

    The typical or the usual suspects speak out about the so-called 'prospects' (with delusions of inevitability) of the Unified Patent Court Agreement, neglecting to account for their own longterm credibility



  10. Links 17/8/2019: Wine 4.14 is Out, Debian Celebrates 26 years

    Links for the day



  11. Nothing Says 'New' Microsoft Like Microsoft Component Firmware Update (More Hardware Lock-in)

    Vicious old Microsoft is still trying to make life very hard for GNU/Linux, especially in the OEM channel/s, but we're somehow supposed to think that "Microsoft loves Linux"



  12. Bill Gates and His Special Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein Still Stirring Speculations

    Love of the "children" has long been a controversial subject for Microsoft; can Bill Gates and his connections to Jeffrey Epstein unearth some unsavoury secrets?



  13. Links 16/8/2019: Kdevops and QEMU 4.1

    Links for the day



  14. The EPO's War on the Convention on the Grant of European Patents 2000 (EPC 2000), Not Just Brexit, Kills the Unitary Patent (UP/UPC) and Dooms Justice

    Team UPC continues to ignore the utter failures that have led to lawlessness at the EPO, attributing the demise of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) to Brexit alone and pretending that it's not even a problem



  15. Links 15/8/2019: GNOME's Birthday, LLVM 9.0 RC2

    Links for the day



  16. 'Foundation' Hype Spreads in China

    Nonprofits seem to have become more of a business loophole than a charitable endeavour; the problem is, this erodes confidence in legitimate Free software and good causes



  17. Links Are Not Endorsements

    If the only alternative is to say nothing and link to nothing, then we have a problem; a lot of people still assume that because someone links to something it therefore implies agreement and consent



  18. The Myth of 'Professionalism'

    Perception of professionalism, a vehicle or a motivation for making Linux more 'corporate-friendly' (i.e. owned by corporations), is a growing threat to Software Freedom inside Linux, as well as freedom of speech and many other things



  19. Links 14/8/2019: Best Chromebooks, EPEL 8.0, LibreOffice 6.2.6

    Links for the day



  20. Being in Favour of Free/Libre Open Source Software Means Rejecting Software Patents

    Those who believe in Software Freedom cannot at the same time believe that software patents are desirable; we've sadly come to a point where many companies that dominate so-called 'Open Source' groups actively lobby for such patents, in effect betraying the community they claim to be a part of



  21. Links 14/8/2019: Apache Evaluated, HardenedBSD Has New Release

    Links for the day



  22. Planet Python is Being Overrun by Microsoft, Just Like PyCon and Python in General

    Microsoft is perturbing the Free/Open Source software (FOSS) world from the inside, promoting Microsoft's most malicious proprietary software from within that world while taking positions of power in powerful FOSS projects



  23. Coming Soon: The Innards of the Eric Lundgren Case That Microsoft is Desperate to Hide or Spin (by Defaming Lundgren)

    Microsoft is rather stressed about Eric Lundgren coming out of prison and telling how Microsoft put him there; right now Microsoft is mostly name-calling while seeking to control public dialogues



  24. Wrong Person in Charge of the Linux Foundation (and in Charge of Linus Torvalds)

    There are several glaring issues when it comes to the leadership of Linux's steward; for one thing, it lacks actual background in... Linux



  25. 2019 Tech Glossary

    This clavis refers to what the de facto definition may be, based on how (and when) media uses the words nowadays



  26. The Silence of the Media Lamb

    There are reasons that are perfectly legitimate to criticise media which is unable and more so unwilling to cover particular scandals for fear that coverage can be detrimental to the media's owners and sponsors



  27. LINUX.COM Managed by Apple’s MacOS Users, Open Source Managed and Covered by People Who Reject Open Source

    The narratives are being hijacked; people who we're supposed to assume speak for Linux and for Open Source support neither of these things; they're only in it for the money



  28. The Linux Foundation's Open Source Summit is a Proprietary Software Marketing Venue

    The distortion of the term Open Source and promotion of proprietary software such as GitHub shows that the foundation called after “Linux” is actually more of a front group of hostile corporations — large brands and rich people to whom Open Source represents a threat that needs to be controlled



  29. Links 13/8/2019: Mir 1.4 Released, Qt PDF Discussed

    Links for the day



  30. Links 13/8/2019: KDevelop 5.4.1 and DragonFly 5.6.2 Released

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts