Bonum Certa Men Certa

Qt is Shooting Itself in the Foot With Licensing Changes

Video download link



Summary: Qt's assumption that developers would walk along regardless of licence changes (in Qt6 and prior LTS releases) is hugely misguided and plainly wrong; one need only consider what was said about Qt back when it was proprietary software

THE LATEST move from Qt (the company) is as worrying as prior plans, which Qt outlined in its mailing lists while issuing (after backlash) face-saving statements for the Free software community (trying to pacify key critics).



"Perhaps it's assuming that locking bugfixes and/or stable releases behind paywalls would make the company richer; in reality, however, it'll mean less inertia (many developers walking away)."The debian-private archives reveal the level of hostility towards Qt when it was proprietary software, as do the latest responses, which include last night's Phoronix article and its comments.

Qt needs to tread carefully. Perhaps it's assuming that locking bugfixes and/or stable releases behind paywalls would make the company richer; in reality, however, it'll mean less inertia (many developers walking away). In this video I explain why I think Qt makes a fundamental strategic mistake; Free software is becoming the norm, so for Qt to move in the other direction (back to its roots) would only be a short-term strategy -- a strategy which would, over the long run, reduce the userbase of Qt and drive developers away.

As Ryan put it moments ago in our IRC channel: "Absolutely nobody is going to accept Qt like this, where version 6 doesn't even work and the LTS stable releases are proprietary. You can't base Free Software on any version in that case, unless someone forks the LTS series."

Developers like yours truly (I've used Qt and GTK, among other toolkits) don't want to rewrite everything from scratch and reinvent the wheel (e.g. scroll wheel support). So we rely on frameworks. Qt has just become a helluva lot less attractive. No amount of technical merit will compensate for legal uncertainty.

"Most of the business plans around Qt failed to materialize," Ryan has just explained, "and it's changed hands many times." Until there will be nothing left to change hands?

"There's some commercial products using Qt," Ryan concludes, "but it's going to be hard to convince them to adopt newer versions or base anything else on it at this point. The logical thing to do is for those users to contribute to the fork so that they can be sure it continues to serve their needs."

Recent Techrights' Posts

The Register MS: "AI" More Than 80 Times in One Article. But It's Not an Article, It's Sponsored Keyword-stuffed Page.
The Register MS is being paid to actively promoted this scheme
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, July 09, 2026
IRC logs for Thursday, July 09, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, July 08, 2026
IRC logs for Wednesday, July 08, 2026
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, July 07, 2026
IRC logs for Tuesday, July 07, 2026
Links 07/07/2026: Microsoft Cuts Doom "id Software" and Turkey Detains Journalists
Links for the day
Gemini Links 07/07/2026: Old Computer Challenge (OCC) and Hardware Tests
Links for the day
A Break From the Routine
What matters is what whistleblowers keep feeding information to us
SLAPP Censorship - Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But Have a Strong Community
Techrights compensates for its fiscal poverty with a wealth of community spirit
European Patent Office (EPO) Series: Czech Mate: EPO Kingmaker or Merely a Pawn in the Game?
recent "missions" of the EPO President
Fame is Not the Goal
"Fame" kills
Mental Health in Free Software Communities
clearly there is a subject that merits debate and it ought not be a taboo anymore
The Era of Sponsored Spam
There is no "era of AI", there is era of BRIBES to PRETEND there is an "era of AI"