EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS


Intel Sabotages Linux-based OLPC, Microsoft Wants to Hijack OLPC (with Windows)

Posted in Bill Gates, GNU/Linux, Hardware, Microsoft, OLPC, Windows at 1:10 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“When you taunt the referee, he usually watches you even more closely. That’s what happened to Microsoft, whose “up yours!” attitude toward the Department of Justice has inspired investigators to dig even deeper. Now they’re looking at Microsoft’s efforts to take over Java. These relentless investigations sap Microsoft, and distract the DOJ from worse dangers such as Intel. And Microsoft’s childish, insulting behavior is largely to blame.”

Jesse Berst

This is definitely an off-topic post, but recent developments are too hard to ignore and leave alone without comment. Here’s just quick pointer to another new antitrust investigation of Intel.

New York state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has launched an antitrust investigation of Intel, after his office served a wide-ranging subpoena on the chip giant.

Cuomo is investigating whether Intel violated state and federal antitrust laws by coercing customers to exclude its main rival, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), from the worldwide market for PC central processing units (CPUs), Cuomo said in a news release.

The subpoena seeks information on Intel’s pricing practices and possible attempts to exclude competitors through its market power, Cuomo’s office said.

As you may recall, Intel dumped Classmates (covering their cost) just to drive OLPC out of the market. Do refresh your memory by looking at previous articles about Intel's case against Linux as a whole, not just Linux-powered OLPCs. This includes combating planned deployments of GNU/Linux in China and Russia, along with Microsoft.

Intel likes Linux only where money is involved. It strives to maintain hardware dominance and high profits regardless of the software which uses the hardware. To Intel, Linux is bad news, for reasons that Glyn Moody explained just a few days ago.

I’ve noted before that Microsoft is in difficulty over the ultra-mobile machines like the Asus EEE PC; now it seems that the other half of the Wintel duopoly is also in trouble because of the new triple-P (price, performance and power) demands these systems make….

This OLPC-Intel issue is already covered pretty well in Groklaw, so it requires little or no unique comments and interpretation elsewhere. I happen to have discussed this in Groklaw personally. Here is something that came up in the the midst of one conversation:

IIRC during the late 1990s Intel would threaten motherboard makers that if they made boards which supported AMD’s athlon they would get their engineering samples and documentation late, it took ages for any motherboards to appear which supported the athlon and the first ones were from small makers, then I think ASUS made a board but left their brand off the silkscreen possible to avoid a backlash from Intel. Intel knows the cost of building FABS and appears to be on a starve AMD of market volume thereby depriving them of funds to build their next FAB mission. This means that Intel will always be one or more generations ahead in process technology, this is a big thing in this industry.

The few articles I found are speculation but hardly unfounded Toms hardware Athlon MB review And another one

Tomshardware Athlon motherboard review 2 The reluctance of motherboard manufacturers to take up and promote the new AMD products even though they were technically superior at the time is telling.

The more terrible news comes as a correct assessment from Bruce Perens

Why Microsoft Must Control One Laptop Per Child

It’s a threat Microsoft can’t let stand: the entire third world learning Linux as children, and growing up to use it. And Microsoft is going to get its way.

It comes after a sudden wave of SCO-like problems for the OLPC project. A specious patent lawsuit over keyboards. Board-member Intel thrown out of the project for attempting to convince national governments to drop OLPC purchases and go with its own (Windows) product. First, OLPC is shown what its problems will be if it doesn’t cooperate with Microsoft. Then, Microsoft approaches with money and technical help – you just have to run Windows to get it.


Unfortunately, I don’t believe that Microsoft’s intent toward the OLPC project is at all benign. They will promote their OLPC software load for DRM-locked content with the help of proprietary publishers who are threatened enough by open content to throw some zero cost but DRM locked e-books to the third world. If they can get governments to commit to the DRM-locked content on your platform, a non-Microsoft OS is going to be out of the race.

Also, nobody who wants an open platform for the third world is being “religious” about it, promoting sound public policy is not religion. I’m really tired of hearing that old saw brought up, please stop it.

According to Microsoft’s OLPC team, which is responsible for “addicting” children to Windows (to use Bill Gates' own terminology), Windows will come to OLPC later this year.

Between Microsoft employees and third party contractors that we have brought into the effort, we have over 40 engineers working full-time on the port. We started the project around the beginning of the year and think it will be mid-2008 at the earliest before we could have a production-quality release.

Do not be surprised if the Gates Foundation later steps in. It will probably become the Sugar Daddy that “saves the day” for OLPC, provided it runs Microsoft Windows. Yesterday, calls were made for an abusive spouse (Intel) to return to the project. Will OLPC end up being just another Wintel laptop after so much corruption, manipulation and sheer abuse of volunteers? Can the world ever accept so much evil? More importantly, will the world be told the true story?

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one


  1. Pandu Rao said,

    January 11, 2008 at 1:31 am


    I am disappointed to hear that Microsoft is “helping” OLPC to bring XP to the XO.


    Here is my comment in its entirety:

    Pandu Rao said,
    January 10, 2008 @ 10:50 pm

    I have read Bruce’s article, your points and his counterpoints.

    I am afraid I have to agree with Bruce here.

    Having grown up in a developing country without access to computing resources, then having gone on the acquire them, I can vouch for the difference it made to my life and that of those around me.

    I can also vouch for the difference that Free Software made.

    Anyway, I meant to write in to OLPC with questions about Microsoft’s involvement. So here goes:

    1. This collaboration with Microsoft (to whatever extent), did they approach OLPC or was it the other way around?

    2. When did Microsoft first offer to help with the OLPC project? When the idea was first conceived? During the prototype phase? Or well after the prototype was proven?

    3. What is the point of Microsoft releasing the specifications publicly? The hardware is OLPC and those specifications are public anyway. As for what they release, what is it good for other than running XP?

    4. “…we don’t wind up with walled gardens”. You mean the kind they built with OEM licensing contracts? How did you miss the irony here?

    If Microsoft would have done a port without the involvement of the OLPC organization, it would have been obvious that it is trying to muscle its way into the third world. By collaborating with Microsoft, you offer a veneer of legitimacy to the effort.

    I am very disappointed with the fact that OLPC is using Microsoft resources in the XO effort.

    I have donated (not g1g1) one XO laptop early in December last year. The fact that XO runs Free Software is what convinced me to contribute to it. I saw a chance for next generation in developing countries to grow up with access to computing resources regardless of their financial capacity. This is in stark contrast to Microsoft’s corporate goals.

    I hate to say this, but if I had known about Microsoft’s involvement earlier, I might have simply donated my money to the Free Software Foundation instead.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 11, 2008 at 1:52 am


    Both Apple and Microsoft offered their platforms for OLPC (Steve Jobs said OS X would be free), but Nick declines. He said, just as you did, that it was not the goal of the project. Over time, Nick seems to have lost some spine, due to Microsoft’s and Intel’s secret, coordinated, and heartless acts of sabotage (I have watched this closely for years). Nick then changed his definition of openness and project goals. Like yourself, I would be disappointed if the hundreds of hours I sacrificed to help OLPC were merely helping the LARGEST DIGITAL IMPRISONMENT CAMPAIGN EVER KNOWN TO HUMAN KIND.

    I’d rather see OLPC dead than see if serving such corporate agenda.

    I will end this with a quote

    “They’ll get sort of addicted [poor Chinese people], and then we’ll somehow figure out how to collect sometime in the next decade.”

    Bill Gates, pseudo-philantroist, secret owner of the media

    OLPC must not become part of the ‘drug dealers cartel’. It can do better than this.

    “Get me into that and goddam, we’ll make so much money!”

    Bill Gates, pseudo-philantroist, secret owner of the media

  3. SubSonica said,

    January 11, 2008 at 3:39 am


    Another fragment of Bruce Perens insightful asessment:

    Nobody can pretend that the world has ever been absent any choice to run Microsoft software, or that Microsoft must work with OLPC to increase choice. Microsoft operating systems are the only option offered with the vast majority of desktop and server computers. By refusing to tolerate hardware that runs another OS by default, Microsoft is working to reduce choice.

    Microsoft will try to harm any such initiative, but fortunately, sooner or later, Gnu/Linux will break the floodgates of the pre-installed OEM OS, a field in which Microsoft has managed to keep a tight grip through strongarm business practices throughout 20 years -and wich is the fundamental pillar that ciments its overwhelming market monopoly over desktop OS-
    Either it will be a big OEM challenging Microsoft, maybe Dell initiative will catch maybe someone other’s, there is the Asus EEEPC, there is the Shuttle sub-200$ computer… Microsoft can try -and will doubtlessly try- to damage any of such initiative, but sooner or later one of them will be sucessful, thus quickly eroding Microsoft main pillar. It is shameful -and illustrative of Microsoft’s weakness and ethics (lack of) – that Microsoft is by no way trying to compete but trying to hijack and taking on a non-for-profit project that is focused on childs and education and not a business enterprise, though. Intel should be ashamed as well.

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 11, 2008 at 3:58 am


    Just so that you know, Microsoft’s OEM chief quit the company a couple of months ago. He quit quietly.

    For those who are not aware of the illegal tactics used to pressure OEMs, here’s a set of good links.

    I frequently thanked Bruce for criticising Novell (and taking heavy fire for it). Again, I wish to thank him for slamming both Microsoft and Intel for their predatory (and illegal) behavior. He is among the top 50 most influential people in technology, according to one ladder (surpassing even Linus Torvalds), so people will listen to him. We need figures of authority (Nicholas also) to speak out. Press coverage of this story has been a total disaster, and not surprisingly so.

  5. SubSonica said,

    January 11, 2008 at 3:59 am


    Moreover, the aim should be to completely unbundle Microsoft Windows and the Hardware, for the better general health of the whole IT business (yes, including Microsoft), and not the opposite:



  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 11, 2008 at 4:37 am


    It’s a tough day today.

    From a link in Groklaw

    Yes, we’ve been meeting with Microsoft about their XP port. OLPC has not dedicated resources to this work. We are not contributing engineering time to it, considering it as part of our strategy, or getting ready to replace Sugar. The extent of our involvement is having several meetings with the Microsoft staff and allowing a Microsoft-paid technical writer to work from our offices in order to produce specifications that will aid the port — on the condition that the specifications are also released publicly (they’re being posted to our wiki.)

    The meetings are important. Microsoft decided to do a port, and they would have done it with us or without us — but they did something remarkable: they asked us to work with them so we don’t wind up with walled gardens. They did not set out merely to make XP boot on the XO and declare victory; they actually want to partake in as much of our learning philosophy as they can. They won’t make XP open source, but they’re building mesh support, going to great lengths to support our security and theft deterrence model, and working on allowing Sugar and Windows XOs to collaborate and share seamlessly.

    The folks running this work on the Microsoft side are good people. They have left no doubt in my mind that they believe in what we’re doing and want to play along. I am also confident we have made the right decision at OLPC by embracing their work instead of stonewalling it.

    To set the dual-boot issue straight: Microsoft has not been working on an actual, side-by-side dual-boot system. We’re jointly making it possible to install XP on an arbitrary XO — subject to the constraints of the Bitfrost theft deterrence system — and then convert the machine back to Linux easily. I have made it clear that the XP port will not receive my security signoff without this Linux rollback feature, and have no reason to believe it won’t be implemented.

    One commonly-forgotten truth about OLPC is that our commitment to open source and free software isn’t religious, but pragmatic — we believe Linux and Sugar constitute a better software platform and, much more importantly, a better learning platform. Our existing customers agree, and we think new ones will continue to make the right decision while being reassured by the availability of Windows as a fall-back.

    Also via Groklaw:

    A team of Microsoft people flew out to Cambridge, Mass. to meet with engineers from the OLPC Foundation yesterday….I have to say I like these guys. They all seem like smart platform people, which is the type of people I seem to have worked with off and on for about 20 years now. In fact, it turns out that the OLPC’s CFO, Chuck Kane, worked with me at Stratus Computer back around 1990.

    We had a good discussion and left the meeting feeling positive about the day. We still have a lot of work to do before we make a final decision around our plans for the XO, but all in all it was a good day.

    For those who wonder, it’s ALL VAPORWARE. By the time you add pseudo ‘security’ to it, no resources are left. It may be a tactic for freezing the market, just like that lawsuit in Nigeria.

    Should people like Bruce B. not feel embarrassed to write articles that say “Microsoft doesn’t matter”? See what Beranger.org says about this ‘bury your head in the sand’ approach. I can’t quote or link to it simply because it’s too offensive.

  7. SubSonica said,

    January 11, 2008 at 8:21 am


    Yet another candidate to break Microsoft’s OEM monopoly (and it won’t run Vista, that’s for sure…):


    And to add insult to injury, not only it runs Gnu/Linux, but the gOS distro, with plentiful of google apps (i already can hear the chairs flying) :-D
    Remember Walmart’s success when they sold out the first everex desktop computer with linux pre-installed… the OEM pillar has already started crackling…

  8. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 11, 2008 at 8:59 am


    Yes, I’ve following gOS very closely (in other sites/forums). Version 2.0 seems to be very successful compared to the first one, which was a decent first go at unknown territories (Linux-based, Web 2.0-oriented, lightweight build). it’s not the only Enlightenment-based Ubuntu derivatives that gets attention.

    I suppose you’ve heard by now about Microsoft’s executive exodus. In the past 2 days:

    Raikes is out.
    Jafee is out.
    Fitzgerald is out.
    And now this http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1101

    Microsoft tries very hard not to cause panic at the moment (see http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1100 and http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1101), but I’ve watched the company long enough to know what’s going on. Mary Jo Foley hides the impact of this because her job depends on it.

    You could make the argument that Microsoft wants to get all its defection/churn announcements out of the way at once. But I’m not sure I’d look at things the same way, if I were one of the company’s “image makers”…

    The more desperate Microsoft gets, the more aggressively it will behave. Wear your ‘corruption goggles’ because it’s going to be a wild ride.

  9. SubSonica said,

    January 11, 2008 at 1:40 pm


    I know I might be going a little off topic but…Oh, yeah, the executives draining… and more good news: Every passing day VIsta is becoming more and more the new “Millenium Edition” even INSIDE Microsoft!!!!

    “Microsoft may have recognized Vista as [being] a damaged brand,” said Paul DeGroot, Directions on Microsoft’s lead analyst for Sales, Support and Desktop Strategies. “Windows is the brand for the long term.”
    And don’t miss this one:
    Holy Crap: Did Bill Gates Just Say Windows Sucks?

  10. Roy Schestowitz said,

    January 11, 2008 at 7:50 pm


    Rex Ballard in a separate forum the other day:

    But let’s look at the rate of Vista adoption.

    Days Millions Average/day Rate/Day
    30 20 670k 670k
    100 40 400k 290k
    180 60 330k 250k
    300 88 290k 230k
    375 100 270k 160k

    Do we see a little problem here? Vista sales are going DOWN, when
    they should be going UP!

    And how many of these licenses, especially those in the last 180 days,
    were actually “Vista Business Edition Downgrades” to WindowsXP?

    If the industry also saw a blow-out lack of sales in PCs during the
    back-to-school and Christmas season, then Microsoft may have an even
    bigger problem, since they haven’t delivered the 20% growth AND the
    20% profit growth expected with a new version of Windows.

    Microsoft bet the farm on Vista, and lost the bet.
    Of course they will welch on the bet.

    Me (fragment of message):

    By the way, about the figures, it’s interesting to note that among those 100 million copies, half of these might be just boxes that contain a DVD and sit inside large warehouses collecting dust. Several shops have complained about Microsoft because Vista does not sell, so they are overstocked (examples below in [1,2]). Among those copies that are sold as opposed to sit on the shelf, not many are actually used. People switch to Linux or run away to XP almost every time [5]. Less than 1% of the businesses out there have adopted Vista after one year in the wild [3]. Too minor an update to be worth the ‘upgrade’? 6 years in development ought to say that something is amiss. Microsoft even /admitted/ this in private (off the record, but it apparently leaked) [4].

    [1] Currys group blames Vista for poor sales

    DSG, the group behind Currys and PC World, has warned that poor sales of Vista could slash its profits by around £20 million.

    [2] DSG continues retailer woes

    DSG, the company formerly known as Dixons, became the latest British retailer to report a drop in profits for the summer months today. But it wasn’t all down to the rotten weather – this time it was also Microsoft’s fault.

    [3] Will Windows Vista Succeed In 2008? Don’t Count On It

    Vista has certainly been slow out of the gate. Sure, Microsoft is putting the operating system on newly shipped systems, but Vista sales didn’t benefit from the upgrade surge that previous OSes got upon release. A year after it began shipping, less than one percent of corporate desktops are running Vista.

    [4] Microsoft admits Vista screwed – report

    Vista SP1 is code named “Fiji”, presumably after a pretty looking island which is paralysed by coups.

    In a statement regarding the service pack Microsoft admits that Vista has “high impact” problems.

    [5] Windows Vista: Sold but not deployed

    Microsoft says it remains happy with enterprise sales of Vista — however, the software behemoth acknowledges that many businesses which have bought Vista licences are yet to deploy the software.

    There’s a lot more where that came from, but I do try hard to keep “Microsoft bashing” out of this site and cover just “Microsoft FUD”, i.e. show how Microsoft deceives, sabotages, bribes, etc. without resorting to making fun at its expense for internal miseries (of which there has been plenty recently). As I said many times before, 2007 was Microsoft’s worst year ever.

What Else is New

  1. EPO Did Not Want to Take Down One Techrights Article, It Wanted to Take Down Many Articles Using Intimidation, SLAPPing, and Psychological Manipulation Late on a Friday Night

    Recalling the dirty tactics by which the European Patent Office sought to remove criticism of its dirty secret deals with large corporations, for whom it made available and was increasingly offering preferential treatment

  2. The European Private Office: What Was Once a Public Service is Now Crony Capitalism With Private Contractors

    The increasing privatisation of the European Patent Office (EPO), resembling what happens in the UK to the NHS, shows that the real goal is to crush the quality of the service and instead serve a bunch of rich and powerful interests, in defiance of the original goals of this well-funded (by taxpayers) organisation

  3. Microsoft Once Again Disregards People's Settings and Abuses Them, Again Pretends It's Just an Accident

    A conceited corporation, Microsoft, shows not only that it exploits its botnet to forcibly download massive binaries without consent but also that it vainly overrides people's privacy settings to spy on these people, sometimes with help from malicious hardware vendors such as Dell or Lenovo

  4. When the EPO Liaised With Capone (Literally) to Silence Bloggers, Delete Articles

    A dissection of the EPO's current media strategy, which involves not only funneling money into the media but also actively silencing opposing views

  5. Blogger Who Wrote About the EPO's Abuses Retires

    Bloggers' independent rebuttal capability against a media apparatus that is deep in the EPO's pocket is greatly diminished as Jeremy Phillips suddenly retires

  6. Leaked: EPO Award of €880,000 “in Order to Address the Media Presence of the EPO” (Reputation Laundering)

    The European Patent Office, a public body, wastes extravagant amounts of money on public relations (for 'damage control', like FIFA's) in an effort to undermine critics, not only among staff (internally) but also among the media (externally)

  7. Links 27/11/2015: KDE Plasma 5.5 Plans, Oracle Linux 7.2

    Links for the day

  8. Documents Needed: Contract or Information About EPO PR/Media Campaign to Mislead the World

    Rumour that the EPO spends almost as much as a million US dollars “with some selected press agencies to refurbish the image of the EPO”

  9. Guest Post: The EPO, EPC, Unitary Patent and the Money Issue

    Remarks on the Unitary Patent (UP) and the lesser-known aspects of the EPO and EPC, where the “real issue is money, about which very little is discussed in public...”

  10. Saving the Integrity of the European Patent Office (EPO)

    Some timely perspective on what's needed at the European Patent Office, which was detabilised by 'virtue' of making tyrants its official figureheads

  11. A Call for Bloggers and Journalists: Did EPO Intimidate and Threaten You Too? Please Speak Out.

    An effort to discover just how many people out there have been subjected to censorship and/or self-censorship by EPO aggression against the media

  12. European Patent Office (EPO) a “Kingdom Above the EU Countries, a Tyranny With ZERO Accountability”

    Criticism of the EPO's thuggish behaviour and endless efforts to crush dissenting voices by all means available, even when these means are in clear violation of international or European laws

  13. Links 26/11/2015: The $5 Raspberry Pi Zero, Running Sans Systemd Gets Hard

    Links for the day

  14. EPO Management Needs to Finally Recognise That It Itself is the Issue, Not the Staff or the Unions

    A showing of dissent even from the representatives whom the EPO tightly controls and why the latest union-busting goes a lot further than most people realise

  15. Even the EPO Central Staff Committee is Unhappy With EPO Management

    The questions asked by the Central Staff Committee shared for the public to see that not only a single union is concerned about the management's behaviour

  16. The Broken Window Economics of Patent Trolls Are Already Coming to Europe

    The plague which is widely known as patent trolls (non-practicing entities that prey on practicing companies) is being spread to Europe, owing in part to misguided policies and patent maximalists

  17. Debunking the EPO's Latest Marketing Nonsense From Les Échos and More on Benoît Battistelli's Nastygram to French Politician

    Our detailed remarks about French brainwash from the EPO's media partner (with Benoît Battistelli extensively quoted) and the concerns increasingly raised by French politicians, who urge for national or even continental intervention

  18. The Sun King Delusion: The Views of Techrights Are Just a Mirror of EPO Staff Unions

    Tackling some emerging spin we have seen coming from Battistelli's private letters -- spin which strives to project the views of Techrights onto staff unions and why it's very hypocritical a form of spin

  19. Links 25/11/2015: Webconverger 33.1, Netrunner 17 Released

    Links for the day

  20. United They Stand: FFPE-EPO Supports Suspended Staff Representatives From SUEPO

    An obscure union from the Dutch side of things at the EPO is expressing support for the suspended colleagues from SUEPO (more German than Dutch)

  21. Censoring WIPR Article About Censorship by EPO

    A testament to how terrified journalists have become when it comes to EPO coverage, to the point of deleting entire paragraphs

  22. Censorship at the EPO Escalates: Now We Have Threats to Sue Publishers

    Having already blocked Techrights, the EPO's management proceeds to further suppressions of speech, impeding its staff's access to independently-distributed information (neither ordinary staff nor management)

  23. Response to Bogus Accusations That EPO Staff Protests Are Really an Attempt to Derail UPC

    Common myths about staff protests in the European Patent Office (EPO) debunked, with some additional background and general perspective on recent events, the unitary patent (UPC) and so on

  24. New Heise Article Makes It Clear That 'Nazi'-Themed Accusations Against the Suspended Board Judge Were Insufficiently Substantiated

    The personal attacks on a judge who was illegally suspended (a so-called 'house ban') increasingly look like the management's own campaign of defamation, mostly intended to marginalise and punish a judge who spoke about serious charges against VP4 (Željko Topić)

  25. Links 24/11/2015: Asus Chromebit CS10, Second Linux 4.4 RC

    Links for the day

  26. European Central Bank Staff Committee Adds to Growing Pressure on Abusive EPO Management

    The staff representatives of the European Central Bank E-mail their colleagues -- with European Central Bank managers' approval -- regarding the European Patent Office and its attacks on staff unions

  27. Gross Violation of Workers' Rights in EPO: Denial of Christmas Vacation/Leave for Slower Workers

    A look at an E-mail from within the EPO which shows how Christmas is used to squeeze staff, urging them to work even faster (despite speed gains) or lose their Christmas leave

  28. The Bogus Narrative Floated by EPO Management: Our Judges and Examiners Are Armed and Violent

    A look at the union-busting and protest-crushing moves from high-level EPO managers, who are trying to convince politicians that they do so in an effort to stop terrorists and neo-Nazis

  29. Support SUEPO or End Up Like They and Some of the Boards Did

    SUEPO, the fast-growing staff union of the EPO, increasingly needs the support and protection offered by action and participation from staff

  30. NRC Handelsblad (Dutch Evening Newspaper) Speaks About EPO's Refusal to Accept Court Orders From The Hague

    Article explains the depths of the issues inside the EPO and the unacceptable immunity that management at the EPO continues to exploit, shaming or discrediting the very notion of the rule of law in Europe


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time


Recent Posts