04.06.11

On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Mercenary

Posted in Microsoft at 5:54 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: Words from unknown or unverified entities make extraordinary claims

A TECHRIGHTS READER has brought a new comment from John Bilderback to our attention. John writes, “I get $10 USD for each 50 word comment I write. We have a site we log into where we point the auto script to check against our name and the comment”.

While this seems absurd, the reader believes Bilderback is serious. At least the name seems real, but we at TechRights are sceptical nonetheless. Consider this:

I get $10 USD for each 50 word comment I write. We have a site we log into where we point the auto script to check against our name and the comment.

A heuristics engine checks for certain words. For example, if we use the word “Microsoft”, it gets counted as 3 words. Punctuation doesn’t count.

We get bonus points (words) if we link back to Microsoft.

I currently make about $700 USD per month. It doesn’t quite pay for a living but it makes for extra spending money.

Tony E. Whitcomb, another so-called insider, has E-mailed us on a weekly basis since 2010. Typically, we do not cover any of his claims (he alleged that Microsoft's Jon DeVaan had engaged in political corruption/election fraud). However, there seems to be enough merit to these claims that we decided to mention then again earlier today. These same claims are now being shared with other sources:

Fellowship of the Minds received an e-mail from Tony Whitcomb, a reader who’s asking for our help to publicize what he claims are Microsoft’s illegal campaign contributions to Obama. Mr. Whitcomb’s plight is heartbreaking and should disturb any American. For his whistleblowing, in three years he has gone from being the CEO of a multi-million dollar Internet start-up (that now is 49% owned by Microsoft) to being flat broke and homeless.

To what extent are these true? And how can one judge? These questions illustrate the difficulty involved when dealing with proprietary sources of all kinds.█

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink Mail Send this to a friend

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

A Single Comment

Dr. Roy Schestowitz said,

April 8, 2011 at 1:24 am

Regarding the credibility of the latter claim, we’ve been sent additional details which can be judged for what they are (or what they are claimed to be:

Dear Dr. Schestowitz,

I see you decided to mention me in another one of your articles, http://techrights.org/2011/04/06/extraordinary-claims/ and I also see that you decided to refer to me as, “Another So-Called Insider.”

So for the record, everything that I have now both privately, as well as publicly, claimed against Mr. Jon DeVaan, as well as several others, is nothing but the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God!

Now I have once again attached for your independent, objective and thoughtful review, a copy of the multi-million dollar, Confidential Private Placement Memorandum that me, Mr. DeVaan and a few others, put together for my Intellectual Property called Expotera, back in 2007, along with a copy of the Expotera/Visa debit card.

I am also “cc” Mr. Jon DeVaan on this particular e-mail, along with his boss, Mr. Steven Sinofsky, along with his boss, Mr. Bill Gates, along with a current member of Microsoft’s Board of Directors, Mrs. Maria Klawe, and I would now ask you to please feel free to personally contact any one of these person’s listed above and ask them to fully explain to you what exactly happened to Expotera back in 2008 and while you are at it, you can also feel free to ask Mr. DeVaan, about his blatantly illegal campaign contributions made directly to President Obama’s, 2008 presidential campaign under two different spellings of his last name DeVaan and DeVann.

Dr. Schestowitz, I now personally thank you in advance for all of your time and for all of your considerations into these extremely serious matters and if Mr. DeVaan or anyone else listed above would now like to directly respond to this e-mail written to you, I would most certainly welcome this opportunity to begin a very public discussion in regards to all of these now outstanding matters as, “Another So-Called Insider.”

Very Best Regards,

Tony E. Whitcomb
Founder/CEO Expotera

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Stac Ming
Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Expotera
To: Robert Barnett
Cc: Tony Whitcomb

Dear Mr. Barnett:

My name is Stacy Ming and I am a business associate of Mr. Whitcomb and investor in his Expotera entrepreneurial endeavor.

I will be speaking on behalf of Mr. Whitcomb in this response to give more of a 3rd party point of view and as one of his many investors, however, Mr. Whitcomb wholehearted shares in the comments and statements made in this reply.

First of all, thank you for your willingness to listen to Mr. Whitcomb’s unfortunate situation and asking the question of, “what is it he wants?”

What we would like to see happen is the correction of a huge injustice that occurred to an African American entrepreneur whose only goal was to come up with an innovative product which utilizes the Internet and Social Networking that would give the American public access to these resources for economic purposes (This opportunity is not currently available to Main Street America).

This innovative idea will allow every American the capability to generate additional monthly residual income to help increase their current standard of living or for many Americans in today’s economic climate, the opportunity to just generate income period.

The overall net results for the economy would be the fact that less people would be unemployed (or collecting unemployment benefits if they still qualify), additional jobs and additional taxable income would be generated which would be beneficial to both State and the Federal government.

Mr. Whitcomb has been trying to get President Obama’s attention to this matter since he believes Expotera can immediately help with the current economic crisis that is occurring in America today.

Mr. Whitcomb has been trying to get a response from President Obama, his Administration at every level, and/or his advisors for the past 2 years and had not received any acknowledgement until your email response dated January 9, 2010.

What we want is President Obama’s administration to partner with us in Expotera since it clearly demonstrates a new way to solve social problems where government serves as an investor in innovations that are developed and identified by citizens outside the government.

Expotera and what we are requesting from the Obama Administration definitely falls into President Obama’s newly created Office on Social Innovation and Civic Participation.

How many entrepreneurs approach the government to form a partnership before launching their company? Mr. Whitcomb so strongly believes that this is the right thing to do for the American people and the Obama administration that he has done everything he possibly can do or made every attempt to bring this to the immediate attention of the Obama administration.

As Mr. Whitcomb has previously stated “Expotera is going to be one of the big stories of 2010”. We sincerely hope that history will show that the Obama Administration was a partner of Expotera and was on the side of justice and the American people.

Best Regards, Stacy L Ming

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: tony whitcomb
Date: Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM
Subject: FBI Election Fraud Agent/Illegal Campaign Contributions Microsoft
To: seattle.fbi@ic.fbi.gov
Cc: stacy.ming@gmail.com

Dear Federal Bureau of Investigation:

My name is Tony Whitcomb and this is my former boss/business partner, http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/devaan/

Below is a list of Political Campaign Contributions Mr. Devaan has made to the Democratic Party going back to the year 2000 under the correct spelling of his last name, “Devaan.”

On this list you will see in 2008, Mr. Devaan donated $28,500.00 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee on March 31, 2008.

Below this list is another list of Political Campaign Contributions Mr. Devaan made in 2008 to the, “Obama Victory Fund” on July 25, 2008 for another, $28,500.00.

But you will notice Mr. Devaan made this second large political campaign contribution to the Obama Victory Fund under a slightly different spelling of his last name, “Devann?”

You will also notice, “Mr. Devann” has all of the same address and employment information as, “Mr. Devaan” but, “Mr. Devann” has only donated money in the 2008 election cycle while, “Mr. Devaan” has donated money in every election cycle going back to the year 2000.

I am not an attorney, but is it normal/legal for a private citizen to be able to make multiple large political campaign contributions under two different spellings of their last name?

It is my understanding the following limits apply to contributions from individuals to candidates for all Federal offices:

$2,400 per Election to a Federal candidate — Each primary, runoff, and general election counts as a separate election.

$30,400 per calendar year to a national party committee — applies separately to a party’s national committee, and House and Senate campaign committee.

$10,000 per calendar year to state, district & local party committees.

$5,000 per calendar year to state, district & local party committee.

It is also my understanding that, “No person shall make a contribution in the name of another person or knowingly permit his name to be used to effect such a contribution, and no person shall knowingly accept a contribution made by one person in the name of another person.”

And it is also my understanding, “It is a federal crime to evade the following donation limits listed above through a straw donor scheme” which is exactly what I think Mr. Devaan may have been a part of through the 4th largest contributors to President Barack Obama’s Presidential Campaign, Microsoft.

Upon your request I can provide the FBI with a copy of a $10,000,000.00 Confidential Private Placement Memorandum that Mr. Devaan and I put together back in 2007 in regards to my Intellectual Property called Expotera to help you verify my relationship to Mr. Devaan and his relationship to me.

Thank you for your time and for your immediate considerations into these matters and if you should need any additional information from me you can feel free to reach me via this e-mail address.

Sincerely,

Tony E. Whitcomb
Founder/CEO Expotera

Jon Devaan Political Campaign Contributions 2008 Election Cycle Contribution Totals

Download all contribution records for this person from 1999 to present To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type

2010 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0
2008 Transaction Count/Amount3/$33,100
2006 Transaction Count/Amount5/$13,300
2004 Transaction Count/Amount12/$50,000
2002 Transaction Count/Amount3/$3,000
2000 Transaction Count/Amount4/$4,000

Download all contribution records for this person from 1999 to present To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type

Jon Devaan Contribution List in 2008

Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar Amount Date Primary/General Contributed To

DEVAAN, JON MEDINA, WA 98039 MICROSOFT/SENIOR VP OF ENGINEERING
$28,500 03/31/2008 P DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE – Democrat

DEVAAN, JON S MEDINA, WA 98039 MICROSOFT CORP./EXECUTIVE
$2,3000 3/12/2007 P AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE – Democrat Farm Labor

DEVAAN, JON S MEDINA, WA 98039 MICROSOFT CORP./EXECUTIVE
$2,3000 3/12/2007 G AL FRANKEN FOR SENATE – Democrat Farm Labor

http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/jon-devaan.asp?cycle=08

Jon Devann Political Campaign Contributions 2008 Election Cycle Contribution Totals

Download all contribution records for this person from 1999 to present To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type

2010 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0
2008 Transaction Count/Amount2/$30,800
2006 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0
2004 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0
2002 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0
2000 Transaction Count/Amount0/$0

Download all contribution records for this person from 1999 to present To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type

Jon Devann Contribution List in 2008

Name & Location Employer/Occupation Dollar Amount Date Primary/General Contributed To

Devann, Jon S Mr.MEDINA, WA 98039 Microsoft Corp/Executive
$28,5000 7/25/2008 P OBAMA VICTORY FUND – Democrat

DeVann, Jon S MEDINA, WA 98039 Microsoft Corp/Executive
$2,300 12/27/2007 P OBAMA FOR AMERICA – Democrat

http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/jon-devann.asp?cycle=08

Barack Obama (D)Top Contributors this table lists the top donors to this candidate in the 2008 election cycle.

University of California $1,591,395
Goldman Sachs $994,795
Harvard University $854,747
Microsoft Corp $833,617
Google Inc $803,436
Citigroup Inc $701,290
JPMorgan Chase & Co $695,132
Time Warner $590,084
Sidley Austin LLP $588,598
Stanford University $586,557
National Amusements Inc $551,683
UBS AG $543,219
Wilmerhale Llp $542,618
Skadden, Arps et al $530,839
IBM Corp $528,822
Columbia University $528,302
Morgan Stanley $514,881
General Electric $499,130
US Government $494,820
Latham & Watkins $493,835

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=n00009638

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Schutz, Ronald J.
Date: Sat, May 1, 2010 at 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Expotera/Canada
To: tony whitcomb
Cc: Stac Ming

Tony:

We admire your passion and intensity. It has obviously served you well over the years. But as we said in our meeting, although we think you were wronged by Mr. Devaan and his group we are not willing to take on that battle for you for all of the reasons we stated in the meeting (e.g., the inherent difficulty in proving the claim and the likelihood that there would be no money to collect). I hope you appreciate that we have limited resources and that we have an obligation on behalf of the firm and its employees to invest those resources wisely. We do not think pursuing this claim on any type of incentive fee arrangement would be a wise use of our resources. And, even if you had the money to pay us we would advise you to use the money toward developing your business.

Again, we hope you take your passion and intensity and apply it toward developing your business.

Regards,

Ron

Ronald J. Schutz

Attorney

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P.

2800 LaSalle Plaza

800 LaSalle Avenue

Minneapolis, MN 55402

Direct: (612) 349-8435

Fax: (612) 339-4181

Email: rjschutz@rkmc.com

http://www.rkmc.com

From: tony whitcomb [mailto:expotera.ceo@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:41 AM
To: Schutz, Ronald J.
Cc: Stac Ming
Subject: Fwd: Expotera/Canada

Ron,

Please let your Partners and Governor Pawlenty know that Expotera has already made several great contacts outside of the United States in regards to this global opportunity.

So all we need at this point is a great attorney/law firm by our side to help us quickly clean up the mess Mr. Devaan and his group have made of this project up to this point.

And to legally protect all of us going forward from here, because thirteen years of repeatedly getting screwed over by corrupt, dishonest and unethical individuals has to finally come to an end.

Best,

Tony

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: tony whitcomb
Date: Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM
Subject: Expotera/Canada
To: dgoossen@springfieldindustries.ca

Dave,

It was a real pleasure meeting you and as promised, here’s a copy of our Confidential Private Placement Memorandum and a copy of our Expotera/Visa debit card.

We are hoping to have the web site up and running in the next 30 to 60 days and as soon as we are able to offer the Expotera opportunity up in Canada, I will be sure to let you know.

Dave I wish you nothing but continued success in all of your current and future endeavors and I hope you and your family enjoyed your week’s stay here in Minnesota and have a very safe drive home.

Best Regards,

Tony Whitcomb

CEO

Expotera

What Else is New

365 Days Later, German Justice Minister Heiko Maas Remains Silent and Thus Complicit in EPO Abuses on German Soil

The utter lack of participation, involvement or even intervention by German authorities serve to confirm that the government of Germany is very much complicit in the EPO's abuses, by refusing to do anything to stop them
Battistelli's Idea of 'Independent' 'External' 'Social' 'Study' is Something to BUY From Notorious Firm PwC

The sham which is the so-called 'social' 'study' as explained by the Central Staff Committee last year, well before the results came out
Europe Should Listen to SMEs Regarding the UPC, as Battistelli, Team UPC and the Select Committee Lie About It

Another example of UPC promotion from within the EPO (a committee dedicated to UPC promotion), in spite of everything we know about opposition to the UPC from small businesses (not the imaginary ones which Team UPC claims to speak 'on behalf' of)
Video: French State Secretary for Digital Economy Speaks Out Against Benoît Battistelli at Battistelli's PR Event

Uploaded by SUEPO earlier today was the above video, which shows how last year's party (actually 2015) was spoiled for Battistelli by the French State Secretary for Digital Economy, Axelle Lemaire, echoing the French government's concern about union busting etc. at the EPO (only to be rudely censored by Battistelli's 'media partner')
When EPO Vice-President, Who Will Resign Soon, Made a Mockery of the EPO

Leaked letter from Willy Minnoye/management to the people who are supposed to oversee EPO management
No Separation of Powers or Justice at the EPO: Reign of Terror by Battistelli Explained in Letter to the Administrative Council

In violation of international labour laws, Team Battistelli marches on and engages in a union-busting race against the clock, relying on immunity to keep this gravy train rolling before an inevitable crash
FFPE-EPO is a Zombie (if Not Dead) Yellow Union Whose Only de Facto Purpose Has Been Attacking the EPO's Staff Union

A new year's reminder that the EPO has only one legitimate union, the Staff Union of the EPO (SUEPO), whereas FFPE-EPO serves virtually no purpose other than to attack SUEPO, more so after signing a deal with the devil (Battistelli)
EPO Select Committee is Wrong About the Unitary Patent (UPC)

The UPC is neither desirable nor practical, especially now that the EPO lowers patent quality; but does the Select Committee understand that?
Links 1/1/2017: KDE Plasma 5.9 Coming, PelicanHPC 4.1

Links for the day
2016: The Year EPO Staff Went on Strike, Possibly “Biggest Ever Strike in the History of the EPO.”

A look back at a key event inside the EPO, which marked somewhat of a breaking point for Team Battistelli
Open EPO Letter Bemoans Battistelli's Antisocial Autocracy Disguised/Camouflaged Under the Misleading Term “Social Democracy”

Orwellian misuse of terms by the EPO, which keeps using the term "social democracy" whilst actually pushing further and further towards a totalitarian regime led by 'King' Battistelli
EPO's Central Staff Committee Complains About Battistelli's Bodyguards Fetish and Corruption of the Media

Even the EPO's Central Staff Committee (not SUEPO) understands that Battistelli brings waste and disgrace to the Office
Translation of French Texts About Battistelli and His Awful Perception of Omnipotence

The paradigm of totalitarian control, inability to admit mistakes and tendency to lie all the time is backfiring on the EPO rather than making it stronger
2016 in Review and Plans for 2017

A look back and a quick look at the road ahead, as 2016 comes to an end
Links 31/12/2016: Firefox 52 Improves Privacy, Tizen Comes to Middle East

Links for the day
Korea's Challenge of Abusive Patents, China's Race to the Bottom, and the United States' Gradual Improvement

An outline of recent stories about patents, where patent quality is key, reflecting upon the population's interests rather than the interests of few very powerful corporations
German Justice Minister Heiko Maas, Who Flagrantly Ignores Serious EPO Abuses, Helps Battistelli's Agenda ('Reform') With the UPC

The role played by Heiko Maas in the UPC, which would harm businesses and people all across Europe, is becoming clearer and hence his motivation/desire to keep Team Battistelli in tact, in spite of endless abuses on German soil
Links 30/12/2016: KDE for FreeBSD, Automotive Grade Linux UCB 3.0

Links for the day
Software Patents Continue to Collapse, But IBM, Watchtroll and David Kappos Continue to Deny and Antagonise It

The latest facts and figures about software patents, compared to the spinmeisters' creed which they profit from (because they are in the litigation business)
2016 Was a Terrible Year for Patent Trolls and 2017 Will Probably be a Lot Worse for Them

The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is planning to weigh in on a case which will quite likely drive patent trolls out of the Eastern District of Texas, where all the courts that are notoriously friendly towards them reside
Fitbit’s Decision to Drop Patent Case Against Jawbone Shows Decreased Potency of Abstract Patents, Not Jawbone’s Weakness

The scope of patents in the United States is rapidly tightening (meaning, fewer patents are deemed acceptable by the courts) and Fitbit’s patent case is the latest case to bite the dust
The EPO Under Benoît Battistelli Makes the Mafia Look Like Rookies

Pretending there is a violent, physical threat that is imminent, Paranoid in Chief Benoît Battistelli is alleged to have pursued weapons on EPO premises
Links 29/12/2016: OpenELEC 7.0, Android Wear 2.0 Smartwatches Coming

Links for the day
Links 28/12/2016: OpenVPN 2.4, SeaMonkey 2.46

Links for the day
Bad Service at the European Patent Office (EPO) Escalated in the Form of Complaints to European Authorities/Politicians

A look at actions taken at a political level against the EPO in spite of the EPO's truly awkward exemption from lawfulness or even minimal accountability
No “New Life to Software Patents” in the US; That's Just Fiction Perpetuated by the Patent Microcosm

Selective emphasis on very few cases and neglect of various other dimensions help create a parallel reality (or so-called 'fake news') where software patents are on the rebound
Links 27/12/2016: Chakra GNU/Linux Updated, Preview of Fedora 26

Links for the day
Leaked: Letter to Quality Support (DQS) at the European Patent Office (EPO)

Example of abysmal service at the EPO, where high staff turnover and unreasonable pressure from above may be leading to communication issues that harm stakeholders the most
Negative Publicity (Personal or by Association With the EPO) is Devouring the Institution

Willy Minnoye, Ciarán McGinley, Lionel Baranès, Theano Evangelou and others near the top of the EPO pyramid recalled in light of old news about them
2017 Will be the Year Team Battistelli Collapsed and EPO 'Reform' Became All About Detoxifying the Organisation

Battistelli's circle (or "Team Battistelli") is starting to disintegrate, perhaps in anticipation of a tough year full of new leaks ("WillyLeaks" as some put it)