Bonum Certa Men Certa

2 Months and No Disclosure from the European Parliament

Budapest parliament



German parliament building at night



Summary: The illusion of transparency lingers on

THIS is the latest part in a series that explores Microsoft's invasion into EU panels and the Commission's unwillingness to allow transparency. To list previous posts chronologically (for context):



It has been two months and here is where we stand. They keep denying, procrastinating, and acting as though they don't understand simple requests. The latest correspondence (anonymised) is below.

I hereby file a confirmatory application on grounds of Article 7(4) EC/1049/2001.

> Dear Mr. Schestowitz, > > Thank you for your e-mail of the 20th of March registered on 23rd of March applying for a copy of documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) N€° 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. > > Your application will be dealt with within the prescribed delays. You have requested access to the documents as follows: > > "I hereby request electronic access to all documents related to the Towards the European Software Strategy process in the posession of the EU-Commission, in particular access to the following documents: > * the list of participants in the industry expert group > * the list of WGs, WGs sleaders and observing Commission officials > * draft contributions of all industry Working groups on a the European Software Strategy > * draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission > * the participant list of the related meeting on January 20th in Brussels > * all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation under the applicable provisions of regulation 1049/2001 which grant me a right of access to all documents mentioned above." > > However, as we notified you previously (see our email dated 15th of April) we are unable to identify the documents refereed to in the sixth item "all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation". Please could you clarify your request so that we may continue to process this item. You have previously clarified item 4 on your list but not item 6. > > We are currently collecting the other requested documents and expect that we will be able to forward them to you shortly. > > Yours sincerely, > > [anonymised] > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy Schestowitz [anonymised] > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:47 PM > To: [anonymised] > Cc: s@schestowitz.com; [anonymised] > Subject: Re: Gestdem 2009/1562 FW: Document access application purpusant to Article 6 EC/1049/2001 (D/116606) > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > "Draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission" means the documents > the chairs of the working groups or participants received from the > Commission to guide the work in a particular group. > > > - -- > ~~ Best of wishes > > Roy S. Schestowitz > http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E > Freelance journalist @ http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/ > > >> Dear Mr. Schestowitz, >> >> Thank you for your e-mail of the 20th of March registered on 23rd of March applying for a copy of documents in accordance with Regulation (EC) N€° 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. >> >> Your application will be dealt with within the prescribed delays. You have requested access to the documents as follows: >> >> "I hereby request electronic access to all documents related to the Towards the European Software Strategy process in the posession of the EU-Commission, in particular access to the following documents: >> * the list of participants in the industry expert group >> * the list of WGs, WGs sleaders and observing Commission officials >> * draft contributions of all industry Working groups on a the European Software Strategy >> * draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission >> * the participant list of the related meeting on January 20th in Brussels >> * all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation under the applicable provisions of regulation 1049/2001 which grant me a right of access to all documents mentioned above." >> >> However, we are unable to identify the documents refereed to in the fourth item "draft input to all WG prepared by the Commission" and the sixth item "all submissions from industry to the ESS consultation". Please could you clarify your request so that we may continue to process it. >> >> Yours sincerely, >> >> [anonymised]


They cannot deny access for much longer. This are already well overdue. According to the rules:

Article 7

Processing of initial applications

1. An application for access to a document shall be handled promptly. An acknowledgement of receipt shall be sent to the applicant. Within 15 working days from registration of the application, the institution shall either grant access to the document requested and provide access in accordance with Article 10 within that period or, in a written reply, state the reasons for the total or partial refusal and inform the applicant of his or her right to make a confirmatory application in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.

2. In the event of a total or partial refusal, the applicant may, within 15 working days of receiving the institution's reply, make a confirmatory application asking the institution to reconsider its position.

3. In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time-limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

4. Failure by the institution to reply within the prescribed time-limit shall entitle the applicant to make a confirmatory application.

Article 8

Processing of confirmatory applications

1. A confirmatory application shall be handled promptly. Within 15 working days from registration of such an application, the institution shall either grant access to the document requested and provide access in accordance with Article 10 within that period or, in a written reply, state the reasons for the total or partial refusal. In the event of a total or partial refusal, the institution shall inform the applicant of the remedies open to him or her, namely instituting court proceedings against the institution and/or making a complaint to the Ombudsman, under the conditions laid down in Articles 230 and 195 of the EC Treaty, respectively.

2. In exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the time limit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.

3. Failure by the institution to reply within the prescribed time limit shall be considered as a negative reply and entitle the applicant to institute court proceedings against the institution and/or make a complaint to the Ombudsman, under the relevant provisions of the EC Treaty.


They have no clue about the time limits of 1049/2001 and think they may discuss this ad nauseam. The process involving Ombudsman might be interesting.

On a related note, earlier today we were made aware of attempts in the UK to bring Free software to the government. Will the process be equally opaque?




UK citizens and MEPs support Europe-wide Free Software Pact



London, UK - Friday May 22, 2009 - The Free Software Pact initiative calls upon UK citizens and MEP candidates to stand up for the principles of a free society by backing free software in the upcoming European Parliament elections on June 4, 2009.



The Free Software Pact is a European initiative to allow candidates for the upcoming European elections to show the voting public that they favour the development and use of free software, and will protect it from threatening EU legislation. It is also a tool for citizens who value free software to educate candidates about it's importance and why they should, if elected, protect the European free software community. The European Parliament is the venue for crucial talks concerning free software, including software patents, interoperability and net neutrality. It is therefore vital to show election candidates why they should support, and sign, the Free Software Pact.



Mark Taylor, the coordinator for the Free Software Pact in the UK, said, The current UK Government is embarrassingly behind the rest of Europe in formulating public policy on the use of free software. Across the rest of the continent we see significant adoption and political support for free software. The Free software Pact is therefore an ideal way to draw attention to the reform the UK public sector needs and the enormous cost savings yet to be realized. For too long the UK has been dependent on the relationship with proprietary software companies like Microsoft, who are hell-bent on keeping our politicians confused on this matter. If you care about this situation, and the resulting cost to our economy, society and political culture, please contact the MEP candidates in your region and ask them to sign the Free Software Pact.



The Free Software Pact is also supported by Richard M. Stallman, founder and president of the Free Software Foundation, who said, Big dangers threaten the freedoms of free software in Europe: software patents, digital restrictions management (DRM), bundled sales and treacherous computing... I call on all European citizens who value free software to join this campaign, contact their candidates and have them sign the Free Software Pact.



A list of UK MEP candidates and their contact details can be found at http://www.bond.org.uk/pages/mep-candidate-contact-details.html. Candidates can support the Free Software Pact by signing a copy of the pact and faxing, mailing or emailing a copy by following the instructions at http://www.freesoftwarepact.eu/post/The-Free-Software-Pact.



About The Free Software pact



The Free Software Pact (FSP) is a citizen initiative, launched by Free Software advocacy associations April (France, http://www.april.org) and Associazione per il software libero (Italy, http://www.softwarelibero.it), to coordinate a European scale campaign in favour of free software. The FSP is providing materials and software to any volunteer who contributes to the initiative. More information can be found at their website http://www.freesoftwarepact.eu.



Media Contacts



Mark Taylor, UK Coordinator for the Free Software Pact



Phone: +44 7967 687379



Email: contact-uk@freesoftwarepact.eu



London - Big Ben

Recent Techrights' Posts

Microsoft a Top Sponsor at Red Hat Summit (IBM Selling Proprietary Spyware and Back Doors in a "Red" Trench Coat)
They both work for Microsoft
New 'Interview' With - or Talk Coverage of - Richard Stallman in the European Union
automated English translation
Gemini Links 20/05/2025: LLM Scraper Bots in Gopher and "Starmer and the Somewheres"
Links for the day
Skype Fell Off a Cliff (Microsoft Killed It), All Microsoft Has Left Now is Slop and Spaghetti Code
"This isn’t about AI. This is a puppet show to drive stock prices up and down."
Slopfarms (Machine-Generated Fake News Sites Authored by Bots With Slop Images) Spread GNU FUD
This isn't about Linux (GNU doesn't run just on Linux)
United States Federal Government's Digital Analytics Program (DAP): GNU/Linux Users Represent Close to 6% of Visitors This Year
How far has GNU/Linux gotten? Very far!
The "LLM Ouroboros of Shit" is Complemented by Even Worse Phenomena Caused by Microsoft's Contribution of SPAM and Pollution
Microsoft became a world leader in promotion of LLM slop
The LLM Ouroboros Phenomenon
Fact #1: over time slop gets worse (training set is like some blurry JPEG). Fact #2: People's "smell" for slop improves over time, as they 'train' on slop and can detect it based on prior encounters. Put 1 and 2 together.
 
Links 20/05/2025: "Bankrupt 23andMe Just Sold Off All Your DNA Data" and "Free Speech Warriors" MIA
Links for the day
Openwashing of Windows, Back Doors, Persistent Surveillance, Keyloggers, Screen Loggers, DRM and So On
WSL is not "Linux", it's Windows
IBM Mass Redundancies Likely This Coming Thursday
We're not in a position to judge if that's true or false
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 19, 2025
IRC logs for Monday, May 19, 2025
The Official SUSE Blog Uses LLM Slop to Compose Fake Articles Promoting Microsoft and Azure
even a little slop spoils the broth
Links 19/05/2025: Charges of Blackmailing Over Son Heung-min, Chad Opposition Leader Detained
Links for the day
Gemini Links 19/05/2025: Ableism, Silicon Monkeys, and More
Links for the day
How We Defeated DDoS Attacks
One of the best things one can do is migrate to an SSG
Microsofters Issuing Threats to Microsoft Critics Who Blog About Microsoft
So far we see that their "legal strategy" revolves around trying to discredit people like Theodore Ts'o
Links 19/05/2025: Political Catchup and CISA Advisories
Links for the day
TheLayoff.com Has Begun Deleting Trolls/AstroTurfers Infesting the IBM Section to Discourage On-Topic Discussion About Culls and Maladministration (Bad Strategy)
Moderators have realised there's a problem
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 18, 2025
IRC logs for Sunday, May 18, 2025
Gemini Links 18/05/2025: Five Years on Gemini and Atom Feeds over Gopher
Links for the day
Links 18/05/2025: F.D.A. More Sceptical of COVID-19 Vaccines, UK Charges 3 Iranian Nationals In Alleged Attack Plot Against Journalists
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/05/2025: "Finally Upgraded" and "Rebooting"
Links for the day
There Are Days or Occasions Where gemini:// Requests Almost Exceed http(s):// and Gemini Protocol Isn't Even 6 Yet
Gemini Protocol turns 6 one month from now
Abundance of Good Code, "Just Like Air."
Richard Stallman's seminal manifesto and foundational (practical) work on GNU gave us a very solid system that facilitates productive work without concerns over spyware
Messages in TheLayoff.com Drowned Out by LLM Slop (Comments Focused on Replying to Bot-Generated Provocation)
apparently shaking hands with nazis isn't as bad as calling your git repository's main branch "master"
The Importance of Full Disclosure and Transparency Online
there will be full transparency, as always
Slopwatch: Slopfarms and Serial Sloppers Still at It
Apparently Google is too understaffed to figure that out
Links 18/05/2025: Decreased Prospects of Science Careers, Disappearance of Journalists
Links for the day
Microsofters Have a Long History Trying to Take Down Techrights by Sending Threats to Webhosts
picking on women
Links 18/05/2025: Science, Censorship and European Commission Taking on Monopoly Abuse by Microsoft
Links for the day
Gemini Links 18/05/2025: Šibenik and SFJAZZ Historical Archive
Links for the day
Over at Tux Machines...
GNU/Linux news for the past day
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 17, 2025
IRC logs for Saturday, May 17, 2025