EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.25.18

The Litigation ‘Industry’ Pays the Media for ‘Sponsored’ (Paid-for) Articles That Sway Public Opinion on Patent Policy

Posted in America, Courtroom, Deception, Law, Patents at 6:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When these people’s blogs aren’t enough they literally pay lobbyists like Kappos (former USPTO Director) and the media to spread their lies and spin

Kappos in Center for American Progress
Photo credit: Center for American Progress

Summary: The latest twists and spin in media owned by the patent microcosm and media that is simply being ‘bought’ by the patent microcosm to discredit the courts and prop up litigious ‘ideals’

THE USPTO‘s management seems intent and determined to bypass high courts such as the Federal Circuit and SCOTUS (or merely cherry-pick such courts’ decisions). The ITC adopted a similar attitude, whereby it simply disregards decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) after inter partes reviews (IPRs). This is highly problematic because if one branch disregards and disobeys another there’s a state of lawlessness (e.g. granting a patent monopoly/injunction order in spite of it being invalid as per the law/courts).

Yesterday CCIA noted that the Founding Fathers of the United States “were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system,” alluding to a particular vision of it. To quote:

Two hundred and ten years later, in KSR v. Teleflex the Supreme Court reiterated this point, holding that there’s no patentable invention when two known things are combined in the normal way.

So when you hear someone talk about the patent system our Founders created, remember that the Founders were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system. The patent system has the potential to incentivize invention—but when the PTO issues patents on old inventions or when patents are used to threaten ideas that aren’t actually covered by the patent, that potential is left untapped.

Michael Loney at a patent maximalists’ publication meanwhile speaks to a software patents booster about KSR (the above case). He speaks to a patenting professional (for profit, he has a whole blog dedicated to teaching people how to overcome Section 101) Charles Bieneman as if that would shed light on what’s really happening rather than offer illusionary spin. To quote the introduction:

Despite the landmark KSR ruling on obviousness a decade ago, it is still possible to argue inability to combine two references in patent prosecution

Charles Bieneman of Bejin Bieneman describes obviousness as “the oldest topic in patents, but also always the most current topic in patent law”.

Most if not all software patents are pretty obvious if “obviousness” is defined in particular terms. There’s a good reason why algorithms had long been excluded from patentability; that was until the Federal Circuit changed that. Nowadays the Federal Circuit, led by a relatively new chief judge, is undoing this mistake (made decades earlier) and Joseph Herndon has just taken note of another bogus patent biting the dust at PTAB and then at the Federal Circuit because of prior art (neither obviousness or scope). This means that American patent clerks/examiners must improve the examination process; they need more time to study prior art and avoid such mistakes (which can cost millions of dollars in legal bills to correct, with expenses rarely being remediable). In this particular case (Nobel Biocare Services AG v Instradent USA, Inc.) the defendant leveraged prior art/35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rather than 35 U.S.C. § 101 that’s often used to throw away bogus software patents or applications in the US. It’s all about prior art contrary to lies lawyers like to tell. To quote:

Nobel Biocare Services AG appealed from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review (IPR) holding claims 1–5 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,714,977 invalid based on an ABT Catalog. Many issues were presented, and here, we review the opinion with respect to whether the ABT Catalog qualifies as a prior art printed publication under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).

[...]

The Federal Circuit addressed the sufficiency of the corroboration of the testimony and found the testimony of Messrs. Hantman and Chakir not only to be corroborated by each other, but also by a) the actual copy of the ABT Catalog, dated March 2003, submitted as evidence and b) Dr. Fromovich’s testimony that ABT operated a booth at the March 2003 IDS conference.

The fact that Hantman had a copy of the ABT Catalog in his files further corroborates his testimony that he obtained a copy of the same document asserted to be prior art in the IPR.

Thus, although much of the evidence relied upon was based on testimony of biased witnesses regarding events that took place over 10-15 years ago, the Federal Circuit found no reason that the testimony was problematic. As a result, the ABT Catalog was found to be prior art.

The moral of the story is, had examiners done their work properly/better (or had been given more time to do the work thoroughly), years of legal disputes would be spared, leaving ‘poor’ lawyers jobless and actual inventors better off financially.

But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.

“But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.”“The Alice 101 Test Has Turned Patent Claims Into the Legal Equivalent of Schrodinger’s Cat— Derivative Trading Is Both Patentable Subject Matter and Non-Patentable Subject Matter,” Janal Kalis wrote. He’s a patent maximalist. He’s an anti Alice/Section 101 ‘activist’. It’s all about money to these people.

Speaking of propaganda for money, days ago we saw Greater Wilmington Business Journal publishing an article titled “The Battle Over Biotech Inventions”. It didn’t take long to spot the text (in all caps) “SPONSORED CONTENT PROVIDED BY RUSSELL NUGENT – ATTORNEY, THE HUMPHRIES LAW FIRM” (so once again the news reports about patents are literally marketing from law firms that lobby for particular outcomes).

“It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.”Watch this rant about the Federal Circuit: “In essence, patent owners [sic] have been caught in ideological battle between the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – the government body that issues patents – and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – the court that has jurisdiction over most patent appeals, on one side and the U.S. Supreme Court on the other.”

It is not an “ideological battle” (as the “sponsored content” above puts it) but the rule of law versus dodgy (self-serving) officials like Iancu, who were elevated by Donald Trump after they had worked for him. The whole thing is quite sickening and seeing that the press is nowadays composed (for a fee) by patent law firms discredits the media in general. It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 19/9/2019: German Federal Ministry of the Interior Wants FOSS, Top Snaps Named

    Links for the day



  2. Buying the Voices of 'Linux' People to Repeat Microsoft's Talking Points While Removing Our Icons and Leaders (Calling Them Sexist)

    The dirty games leveraged by several companies including Microsoft target charismatic people who are essential for morale and leadership; these tactics aren't particularly novel



  3. When the EPO Sees Itself as Above European Law, Grants Patents in Defiance of the EPC (Its Founding Document) and Violates Staff's Labour Rights/Protections (International Law)

    The absurd state of affairs at the EPO has reached the point where laws at every level are being violated and even judges are being threatened or vainly ignored; the EU is belatedly trying to tackle these issues, which have actually cost its credibility a great deal and threaten the perception of Rule of Law at multiple levels



  4. Links 19/9/2019: Samba 4.11.0 and Kubernetes 1.16

    Links for the day



  5. Update on Koch v EPO: Internal Appeals Committee (IAC) Composition Still Likely Illegal

    An important EPO case, concerning a dismissed staff representative, shows what ILO-AT and the EPO's Internal Appeals Committee boil down to



  6. Links 18/9/2019: Fedora Linux 31 Beta, PCLinuxOS 2019.09 Update

    Links for the day



  7. Links 17/9/2019: CentOS 7.7 and Funtoo Linux 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  8. EPO is Not European

    Internationalists and patent trolls are those who stand to benefit from the 'globalisation' of low-quality and law-breaking patents such as patents on algorithms, nature and life itself; the EPO isn't equipped to serve its original goals anymore



  9. The EPO's Central Staff Committee and SUEPO (Staff Union) Respond to “Fascist Bills” Supported by EPO President António Campinos

    Raw material pertaining to the latest Campinos "scandal"; what Campinos said, what the Central Staff Committee (CSC) said, and what SUEPO said



  10. Storm Brewing in the European Patent Office After a Hot Summer

    Things aren't rosy in EPOnia (to say the least); in fact, things have been getting a lot worse lately, but the public wouldn't know judging by what media tells the public (almost nothing)



  11. Why I Once Called for Richard Stallman to Step Down

    Guest post from the developer who recently authored "Getting Stallman Wrong Means Getting The 21st Century Wrong"



  12. As Richard Stallman Resigns Let's Consider Why GNU/Linux Without Stallman and Torvalds Would be a Victory to Microsoft

    Stallman has been ejected after a lot of intentionally misleading press coverage; this is a dark day for Software Freedom



  13. Links 16/9/2019: GNU Linux-libre 5.3, GNU World Order 13×38, Vista 10 Breaks Itself Again

    Links for the day



  14. Links 16/9/2019: Qt Quick on Vulkan, Metal, and Direct3D; BlackWeb 1.2 Reviewed

    Links for the day



  15. Richard Stallman's Controversial Views Are Nothing New and They Distract From Bill Gates' Vastly Worse Role

    It's easier to attack Richard Stallman (RMS) using politics (than using his views on software) and media focus on Stallman's personal views on sexuality bears some resemblance to the push against Linus Torvalds, which leans largely on the false perception that he is sexist, rude and intolerant



  16. Links 16/9/2019: Linux 5.3, EasyOS Releases, Media Backlash Against RMS

    Links for the day



  17. Openwashing Report on Open Networking Foundation (ONF): When Open Source Means Collaboration Among Giant Spying Companies

    Massive telecommunications oligopolies (telecoms) are being described as ethical and responsible by means of openwashing; they even have their own front groups for that obscene mischaracterisation and ONF is one of those



  18. 'Open Source' You Cannot Run Without Renting or 'Licensing' Windows From Microsoft

    When so-called ‘open source’ programs strictly require Vista 10 (or similar) to run, how open are they really and does that not redefine the nature of Open Source while betraying everything Free/libre software stands for?



  19. All About Control: Microsoft is Not Open Source But an Open Source Censor/Spy and GitHub/LinkedIn/Skype Are Its Proprietary Censorship/Surveillance Tools

    All the big companies which Microsoft bought in recent years are proprietary software and all of the company’s big products remain proprietary software; all that “Open Source” is to Microsoft is “something to control and censor“



  20. The Sad State of GNU/Linux News Sites

    The ‘media coup’ of corporate giants (that claim to be 'friends') means that history of GNU/Linux is being distorted and lied about; it also explains prevalent lies such as "Microsoft loves Linux" and denial of GNU/Free software



  21. EPO President Along With Bristows, Managing IP and Other Team UPC Boosters Are Lobbying for Software Patents in Clear and Direct Violation of the EPC

    A calm interpretation of the latest wave of lobbying from litigation professionals, i.e. people who profit when there are lots of patent disputes and even expensive lawsuits which may be totally frivolous (for example, based upon fake patents that aren't EPC-compliant)



  22. Links 15/9/2019: Radeon ROCm 2.7.2, KDE Frameworks 5.62.0, PineTime and Bison 3.4.2

    Links for the day



  23. Illegal/Invalid Patents (IPs) Have Become the 'Norm' in Europe

    Normalisation of invalid patents (granted by the EPO in defiance of the EPC) is a serious problem, but patent law firms continue to exploit that while this whole 'patent bubble' lasts (apparently the number of applications will continue to decrease because the perceived value of European Patents diminishes)



  24. Patent Maximalists, Orbiting the European Patent Office, Work to 'Globalise' a System of Monopolies on Everything

    Monopolies on just about everything are being granted in defiance of the EPC and there are those looking to make this violation ‘unitary’, even worldwide if not just EU-wide



  25. Unitary Patent (UPC) Promotion by Team Battistelli 'Metastasising' in Private Law Firms

    The EPO's Albert Keyack (Team Battistelli) is now in Team UPC as Vice President of Kilburn & Strode LLP; he already fills the media with lies about the UPC, as one can expect



  26. Microsoft Targets GNU/Linux Advocates With Phony Charm Offensives and Fake 'Love'

    The ways Microsoft depresses GNU/Linux advocacy and discourages enthusiasm for Software Freedom is not hard to see; it's worth considering and understanding some of these tactics (mostly assimilation-centric and love-themed), which can otherwise go unnoticed



  27. Proprietary Software Giants Tell Open Source 'Communities' That Proprietary Software Giants Are 'Friends'

    The openwashing services of the so-called 'Linux' Foundation are working; companies that are inherently against Open Source are being called "Open" and some people are willing to swallow this bait (so-called 'compromise' which is actually surrender to proprietary software regimes)



  28. Microsoft Pays the Linux Foundation for Academy Software Foundation, Which the Linux Foundation is Outsourcing to Microsoft

    Microsoft has just bought some more seats and more control over Free/Open Source software; all it had to do was shell out some 'slush funds'



  29. Links 14/9/2019: SUSE CaaS Platform, Huawei Laptops With GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  30. Links 13/9/2019: Catfish 1.4.10, GNOME Firmware 3.34.0 Release

    Links for the day


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts