EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

05.01.08

Adobe Flash: Now a Little Less Evil (We’ll Stick to Ogg, Thank You)

Posted in Formats, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Novell, OSDL, Videos at 10:43 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

GNOME FlashThe announcement from Adobe may be slightly overplayed by the press, but the gist of the story is that Flash technologies get a little gentler and a little more transparent. This is good news by all means and it will assist projects like gnash tremendously. However, this does not resolve the deformation of the Web, whose control used to be more decentralised.

It is worth remembering that Adobe is now a member of the Linux Foundation. Despite this, Adobe is being betrayed by Novell in favour of Microsoft. Nonetheless, Novell built parts of its Web site using Adobe Flash. Makeover to come?

Reports from the press include (thanks to several readers who brought this to our attention):

1. Adobe moves to broaden Flash reach

Open Screen is being spearheaded by Adobe. But the company is working with Nokia, Sony Ericsson, Qualcomm, Chunghwa Telecom, Samsung, Motorola, NTT Docomo, Toshiba, Verizon Wireless, ARM, Intel, Marvell, NBC, MTV, and the BBC. It’s “a who’s who in the industry,” said David Wadhwani, general manager and vice president of the Platform Business Unit at Adobe.

2. Adobe Drops Licensing Fees, Gives Away Flash For Devices

Software maker Adobe announced Thursday that it would drop many of the licensing requirements attached to its Flash technology, which is used to display video and audio content on the web.

We will stick to Ogg Theora though, whenever this is possible. Thanks to akf for the invaluable suggestions, which made transcoding a lot easier. In order for Adobe to become a darling, the whole stack that it uses ought to embrace a licence like the GPLv3 (this includes codecs).

Another reader wrote to bring up this article, adding: “It’s about what Silverlight need to do to become successful.” It can hopefully be eliminated, but not using Flash. We need some real alternatives like Ogg, rather than fight fire with fire. We shall do our best to promote Ogg and make it more widespread. Presence typically ushers adoption.

Ogg Theora

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

15 Comments

  1. Robert Millan said,

    May 1, 2008 at 11:52 am

    Gravatar

    I completely agree, we should use Ogg. But shouldn’t you start by giving example? This site uses Flash when it comes to video hosting (and it turns out that the way youtube videos are embedded externally doesn’t work for Gnash yet).

    I think you should contemplate switching to Ogg. You can embed Ogg in a website in a way that even Windo** users will be able to play it without major gimmicks; see how Wikipedia does it (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Win32-loader.ogg)

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 1, 2008 at 11:57 am

    Gravatar

    Thanks.

    Yes, I intend to upload some more Oggs. I did this in the past on several occasions, but other than quota (bandwidth and server space) there’s copyrights to keep in mind. I’ll do the best I can.

  3. Robert Millan said,

    May 1, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    Gravatar

    Maybe this helps: http://en.theorasea.org/

    It’s like Youtube but Ogg-based. Or so I’m told.

  4. Miles said,

    May 1, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    Gravatar

    Roy, you might be interested in this:

    http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Apr-20.html

    specifically:

    Lacking a viable open source-based competitor today for rich media delivery on the web and given the current state of both Flash and Silverlight, it is in open source’s best interest to ensure that Flash gets ahead of the competition.

    In my opinion, Flash needs a couple of things to stay ahead:

    * A text-based format to populating the flash contents, either from a JSON representation or an XML file.
    * An open specification that allows for third-party implementations. My understanding is that today’s Flash specification is semi-open.

    And of course, I think that Flash should be open sourced, but that is a long shot.

    A completely open alternative would be ideal, a combination of:

    * OGG Video and Audio objects as part of the what-wg specification, to complement the existing tag.
    * Tools to convert popular design formats like XAML and whatever Flash uses into Canvas tags.
    * Tools and Javascript hacks to implement dynamic loading of extra content for the canvas tags.

    It does not seem like a far shot, but it would require cross-browser support and would prevent us from being locked into either proprietary stacks.

    It is also worth mentioning that I am told that the moonlight sources include tools to convert between xaml and svg, so it would appear that Miguel is truly helping along Free Software here – he’s pushing for what he said should be pushed for, tools to conevrt between the formats.

    You can also plainly see from the article I linked that Miguel really does want Free Software to succeed and a free software framework for delivering rich content in particular.

    As far as I can tell, he’s implementing Moonlight because he feels his team is in the best position to be able to deliver a Silverlight 2.0 (he didn’t have any interest in 1.0) implementation for Linux because of Mono. Just like he mentions the great work being done by the SwfDec team for implementing a Free Software replacement for Flash.

  5. Victor Soliz said,

    May 1, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    Gravatar

    Yeah, and all those claims by Icaza would make sense and gain my support, if it wasn’t for the fact moonlight cannot be included by default in any distro that is not SLED and can only be obtained from novell otherwise.

    He might like to call it free software and what not, but without freedom of distribution, sorry, I can’t call it free software , if anything it looks like a Novell attempt to fork Linux.

  6. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 1, 2008 at 3:12 pm

    Gravatar

    Robert,

    Yes, I’ve mentioned it here before. It can come handy. Thanks.

    I returned from Stallman’s talk about 15 minutes ago (almost 2 hours long) and it inspired me to give Flash more of a kick than before, to the extent possible.

  7. Nikolas Koswinkle said,

    May 1, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Victor, you got it wrong, again. Moonlight WITH BUNDLED MS-CODECS cannot be included by a distro that doesn’t have an agreement with MS. ’cause it is MS’ codecs. That should be clear.

    WITHOUT MS codecs (using ogg theora instead of WMV, for example) or with ‘UNOFFICIAL’ MS codec support (like xine, ffmpeg, gstreamer-plugins-bad) every distribution can ship it.

    Now, was that so hard to understand?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  8. Miles said,

    May 1, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    Gravatar

    Victor: As far as I’m aware, the only reason you have to obtain Moonlight from Novell is due to the codecs (since Novell is paying for the licenses) – if you don’t mind codec-less Moonlight, then there’s no reason you need to obtain your copy from Novell.

    The way you license codecs from MPEG-LA is by paying for the number of copies distributed (iirc, there’s also an option for ‘infinite copies’)

    I speculate that the “infinite licenses” option is likely far more expensive than Novell was willing to pay especially without knowing how many installations of Moonlight there’d even be.

    If Novell didn’t do this, then it’d be up to the end-user to pay the bill for codec support and that would cause far more outrage, wouldn’t you say?

  9. Miles said,

    May 1, 2008 at 3:57 pm

    Gravatar

    Addendum to my previous post:

    Currently, unless you are paying for your own use of the most common audio and video codecs to play your media, then you are currently breaking the law and technically, since the GPL’d software you are using to play such media knowingly infringes on the codec patents, it is also illegal software and thus not Free Software.

    Note that I don’t agree with this system, but it is there and it is the law.

  10. Miles said,

    May 1, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    Gravatar

    Nikolas: From my understanding of the codec licensing situation, distros need to be careful shipping Moonlight with codec support at all, MS binary codecs or not (unless they are licensing MPEG-LA’s codecs) because simply by shipping software which can play those patented codecs, you are breaking the law if you are not paying the licensing fees.

    Note that this is my interpretation and I may be wrong, but it seems to be supported by the fact that Red Hat, for example, stopped shipping mp3 support in their distros some years ago due to this issue.

  11. Nikolas Koswinkle said,

    May 1, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    Gravatar

    Of course; I think most of us are breaking the law right now (How many of you have BOUGHT the legal plugins from Fluendo for DVD playback – hands up.). Only that some of us (you and me) are aware of this fact while others seem to be living in the delusion that not paying for a patent-covered codec somehow makes this codec ‘free’. ;)

    Well, free as in beer it may be, but never free as in freedom. To make it very clear to you: IF YOU ARE WATCHING DVDs YOU ARE USING PROPRIETARY CODECS (MPEG-2 and AC3)! You have either payed your LICENSE (yes that evil word!) or you are breaking the stupid law.

    So, Victor; what was your case against free and legal codecs in SLED again?

    Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

  12. Miles said,

    May 1, 2008 at 4:13 pm

    Gravatar

    The problem with the way licensing codecs from MPEG-LA works is that unless you opt for the “infinite licenses” option, it makes it difficult (if not impossible) for distros to ship multimedia applications that use the widely used media codecs.

    The fact that Novell is even offering to fit the bill for all users who download it directly from them is, in my opinion, quite respectable – especially in comparison with every other distro who does not offer any such service and leaves it up to the end user to pay the bill (or risk it by viewing or listening to the content illegally).

    When you look at the big picture, Novell certainly looks more the Good Guy than the other more widely used Linux distributors… now doesn’t it? :)

    Obviously if you focus on the very narrow space of “well, I have to download it from them directly” then it sounds bad, but when you zoom out you notice that they are actually doing you a huge favor.

    What Victor is essentially doing is criticizing the Good Samaritan who offers to buy a homeless person a meal rather than giving him a few pennies.

  13. akf said,

    May 2, 2008 at 3:18 am

    Gravatar

    Back to Flash.

    The gnash developers seem not to be so euphoric about the announcement:

    Freeing up specs for things that the community has already reverse-engineered makes for good publicity, and eliminates a legal EULA issue that Adobe was likely to lose in court in most countries, but doesn’t change anything substantial.

    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnash-dev/2008-05/msg00004.html

    This mail also points out, that a lot of things about the license change are still unclear.

  14. Roy Schestowitz said,

    May 2, 2008 at 3:30 am

    Gravatar

    Interesting. I didn’t expect that response, but it makes a lot of sense. A ‘defeat’ downplayed… as a victory. Matt Asay has just shared some thoughts too (he’s pro GPL):

    Royalty free. Open publication of protocols. No side-deals to ensure a dearth of competition. Maybe Microsoft could take a page from Adobe’s playbook. That is, if it wants to be relevant on the web.

    It’s a bit like Mono really. Microsoft wants developers, whom it privately calls “one-night stands” and “pawns”, to help with adoption (e.g. against Java or Adobe Flash), but licensing gives Microsoft total control and makes win32 more attractive than all else (second-class citizens). Maybe we should beat the drum which illustrates this problem by stressing these similarities.

    Some people remain unconvinced after the damage control from the apologists, so a more sound argument is needed.

  15. akf said,

    May 2, 2008 at 5:43 am

    Gravatar

    Note: The quote I gave was nothing official. It was just a mail picked from a mailing list, not more.

What Else is New


  1. Links 29/4/2016: GNOME 3.21.1, Fairphone

    Links for the day



  2. Microsoft Says It Will Continue to Extort Companies That Distribute Linux, Using Software Patents As Usual

    Microsoft's war on Linux, a war which is waged using software patents (for revenue and/or for coercion in bundling deals), is still going on in spite of all the PR tactics from Microsoft and its paid partners



  3. Australia Might be Next to Block Software Patents If Commission's Advice is Followed

    Australian advice against software patents, which can hopefully influence Australian politicians and put an end, once and for all, to all software patents in Australia



  4. [ES] ''Si la Forma de Pensar de la EPO fuese Seguida, Guantánamo Sería Posible en Suelo Alemán.”

    La EPO está todavía bajo fuego, pero mucho de ello pasa detrás de las cortinas y envuelve abogados y/o burócratas



  5. The European Copy-Paste Office (EPO)

    This morning's example (not the first) of how the EPO uses 'social' media



  6. Links 28/4/2016: Fedora 24, EE Goes Open Source

    Links for the day



  7. Amid Referendum “the New European Unitary Patent System is Likely to Collapse Before It Started”

    The Unitary Patent Court (UPC) vision seems like it may be just one month away from its gradual death, depending on British voices amongst other key factors



  8. USTR is Trying to Shame and Bully India Into Introducing Software Patents in India

    Lobbying body of the US (corporations-led) is trying its usual dirty tactics against India's sound policy which excludes software/algorithms from patent scope



  9. No, Visual Studio is NOT Open Source and Xamarin Openwashing is NOT News

    The latest example of Microsoft openwashing, courtesy of confidants of Microsoft and those who got bamboozled by them



  10. Latest Black Duck Puff Pieces a Good Example of Bad Journalism and How Not to Report

    Why the latest "Future of Open Source Survey" -- much like its predecessors -- isn't really a survey but just another churnalism opportunity for the Microsoft-connected Black Duck, which is a proprietary parasite inside the FOSS community



  11. If EPO “Form of Thinking Were to be Followed, Guantanamo on German Soil Would be Possible.”

    The EPO is still under fire, but a lot of it happens behind the scenes and involves lawyers and/or bureaucrats



  12. Links 28/4/2016: Tomb Raider for GNU/Linux, Proxmox VE 4.2

    Links for the day



  13. [ES] La Departura de la Readidad de la EPO Y Su Entrada en la Esféra Industrial China de Propaganda

    La deceptiva trampa del maximálism de patentes, donde se asume que artficialmente aumentando el número de patentes otorgadas traerá el resultado esperado



  14. [ES] Una Fársa de Sistema: ¿Cómo la SIPO, USPTO, y cada vez más la EPO se Convierten en Llenado de Patentes (No Se Requiere Propia Examinación)

    Una crítica al decline en la calidad de patentes en algunas de las más grandes oficinas de patentes del mundo, donde aspiración parece ser neo-liberal en el sentido económico



  15. [ES] Microsoft ‘Asalto con Todo’ Contra Android, Java, y GNU/Linux, Usando la Clásica E.E.E. Táctica de Nuevo

    Otro recordatorio de la realidad que Microsoft está muy activo en el frente E.E.E., not no sólo contra GNU/Linux pero también Android y Java



  16. [ES] Más Rumores y Llamadas Acerca de Prospectos de Microsoft Vaya a Comprar Canonical (Ubuntu con todo y Zapatos)

    Teniendo en cuenta los últimos movimientos de Canonical, algunos expertos piensan que es posible que Shuttleworth elija el dinero a Microsoft sobre principios sino también inste para que esto ocurra



  17. Links 27/4/2016: A Lot About OpenStack, Vivaldi 1.1 Released

    Links for the day



  18. A Farce of a System: How SIPO, USPTO, and Increasingly the EPO Too Turn Into Filing Systems (No Proper Examination/Filtering Required)

    A critique of the declining quality of patents in some of the world's biggest patent offices, where the aspiration seems to be neo-liberal in the economic sense



  19. Microsoft's 'Full Assault' on Android, Java, and GNU/Linux, Using Classic E.E.E. Tactics Again

    Another reminder of the fact that Microsoft is very active on the E.E.E. front, not just against GNU/Linux but also Android and Java



  20. More Rumours and Calls Surrounding Prospects of Microsoft Buying Canonical (Ubuntu and More)

    Taking some of Canonical's recent moves into account, some pundits not only think it's possible for Shuttleworth to choose Microsoft money over principles but also urge for this to happen



  21. [ES] El Nuevo Impulso Finánciado por Microsoft Para Reforzar las Patentes de Software en los EE.UU., Apoyado por los Sospechosos Usuales (La Sagrada Familia) Mientras que Microsoft Cada Vez Más Lucha Como Compañíá Productiva

    Una mirada al esfuérzo de trae una resurgencia de las patentes de software en los Estados Unidos (con un clarísimo rol de Microsoft en él) y la fundación/conf ianza de Microsoften las patentes de software como arma contr Linux/Android porque las ganancias de Windows se están secando y el Windows Phone está al borde del colápso



  22. Links 26/4/2016: Firefox 46.0, Thunderbird's Stewardship

    Links for the day



  23. Links 25/4/2016: Kodi 16.1, OpenStack Summit

    Links for the day



  24. New Microsoft-Funded Push to Make Software Patents Stronger in the US, Backed by the Usual Suspects as Microsoft Increasingly Struggles as a Producing Company

    A look at the effort to bring about a software patents resurgence to the US (with clear Microsoft role in it) and Microsoft's reliance on software patents as a weapon against Linux/Android because Windows profits dry up and Windows Phone is on the verge of collapse



  25. Patents Roundup: Marijuana Patents, Patent Satellites, Patent Trolls, Wars, and Merchants (Notably Lawyers)

    Various strands of news about patents, focused on issues raised in the latter half of last week



  26. The EPO's Departure From Truth and Entrance Into the Realms of Chinese Industrial-Grade Propaganda

    The entrapping delusion of patent maximalism, wherein artificially or superficially increasing the number of granted patents is assumed to be a desirable outcome



  27. [ES] La Fundación de Frontera Electrónica (EFF) Continua su Batalla por la Sanidad de Patentes en los Estados Unidos

    Una mirada a las últimas actividades de la EFF en el área de patentes, donde probablemente habrá mayor énfasis en los daños de las patentes de software y la necesidad de eliminarlas completamente



  28. [ES] La Sociedad Regional de Economía Comprehensiva (RCEP) Amenaza Traer las Patentes de Software a la India

    La amenaza que arrastra otro acuerdo denominado de "comercio" cuyo impacto a favor de los MONOPOLIOS contra los intereses del pueblo de la India y por lo tanto debe ser rechazadas por ellos



  29. [ES] Toma Menos de 10 Votos para 'Ganar' una Elección en la Mini Unión (Minion) de Battistelli

    Una mirada al minúsculo tamaño de la Unión apadrinada por Battistelli, la que parece tener una docena de miembros activos



  30. [ES] Di la Verdad Acerca del Sistema de Patentes de los EE.UU., Conseguiras Ser Atacado por la Máquina Propagandistica de Patentes (Disfrazada de Prensa)

    El Sr. Darrell Issa (fotografiado arriba) cae bajo ataque de los proponentes de patentes de software patents, los apologistas de los trolles de patentes (quiénes los financian frecuéntemente), y los máximalistas de patentes porque correctamente insinuó que la (mayoría) de demandantes son como/casi trolles de patentes en los Estados Unidos


CoPilotCo

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

CoPilotCo

Recent Posts