EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.28.10

Patents Are Not Copyrights, Copyrights Are Not Patents

Posted in Intellectual Monopoly, Patents, SCO at 5:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Toy animal

Summary: Another fine example from the news which helps show why the term “IP” is poisonous; Google wins a monopoly on mouse-tracking for personalisation/search results refinement

A SHORT WHILE ago we wrote about the deliberate confusion between counterfeiting and copyright infringement. The importance of this is very high because the mixture of totally separate notions (such as “IP” as umbrella term for copyrights, trademarks, and patents) is the source of much abuse. It enables an exploitative party to use particular laws that apply to one area of law in another area where such laws do not exist. According to an article we saw yesterday in TechDirt (put in daily links already), some companies are trying to extend the scope of copyright to mean “works like another thing” rather than be an exact copy of one specific rendition. This ‘artistic’ extension of copyrights is perhaps the sort of thing SCO, for example, would crave. We are glad to see that Glyn Moody has just addressed this subject, which he introduced as follows:

One of the many arguments against allowing patents for software (alongside the principle argument that software is made up of algorithms, which are essentially mathematics, which is pure knowledge and hence is not patentable) is the fact that software is anyway covered by copyright law. This means that others cannot simply copy your code, just as a novelist cannot simply copy large chunks of someone else’s writing. But whether copyright law prevents others from copying the underlying ideas of that code by re-implementing them independently is another matter.

On-the-fly changes to the law are never acceptable as laws define boundaries that preserve rationale.

In other disturbing news, Google carries on patenting software, even software which violates a user’s privacy. [via]

Google has been awarded a patent for displaying search results based on how you move your mouse cursor on the screen.

While it sounds initially bizarre, Google’s plans are to monitor the movements of the cursor, such as when a user hovers over a certain ad or link to read a tooltip, and then provide relevant search results, and ads, based on that behaviour. It means that it does not require users to actually click a link to know that they were interested in it, opening a world of opportunity for even more focused ads, which are Google’s main source of income.

The fine balance between features and privacy is a controversial subject beyond the scope of this site. But in any case, for Google to claim a monopoly on it — that’s where the problem lies.

Links 28/7/2010: eBox Platform 1.5, $150 Linux-powered Tablet

Posted in News Roundup at 5:02 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

GNOME bluefish

Contents

GNU/Linux

  • Server

    • Linux-based hybrid video server supports 40 channels

      Exacq Technologies is shipping a line of Linux-based hybrid video surveillance appliances with Intel Atom processors. The ExacqVision EL-S systems offer eight or 16 analog inputs and up to 24 IP inputs, allowing creation of systems with up to 40 channels overall, says the company.

  • Audiocasts/Shows

  • Kernel Space

    • Graphics Stack

      • AMD Catalyst 10.7 For Linux Has Eyefinity Support

        As was widely anticipated, today AMD is rolling out their Catalyst 10.7 graphics driver for Windows and Linux platforms. On the Windows side, their Catalyst 10.7 rolls out support for OpenGL ES 2.0. ATI Radeon HD 2000/3000/4000/5000 series graphics cards (along with the FirePro hardware) running Windows can now take advantage of OpenGL ES 2.0 support with HTML5 for in-browser graphics rendering. However, that support hasn’t yet made its way to the Catalyst Linux driver, but there are other changes packed away in this month’s update.

      • Kristian Shows Off GTK+ 3.0 On Wayland

        Earlier this month the Wayland TODO list was updated — a month after it received some summer love — and now we some new information from the founder of the Wayland Display Server, Kristian Høgsberg.

      • Latest ATI Video Driver Has Support for Ubuntu 10.04

        Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) proudly announced a few minutes ago, July 26th, another improved version of its ATI Catalyst Linux display driver, available for both x86 and x86_64 architectures. ATI Catalyst 10.7 introduces final and stable support for the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS (Lucid Lynx) operating system, early support for the newly released openSUSE 11.3 distribution, and official support for the ATI Eyefinity technology.

  • Applications

  • Desktop Environments

    • K Desktop Environment/KDE SC)

      • Forking KDE 3: Trinity KDE’s Timothy Pearson

        Pearson tried other desktops, “but nothing really satisfied my needs. This left me with one choice: to maintain KDE 3.5.” That, in turn, forced Pearson into crash courses in assembling Debian packages and C++ applications development with the help of others in the Kubuntu community. Over the past two years, he has been maintaining KDE 3.5, and adding new features to the code base.

      • Exporting and publishing

        It is fair to say that digiKam is a clear winner in this respect. Aperture exports to far few services, but does so in a very nice way. Aperture keeps track of what you have exported as long as you export it to one of the services mentioned before. Think about it: will you really never log in to your Flickr account? Even if you are managing plenty of albums? And are you never willing to change anything straight there? I doubt it and I rate the way Aperture manages your export as nice to have! Therefore, digiKam is the clear winner here: you are free to choose whatever service you like and digiKam will manage your exports without problems!

      • Reviewed: KOffice 2.2

        This version of KOffice is much improved, but whether this is enough now, with the growth of online office options, is debatable. KDE’s social strategy means that in the future, adding cloud options – whether that’s working with Google Docs, MS Live Office or whatever Facebook comes up with – shouldn’t be too problematic. With the input of Nokia, which is now supporting the project as part of its mobile strategy, the developers seem to be intent on consolidating what’s available rather than adding superfluous fluff and online storage is likely to be a big part of that.

  • Distributions

    • New Releases

      • eBox Platform 1.5 Is Based on Ubuntu 10.04

        eBox Platform 1.5 has been released. The latest version makes the switch to Ubuntu 10.04 and comes with several new features and components. Despite not being labeled as such, eBox Platform 1.5 is a beta of sorts and is only intended for testing purposes. Eventually, it will become eBox Platform 2.0, once all of the bugs have been squashed. Otherwise, all of the planned features have been implemented and there will be no additions moving forward.

      • What? Already? Yep, it’s Kiara 15!
    • Debian Family

      • Canonical/Ubuntu

        • Ubuntu, the Cloud and the Future — Neil Levine

          After the cloud summit last week at OSCON, I sat down with Neil Levine of Canonical to see what was in store for Ubuntu cloud-wise (Canonical is a partner of ours in our cloud ISV program). Neil is the VP of Canonical’s corporate services division which handles their cloud and server products.

        • Ubuntu’s Advantages Over Windows and Mac

          Yet Ubuntu, provides a different approach one where there’s one comprehensive software updating system. Ubuntu has a centralized repository of applications system. The only third-party applications that slide into the main repository are the ones that comply and pass the tests given by Canonical, the company that produces Ubuntu. If they pass and prove to work with the OS, they are in. This allows Ubuntu’s main repository to always have the very latest version of Google or Opera, for example. So the one it does have will usually install easily, work smoothly, and remain updated automatically.

  • Devices/Embedded

    • Phones

      • Android

        • Mobile Tools: Android Vs. iPhone for Small Business

          Choosing a good mobile smartphone is crucial for many small businesses. The right smartphone can make all the difference between being productive on the road and being ineffective away from the office. Small business owners looking to choose a mobile smartphone for themselves, or their workers, should think strongly about passing up the iPhone for an Android.

        • Would open source have prevented Apple bruising?

          It does appear the iPhone4 may have gone out the door too fast and without the usual carrier testing, and this may be evidence of the pressures Apple is feeling regarding speed of development given Android’s traction in applications and market share.

    • Tablets

      • In Search Of… Android Tablets

        There’s also the issue of key shortages in important component parts — 10″, 7″ and 5″ LCD and OLED touchscreen displays produced by the major Korean, Chinese and Japanese manufacturers are all being eaten up. And Apple is apparently one of the biggest consumers of the existing pipeline. If the demand for iPad screens is becoming difficult to meet, then surely Android Tablets from the major consumer electronics OEMs are going to have manufacturing procurement issues as well.

      • Kmart touts $150 Android tablet

        Kmart has begun touting a seven-inch “Gentouch78″ Android 2.1 tablet for $150, as well as a Linux-based seven-inch color e-reader called “TheBook eReader,” both from Augen. Meanwhile, TheStreet quotes analyst Ashok Kumar as saying Motorola will release a 10-inch tablet this November running Android 3.0.

      • Seven-inch Android 2.1 tablet targets Indian market

        Indian retailer Infibeam.com is readying two seven-inch tablet computers to be sold in India, one running Android 2.1, and one running Windows CE 6.0. Both known as the “Phi,” the devices have different CPUs and dimensions, but both offer 800 x 480 pixel resistive touchscreens and up to five hours of battery life, the company says.

Free Software/Open Source

  • Deacon: Musings on Starting an Open-Source Project

    I’ve been using open-source software since the late-nineties – I can still remember the intrigued excitement I felt when my friend Seth first told me about a free system called “Linux”, and showed me the LRP box humming along in his attic. In April, nearly two college degrees, countless thousands of lines of code, and over a decade later, I felt that same excitement when I decided to launch my own open-source project. “Deacon” (short for Droid+Beacon) was on its way to becoming a library for Android developers who wished to add push-notification capability to their Android applications. The Deacon library would avoid requiring the use of any third-party server for push delivery, affording complete autonomy for app developers – and embodying the spirit of freedom and choice that the Android platform represents.

  • Sony Pictures Imageworks: SIGGRAPH 2010

    Imageworks adds to its Open Source initiative, announced at Siggraph09, with the release of its sixth program, OpenColorIO, which provides a framework for sharing color transformations across computer graphics workflows. Imageworks has also scheduled a press conference with Industrial Light & Magic on Tuesday morning to announce another important Open Source development.

  • Lockheed Martin Launches Eureka Streams™ Open Source Project for Enterprise Social Networking
  • Will Adobe See the Light (of Day)?

    The content management company Day Software may not be the world’s most famous outfit making money from open source – perhaps a function of the fact that it is located in Basel, hardly known as a hotbed of hackers – but it’s certainly an important one, particularly in the Apache part of the open source ecosystem.

    That’s partly because Day’s Chief Scientist, Roy Fielding, was co-founder of the Apache Software Foundation, author of the Apache Software licence, and creator of the Apache web server.

    [...]

    Two things concern me here. The first is the emphasis on integrating proprietary technologies like AIR and Flash with Day’s products. The second, more worrying, is the total absence of any mention of Day’s open source work. Does this mean that Adobe is taking over Day in order to turn its products into purely proprietary offerings? Will it simply abandon Day’s work in supporting Apache projects?

  • SaaS

    • Apache Hadoop project gains momentum

      Hadoop is a top-level Apache project that provides a Java software framework for storing, managing, processing and analysing the massive datasets produced by enterprise web and cloud computing applications.

  • Databases

  • Business

    • One Year and 120,000 Downloads Later: Kaltura Launches Version 2.0 of Its On-Prem Community Edition Open Source Video Platform
    • Semi-Open Source

      • What you can do to help get rid of open core

        As a general rule, it is important to realize that the managers who run open core companies don’t work in the same universe as the average open source blogger (like myself) does. For instance, that SugarCRM get’s criticism for being closed source on Slashdot is of course helpful, but let’s face it: has anyone ever changed their business strategy based on some rants on Slashdot? Ok, so MySQL actually had to backtrack on its plans to further close source backup modules, because Sun (in its desperation, more than anything else) was sensitive to such criticism, but MySQL’s managers themselves would not have cared, they were used to being bashed by a small group of PostgreSQL fanboys anyway each time MySQL was mentioned on the site.

        And that’s what you have to remember when talking about open core. The business managers practicing open core will not care to educate themselves about values of the open source community, Open Source Definition, Building a vibrant community or any of the things we in the open source community have learned to value. To them, such arguments are just one word against another, indistinguishable from the teenager who has to mention “PostgreSQL” as a reflex every time someone mentions “MySQL”. Who’s to say what’s right or wrong, there are so many opinions…?

      • OpenGamma and Open Core Components
      • Open Core, Natural Feature Divisions, and OpenGamma
      • The basis of OSS business models: property and efficiency

        There are two possible sources for the value: a property (something that can be transferred) and efficiency (something that is inherent in what the company do, and how they do it). With Open Source, usually “property” is non-exclusive (with the exception of Open Core, where part of the code is not open at all). Other examples of property are trademarks, patents, licenses… anything that may be transferred to another entity through a contract or legal transaction.

      • Open Source Business Models (for Compiere)

        The basic question: How do you want to make money?

        After open sourcing your product, your income options are reduced. Here are the usual options:
        Service based

        * Consulting
        * Support, Maintanance
        * Hosting

        Product based

        * Product add-on / extensions
        * Sponsored develipment
        * Legal (commercial license, hold harmless agreement)

  • Licensing

    • The issue of license proliferation »

      When I was on the ICANN board, we were dealing with the issue of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs), an initiative to allow non-latin characters in domain names. Technically, it was difficult and even more difficult was the consensus process to decide exactly how to do it. Many communities like the Chinese and Arabic regions were anxious to get started and were getting very frustrated with the ICANN process around IDNs. At times, it seemed like the Arab Internet and the Chinese Internet were ready to either fork away and make their own Internet to solve the problem or were ready to introduce local technical “hacks” to deal with the issue which would have broken many applications that depended the standard behavior of the Domain Name System.

      [...]

      Copy-left licenses such as the Free Software Foundation’s GNU Public License require derivative works be licensed under the same license. This feature – and to many coders this is a feature, not a bug – however, makes it challenging to combine code from projects with different licenses because of the requirement on how derivatives must be licensed. These islands of code looked a lot like a forked Internet, existing IM networks and email before the Internet connected them together.

    • Lawsuit Averted As WordPress and Thesis Settle Differences Over Themes And The GPL

      Free (libre) and open source software is one of the best examples of an alternative to restrictive copyright, but even within these communities there can be heated debates about licensing. The WordPress community just witnessed such a debate between the founder of WordPress, Matt Mullenweg, and the developer of a popular premium WordPress theme, Chris Pearson, over whether or not themes are subject to the GPL (WordPress’ license). The GPL applies to derivative works of a program—requiring that they, too, must be licensed freely—but Pearson maintained quite publicly that he wasn’t subject to it and could use a proprietary license for his theme. This caused tension between him and Mullenweg, until last week, when Pearson gave in and switched to a split GPL license.

      [...]

      This kind of disagreement also highlights the fact that free software licenses (like the GPL) and the free culture licenses they’ve inspired (like some of those offered by Creative Commons) are ultimately hacks on a restrictive copyright system; they’re merely tactics to reverse the negative effects of overly restrictive copyright, but not at all the ideal scenario. For example, we’ve seen concerns over how Creative Commons licenses act as a contractual layer on top of copyright, and non-commercial restrictions can also be a source of tension. Sometimes these disputes help a community to better develop its position on copyright and licensing, but other times, they’re a sign that these licenses are still just a hack on a less than ideal system.

  • Openness/Sharing

    • Open Data

      • PP4_0.1: Repositories for Scientific Data

        I shall be blunt. The only place where Scientific Data should be stored is in domain-specific repositories.

      • Court secrecy: The courts are open but justice is a closed book

        The courts’ refusal to allow people to tape-record benefit a few private companies whom the court approves in cosy deals. These people have exclusive right to tape record or listen to official recordings. The cost to the individual of hiring them is about £150– 250 per hour of typing and even before the transcription process begins, you must sign a form stating you will pay whatever amount the company decides. You could be out tens of thousand of pounds and there’s no way to challenge the bill as only the company is allowed access to the raw tapes.

  • Programming

Leftovers

  • Immigration pushes EU population above 500 million

    Overall, population increased in 19 EU countries and declined in eight, with the highest rates of growth in Luxembourg, Sweden, Slovenia and Belgium. Lithuania, Latvia and Bulgaria saw the largest overall reductions in population.

  • Science

    • Kepler Scientist: ‘Galaxy is Rich in Earth-Like Planets’

      In a recent presentation, Kepler co-investigator Dimitar Sasselov preempted the official announcement that the exoplanet-hunting Kepler Space Telescope has discovered about 140 candidate worlds orbiting other stars that are “like Earth.”

    • If the Earth Stood Still

      The following is not a futuristic scenario. It is not science fiction. It is a demonstration of the capabilities of GIS to model the results of an extremely unlikely, yet intellectually fascinating query: What would happen if the earth stopped spinning? ArcGIS was used to perform complex raster analysis and volumetric computations and generate maps that visualize these results.

    • The Titanic in 3-D

      A team of scientists will launch an expedition to the Titanic next month to assess the deteriorating condition of the world’s most famous shipwreck and create a detailed three-dimensional map that will “virtually raise the Titanic” for the public.

    • Panasonic launches 3D camcorder for budding James Camerons

      Not enough 3D content available on your fancy new 3D TV? Then make your own. Panasonic has become the first major manufacturer to launch a consumer videocamera that can record in 3D.

  • Security/Aggression

  • Censorship/Privacy/Civil Rights

    • Chatroulette collecting IP addresses, screenshots

      The founder of online video chat-room sensation ‘Chatroulette’ has revealed the company has been storing the IP addresses and even taking screenshots of users engaged in inappropriate conduct whilst connected to the service.

    • Privacy Lawsuit Targets Net Giants Over ‘Zombie’ Cookies

      A wide swath of the net’s top websites, including MTV, ESPN, MySpace, Hulu, ABC, NBC and Scribd, were sued in federal court Friday on the grounds they violated federal computer intrusion law by secretly using storage in Adobe’s Flash player to re-create cookies deleted by users.

  • Intellectual Monopolies

    • Are Investment Ticker Symbols Covered By Trademark Law?

      Here’s an interesting trademark law dispute that hits on something I never would have considered before: can there be trademark protection in a ticker symbol? My first reaction, honestly, was that the whole concept is silly. A ticker symbol is unique, and anyone buying a particular product should simply know what they’re investing in, and that includes entering the correct ticker.

    • Copyrights

      • For An Industry Being Destroyed By ‘File Sharing,’ Film Industry Keeps Reporting Record Numbers

        The movie industry keeps sending very, very mixed messages. It keeps insisting that its business is being decimated by file sharing, but then keeps putting out reports bragging how well it’s doing. Reader ethorad points us to a page put up by the UK Film Council about the movie business in the UK, where it makes a pretty compelling case that the movie business is thriving, despite all the reports of doom and gloom. Some key highlights:

        * The core UK film industry has grown 50% over the last 10 years
        * UK box office takings at record levels, with growth of over 60% over 10 years
        * They have had a 500% return on their investments in film

      • So What DMCA Exemption Requests Got Rejected?

        Many of the rejections were basically over situations where the Copyright Office said there was no real evidence of an actual problem, so nothing to worry about. Still, just the fact that many of these situations had to be proposed and were rejected shows how ridiculous copyright law is today. The fact that we have to go begging to the Copyright Office every three years for simple exemptions like this, which can (and often are) rejected, is not how modern society should work. Technology is changing how people can and do interact with content. This whole process (even the fact that it only happens every three years) has the whole thing backwards. We shouldn’t have to ask for permission to use technology to do what it allows.

      • Digital Economy (UK)

Clip of the Day

openBSD 4.6 Recording


Talk in Spanish: Presente y futuras amenazas a la libertad del software

Posted in Site News at 1:46 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Slide 1

Summary: Translation of last week’s talk about threats to software freedom

I

was delighted to see that some people found the 2-hour talk, which I prepared in the train on my Palm PDA (with external keyboard), valuable enough to translate it.

One reader of Techrights has kindly produced an ODP version and PDF version of the talk, as some people had requested it. He also produced a Spanish translation of it (contents as plain text below).

  • Present and future threats to software freedom [ODP, PDF]
  • Presente y futuras amenazas a la libertad del software [ODP, PDF]

Feel free to reuse these and teach others to keep software free (libre).


Manchester Software Libre
Presente y futuras amenazas a la libertad del software
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Universidad de Manchester


La libertad del software que usamos constantemente se enfrenta a retos que hay que reconocer con el fin de hacerles frente. En esta presentación, varios de ellos se destacan y son unos pocos ejemplos proporcionados.
Son diapositivas minimalistas para no distraer y animar a más interacciones Por favor, no interrumpir al orador, pero hagan preguntas
Hoy estamos sacando las consideraciones técnicas fuera del tema.


En su lugar …


No nos sorprende saber que los meritos tecnicos de por sí solas no garantizan la victoria


Temas de desafíos (con las intersecciones entre ellas):

1. Marco legal

2. Software filosofía

3. Competencia


Información general
Marco legal

* La legislación del gobierno
* Las patentes de software
* Contratación
normas *


Visión de conjunto – CTD.
Software filosofía

* Paradigmas de negocios (como la adquisición en comparación con el apoyo y mantenimiento)
* Escasez artificial frente a la abundancia
* Conceptos erróneos acerca de la transparencia
* Exclusiones (por motivos ético-político)


Visión de conjunto – CTD.
Competencia

* Publicidad
* Agrupación
* Sistemas heredados / lock-in
conflictos de intereses *


Gobierno legislación

* Distribución del presupuesto y asignación (más sobre esto más adelante)
* Criptografía de exportación
* DMCA contra el descifrado
* ACTA
* Grupos de presión


tratados Transnacional

DMCA – sofoca la ingeniería inversa, el acceso a los medios de comunicación, copia de seguridad, el intercambio, la piratería

ACTA – derechos de autor, patentes, y potencialmente usuarios de Internet en seguimiento (agrupados con la lucha de la medicina falsa)


Las patentes de software

* Las patentes de software sólo es válido en algunos países, pero existen lagunas (ambigüedad “como tal”)
* En Europa, la legalización formal de la reforma solicitada por los nombres diferentes (unificación / armonización / UPLS / Patente Comunitaria)

Sistemas piramidales

* Acaparadores de patentes (por ejemplo, Intellectual Ventures)
* Cruce de licencias (vendedores), las piscinas (por ejemplo, RPX)


Las patentes de software – CTD.
Patentes ofertas

* Secreto, se trata de excluir la competencia
* No revele información sobre patentes reales (el método OCS)
* Los beneficios económicos a los titulares de patentes no importa la elección de los productos comprados (monopolio frente a la ejecución)


Ejemplos de casos de patentes contra Linux

* Apple vs Android / HTC
* Apple amenaza a Palm patente (ahora HP)
* El caso de Apple, Nokia puede incluir Maemo / Meego
* Acacia contra Red Hat, Novell
* Microsoft contra Linux distribuidores (por ejemplo, TomTom)
* OIN defiende “buenas” las patentes de software, sofoca abolishers de las patentes del software


Papel de Novell

* Génesis de las denuncias de patentes contra Linux – mayo-noviembre de 2006 (Novell se acercó a Microsoft)
* Reacción en “Boicot a Novell” campaña (ahora parte de Techrights)
* Novell cuenta con gran cartera de patentes de software (el más alto por empleado), en su mayoría vende software propietario
* Habilitar el dominio de APIs de Microsoft (por ejemplo, Mono, Moonlight)


Papel de Novell – CTD.

* La oferta de “paz IP mental” como propuesta de valor añadido
* FUD (miedo, incertidumbre y duda) – componente visible y oculto / componente implícito
* Solución: recompensa para un comportamiento razonable, denunciar la conducta contraproducente


Obtención

* Tradición versus la novedad
* Proveedores y “puertas giratorias”
* La falta de licitación
* Dependencias dentro del sistema existente
* La asignación presupuestaria depende de las expectativas


Normas

* De hecho, en comparación real
* Organismos de coacción de las normas
* Documentación
* Unilaterales mejoras


Negocios paradigmas

* La distribución gratuita
* Igual que el propietario (gratis / dumping)
* Permite el intercambio de apoyo y mantenimiento (servicios) con base en la habilidad, la escasez
* Barrera: analogías que implica “comunismo”, “virus”, “no fiable”, etc


Conceptos erróneos de código fuente

* Una mayor transparencia mejora el control, la calidad del código
* Posibilidad de copiar (Plurk)
* Código compartido de responsabilidad (no hay más seguro que muchos EULAs)
* Ejecución de los pedidos educados para el cumplimiento, los asentamientos


Publicidad / Fútbol Base / AstroTurf

* Sobre todo amoral o inmoral por naturaleza
* OEM recomendaciones son anuncios
* El valor percibido
* PR organismos manipular periodistas (regalos, las burlas, el acoso a través de editores)
* Monitoreo de la reputación, por ejemplo, en la Wikipedia
* Agentes contratados (a través de agencias periféricas) para burlarse de la competencia


Bundling

* Supresión de la elección
* Percepción de la integración del mercado (monocultivo)
* La insistencia de que los clientes exigen lo que están obligados a recibir
* Aumento de la dependencia del mercado a través de ISV
* Navegador / system/x86 operativo …


Los sistemas legados / lock-in

* Con la ayuda de agrupación
* Sistema interconectado con otros sistemas
* Diseñado para elevar las barreras de salida
* Diferentes bloqueo en capas: Hardware / arquitectura, base de datos, formatos de archivo, los procesos de negocio …


Los conflictos de intereses

* Recursos Humanos (HR) expedirá
* Empresa que compra contrata de la compañía que vende
* Empresa que asesora a contrata de la compañía que compra / vende
* Relaciones interpersonales Popular / preferencias / hábitos / dogma no cambian durante la noche
* La cultura corporativa depende de la dirección y los accionistas
* El proteccionismo, los planes para un futuro después de salir / retirarse


Barrera Ejemplo # 1

Suscripción como parte obligatoria del modelo de negocio – “empresa” y “comunidad” Edición

Propietario requisitos previos


Barrera Ejemplo # 2

* Adquisición de la investigación sesgada

“Mentiras, malditas mentiras y estadísticas”

* Publicidad / contratos en parte diseñados para los conflictos de intereses
* Colocación de las figuras y los métodos de resultados que exige
* Hay que pagar el impuesto “analista” – altos presupuestos necesarios para influir en el consenso


Barrera Ejemplo # 3

Soborno, Memorando de Entendimiento (“Proyecto Mariscal “)


Barrera Ejemplo # 4

* Falsificación spin
* EDGI (detalles en Comes vs Microsoft)

“Ellos se van a volver adictos, y entonces vamos a encontrar la manera de que pagen en la próxima década.”

-Bill Gates
“Es más fácil para nuestro software para competir con Linux cuando hay piratería que cuando no hay.”

-Bill Gates


Lobo con piel de oveja

* KHTML frente WebKit
* Las empresas creado / dirigido por el ex ejecutivos de Microsoft generar dinero de GPL FUD, y añadió la dependencia de software propietario
* Licencias de software que Microsoft controla
* Juntas y conferencias apiladas por las compañías de software propietario en “Open Source” banner


Mensajes para llevar a casa

* Los obstáculos técnicos se imponen a servir como defensores de los puntos fuertes de software propietario
* Despiadado, el comportamiento abrasivo recompensado
* La riqueza otorga facultades a las decisiones de impacto, la percepción, la ley
* Educación para destacar estas cuestiones
* Pruebas que deben aportarse para una respuesta eficaz (por ejemplo, exhibe verificable tribunal, exponiendo citas inadecuado, el amiguismo)

Techrights.org acumula y organiza la información, las iniciativas de campañas de sensibilización


Discusión

07.27.10

Links 27/7/2010: Dell Restores and Expands Ubuntu Offerings (US), Linux Quality Assurance

Posted in News Roundup at 6:30 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

GNOME bluefish

Contents

GNU/Linux

  • Is Linux Just Another Unix Flavor?

    What defines an operating system isn’t a geeky label or a collection of ramblings from the mouths of its community members. Nor is it some empty and pointless certification offered up by an obscure group of malcontented purveyors of “standards.”

    [...]

    You might also ask, “With how much certainty can you guarantee that my applications will make that same transition?” Red Hat, Novell and Canonical can give the best answers, but their consultants will tell you that only in rare cases will your applications have trouble making the trip from your Unix environment to a Linux-hosted one. Rest assured that your issues aren’t so unique that their highly skilled Linux engineers can’t tackle them.

    Unix has different “flavors” that generally refer to differences injected by their development teams to take advantage of proprietary hardware features or to capitalize on special software innovations, such as volume management or virtualization. Such flavors are Sun’s Solaris, IBM’s AIX, HP’s HP-UX, AT&T’s System Vr4, BSD Unix, DEC Unix, Mac OS X, and the beloved SCO Unix.

  • Washing the windows myths. Program installation.

    Meanwhile Zaphod has finished his work for now and decides to play a game to relax. He opens up his software manager (similar to Apple’s app store) and finds a game he likes. After selecting it and clicking on install he goes away for a drink of something that is almost but not quite like tea. When he comes back with the steaming mug in his hands, Zaphod is pleased to find that his new game has been installed and is ready to play. Putting the mug next to the keyboard Zaphod immerses himself into the game.

    [...]

    So anyone who states that installing programs under windows is easier than under Linux is obviously showing their lack of knowledge and inability to look at the true state of affairs.

  • Why Ubuntu Linux Is a Good Business Choice

    Let’s first consider Ubuntu as a replacement for your Windows desktop or laptop operating system. Computer owners generally use an Internet browser, a word processing program, the occasional spreadsheet, an email application and almost nothing else. These computer owners may not realize that they’re paying $150 to $300 for the OS and another $300 or more for the office suite–most of which they’ll never use. Why add hundreds of dollars to a computer system that has a life expectancy of three to four years?

  • Get a Blazing Fast Computer for Free

    Still, I thought that Mark Shuttleworth, the software entrepreneur who founded the Ubuntu project, was onto a good thing. In a world of cloud-based apps, there are fewer and fewer substantive differences between Windows and the Mac OS—since I can easily shuttle my data and programs between different computers, I rarely find myself wishing for one OS when I’m on another. If Ubuntu’s designers could iron out some of its kinks, I thought, a free operating system could fit perfectly in this new, OS-agnostic world.

    Well, I think they’ve done it. I made a second foray onto Ubuntu’s shores a week ago, and so far, I like it quite a bit. The OS has progressed a great deal since I last checked in (in 2008 I installed version 8.04; now I’m running version 10.04). I found Ubuntu quick to install, speedy to do pretty much everything, and, thankfully, very easy to figure out. There were some rough edges; for instance, Ubuntu’s designers ought to make some of its error messages more comprehensible to newbies. While installing Skype, I was informed that a “later version is available in a software channel. You are strongly advised to install the version from the software channel, since it is usually better supported.” I’m pretty sure that could have been translated to, “Click ‘Next’ to install a newer version of Skype.” For the most part, though, Ubuntu has broken free of technical mumbo jumbo, and if you’ve got a little bit of tech savvy, you’ll have no problem dealing with it.

  • Desktop

    • Prettier Fonts Coming Your Way

      There was a time when Linux was notorious for having what was called “fugly” fonts. Things improved a bit over the years, but thanks to expiring patents things are about to get even better.

    • Calm down! Dell is not throwing Ubuntu Linux out!

      Jeeze, people, one guy has trouble ordering Ubuntu Linux on a Dell laptop over the weekend and it’s Ubuntugeddon. Chill. Ubuntu is still going to be offered by Dell.

    • Dell Preparing Ubuntu 10.04 Linux Systems

      Plenty of folks are confused about Dell’s commitment to Ubuntu, the Linux distribution promoted by Canonical. In recent days, old rumors about Dell abandoning Ubuntu have returned. But in reality, Dell indicates it is preparing to ship systems with Ubuntu 10.04 — the most recent Ubuntu release — within the next few weeks. Here’s the reality check.

    • Dell expands Ubuntu Linux desktop offerings

      The latest panic in desktop-Linux-land was that Dell would no longer be selling Ubuntu pre-installed on laptops and netbooks. Alas, for those who love drama, it wasn’t true. In fact, Dell is expanding its Ubuntu desktop offerings.

      Gerry Carr the marketing manager for Canonical, the company behind Ubuntu, told me that the stories that Dell will no longer be offering Ubuntu pre-installed on its hardware were “NOT true.” Now, Anne Camden, a Dell PR manager, tells me that far from moving away from Ubuntu Linux, Dell is offering more Ubuntu choices than ever.

  • Kernel Space

    • Kernel Log: Who’s responsible for troubleshooting and quality assurance?

      A change recently implemented in kernel 2.6.35 shows how developers from different companies collaborate on the kernel, what good support contracts with Linux distributors are, and how commercial interests influence the development of Linux and troubleshooting. The change was made by Red Hat’s DRM subsystem maintainer Dave Arlie to solve some stability problems and prevent crashes that reportedly occurred on a lot of systems with Intel’s 945GM, which was launched in 2006 and is mainly used in notebooks.

  • Applications

    • Games

      • 6 most talked about Linux games

        In your quest to find a good, native and free game for Linux you might have seen long lists of games mentioned on various sites and forums. These mentioned games range anywhere from simple 2D side-scrollers to impressive 3D shooters. The amount of Linux games is surprising and can be a tid bit overwhelming. So, how do you pick out the games that are actually worth your time? Well, I’ve compiled a small list of some of the most talked about games for Linux on the internet. Have a read and see if any of these catch your eye.

  • Desktop Environments

    • K Desktop Environment/KDE SC)

      • Forking KDE 3: Trinity KDE’s Timothy Pearson

        A long time developer with Kubuntu, Ubuntu’s KDE variant, Pearson describes himself as “an electrical engineer specializing in embedded systems and RF [Radio Frequency] by day, and an open source programmer by night.”

        Pearson first discovered free and open source software in 2001 as an alternative to Windows, but at first used it only for servers, judging the desktop as not ready for general use. Later, though, he discovered Kubuntu and KDE 3.5, “and was blown away by the powerful but user friendly interface, as well as the fast Debian packaging system. Shortly thereafter I replaced all my Red hat and Windows XP installations with Kubuntu, never looking back.”

        With such an attitude, Pearson was blindsided by the release of KDE 4.0 in January 2008.

        “KDE 4 kind of snuck up on me,” he writes. “I had assumed that the new software coming from KDE was going to be along the same lines as KDE 3.5. I tried using KDE 4 for a few days and just could not stand the interface; my productivity plummeted and I seriously considered going back to Windows. The only thing that kept me from doing that was the sheer expense of deploying Windows Server across multiple environments.”

  • Distributions

  • Devices/Embedded

    • Sub-notebooks

      • Jolicloud as a Second Netbook OS – It Plays Well With Windows

        Back in March, we broke the news that Jolicloud had released their Pre-Final build. For those of you who aren’t familiar with it, Jolicloud is a customized version of Linux Ubuntu Netbook Edition (UNE). It’s designed to be an easy and trouble-free operating system for almost all netbooks. It’s taken me awhile, but I’ve finally had time to install Jolicloud and try it out on my HP Mini netbook. I’ll give you some details and screenshots from my brief time exploring Jolicloud.

        [...]

        If you need a simple, fast, secure and visually pleasing OS on your netbook, this one will be hard to beat. The express install option is a big winner, making it one of the easiest Linux OS’s to install. For those with more Linux experience, you might want to stick with Ubuntu Netbook Edition. It’s much more flexible but definitely more difficult for newbies. I believe that Jolicloud will continue to bring good news to netbook users who may not want to be chained to Microsoft Windows.

      • Hands on: Jolicloud 1.0, a Linux distro in progress

        Jolicloud 1.0 is a new edition of Linux aimed at nontechnical netbook users that’s described this way by its makers: “[It] is not a traditional OS. It was built for netbook users to leverage the cloud and make their life easier.” Think of it as a variant on the Google Chrome OS approach: This Internet operating system, as the company calls it, is little more than a Web browser plus a few other supporting technologies.

Free Software/Open Source

  • The 75 “Funnest” Open Source Downloads

    It’s summer. And frankly, that means no one’s all that excited about working. Oh goodness no.

    In honor of the season of laziness, we’ve put together a list of some of the most fun open source downloads you can find. No, none of those office productivity tools here – just lots of games, hobbyists’ tools and other time wasters. Is it quitting time yet?

    In case you’re feeling too lazy to read all the way through the article, the very “funnest” apps – the games – are at the beginning. The rest are categorized and in alphabetical order.

    I should probably write some more about the list here, but – you know – it’s summer.

  • Web Browsers

  • Oracle

    • Is Oracle trying to kill VirtualBox?

      It seems Oracle is hellbent on destroying whatever good Sun had done to the Open Source Ecosystem. The latest product to get the axe seems to be none other than the Flagship Virtualization program xVM VirtualBox.

  • Education

  • FSF/FSFE/GNU/SFLC

    • GnuTLS 2.10.1 released

      GnuTLS is a modern C library that implements the standard network security protocol Transport Layer Security (TLS), for use by network applications. GnuTLS is developed for GNU/Linux, but works on many Unix-like systems and comes with a binary installer for Windows.

  • Project Releases

  • Standards/Consortia

    • OpenDocument 1.2 available for review for 60 days

      If it goes through, the standard will then be presented to the interdisciplinary ISO (International Standardisation Organisation) to be ratified as the current version of the ISO 26300 standard. OASIS is in charge of maintaining this standard, and its stated aim is to promote the interoperability, that is the ability to exchange documents, between different office suites.

Leftovers

  • Internet/Net Neutrality/DRM

    • Ofcom calls for clarity in broadband speed ads

      Britons are not getting the broadband services they are being sold, research by the regulator Ofcom suggests.

      Its analysis of broadband speeds in the UK shows that, for some services, 97% of consumers do not get the advertised speed.

Clip of the Day

Sen. Franken: Stop the Corporate Takeover of the Media


IRC Proceedings: July 27th, 2010

Posted in IRC Logs at 6:11 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

GNOME Gedit

Read the log

Enter the IRC channel now

New Flaw in Windows Facilitates More DDOS Attacks

Posted in Microsoft, Security, Windows at 5:03 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Stachledraht DDOS attack

Summary: Shoddy Microsoft software continues to provide opportunities for disgruntled people to attack and take down servers they dislike

ANY Windows botnet which is enabled by “Zeus” (Zeus is known to be a cause of DDOS attacks) is already taking advantage of Microsoft’s latest severe flaw which affects even fully patched Windows:

Miscreants behind the Zeus cybercrime toolkit and other strains of malware have begun taking advantage of an unpatched shortcut handling flaws in Windows. It was first used by a sophisticated worm to target SCADA-based industrial control and power plant systems.

No patch is available yet:

Security researchers have found more malware exploiting an unpatched Windows vulnerability via .LNK shortcut files.

According to Sophos blog July 23, two other pieces of malware have been observed targeting the bug. One is a keylogging Trojan the company is calling Chymin-A that is “designed to steal information from infected computers.” The other is Dulkis-A, a “worm written in obfuscated Visual Basic” that contains several subcomponents.

More here:

Slovakian security firm Eset reports the appearance of two malware strains that exploit security vulnerabilities in the way Windows handles .lnk (shortcut) files, first used by Stuxnet to swipe information from Windows-based SCADA systems from Siemens.

We covered those SCADA incidents earlier today. This has a serious impact on the world’s energy, not to mention those BP BSODs which we’ve already covered in [1, 2, 3].

The damage costs a lot of money and time (which can be equated to money) and the security world is “ill-equipped to solve digital whodunnits,” reports The Register.

“A lot of those efforts are very unqualified and pedestrian,” said Parker, who is director of security consulting services at Washington, DC-based Securicon. “There’s really not any science behind the efforts that many people have been making recently that have resulted in stories like China is attacking us, Russia is attacking us, Korea is attacking us.”

It is really hard to know where DDOS attacks come from these days. People don’t control their Windows PCs, which can be hijacked and chained back to some botmasters whose interests are not known.

Georgia has an unfortunate DDOS story to tell about its national infrastructure; after years of investigation it is still not perfectly clear if the Russian government had something to do with it or not. One youngster claims responsibility, but can he be believed? It can be hard to verify. And if one youngster can paralyse an entire nation, what does that teach us about those Windows zombies he used?

US Supreme Court May Have Another Chance to Eliminate Software Patents, But It’s Up to Microsoft

Posted in America, Microsoft, Patents at 4:45 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Supreme Court bricks

Summary: The i4i case, which is hinged on a software patent, can reportedly end up being decided at the highest possible level, but the company capable of doing so is Microsoft

AS THE i4i case carries on, it becomes apparent that Microsoft too can sometimes suffer from software patents, which it compares to mathematics when the software patents put it in the victim's side.

According to the Canadian news, this whole i4i brouhaha may get escalated to the Supreme Court:

The U.S. Patent Office has handed software giant Microsoft its third setback in a patent dispute with Toronto’s i4i.

In January, a judge ruled that Microsoft’s Word software infringed on a patent owned by i4i.

[...]

Microsoft still has as a final option an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. That would require that an application be filed by Aug. 27.

Red Hat’s Wildeboer asks: “Will Microsoft now finally pay or go [to] Supreme Court with i4i patents?”

Ruiseabra responds with: “I hope Microsoft goes to Supreme Court. More nails [are] needed for software patents coffin after Bilski.”

In other patent news, Toyota loses to a tiny entity with a deadly monopoly. How similar to Microsoft’s situation.

RedGhost was the first of a few of you to pass along Jalopnik’s detailed story of Toyota’s long patent battle with Paice and its founder Alex Severinsky, over patents on hybrid engine technology, which was just settled. We’ve actually covered the story before, last year when Paice — who had already won a court battle — aimed to get a second crack at the apple, by taking the case to the ITC, which potentially could bar the import of Toyota vehicles into the US if it found that Toyota infringed. Toyota settled the case the day the ITC was to begin its investigation, and it did so for one reason: the potential liability from a possible injunction isn’t worth the uncertainty. So you pay to make it go away.

The ITC is again being a nuisance [1, 2, 3].

How Microsoft Belittles ODF, Using the “Choice”-Themed Lies (and Why Google Should Offer ODF as a Choice)

Posted in Formats, ISO, Microsoft, Open XML, OpenDocument, Standard at 4:21 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“If thought can corrupt language, then language can also corrupt thought.”

George Orwell

Summary: Microsoft and its proponents/minions are still pushing an old propaganda line by claiming that Windows and OOXML will bring “choice”

THE NEWS is aflood with reports that IBM comes under scrutiny in the EU. Little is being said about the fact that IBM is being attacked SCO-style by Microsoft and its “satellite proxies” (IBM's words). We care about this because IBM’s mainframes run GNU/Linux — a fact that people like Florian Müller could not care less about (and this matters because “FlorianMueller” is the one who also pushed the news into Slashdot with his own convictions and bias). See the conversation in the previous post where Müller admits using Vista 7 (he seems like a permanent Windows user) and does not care so much if his stance is helping Microsoft. He’s apathetic to it. He also spins/subverts the word "choice" in the same way Microsoft does (same with the word “openness”*). It’s done just as Microsoft Malaysia did it to ODF and other branches of the company do under all sorts of situations. It’s a language game. Standards are about limiting choice at some level of granularity in order to ensure that different implementations work well with one another. Microsoft’s hypnosis strives to confuse people about choice; it’s about office suites, not formats.

Rob Weir has just informed his peers and supporters of ODF that Microsoft is restricting choice (abolishing and harming ODF’s status) using language games.

Microsoft’s talking points go something like this:

If you adopt ODF instead of OOXML then you “restrict choice”. Why would you want to do that? You’re in favor of openness and competition, right? So naturally, you should favor choice.

You can see a hundreds of variations on this theme, in Microsoft press releases, whitepapers, in press articles and blogged by astroturfers by searching Google for “ODF restrict choice“.

This argument is quite effective, since it is plausible at first glance, and takes more than 15 seconds to refute. But the argument in the end fails by taking a very superficial view of “choice”, relying merely on the positive allure of its name, essentially using it as a talisman. But “choice” is more than just a pretty word. It means something. And if we dig a little deeper, at what the value of choice really is, the Microsoft argument falls apart.

So let’s make an attempt to show how can one be in favor of choice, but also be in favor of eliminating choice. Let’s resolve the paradox. Personally I think this argument is too long, but maybe it will prompt someone to formulate it in a briefer form.

Glyn Moody remarks on this post by calling it a “nice debunking of a sneaky Microsoft trope about choice” and he also shares this word of warning about a new Google Docs “format”.

“I’m having trouble searching for just ODF formats, Did Google remove the ability?”
      –Anonymous
I asked Weir about it and he said that he “Can’t tell much from the screenshot. Not clear that it is a format. Maybe Punch is an app? Or internal test system?”

As a reminder, Google officially opposed OOXML when Microsoft was corrupting standards bodies all over the world, but Google never showed much active support for ODF, either. Google has been mostly passive and there are recent examples where Google exlcuded ODF support and was criticised for it (although not in a major way).

One person has just mailed us to say: “I’m having trouble searching for just ODF formats, Did Google remove the ability?”

“In general I’m losing it for Google,” said this person to us, “they support OS [open source] only when it suits them. They [are] really not our friends.”

Google Docs is of course proprietary.
_____
* When Microsoft says “openness” it never means “Open Source”. In cases where Microsoft is excluded or chooses to be excluded it advocates “choice” as means/route to depart from standards and embrace proprietary offerings instead.

« Previous Page« Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries »Next Page »

Further Recent Posts

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources

No

Mono

ODF

Samba logo






We support

End software patents

GPLv3

GNU project

BLAG

EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com



Recent Posts