EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

10.26.18

On PTAB, Andrei Iancu is to the Patent Litigation Giants What Ajit Pai is to Big Telecom (Former Employers)

Posted in America, Patents at 3:45 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

The USPTO suffers the same syndrome as the FCC

Trump and Iancu

Summary: Iancu moves to the next phase of the entryism-esque ‘operation’; he further denies access to PTAB for the purpose of scrutinising wrongly-granted US patents (after fee hikes and other barriers failed to slow PTAB down) whilst also complaining about 35 U.S.C. § 101, which is not a problem at all and is widely supported by technology firms large and small

THE picture is becoming clearer (conflict of interest) and harder to ignore; the USPTO is getting its own Battistelli, the corrupt President of the EPO. Patent quality is seen as a nuisance, not an aspiration, for the ultimate measure of “success” is number of patents or patent lawsuits.

Battistelli attacked judges in the appeal boards, whereas Iancu belittles or bemoans the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), trying to water down/weaken inter partes reviews (IPRs) in direct defiance of the US Supreme Court. He’s supported by other Trump appointments like Justice Gorsuch. Today’s U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is also hostile towards 35 U.S.C. § 101, no matter if courts express no complaints/issues associated with it. Further limitations on IPRs are nowadays being attempted against entities like RPX and by extension Unified Patents. It’s about disenfranchising challengers (oppositions/appeals to bogus patents).

We advise new readers to read older posts of ours for background. PTAB is under attack by dirty tactics and a self-serving industry that strives to ‘create’ nothing but more lawsuits. One site of this industry notes this week:

The court’s ruling creates real challenges to the business model of defensive patent groups such as RPX. I expect that RPX will now petition for Supreme Court review and could become a companion case of the company’s already pending petition on the issue of when such a group has standing to appeal an adverse PTAB decision. RPX Corporation v. ChanBond LLC.

In its unsuccessful rehearing petition, RPX argued that the panel improperly expanded the meaning of real-party-in-interest because of its desire to protect patent holders against defensive patent groups.

They try to send it all the way up to the Supreme Court — to merely reaffirm the legitimacy of what entities like Unified Patents have been doing for years (squashing bogus patents using PTAB). The above from Dennis Crouch is complemented by another post about what happens when tribe lawyers resort to evil and greed, trying to deny access to justice by pretending patents of some large corporations are actually ‘tribal assets’. No matter the amount of negative publicity, the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe still participates in a scam by which to shield bogus patents and help the pharmaceutical cartel overcharge people; we wrote about it approximately a dozen times before, even recently [1, 2]. Here’s the latest on this:

The Federal Circuit has denied the Mohawk Tribe’s petition for en banc rehearing on the issue of whether sovereign immunity may be asserted in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings. Although the case focused on immunity of federally recognized Indian tribes, the Federal Circuit decision is broadly written to also include patents owned by individual states. [Fed.Cir.St.Regis.Decision] A parallel case involving Minnesota is pending before the Federal Circuit. Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. LSI Corp. Appeal No. 18-1559. Of course, the states and tribes do not receive a lot of sympathy from private patent holders whose patents are subject to IPRs.

[...]

The Scheme: Any post about this case is not complete without a discussion of how the tribe came to own these Allergan patents at issue here. Basically, Allergan is paying the tribe to own these Restasis patents for the sole purpose of taking advantage of the Sovereign Immunity benefits. This involved a reverse-payment: Allergan paid St. Regis to take ownership of patents and is paying an annual royalty for their continued participation in the scheme.

So basically what we deal with here are a bunch of scammers and frauds. They even send me threats to my door, citing copyright law as an excuse by which to intimidate me (classic SLAPP).

Who does Iancu sidle with? Scammers and frauds, obviously. He didn’t get picked up by Trump for nothing. He fits a pattern and it makes the Office hopeless. Corrupt people tend to surround themselves by similarly-minded people because it makes them easier to control (the Mafia mentality of kinship and business partners).

Today’s Office Director — like Watchtroll — is pushing a false, misleading narrative, e.g. finding exceptions by which to discredit or distort PTAB’s record on accuracy. It last happened just two days ago. Iancu, who is close to Watchtroll, likes that because he too is in the litigation lobby. It sometimes seems like he’s more like a ‘mole’ propped up by Trump on behalf of business interests. He had long been a proponent of patents on software (before he got the job) and nowadays Iancu keep pushing Section 101 mythology (overstating the supposed ‘problem’). As Dennis Crouch points out, Chad Gilles has just written about the limited impact of what the patent microcosm characterises as “sky is falling” scenario (because they dislike the law).

Regarding PTAB, the chief judge moved (or was moved) some months ago, whereupon the patent microcosm leaped to replace him with another 'mole' like Iancu. David Ruschke (the chief judge) is a scientist, i.e. something that the Trump administration does not quite tolerate.

Iancu now moves to the next stage. ““I believe that the current amendment process in AIA proceedings is not working as intended,” said Andrei Iancu, announcing a new procedure at the AIPLA Annual Meeting,” according to this report from Michael Loney in Toronto. “USPTO director Andrei Iancu made news at the AIPLA Annual Meeting yesterday, announcing a new claim amendment procedure at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,” he wrote.

Then came Dennis Crouch with a transcript:

In remarks today, USPTO Director Iancu has proposed the PTAB’s next step in reforming AIA Trials — giving the patent owner a six-week window following an institution decision to file a motion to amend. See below.

[...]

This is a new day for the USPTO and our Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB). For we are now increasing balance, consistency and transparency, especially in post grant proceedings. And in doing so, we are increasing confidence in these important proceedings.

Since Congress passed the America Invents Act (AIA) in 2011, we have received more than 9,000 petitions and issued over 2,000 final written decisions. So, we now have broad experience in understanding the true benefits and true challenges of these proceedings.

Opinions on how post-grant proceedings have been conducted to date diverge widely. Some vigorously dislike them, arguing that they are unfair and tilt too much in favor of the petitioner. Indeed, some would like to see the system abolished entirely. Others love the system, believing it’s the best tool we have to correct errors, eliminate “bad patents,” and improve patent quality. In fact, some would like to see IPRs expanded to consider even more issues.

So Iancu is trying to weaken PTAB and allow ways around it to defend bogus patents. He has already done several things to that effect and he won’t stop until appeals decline in number — the same thing Battistelli did to the appeal boards at the EPO.

Trump appointments have put corruption on steroids and this is one example that mainstream media rarely and perhaps never speaks about. When Trump puts a lawyer who promotes the litigation ‘industry’ in charge of examination and a tribunal (PTAB) it’s bound to end badly and Watchtroll seems happy, having just published “USPTO Director Iancu tells AIPLA annual meeting: ‘It is a new day at the PTAB’” (this is coming from the most radical patent blog out there).

Well, it’s hard not to feel like it’s somewhat of a coup by the likes of Watchtroll, who bullied Michelle Lee out of her job after Trump had been elected and wanted radical — sometimes corrupt people — in charge of the Office, bypassing the courts.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/11/2019: Slimbook’s GNU/Linux Laptops, Kubernetes Hype

    Links for the day



  2. Techrights is Still a Team Effort

    Getting involved in what we do is not difficult and it is even encouraged



  3. Guest Post/Off-Topic: Koalas Caught in Australian Bushfire

    Australian volunteers and rescuers need help to rescue helpless animals facing danger



  4. Global Patent Warming

    The old term "Global Patent Warming" comes to mind when one assesses the neoliberal approach of today's EPO, where the sole goal is making piles of money by granting loads and loads of illegal European Patents



  5. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, November 21, 2019

    IRC logs for Thursday, November 21, 2019



  6. Teaser: “Enriching Exchanges”

    Ahead of the fourteenth part in the Breton series this old tweet seems increasingly relevant



  7. Web Site Which Exposed Microsoft Crimes is Gone From the Web, But Copies Still Exist

    Reputation laundering operations of Microsoft tell us that Microsoft is a 'new' and 'reformed' company; but Comes v Microsoft documents serve to show that little has changed



  8. Understanding Thierry Breton: Socialising With the Elite

    "Bernadette Chirac is not the only Presidential widow with whom Valerie has close connections."



  9. Justice Peter Huber Speaking to a Front Group of Team UPC May Compromise the Integrity of the FCC and Its Outcomes

    The public reaction, even from some legal professionals, isn't too positive, seeing how judges from BVerfG (FCC) speak to the mouthpieces of Team UPC (biased and in the pockets of the litigation 'industry')



  10. Injustice at Every Level Would Simply Doom the Entire Patent System

    Repeated failure to restore the Rule of Law and enforce accountability/oversight in Europe's patent system renders the entire system moot; it is a case of adherence to basic constitutional pillars



  11. Understanding Thierry Breton: Thierry and the $100 Billion Man

    Thierry Breton's connections to the tax avoidance ploy of his friend Bernard Arnault



  12. Links 21/11/2019: Mesa 19.3.0 RC4, Canonical SPS

    Links for the day



  13. Links 21/11/2019: Charmed OSM, Mesa 19.2.5, DXVK 1.4.5, Zorin OS 15 Lite

    Links for the day



  14. Understanding Thierry Breton: Atos Healthcare - “The Ugly Face of Business”

    "...2,380 people died after their claim for employment and support allowance (ESA) ended because a work capability assessment (WCA) found that they were found fit for work."



  15. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, November 20, 2019

    IRC logs for Wednesday, November 20, 2019



  16. Microsoft Tim: Microsoft is Now Defending Linux

    The difference between fiction and reality



  17. Justice Peter Huber of the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) Calls 'Bullshit' a Rumour Nobody Really Spreads

    A sort of 'trial by media' (by Team UPC) compromises the integrity of the case (constitutional complaint) and can be interpreted as judges succumbing to lobbying/pressure from those who conspire to violate many constitutions across Europe for personal/financial gain



  18. Understanding Thierry Breton: What Thierry Did Next...

    "Whether by coincidence or not, when Atos announced in 2010 that it would acquire Siemens’ IT unit, it was the 32-year-old Macron at Rothschild who advised Breton on the deal."



  19. Links 20/11/2019: HONOR MagicBook With GNU/Linux, Coreboot 4.11, GNU Health Patchset 3.6.1

    Links for the day



  20. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, November 19, 2019

    IRC logs for Tuesday, November 19, 2019



  21. EPO Geared Towards Financial Exploitation of Europe Instead of Serving Europe

    For the financial benefit of law firms and patent offices (they profit from processing loads of patents and lawsuits) Europe is being reverted back to Medieval Times when exercising invention and free thought (or free coding) was a luxury of the rich alone



  22. Microsoft and IBM Are the Patent Trolls, They Won't Protect Us From Trolls

    "Microsoft has no taste" and IBM has no taste, either; they're lying to our collective face together with OIN and the 'Linux' Foundation



  23. How Ralph Nader Put It

    Ralph Nader on money in politics



  24. ZDNet (CBS) Associates GNU/Linux Users With ISIS

    Response to "US student was allegedly building a custom Gentoo Linux distro for ISIS," just published by ZDNet and composed by their biggest troll, Catalin Cimpanu



  25. Understanding Thierry Breton: Noël Forgeard and His “Golden Parachute”

    The end of the first half of the Breton series; in this particular part we continue to cover the EADS scandal and the second half of this series will include the EPO connections (the vote in a plenary for Breton's nomination is due 27/11)



  26. Links 19/11/2019: Zswap's B-Tree Search Implementation, WordPress 5.2.4

    Links for the day



  27. We've Already Entered the Era When Patents Should be Presumed Invalid

    The abundance of low-quality patents may mean short-term profits for patent offices and law firms; but we know at whose expense they are profiting and the legitimacy of patent systems suffers as a result



  28. Jean-Luc Breton

    Breton a champion of obstruction and obfuscation



  29. Understanding Thierry Breton: Insider-Trading Scandal at EADS

    Although Breton was not directly implicated in the insider trading scandal itself he did come under fire in 2007 for the role he played in a side-show to the main story, namely the payment of a generous € 8.5m severance package to Noël Forgeard when the EADS co-CEO was compelled to resign in June 2006.



  30. Startpage is Not Denying Its Betrayal of Privacy, It is Just Being Evasive

    They can't call you a liar if you issue a non-denying 'denial'; the "Roll Safe Think About It" meme seems applicable here


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts