08.23.20

Gemini version available ♊︎

Leak: FSFE and OSI Coordinate Rubbing Off Free Software by Saying “Open Source” is the Same (It’s Not, Same False Argument From 20 Years Earlier)

Posted in Deception, Europe, Free/Libre Software, FSF, OSI at 12:52 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Many men in table football

Summary: Three years ago the 20-year anniversary of an attack on Free software (which an OSI founder and high-profile boosters said was a plan to dethrone Richard Stallman) was secretly exploited by the FSFE in coordination with OSI leadership

TODAY we present an E-mail which exposes coordination between OSI/”Open Source” (and OSI President Simon Phipps) and the FSFE, undoing much of the work of the FSF while painting the FSF as unreasonable or even radical. We let the readers decide for themselves, but we’re adding some thoughts of members of ours, who saw the E-mail prior to this publication.

This happened months after the trademark dispute (FSF demanding that FSFE stops misusing the "FSF" name). “For most practical purposes,” Ryan explains, “Free and Open Source mean the same thing, but Open Source doesn’t emphasize in making sure it stays available under the same terms. So any changes made under a proprietary license are simply useless to everyone else and lost forever if it gets discontinued. It can also be turned against the user in all sorts of horrible and twisted ways, like Apple did to create macOS and iOS.”

“…call it Hegelian brainwashing, or hermetic mergers for purposes of deception, not limited to software licenses…”
      –Anonymous
“The FSF used to say if it’s trivial,” Ryan continues, “as in <150 lines of code, or implements something that is an open specification that we’re trying to encourage adoption of, or there’s already lots of proprietary implementations out there, sometimes a more permissive license does more good than harm.”

Matthias Kirschner, who recently accepted money from Microsoft, sent the following message, alluding to the OSI’s President at the time (Simon Phipps), showing how they coordinated statements on “Free Software and Open Source Software” (if they mean it, FSFE should just rename/rebrand as OSIE, or maybe replace the O with an M now that it’s partly Microsoft funded… to became MSIE). Here’s the E-mail in question, citing a blog post from Phipps, published 5 days after the FSF had sent a message concerning the FSFE’s violation of the 2005 agreement:

Subject: Joint Statement about “Free Software and Open Source Software”
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:55:17 +0100
From: Matthias Kirschner <mk@fsfe.org>
To: team@lists.fsfe.org

Hello all,

after a discussion on the legal network mailing list, which resulted in my blog post http://k7r.eu/2-percent-discussion-free-software-or-open-source-software/ and then in longer discussions on https://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/2017-November/011994.html and individual follow-up, Simon Phipps and I had the idea to use the upcmming 20th anniversary of the term “Open Source” on 9 February 2018 for a joint statement.

We would clarify for newcomers that it is the same software. Encourage everybody to work with others although they might use another terminology. Show them that even organisations which use different terms can work together. Simon is positive that he gets support by others in OSI about that, and I thought that we will also agree on this, as it it will be mainly a repetition of our official statement: https://fsfe.org/freesoftware/basics/comparison.en.html (we might add some arguments from my blog post above + parts of Simon’s articles:

https://webmink.com/essays/causality/

https://meshedinsights.com/2017/06/07/free-vs-open/ ).

I would continue to discuss that idea with Simon Phipps so we could get such a statement ready in time, and get other organisations on board, too. I’ll share any text drafts here before.

Best Regards,
Matthias


Matthias Kirschner – President – Free Software Foundation Europe
Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany | t +49-30-27595290
Registered at Amtsgericht Hamburg, VR 17030 | (fsfe.org/join)
Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner) – Weblog (k7r.eu/blog.html)
_______________________________________________
Team mailing list
Team@lists.fsfe.org

https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/team

The better informed Free software proponents will immediately understand what’s going on here. They are, in effect, doing exactly the opposite of what the FSF would do. Under the guise of ‘peace’ of whatnot they sort of bury the original brand. No wonder not too long after that an FSF Board member (Ben) said that they need to further distance themselves from this “Open Source” lunacy, which was already opening up to proprietary software giants, including Microsoft.

As one person has just put it in IRC, “they do seem purposely trying to muddy the waters… call it Hegelian brainwashing, or hermetic mergers for purposes of deception, not limited to software licenses… I think it’s used for many many many things…”

“Permissive licenses harm the Free Software Movement in general…”
      –Ryan
“Show them that even organisations which use different terms can work together” is the part he was alluding to. They’re basically trying to paint the FSF as irrational, hostile zealots. When it is in fact the FSF that’s under attack, along with the term Free (as in freedom) software. The person argues that “his [Kirschner's] “different terms” strikes me as disingenuous, i.e. trying to convince people [that] different terms are actually the same… people might think I’m too harsh, but to me, there’s no other word except attempted brainwashing, also known as EEE of course…”

The merger is even broader than the above, as we shall show in a separate leak.

“Permissive licenses harm the Free Software Movement in general,” Ryan notes, “although sometimes that harm is outweighed by the benefit of solving a bigger problem. If Microsoft swallows FLAC and Opus and AV1, more people will use it. That helps us if they grab it and use it. In general, just giving them software to pick over that would make Windows or Office or Azure work better sets us back.”

“…whether you are pro or against something, when the waters are muddied it’s difficult to even have a conversation… after things get warped.”
      –Anonymous
The move was explained as follows in IRC: “embrace a word, extend its meaning to what you want it to mean, extinguish the original definition, destroy by “merging” with something of [a] different meaning [...] it annoys me to no end, because whether you are pro or against something, when the waters are muddied it’s difficult to even have a conversation… after things get warped. If successful, it means future people are both just attacking or praising straw men basically [and] it destroys any possible debate…”

Not only the OSI and the FSFE ‘colluded’ in this agenda, as future leaks will show. That helps explain why particular statements were made one year ago when media shifted attention from a Gates/Epstein MIT scandal to a bogus RMS/MIT scandal (over a misquoted/misinterpreted E-mail).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Intimidation Against Nitrux Development Team Upsets the Community and Makes the Media Less Trustworthy

    Nitrux is being criticised for being “very unappealing”; but a look behind the scenes reveals an angry reviewer (habitual mouthpiece of the Linux Foundation and Linux foes) trying to intimidate Nitrux developers, who are unpaid volunteers rather than “corporate” developers



  2. Links 31/01/2023: GNOME 44 Wallpapers and Alpha

    Links for the day



  3. Free and Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting (FOSDEM) and KU Leuven Boosting Americans and Cancellers of the Father of Free Software

    The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and its founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), along with the SFLC one might add, have been under a siege by the trademark-abusing FSFE and SFC; Belgium helps legitimise the ‘fakes’



  4. Techrights in the Next 5 or 10 Years

    Now that I’m free from the shackles of a company (it deteriorated a lot after grabbing Gates Foundation money under an NDA) the site Techrights can flourish and become more active



  5. 60 Days of Articles About Sirius 'Open Source' and the Long Road Ahead

    The Sirius ‘Open Source’ series ended after 60 days (parts published every day except the day my SSD died completely and very suddenly); the video above explains what’s to come and what lessons can be learned from the 21-year collective experience (my wife and I; work periods combined) in a company that still claims, in vain, to be “Open Source”



  6. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 30, 2023

    IRC logs for Monday, January 30, 2023



  7. Taking Techrights to the Next Level in 2023

    I've reached a state of "closure" when it comes to my employer (almost 12 years for me, 9+ years for my wife); expect Techrights to become more active than ever before and belatedly publish important articles, based on longstanding investigations that take a lot of effort



  8. The ISO Delusion: When the Employer Doesn’t Realise That Outsourcing Clients' Passwords to LassPass After Security Breaches Is a Terrible Idea

    The mentality or the general mindset at Sirius ‘Open Source’ was not compatible with that of security conscientiousness and it seemed abundantly clear that paper mills (e.g. ISO certification) cannot compensate for that



  9. Links 30/01/2023: Plasma Mobile 23.01 and GNU Taler 0.9.1

    Links for the day



  10. EPO Management Isn't Listening to Staff, It's Just Trying to Divide and Demoralise the Staff Instead

    “On 18 January 2023,” the staff representatives tell European Patent Office (EPO) colleagues, “the staff representation met with the administration in a Working Group on the project “Bringing Teams Together”. It was the first meeting since the departure of PD General Administration and the radical changes made to the project. We voiced the major concerns of staff, the organization chaos and unrest caused by the project among teams and made concrete proposals.”



  11. Links 30/01/2023: Coreboot 4.19 and Budgie 10.7

    Links for the day



  12. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 29, 2023

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 29, 2023



  13. [Meme] With Superheroes Like These...

    Ever since the new managers arrived the talent has fled the company that falsely credits itself with "Open Source"



  14. Not Tolerating Proprietary 'Bossware' in the Workplace (or at Home in Case of Work-From-Home)

    The company known as Sirius ‘Open Source’ generally rejected… Open Source. Today’s focus was the migration to Slack.



  15. The ISO Delusion: A Stack of Proprietary Junk (Slack) Failing Miserably

    When the company where I worked for nearly 12 years spoke of pragmatism it was merely making excuses to adopt proprietary software at the expense of already-working and functional Free software



  16. Debian 11 on My Main Rig: So Far Mostly OK, But Missing Some Software From Debian 10

    Distributions of GNU/Linux keep urging us to move to the latest, but is the latest always the greatest? On Friday my Debian 10 drive died, so I started moving to Debian 11 on a new drive and here's what that did to my life.



  17. Stigmatising GNU/Linux for Not Withstanding Hardware Failures

    Nowadays "the news" is polluted with a lot of GNU/Linux-hostile nonsense; like with patents, the signal-to-noise ratio is appalling and here we deal with a poor 'report' about "Linux servers" failing to work



  18. Microsofters Inside Sirius 'Open Source'

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ has been employing incompetent managers for years — a sentiment shared among colleagues by the way; today we examine some glaring examples with redacted communications to prove it



  19. Links 29/01/2023: GNOME 43.3 Fixes and Lots About Games

    Links for the day



  20. The Hey Hype Machine

    "Hey Hype" or "Hey Hi" (AI) has been dominating the press lately and a lot of that seems to boil down to paid-for marketing; we need to understand what's truly going on and not be distracted by the substance-less hype



  21. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, January 28, 2023

    IRC logs for Saturday, January 28, 2023



  22. Unmasking AI

    A guest article by Andy Farnell



  23. The ISO Delusion/Sirius Corporation: A 'Tech' Company Run by Non-Technical People

    Sirius ‘Open Source’ was hiring people who brought to the company a culture of redundant tasks and unwanted, even hostile technology; today we continue to tell the story of a company run by the CEO whose friends and acquaintances did severe damage



  24. Links 28/01/2023: Lots of Catching Up (Had Hardware Crash)

    Links for the day



  25. IRC Proceedings: Friday, January 27, 2023

    IRC logs for Friday, January 27, 2023



  26. Microsoft DuckDuckGo Falls to Lowest Share in 2 Years After Being Widely Exposed as Microsoft Proxy, Fake 'Privacy'

    DuckDuckGo, according to this latest data from Statcounter, fell from about 0.71% to just 0.58%; all the gains have been lost amid scandals, such as widespread realisation that DuckDuckGo is a Microsoft informant, curated by Microsoft and hosted by Microsoft (Bing is meanwhile laying off many people, but the media isn’t covering that or barely bothers)



  27. This is What the Microsoft-Sponsored Media Has Been Hyping Up for Weeks (Ahead of Microsoft Layoffs)

    Reprinted with permission from Ryan



  28. [Meme] António Campinos Wants to Be F***ing President Until 2028

    António Campinos insists he will be EPO President for 10 years, i.e. even longer than Benoît Battistelli (despite having appalling approval rates from staff)



  29. European Patent Office Staff Losing Hope

    The EPO’s management with its shallow campaign of obfuscation (pretending to protect children or some other nonsense) is not fooling patent examiners, who have grown tired and whose representatives say “the administration shows no intention of involving the staff representation in the drafting of the consultant’s mandate” (like in Sirius ‘Open Source’ where technical staff is ignored completely for misguided proposals to pass in the dark)



  30. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 26, 2023

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 26, 2023


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts