03.30.10
Potential Designs
Summary: Any strong preference for any of the following?
If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.
RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates
Site Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content
Site Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page
IRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time
mtjm said,
March 30, 2010 at 4:11 am
The font of the third one suggests times where laws were made more to help people, it’s also not used by nearly all websites. Does the unusual design of “ig” have some special meanings?
Needs Sunlight said,
March 30, 2010 at 6:05 am
The top two are good starts. The checkbox is nice,
Dr. Roy Schestowitz Reply:
March 30th, 2010 at 6:16 am
Since two were contributed by readers, we might use of all them in different places.
Robotron 2084 said,
March 30, 2010 at 10:58 am
The first graphic is fine but the other two are crap. The green check-box looks good but the font kerneling is all jacked up. The last one is just plain ugly.
And for God’s sake, change your avatar picture to one that uses a correct aspect ratio. Why do you think I used to call you “squarehead” back in the day?
NotZed said,
March 30, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Well at least you’ve got something better than that *god*awful* bottom one! Whomever came up with that should be banned from using The Gimp for life!
The name itself is a bit wet lettuce-y weak and a bit geeky sounding, but it could be worse. Because technology is only getting more pervasive these issues are taking over and affecting everything from human rights to food production to democracy.
Robotron 2084 Reply:
March 30th, 2010 at 10:05 pm
Ha ha ha. Careful… it’s possible one of those designs is Roy’s own creation.
While I agree that “Technology Rights” may be a good issue, should Roy be the once deciding those rights? Is he objective enough to look at all sides of the issues without watering things down to good vs evil? Would he support the right of people to create, sell, and purchase commercial software? I doubt it. A house with a crooked foundation can’t be built up too high, so I don’t think anything will change around here except for the name.