EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.25.18

The Litigation ‘Industry’ Pays the Media for ‘Sponsored’ (Paid-for) Articles That Sway Public Opinion on Patent Policy

Posted in America, Courtroom, Deception, Law, Patents at 6:29 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When these people’s blogs aren’t enough they literally pay lobbyists like Kappos (former USPTO Director) and the media to spread their lies and spin

Kappos in Center for American Progress
Photo credit: Center for American Progress

Summary: The latest twists and spin in media owned by the patent microcosm and media that is simply being ‘bought’ by the patent microcosm to discredit the courts and prop up litigious ‘ideals’

THE USPTO‘s management seems intent and determined to bypass high courts such as the Federal Circuit and SCOTUS (or merely cherry-pick such courts’ decisions). The ITC adopted a similar attitude, whereby it simply disregards decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) after inter partes reviews (IPRs). This is highly problematic because if one branch disregards and disobeys another there’s a state of lawlessness (e.g. granting a patent monopoly/injunction order in spite of it being invalid as per the law/courts).

Yesterday CCIA noted that the Founding Fathers of the United States “were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system,” alluding to a particular vision of it. To quote:

Two hundred and ten years later, in KSR v. Teleflex the Supreme Court reiterated this point, holding that there’s no patentable invention when two known things are combined in the normal way.

So when you hear someone talk about the patent system our Founders created, remember that the Founders were themselves frequently quite skeptical of that patent system. The patent system has the potential to incentivize invention—but when the PTO issues patents on old inventions or when patents are used to threaten ideas that aren’t actually covered by the patent, that potential is left untapped.

Michael Loney at a patent maximalists’ publication meanwhile speaks to a software patents booster about KSR (the above case). He speaks to a patenting professional (for profit, he has a whole blog dedicated to teaching people how to overcome Section 101) Charles Bieneman as if that would shed light on what’s really happening rather than offer illusionary spin. To quote the introduction:

Despite the landmark KSR ruling on obviousness a decade ago, it is still possible to argue inability to combine two references in patent prosecution

Charles Bieneman of Bejin Bieneman describes obviousness as “the oldest topic in patents, but also always the most current topic in patent law”.

Most if not all software patents are pretty obvious if “obviousness” is defined in particular terms. There’s a good reason why algorithms had long been excluded from patentability; that was until the Federal Circuit changed that. Nowadays the Federal Circuit, led by a relatively new chief judge, is undoing this mistake (made decades earlier) and Joseph Herndon has just taken note of another bogus patent biting the dust at PTAB and then at the Federal Circuit because of prior art (neither obviousness or scope). This means that American patent clerks/examiners must improve the examination process; they need more time to study prior art and avoid such mistakes (which can cost millions of dollars in legal bills to correct, with expenses rarely being remediable). In this particular case (Nobel Biocare Services AG v Instradent USA, Inc.) the defendant leveraged prior art/35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rather than 35 U.S.C. § 101 that’s often used to throw away bogus software patents or applications in the US. It’s all about prior art contrary to lies lawyers like to tell. To quote:

Nobel Biocare Services AG appealed from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review (IPR) holding claims 1–5 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 8,714,977 invalid based on an ABT Catalog. Many issues were presented, and here, we review the opinion with respect to whether the ABT Catalog qualifies as a prior art printed publication under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).

[...]

The Federal Circuit addressed the sufficiency of the corroboration of the testimony and found the testimony of Messrs. Hantman and Chakir not only to be corroborated by each other, but also by a) the actual copy of the ABT Catalog, dated March 2003, submitted as evidence and b) Dr. Fromovich’s testimony that ABT operated a booth at the March 2003 IDS conference.

The fact that Hantman had a copy of the ABT Catalog in his files further corroborates his testimony that he obtained a copy of the same document asserted to be prior art in the IPR.

Thus, although much of the evidence relied upon was based on testimony of biased witnesses regarding events that took place over 10-15 years ago, the Federal Circuit found no reason that the testimony was problematic. As a result, the ABT Catalog was found to be prior art.

The moral of the story is, had examiners done their work properly/better (or had been given more time to do the work thoroughly), years of legal disputes would be spared, leaving ‘poor’ lawyers jobless and actual inventors better off financially.

But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.

“But of course those lawyers will just carry on whining and whining (we’ll say more about it in the weekend) because no amount of patents and lawsuits is ever enough for them.”“The Alice 101 Test Has Turned Patent Claims Into the Legal Equivalent of Schrodinger’s Cat— Derivative Trading Is Both Patentable Subject Matter and Non-Patentable Subject Matter,” Janal Kalis wrote. He’s a patent maximalist. He’s an anti Alice/Section 101 ‘activist’. It’s all about money to these people.

Speaking of propaganda for money, days ago we saw Greater Wilmington Business Journal publishing an article titled “The Battle Over Biotech Inventions”. It didn’t take long to spot the text (in all caps) “SPONSORED CONTENT PROVIDED BY RUSSELL NUGENT – ATTORNEY, THE HUMPHRIES LAW FIRM” (so once again the news reports about patents are literally marketing from law firms that lobby for particular outcomes).

“It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.”Watch this rant about the Federal Circuit: “In essence, patent owners [sic] have been caught in ideological battle between the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) – the government body that issues patents – and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – the court that has jurisdiction over most patent appeals, on one side and the U.S. Supreme Court on the other.”

It is not an “ideological battle” (as the “sponsored content” above puts it) but the rule of law versus dodgy (self-serving) officials like Iancu, who were elevated by Donald Trump after they had worked for him. The whole thing is quite sickening and seeing that the press is nowadays composed (for a fee) by patent law firms discredits the media in general. It’s all about money (legal bills), not about innovation or science or technology or whatever.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 23/2/2020: PipeWire 0.3 and Osu!

    Links for the day



  2. FSF's Interim Co-President Alexandre Oliva on Being Cancelled

    It was reading this that I realized I’d been cancelled myself. In my case, I was painted misogynist and transphobic, and for a post in which I supported women but denounced a crowd of men twisting the feminist cause, that I share, to attack rms, as if he wasn’t a feminist himself; and in which I express curiosity as to what pronoun to use to refer to zero women to paint me as someone who disregards gender identities and their pronouns.



  3. Good People Need to Run for Free Software Foundation (FSF) Board Positions After an FSF Coup Threw in the Towel, Pushing Out the Founder

    "I have been hit, but not knocked out, and my campaign for free software is not over." --Richard Stallman, October 2019



  4. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, February 22, 2020

    IRC logs for Saturday, February 22, 2020



  5. Alexandre Oliva's Message About Cancel Culture at the FSF

    Being cancelled is no fun. In my case, it was for standing for a friend who got canceled for defending someone else from an accusation that was later proven false.



  6. Links 22/2/2020: Polish Government Increases GNU/Linux Use, Samza 1.3.1

    Links for the day



  7. Being Rich Does Not Imply Being Smart (Especially When One is Born Into Wealth)

    Presenting the 'genius' (college dropout, but that does not matter when the yardstick of wisdom is wealth alone), with his own predictions overlaid on top of his photo from the show of Bloomberg (another 'genius' whose supposed brilliance is measured using money alone)



  8. The Rise and Fall of Free Software

    "We simply need to make the movement less corporate, and more grassroots."



  9. Why You Should Adopt Debian 10, Not Vista 10 (Windows Vista With Microsoft's Latest Surveillance Add-ons)

    A little personal story and recommendation of Debian "Buster" (10) or Devuan (whose developers persist)



  10. Ethics by Exclusion

    It's the same old philosophical question; can excluding those who are perceived to be intolerant be seen as an act of tolerance?



  11. Even Worse Than Microsoft Inside the Board of the OSI

    The OSI has accepted people from companies that actively attack Software Freedom and there may be more on their way



  12. ZDNet Continues to Stuff Its 'Linux' Section With Proprietary Software of Microsoft

    The above is what the "Linux" section of ZDNet is going to look like throughout the weekend (and this is hardly unusual, either)



  13. IRC Proceedings: Friday, February 21, 2020

    IRC logs for Friday, February 21, 2020



  14. Links 21/2/2020: EasyOS 2.2.11 Released, Microsoft's Control of the Linux Foundation Increases and More Binary Blobs Arrive

    Links for the day



  15. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, February 20, 2020

    IRC logs for Thursday, February 20, 2020



  16. Video: LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman

    LinuxWorld 1999, Torvalds and Stallman



  17. GNU World Order is a Personal Sacrifice, LinuxWorld Just Business

    As the Linux Foundation shows, Linux is just business (and proprietary software) as usual, software patents included, whereas it’s GNU that continues the Free Software Movement’s battles



  18. Links 20/2/2020: Oracle Solaris 11.4 SRU18, Mesa 20, VirtualBox 6.1.4

    Links for the day



  19. Open Source Did Not Win, It Was Assimilated to and by Proprietary Software

    Don’t fall for the whole “Open Source has won!” spiel; You know we’ve lost the battle (and were in effect gradually conquered) at OSI and elsewhere when those who speak for the OSI are Michael Cheng (Facebook), Max Sills (Google), and Chris Aniszczyk (Linux Foundation); they say “Open Source Under Attack” (FOSDEM talk) but their employers are the ones attacking and they downplay openwashing



  20. Former Microsoft Employees Don't Like Talking About Past and Present Microsoft Back Doors (Designed for Spy Agencies)

    In a typical Microsoftian fashion, once they cannot defend the illusion/delusion that Microsoft values security the 'Softers' run away and block any further debate



  21. Techrights Warns Against Impending Extradition Efforts (Passage of Julian Assange to His Death in the United States)

    Imprisonment of journalists who are effective at exposing crimes (of the powerful, not petty crimes) must never be condoned



  22. Team UPC: Many Mouths and No Ears

    The mental condition of Team UPC gets more worrisome by the week



  23. Team UPC Insults Judges Because the UPC is Dead and UPC Lobbyists Have Nothing Left to Lose

    More judge-shaming tactics are in the mix; Team UPC seems to feel like there's nothing left to lose as the UPC is already dead (hope itself is next to die)



  24. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, February 19, 2020

    IRC logs for Wednesday, February 19, 2020



  25. China Bashing is Grounded in Fear (That They Can Simply Do Better Than the West)

    The atmosphere of hate towards China — fuelled partly by a white supremacist in the White House — is unhelpful and insulting; dignity and understanding is the way to go



  26. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, February 18, 2020

    IRC logs for Tuesday, February 18, 2020



  27. FFII Press Release: Germany Can No Longer Ratify the Unitary Patent Due to Brexit and the Established AETR Case-law, says FFII

    Germany cannot ratify the current Unitary Patent due to Brexit and the established AETR case-law. The ratification of the UPC (Unified Patent Court) by Germany would constitute a violation of the AETR case-law, which was used during the EPLA negotiations in 2006 to consider a deal with non-EU countries, such as Switzerland.



  28. DRM (Proprietary Software) Already Makes Mozilla Firefox Broken, Unreliable, Undependable (Dependent on Binary Blobs)

    More people are beginning to realise that Mozilla resorted to self-harming DRM and self-inflicted damage that impacts Firefox; can Mozilla (re)join the anti-DRM coalitions?



  29. EPO and Other Patent Updates Over RSS

    Site syndication (over RSS feeds or XML/Atom) is vastly better than what became popular in recent years (censored, centralised, discriminatory "Social Control Media"); here are some feeds of interest



  30. When It Comes to a Unitary Patent System, Bad (or Intentionally Dishonest) Legal Advice Has Become the Norm

    The Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent (UPC and UP, respectively) reinforce the old saying about lawyers being liars, doing anything to attract clients (to take their money); the UPC is basically dead, but fiction, falsehoods and outrageous fantasies still find their way into Web sites of law firms


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts