06.08.16
Caricature of the Day: Presidential Brakes
Summary: The latest widely-circulated cartoon about the so-called 'Bike Affair'
Summary: The latest widely-circulated cartoon about the so-called 'Bike Affair'
They just keep repeating the “SME” line…
Summary: A call for transparency in this age of bought press coverage and an attempt to crush quality control at the EPO, i.e. expand the number of patents without any regard to public interests
EARLIER today we covered this year’s effort to subvert the media, or the EPO‘s paid puff pieces. We can expect more of that tomorrow and perhaps well into the weekend if not beyond. Will any attention be paid to staff protests in multiple sites tomorrow? SUEPO does not buy media organisations.
EPO management buying the media is not exactly news. Literally millions of Euros were spent buying the media last year. This is where EPO budget goes; even celebrity endorsements more or less. There’s a bunch of hashtags being used to carry such paid coverage and if somebody knows how much the EPO paid the Financial Times for this publicity stunt, please get in touch. We want the facts. Tweets like this one are a disgrace not just to the EPO but also to the media. “FT Special Reports” perhaps means purchased ‘reports’. Their Twitter account says: “Our customer service team is @FTcare.”
“EPO management buying the media is not exactly news. Literally millions of Euros were spent buying the media last year.”Right now, judging by the output so far, the EPO spreads “SME” propaganda (see the image the top, taken from this tweet) while giving a priority to large corporations, in effect attacking SMEs’ interests. The UPC, which the EPO promotes, harms SME and they say so themselves while complaining about those who misrepresent them.
Earlier today we showed how IAM was again pushing the "SME" angle for UPC. It was soon thereafter that IAM started pushing for software patents with sponsored ‘articles’ (marketing). Bought ‘articles’ go a long way. In addition to this, the EPO apparently got someone from the Guardian to do the whitewashing exercise. It’s the same ‘news’ paper which also took lots of money (effectively bribes) from Bill Gates to create entire sections for him and promote his for-profit ventures/investments for years (purchased pseudo-journalism). What on Earth is going on and who exactly is being paid? The invoicing is pretty secretive and we can only make an appeal for information. This kind of information needs to be out there for Europeans to see. This in itself is an EPO scandal.
“The invoicing is pretty secretive and we can only make an appeal for information.”In the mean time, the IP Kat ban was removed (at what cost? Will IP Kat self-censor after this kind of warning shot?), making available again articles like that which SUEPO called: “Analysis of the increase in appeal fees on the number of appeals filed before the Boards of Appeal.”
Merpel has got access to a leaked document, but she almost certainly won’t publish it after the EPO banned the site for a day (maybe unrelated to this), so if anyone has a copy, please send it our way for publication. To quote Merpel:
Yes, Merpel has seen a copy, but it is not publicly available and Merpel is not in a position to post it. She hopes that there is enough information in this post (and in the precursor proposal CA/16/15 which is public and linked above) for you to raise concerns as appropriate.
We need more information out there as the EPO is far too secretive. Transparency is what would lead to justice at the EPO. █
Publicado en Europa, Patentes at 4:16 am por el Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Fuente: TV Belga se Burla de Battistelli Por Todo Lo Que Se Ha Salido Con la Suya
Sumario: Otra mirada al contrato secreto con Wellkom, el cual ayuda a enterrar preocupaciónes acerca de deprimidos (y a veces suicidas) empleados de la EPO, revela que incluso un proceso curativo fue seguido
Escribimos previamente acerca de una empresa bastante siniéstra. Cuanto más cerca se mira, más astuta parece porque a diferencia de otros casos (por ejemplo BlueCoat), aquí también hay un elemento de secreto. En cuanto a BlueCoat, nos dijo un lector “, según algunas fuentes, el tráfico de Internet de todos los sitios de la EPO está pasando por La Haya (que tiene las pocas direcciones IP con la que está conectado el servidor proxy, estoy muy seguro). Por lo que esta puede ser la razón natural por qué los electrodomésticos Blue Coat (?) por necesidad (sólo) se encuentran allí”.
Estamos empezando a tener una idea más precisa de cómo funcionan realmente las cosas detrás de las escenas en el Reino de Eponia y cuanto más nos damos cuenta, peor se está consiguiendo. La prensa se sobornó, «estudios» falsos configurados,por lo Bluecoat es sólo el borde de un iceberg. Todavía estamos tratando difícil de conseguir de detalles acerca de Microsoft contrato de la EPO / s, ya que parece ser un tema que la EPO es extremadamente nerviosos acerca de (suficiente para enviar amenazas legales a los bloggers). Ayer la EPO promovió herramientas que normalmente requieren los solicitantes o los abogados que sean clientes de Microsoft, aunque la EPO no lo mencionó. Nunca lo hace. Lo mismo resulta ser el caso de la UPC, que el portavoz de la EPO, IAM, se sigue promoviendo para que (este “artículo” es más como una especie de pieza de hojaldre/publicidad), después de haber recibido dinero de firma de relaciones públicas de la EPO. Para citar el editor en jefe sesgada de esta boquilla de la EPO: “También les dejará en una buena posición para hacer la mayor parte de lo que podría pasar después en Europa, que el voto del Reino Unido para permanecer en la UE y la UPC despega.”
“Basados en la información que hemos estado recibiendo, los practicantes/asesores de salud están fanáticamente preocupados por la salud del personal de EPO, de haber visto cosas que les horrorizaban.”
En esta última frase, IAM promueve la ficción de que si el Reino Unido se mantiene en la UE, que sólo hará que la UPC sea una realidad (no importa otros obstáculos entre ellos España). ejemplos anteriores de la UPC presión por parte de la boquilla del OPE incluyeron la vergüenza de los políticos europeos (o naciones) que no hicieron lo suficiente para promover la UPC. Cuando va a empezar a pagar la EPO empresas de la UPC ‘estudios’, con el fin de reforzar los esfuerzos de presión de Battistelli IAM fue “apoyada” por la EPO para configurar un evento pro-UPC en los EE.UU. a principios de este año.
Hemos decidido echar un vistazo más de cerca a los contratos o por lo menos ofertas relativas a la EPO, en un esfuerzo para encontrar lo que sea referente a Wellkom y los gustos de ella (la propaganda/arreglada de cal disfrazados de ‘encuesta’/’estudio’). No hemos podido encontrar ningún anuncio de licitación en el último año en relación con la prestación de un estudio personal. Sin embargo, la EPO exige ofertas competitivas para todo tipo de servicios que incluyen encuestas a los clientes. Si el trabajo Wellkom había sido ofrecido formalmente, entonces no habría un rastro de ella en virtud de TED. Por extraño que deben utilizar un sitio de la UE, si son tan independientes. Las ofertas también se pueden encontrar en el sitio web de la EPO, pero aquí hay TED:
Click for original-sized screenshot
No hay ada hay sobre el trabajo Wellkom. ¿La transparencia no espera?
El personal de la EPO debe pedir serias dudas acerca de esta firma que pretende ser la evaluación del estado de salud del personal, cuando en realidad el secuestro de voces del personal con el fin de ayudar a la propaganda de Battistelli y hacer a su vez su personal muertos en sus tumbas. Con base en la información que hemos estado recibiendo, asesores médicos/de salud están fanáticamente preocupados por la salud del personal de EPO, de haber visto cosas que les horrorizaban. El trabajo de Wellkom es básicamente para desacreditar esas observaciones y crear una realidad (falsa) alternativa.
Publicado en Europa, Patentes at 4:35 pm por el Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Cabildeándo al público y a sus representatntes al pagar firmas privadas para decir lo que el Presidente dese decir y pagar a reporteros a repetir lo mismo como loros
El alto costo/peaje de un jefe republicano con visión empresarial no científica: Benoît Battistelli utiliza las mismas tácticas que los gigantes del petróleo con el fin de poner en duda la incertidumbre/elenco de hechos probados, por lo general mediante el pago de las personas a engañar a los funcionarios públicos y privados, con lo que se perpetúa el daño y la miseria causando daños severos en la reputación de la oficina tradicional-científica en el largo plazo
Sumario: El modelo de propaganda de Benoît Battistelli es ilustrado usando detalles acerca de diferéntes contratos que firma no sólo con firmas PR pero también con compañíás dueñas de los medios y firmas de ‘investigación’ (con ataduras fináncieras)
ESTE post se basa en los dos documentos adjuntos en la parte inferior. Ellos pueden parecer bastante banales (basado en plantillas), pero en una etapa posterior que se va a proporcionar un cierto contexto crucial. Estas son las ofertas para la propaganda, que la EPO es ahora reconocido internacionalmente por (si no es notorio por). La EPO incluso da contratos a compañías bien fuera de Europa para estos fines maliciosos y necesidades percibidas (desperdicios). En la primera parte hemos dado un ejemplo del Reino Unido y en la segunda parte de los EE.UU.. Detectar el patrón perturbador aquí. La EPO es internacional, no es Europea. Sólo tiene “Europeo” en su nombre y el personal es europeo.
“La EPO es internacional, no es Europea. Sólo tiene “Europeo” en su nombre y el personal es europeo.”
A la EPO le gusta esparcir divertidos infographics y videos acerca de sus llamados ‘resultados’ que no son un resultado exácto del exito de la EPO, a menos que uno adopte una yarda/aproximamiento neoliberal y arregle los libros [1, 2, 3].
El matrimonio por conveniéncia de la EPO y IAMahora pretenden queesta cosa dudosa que ellos llaman ‘encuesta’demuestra la cálida de la EPO y temprano hoy la EPO publicóuna pieza de lavandería acerca de ello (warning: epo.org
link), citando a sus viejos socios (a los cuáles la firma PR de la EPO paga), aún citando el mentiroso en jefe: “” La calidad es nuestra prioridad estratégica “, dijo el presidente de la EPO Benoît Battistelli. “Hemos sido certificada ISO 9001 para nuestro proceso de concesión desde 2014 y se amplió para abarcar todo el proceso de patentes el año pasado. afirmación de nuestra alta calidad de los usuarios es un crédito para el personal de EPO que aumentó su producción en un 14% en 2015, en un momento cuando las aplicaciones se elevaron un 4,8% más, todo ello sin comprometer la calidad. Estos buenos resultados nos inspiran a seguir mejorando la calidad de nuestros servicios “” (repetición de afirmaciones dudosas si no de mentiras absolutas).
Recuérden que bajo el régimen de Benoît Battistelli la EPO literalmente paga a organizaciones de los medios como CNN grandes cantidades de dinero. La EPO no sólo miente al por mayor; también desperdicia cantidades extraordinarias de dinero que pagan los medios para repetir las mentiras y el pago de los ”estudios‘ fálsos, artículos de escritores fantasma, etc. Escandaloso, seguro que sí, pero ¿dónde está la responsabilidad en Eponia?
“La EPO no sólo miente al por mayor; también desperdicia cantidades extraordinarias de dinero que pagan los medios para repetir las mentiras y el pago de los ”estudios’ fálsos, artículos de escritores fantasma, etc. Escandaloso, seguro que sí, pero ¿dónde está la responsabilidad en Eponia?”
En los documentos a continuación vemos algunos detalles sobre los contratos secretos (que no hemos visto todavía, por lo que las más fugas son bienvenidas). Bueno, la primera dice “Objeto del contrato” es “Prestación de servicios de consultoría para el diseño y ejecución de los centros de evaluación para puestos de dirección de la Oficina Europea de Patentes”, mientras que el segundo dice “Prestación de servicios de consultoría para e-Business Research y barómetro los estudios del departamento de EPO servicios en línea, que consisten en el diseño mutuo de cuestionarios, entrevistas a clientes de EPO en varios países y seguido de análisis y la presentación de resultados “.
La mejor analogía es la Fundación Gates (veán nuestra Wiki acerca de ella). Desde hace varios años ha estado llevando a cabo los llamados «estudios» para su trabajo de lobby que ayudan a Bill (y su esposa) de beneficio mejor de sus inversiones corporativas y ahogan puntos de vistas opuestos en plataformas como paneles, la literatura, etc. Hemos escrito muchas artículos que proporcionan cientos de ejemplos de esto. La EPO se parece mucho a Bill Gates, en el sentido de que ambas compañías sobornan a los medios para “plantar” sus propios “artículos” que es nada menos que las piezas sean glamour. La gente no está acostumbrada a ver los artículos críticos de Bill Gates porque él paga por tantas piezas de hojaldre que ahogan todo lo contrario (periodismo de investigación). La última vez que nos registramos (que utiliza para seguir de cerca este), Bill Gates estaba gastando $ 300 millones por año sobornando esencialmente los medios de comunicación. Lo llaman “promoción” o “comunicaciones”, pero en la práctica se trata de pasar las cajas de dinero en efectivo para las organizaciones de medios de comunicación, con lo cual se convierten en portavoces como “socios de los medios” de Battistelli. Nuestros lectores son lo suficientemente inteligente para saber que muchas compañías de medios de comunicación son la estenografía o PR (piezas de hojaldre) para la venta. Que en realidad es su modelo de negocio (para sobrevivir). Las compañías de medios necesitan “amortiguador” todos los anuncios y puff/piezas disfrazadas de periodismo legítimo (costoso) para ocultar el modelo de agenda real/negocio, pero es cuando la gente como Battistelli tiran un millón de dólares a la CNN que realmente escuchan la marcha registro “ka-ching”.
Acerca de esta llamada ‘encuesta’ o dos de Battistelli (hay muchas en camino), poniéndo aparte el cubrimiénto de prensa corrupot este nuevo comentario dice: “Estas en lo correcto, los resultados de encuesta al personal son pésimos. Los indicadores de estress están fuera de la escala. Me pregunto ¿si el “estudio social” conducido por la gerencia de la EPO encontrará muchas causas similares de preoucupación?
“Nuestros lectores son lo sufici entemente sabios para darse cuenta que muchas compañíás de los medios son estenógrafos o PR (piezas de hojaldre) a la venta.”
“Sin el deseo de disminuir la importancia del estudio en poner de relieve la difícil situación actual de los empleados de EPO, no pude dejar de notar algunos números que (o al menos deberían) dar a los abogados de patentes un motivo de alarma.
“En particular, parece que sólo el 30% de los encuestados cree que se les proporcionó el tiempo necesario para realizar su trabajo correctamente. Esto significa que 7 de cada 10 encuestados (66% de los cuales eran de DG1) creen que – al menos no siempre – realizan su trabajo al nivel que les gustaría. En combinación con los múltiples indicadores que apunta a la preocupación por una disminución de la calidad (por ejemplo, más del 90% de los encuestados cree que la importancia de acuerdo con la calidad ha disminuido en los últimos 3 años), esto hace que sea bastante claro que los médicos están tratando con una EPO que está marchando con rapidez por el camino a un examen normal “rápido y sucio”.
“Todo muy bien, pero es que lo que los usuarios quieren? Lo dudo mucho – sobre todo porque los derechos de examen ciertamente no han disminuido en los últimos años “.
Esto fue dicho en relación con esta nueva encuesta, que va a ayudar a refutar la propaganda de Battistelli en la fabricación (ver los documentos abajo).
“Recuérden que el Presidente de la EPO actualmente está tratándo de deshacerce de las Salas de Recurso por completo, en esencia asegurándose incluso de que haya menos control de calidad.”
Calidad de la examinación en la EPO sin duda alguna ha declinado, basado en el apuro de procedimiéntos de lo que tenemos evidencia concreta (incluyendoalgo por lo cual la EPO me amenazo de sacarme de la Red). Ahora suena como si la EPO esta promoviéndo las patentes de software en los US o tratándo de ‘importarls’ bajo la bandera de la “ICT” (de nuevo), basado en tweets de hoy. Marks & Clerk (promotores de patentes de software) publicaronesta nueva pieza hoy lo que sugiere que otro tipo de controversia de las patentes, a saber, las patentes sobre la vida, todavía está en la agenda de la EPO. Para citar: “La Junta de Apelación de la EPO y el Reino Unido Tribunal Supremo han publicado recientemente decisiones contradictorias sobre la validez de la patente europea Regeneron Pharmaceuticals para el desarrollo de anticuerpos terapéuticos de plataforma VelocImmune.”
Recuérden que el Presidente de la EPO actualmente está tratándo de deshacerce de las Salas de Recurso por completo, en esencia asegurándose incluso de que haya menos control de calidad.
Servicios – 422718-2015
02/12/2015 S233 European Patent Office – Services – Contract notice – Open procedure
Germany-Munich: Provision of consultancy services for the design and execution of assessment centres for management positions in the European Patent Office
2015/S 233-422718
La Organización Europea de Patentes (EPO), actuando a través de la Oficina Europea de Patentes: la Sede, Bob-van-Benthem-Platz 1, 80469 Múnich, Alemania, dirección postal: EPO, 80298 Munich, Alemania.
La Organización Europea de Patentes es una organización intergubernamental creada de conformidad con la Convención Europea de Patentes, que entró en vigor en 1977. En la actualidad cuenta con 38 Estados miembros (Albania, Alemania, Austria, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Croacia, Chipre, República Checa, Dinamarca, Estonia , Finlandia, Antigua República Yugoslava de Macedonia, Francia, Alemania, Grecia, Hungría, Islandia, Irlanda, Italia, Letonia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Malta, Mónaco, Países Bajos, Noruega, Polonia, Portugal, Rumania, San Marino, Serbia, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Suecia, Suiza, Turquía y Reino Unido). El órgano ejecutivo de la EPO es la Oficina Europea de Patentes que se encarga de la búsqueda y el examen de las solicitudes de patentes europeas y concesión de patentes europeas. Emplea a aproximadamente 6 700 personas en la sede de la EPO en Munich, una sucursal en La Haya / Rijswijk (Países Bajos) y sub-oficinas en Berlín y Viena (el número de Estados miembros y los miembros del personal indicado puede cambiar).
2. Procedimiento de adjudicación:
Concurso abierto con la concesión discrecional de contrato.
3. Descripción del contrato:
(A) Objeto del contrato:
Prestación de servicios de consultoría para el diseño y ejecución de la evaluación de los centros para puestos de dirección en la Oficina Europea de Patentes.
(B) División en lotes:
No aplica.
(C) Si procede, depósitos y garantías exigidos:
No aplica.
(D) Principales condiciones de pago:
Dentro de los 30 días después de la aceptación.
(e) Requisitos exigidos por la ley:
No aplica.
4. Lugar y plazo de ejecución:
(A) El lugar en el que el contrato se va a realizar:
Sede como en 1,
sucursal en Rijswijk,
Sub-oficina en Viena y
Sub-oficina en Berlín.
(B) Duración del contrato:
El contrato se ha establecido un periodo de 3 años con derecho a la EPO para ampliar esta duración dos veces por 1 año cada una.
5. Variantes:
No permitido.
6. Las solicitudes de los documentos de adquisición y recepción de las ofertas:
(A) Nombre y dirección del servicio en el que los documentos de adquisición y la aclaración de los documentos de adquisición
se podrá solicitar:
Oficina Europea de Patentes
Central de Contratación 482, Tender No.1982
Patentlaan 2, 2288 EE Rijswijk (ZH)
Países Bajos
E-Mail: mntenderclarifications@epo.org
Los documentos de adquisición serán remitidos previa solicitud por escrito o por correo electrónico.
(B) Fecha límite de recepción por la EPO de solicitudes de los documentos de adquisición:
- 17/12/2015 (12:00), hora de Europa
(C) la fecha límite de recepción por la EPO para las solicitudes de aclaración:
- 05/01/2016 (12:00), hora de Europa
- Las preguntas deben ser enviadas por correo electrónico.
(D) Fecha límite de recepción de las ofertas / número de copias que se enviará:
- 01/25/2016 (12:00), hora de Europa
- Las ofertas deben presentarse en el original.
(E) Dirección a la que las solicitudes de aclaraciones y las ofertas deben enviarse:
Al igual que en el punto 6 (a).
Por favor presentar ofertas por correo y no por fax o correo electrónico. serán excluidas las ofertas presentadas por fax o correo electrónico.
(F) Lengua o lenguas en las que las solicitudes de aclaración y las ofertas deberán redactarse:
Inglés.
Los documentos de adquisición estarán disponibles en Inglés.
7. Criterios para la evaluación de los oferentes ‘know-how, capacidad y fiabilidad para cumplir el contrato:
Las ofertas de los licitadores que no cumplan los criterios de selección establecidos en los documentos de adquisición y / o cuyas circunstancias son tales que ponen seriamente en duda su fiabilidad financiera y profesional (véase el artículo 2 de las condiciones generales de la oferta, disponible bajo www.epo. org) no será considerada para la adjudicación del contrato.
Licitadores conocimientos, capacidad y fiabilidad para cumplir el contrato se evaluará sobre la base de la información y las pruebas presentadas en respuesta al cuestionario en el Anexo 1 de las condiciones generales de licitación y su cuestionario adicional (s) incluido en la Adquisición Documentos.
8. Plazo durante el cual el licitador está obligado por su oferta:
6 meses siguientes a la fecha límite de recepción de las ofertas indicados en el punto 6 (d).
9. Criterios para la adjudicación del contrato:
El contrato se adjudicará al licitador cuya oferta se prefiere con respecto a la capacidad del ofertante para satisfacer las necesidades de la EPO y
requisitos que vayan a ser medidos por:
• Aspectos técnicos (60%)
• precio (40%)
10. Otras informaciones:
Se espera que la adjudicación del contrato que tendrá lugar en el primer trimestre de 2016.
Servicios – 106290-2016
30/03/2016 S62 European Patent Office – Services – Contract notice – Open procedure
Germany-Munich: Provision of Consultancy services for e-Business Research and Barometer Studies of the EPO Online Services department
2016/S 062-106290
PUBLISHED NOTICE
OPEN INVITATION TO TENDER 1978
1. Awarding Authority:
The European Patent Organisation (EPO), acting through the European Patent Office: Headquarters, Bob-van-Benthem-Platz 1, 80469 Munich, Germany, Postal address: EPO, 80298 Munich, Germany.
The European Patent Organisation is an intergovernmental organisation set up pursuant to the European Patent Convention which entered into force in 1977. At present it has 38 Member States (Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom). The executive body of the EPO is the European Patent Office which is charged with the search and examination of European patent applications and granting European patents. It employs approximately 6 700 staff at EPO headquarters in Munich, a branch at The Hague/Rijswijk (NL) and sub-offices in Berlin and Vienna (the number of Member States and staff members indicated may change).
2. Award procedure:
Open invitation to tender with discretionary award of contract (Framework Agreement).
3. Description of the contract:
(a) Purpose of the contract:
Provision of Consultancy services for e-Business Research and Barometer Studies of the EPO Online Services department,
consisting of mutual design of questionnaires, interviewing EPO clients in several countries and followed by analysis and
reporting of results.
(b) Division into lots:
Not applicable.
(c) Any deposits and guarantees required:
Not applicable.
(d) Main terms concerning payment:
Invoices are to be paid by the EPO within 30 days of acceptance of the report for individual tranches.
(e) Qualifications required by law:
Not applicable.
4. Place and period of performance:
(a) Place at which the contract is to be performed:
• Primarily off-site: further described in the procurement documents.
• Liaison and reporting activities, if requested: The EPO Branch office in Rijswijk.
(b) Duration of contract or time limit for delivery or completion of services/work: The contract has a duration of 3 years with the possibility of 2 extensions of 1 year each. Individual tranches of work shall have expected completion dates defined in the associated commission form. The final report shall be delivered electronically.
5. Variants:
Proposals for variants, the effect of which would be to reduce significantly the rights and safeguards of the EPO, are not allowed.
6. Requests for the Procurement Documents and receipt of bids:
(a) Name and address of department from which the Procurement Documents and clarification of the Procurement Documents may be requested:
European Patent Office
Central Procurement the Hague 4.8 (Tender 1978)
Patentlaan 2, 2288 EE Rijswijk, the Netherlands
P.O. Box 5818, 2280 HV Rijswijk, the Netherlands
e-mail: dhtenderclarifications@epo.org
Procurement Documents will be forwarded upon written or E-Mail request.
(b) Final date for receipt by the EPO of requests for the Procurement Documents:
- 13.4.2016 (12:00), CET
(c) Final date for receipt by the EPO of requests for clarification:
- 13.5.2016 (12:00), CET
- Questions must be submitted by letter or E-Mail.
(d) Final date for receipt of bids/number of copies to be sent:
- 3.6.2016 (12:00), CET
- The bid must be submitted in 1 original, to be marked as such, including the Price Offer Form, 1 paper copy without the Price Offer Form, and 1 copy in electronic form (i.e. USB or CD-ROM) without the Price offer Form as searchable PDF.
(e) Address to which the requests for clarification and bids must be sent:
As in point 6(a).
Please submit bids by post only and not by fax or E-Mail. Bids submitted by fax or E-Mail will be excluded.
(f) Language or languages in which requests for clarification and bids must be drawn up:
English.
The Procurement Documents will be available in English only.
7. Legal form of the grouping in the event of a joint bid:
If several bidders submit a joint bid, they must be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the obligations under the contract. A declaration to this effect, duly signed by all members of the grouping and appointing a representative that is authorised to act on behalf of all members, must be submitted with the bid.
8. Criteria for assessing bidders’ know-how, capacity and reliability to fulfil the contract:
Bids from bidders who do not fulfil the selection criteria stated in the Procurement Documents and/or whose circumstances are
such as to seriously call into question their financial and professional reliability (see Article 2 of the General Conditions of
Tender, available under www.epo.org) will not be considered for contract award.
Bidders’ know-how, capacity and reliability to fulfil the contract will be assessed on the basis of the information and evidence
submitted in reply to the questionnaire in Annex 1 to the General Conditions of Tender and any additional questionnaire(s)
included in the Procurement Documents.
9. Plazo durante el cual el licitador está obligado por su oferta:
6 meses siguientes a la fecha límite de recepción de las ofertas indicados en el punto 6 (d).
10. Criterios para la adjudicación del contrato:
Los criterios de adjudicación y su ponderación relativa son los siguientes:
Aspectos técnicos: 60%
Aspectos financieros: 40%
La evaluación de los aspectos técnicos se basa en las respuestas de los oferentes a las condiciones técnicas a través de sus respuestas al cuestionario ‘Criterios de adjudicación ».
11. Otras informaciones:
Se espera que la adjudicación del contrato que tendrá lugar en el segundo trimestre de 2016.
Publicado en Europa, Patentes at 4:35 pm por el Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Sumario: En vez de invertir en una mejora en el proceso de examinación y de apelaciónes, Battistelli desperdicia un montón de dinero en censura y vigiláncia (para ser usado contra sus empleados como los examinadores) con Blue Coat Systems, el cuál es notorio por apoyar régimes abusivos y autoritarios
En la primera parte escribimos acerca de una astuta compañíá la que revisaremos en la cuarta parte. Hoy, por razones se seran aparentes (noticias de hoy), decidimos saltarnos a la segunda parte y escribir acerca de BlueCoat y su relación con la EPO. BlueCoat ayuda al tirano Battistelli y sus chacales con opresión, bloquendo access a ciertos puntos de vista particulares (censura) y usando vigilancia para generar temor que conlleva a autocensura. BlueCoat es popular dentro de régimes represivos alrededor del mundo. Pueda ser ilegal en naciónes civilizadas, pero Eponia es un caso especia y Battistelli se sale con la suya en lo que quiera.
Previamente escribimos acerca de BlueCoat en la EPO en los siguiéntes posts:
Advertencia: La Vigilancia en la EPO Pueda Haberse Convertido en Más Intrusiva
Como la Gerencia de la Oficina Europea de Patentes Esta Espíando a Sus Propios Empleados
En la parte inferior se presenta un documento que puede ayudar a arrojar luz sobre la naturaleza del contrato secreto (la cantidad de dinero gastado es desconocido). Lo interesante es que la EPO da dinero a una empresa estadounidense (no es la primera vez a “Blue Coat Systems Inc., anteriormente CacheFlow, es un proveedor con sede en Sunnyvale, California,” según Wikipedia). A diferencia del contrato secreto, el documento más abajo no nos dice cuánto dinero va y dónde exactamente. Esto en cuanto a la “transparencia” … así se mostrará otro día, es sólo el pretexto de la transparencia.
Noten cómo ponen los nombres de marca en los requisitos, lo cual es una práctica notorio que fue atacado en la Comisión (como la especificación de “Oracle” o “Microsoft” como requisitos en las licitaciones abiertas ”).
Uno se pregunta, ¿de dónde sacaron esta recomendación? Tal vez algunos de los recientes viajes de Battistelli, a las naciones autoritarias abusivas -Cuba, Marruécos -(fecha de notificación de este documento y las fechas en el mismo), que hacen uso de la famosa “soluciones” que hacen un seguimiento y desacreditar a disidentes y periodistas tales derechos humanos incompatibles? “Entrega”, según el documento, es el de “sucursal en Rijswijk.” Es posible que exista un equipo similar en Munich y otros sitios de EPO.
Todo esto es digno de mención no sólo porque ayuda a demostrar o verificar los abusos de la EPO contra el personal, sino también porque muestra cómo Battistelli prosigue con su desperdicio de dinero, pretendiendo que no hay dinero para las actividades reales, que incluyen el examen, apelaciones, renovaciones (administración), etc.
Consideren este nuevo reporte de hoy que dice:
La EPO es acusado de reducir el poder de salas de recursos
reformas propuestas a las salas de recurso de la Oficina Europea de Patentes (EPO) se han cerrado de golpe en una carta filtrada enviado por algunos de los miembros de las juntas.
En la carta, enviada el mes pasado y visto por WIPR, las reformas propuestas por el presidente de EPO Benoît Battistelli fueron criticados como “disminuir el nivel de autonomía e independencia” de las juntas.
En su forma actual las salas de recurso se clasifican como una Dirección General de la EPO, que significa que son una rama específica de la oficina.
Las propuestas tienen como objetivo hacer que los foros de una entidad orgánica separada en la medida de lo posible sin reformar el Convenio sobre la Patente Europea (CPE), el marco que creó la Organización Europea de Patentes, con la que opera la EPO.
Lo anterior no dice mucho acerca de lo que se trata todo esto: el dinero (o por lo que ha reivindicado).
Tal vez si Battistelli no estuviera tan ocupado desperdiciándo millones estúpidos (probablemente políticos) en charadas políticas en los medios de comunicación que implican la compra de los medios de comunicación, habría más dinero para las actividades reales que la EPO se supone que debería a estar dedicada. Diremos más sobre esto en la tercera parte
Supplies – 362318-2015
15/10/2015 S200 European Patent Office – Supplies – Contract notice – Open procedure
Alemania-Múnich: Prestación de Blue Coat PacketShaper de hardware, software Escudo PolicyCenter azul, y la instalación, configuración y migración de las prestaciones que incluye soporte y mantenimiento
2015 / S 200-362318
Concurso abierto
1. Entidad adjudicadora:
La Organización Europea de Patentes (EPO), actuando a través de la Oficina Europea de Patentes: la Sede, Bob-van-Benthem-Platz 1, 80469 Múnich, Alemania, dirección postal: EPO, 80298 Munich, Alemania.
La Organización Europea de Patentes es una organización intergubernamental creada de conformidad con la Convención Europea de Patentes, que entró en vigor en 1977. En la actualidad cuenta con 38 Estados miembros (Albania, Alemania, Austria, Bélgica, Bulgaria, Croacia, Chipre, República Checa, Dinamarca, Estonia , Finlandia, Antigua República Yugoslava de Macedonia, Francia, Alemania, Grecia, Hungría, Islandia, Irlanda, Italia, Letonia, Liechtenstein, Lituania, Luxemburgo, Malta, Mónaco, Países Bajos, Noruega, Polonia, Portugal, Rumania, San Marino, Serbia, Eslovaquia, Eslovenia, España, Suecia, Suiza, Turquía y Reino Unido). El órgano ejecutivo de la EPO es la Oficina Europea de Patentes que se encarga de la búsqueda y el examen de las solicitudes de patentes europeas y concesión de patentes europeas. Emplea a aproximadamente 6 700 personas en la sede de la EPO en Munich, una sucursal en La Haya / Rijswijk (Países Bajos) y sub-oficinas en Berlín y Viena (el número de Estados miembros y los miembros del personal indicado puede cambiar).
2. Procedimiento de adjudicación:
Concurso abierto con la concesión discrecional de contrato.
3. Descripción del contrato:
(A) Objeto del contrato:
Este contrato tiene por objeto la provisión de hardware de Blue Coat PacketShaper, el software de Blue Coat PolicyCenter, y la instalación, configuración y migración de las prestaciones incluido el soporte y mantenimiento.
(B) División en lotes:
No aplica.
(C) Si procede, depósitos y garantías exigidos:
No aplica.
(D) Principales condiciones de pago:
Compra: dentro de los 30 días siguientes a la aceptación de los equipos.
Mantenimiento: los pagos se efectuarán por trimestres vencidos.
(e) Requisitos exigidos por la ley:
No aplica.
4. Lugar y plazo de ejecución:
(A) El lugar en el que el contrato se va a realizar:
Entregar a
sucursal en Rijswijk.
(B) Duración del contrato o fecha límite de entrega o de ejecución de los servicios / trabajo:
La duración del contrato es de 3 años con derecho a la EPO para ampliar esta duración dos veces por 1 año cada una.
5. Variantes:
Las propuestas de variantes, el efecto de los cuales serían para reducir significativamente los derechos y garantías de la EPO, no están permitidos.
6. Las solicitudes de los documentos de adquisición y recepción de las ofertas:
(A) Nombre y dirección del servicio al que pueden solicitarse los documentos de adquisición y la aclaración de los documentos de adquisición:
Oficina Europea de Patentes
4.8 Central de Contratación (1955),
Patentlaan 2,
2288 EE Rijswijk,
Países Bajos
E-mail: dhtenderclarifications@epo.org
Los documentos de adquisición pueden ser solicitadas por carta o correo electrónico.
(B) Fecha límite de recepción por la EPO de solicitudes de los documentos de adquisición:
- 27/10/2015 (12:00), hora de Europa
(C) la fecha límite de recepción por la EPO de solicitudes de aclaración:
- 06/11/2015 (12:00), hora de Europa
- Las preguntas deben ser enviadas por correo o correo electrónico.
(D) Fecha límite de recepción de las ofertas / número de copias que se enviará:
- 04/12/2015 (12:00), hora de Europa
- Las ofertas deben presentarse en 2 copias (incluyendo el original debe marcarse como tales). La oferta deberá presentarse además en una memoria USB / CD (con excepción de los formularios de la oferta sólo para ser proporcionados como parte de la copia original).
(E) Dirección a la que las solicitudes de aclaraciones y las ofertas deben enviarse:
Al igual que en el punto 6 (a).
Por favor presentar ofertas por correo y no por fax o correo electrónico. serán excluidas las ofertas presentadas por fax o correo electrónico.
(F) Lengua o lenguas en las que las solicitudes de aclaración y las ofertas deberán redactarse: Inglés.
Los documentos de adquisición estarán disponibles en Inglés.
7. Forma jurídica de la agrupación en el caso de una oferta conjunta:
Si varios licitadores presentan una oferta conjunta, deben ser solidariamente responsables para el cumplimiento de las obligaciones en virtud del
contrato. Una declaración a tal efecto, debidamente firmado por todos los miembros de la agrupación y la designación de un representante que es
autorizado para actuar en nombre de todos los miembros, debe ser presentada con la oferta.
8. Criterios para la evaluación de los oferentes ‘know-how, capacidad y fiabilidad para cumplir el contrato:
Las ofertas de los licitadores que no cumplan con los criterios que se mencionan en los documentos de adquisición y / o cuyas circunstancias son
como serio para poner en duda su fiabilidad financiera y profesional (véase el artículo 2 de las Condiciones Generales de
Tender, disponible en www.epo.org) no será considerada para la adjudicación del contrato.
Licitadores conocimientos, capacidad y fiabilidad para cumplir el contrato se evaluará sobre la base de la información y las pruebas
presentada en respuesta al cuestionario en el Anexo 1 a las Condiciones Generales de licitación y su cuestionario adicional (s)
incluido en los documentos de adquisición.
9. Plazo durante el cual el licitador está obligado por su oferta:
6 meses siguientes a la fecha límite de recepción de las ofertas indicados en el punto 6 (d)
10. Criteria for the award of contract:
The contract shall be awarded to the bidder whose bid is preferred regarding the bidder’s ability to meet the requirements of the EPO which will be measured by:
- In first instance, the technical quality of the support and of the maintenance, and the delivery time (70 %)
- The price and the operation cost (30 %)
11. Other information:
Contract award is expected to take place in the beginning of the 1st quarter of 2016.
Publicado en Decepción, Europa, Patentes at 7:04 am por el Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Los chacales de Battistelli juegan juegos morales y manipula (o paga) a los medios, todavía
Reference: Demoralization (warfare)
Sumario: Habiéndo acabado de pagar a largos medios de comunicación, Battistelli y sus contratántes privados producen más desinformación con la cuál indoctrinan al público y fabrican consentimiento para el régimen de Battistelli
Hay material acerca de la EPO en circulación ya que muchas personas están preocupadas acerca de la Oficina y quieren que salvar/redimir a la Organzación. Publicamos 6 artículos acerca de la EPO ayer y hay mucho más por venir. En los próximos dias nos enfocaremos en algo de la desinformación propagadad por Battistelli y sus chacales. No es acerca de las distracciónes (como la alegada bicicletay la próxima extravaganzaenLisboa) pero acerca de los llamados ‘estudios’ con los cuáles Battistelli intenta usar para cabildera a los medios, politícos, etc. Estos financiados (y comisionados) ‘estudios’ de Battistelli, comos son el modelo neoliberal donde incluso la ciencia es simplemente negocio, no más legitimos que los‘estudios’ financiados/fabricados por Mosantoaquellos que necesitan ser escrutinizados perpetuamente. Battistelli esta peleándo una guerra informativa. El también compara a sus críticos con Nazis y criminalescuando habla a los políticos.
“Battistelli está peleándo una guerra informativa.
Aludiéndo ala última encuesta tecnológica, esta persona escribió: “aquí estan los pésimos resultados de la encuesta Tecnológica a los empleados en riesgos psicosociales [...] ellos ilustran el mandato de Battistelli (2010 al 2016) y hablan por sí mismos” (mostrando el rol que Battistelli mismo ha jugado al comparar diferentes periódos de tiempo).
Battistelli esta tratando de comisionar una falsa encuésta de una compañíá astuta (Wellkom). Supuestamente para distraer atención de sus abusos y echar la culpa a otros.
“Battistelli esta tratando de comisionar una falsa encuésta de una compañíá astuta (Wellkom).
“En cuanto a Wellkom”, un lector nos escribió, “para lo que vale la pena Miré hacia arriba” Andrea Jutta Phillips “- que es una combinación poco común de dos nombres alemanes y un apellido Inglés – y se salió con lo siguiente. Es un sumario de un sitio de información legal español, proporcionando un extracto del Diario Oficial de la Región Española de Murcia. El nombre aparece en la parte difuminada de la página. La página completa está disponible con un registro de ensayos. El título del anuncio es: “Citación un Contribuyentes en Ignorado domicilio, o por no saber, o haberse NEGADO una cédula de sacrificar las exigencias notification, Para Ser notificados por comparecencia.” No se da ninguna fecha. Estos son convocatoria pública para los contribuyentes de absentismo, una medida de último recurso cuando no hay una dirección conocida por el servicio, o la parte que se niega a aceptar la notificación. Parece un consejo local tenía la intención de subastar alguna propiedad para la solución de los impuestos no pagados. A consecuencia de la gran burbuja inmobiliaria española? Ninguno de los cónyuges Phillips parece tener una gran huella en Internet, por decir lo menos“.
Sintónicenos para la parte 2 ya que vamos a mostrar la total falta de transparencia en este proceso.
Aircraft holding Russian Helicopters intends to switch to Linux operating system, Kamil Gazizov, CEO of RT-Inform, told reporters.
To be fair, setting up your own router from a generic server distro isn’t a project for everyone. It certainly isn’t user-friendly, both during the build process and once it’s finished. While it’s not terribly complex, it’s definitely arcane, with absolutely no hand holding along the way. If you aren’t already very experienced with Linux, you’ll likely do a lot of puzzled head scratching (and maybe a little cursing). You won’t get a super feature-rich build once you’re done, either—unless you go on to do a lot more for your build than I have with mine, you won’t have fancy quality of service features, usage graphs, or much of anything else besides a bare-bones (although extremely high performance) router that hands out IP addresses, resolves DNS records, connects to the Internet, and makes packets go where they’re supposed to.
We won the battle for Linux, but we’re losing the battle for freedom.
Linux turns 25 in August 2016. Linux Journal turned 21 in April 2016. (Issue #1 was April 1994, the month Linux hit version 1.0.) We’re a generation into the history of our cause, but the fight isn’t there anymore, because we won. Our cause has achieved its effects.
It helps to remember that Linux was a fight, and so were free software and open source. If they weren’t fights, they wouldn’t have won what they did. They also wouldn’t have been interesting, meaning there wouldn’t have been any Linux stories, or a Linux Journal.
Doc Searle is a thinker and strategist. He makes a lot of good observations in a recent writing but he’s bypassing the desktop PC strongholds when he declares victory for Open Source and Linux. The world is still in the wrong place when a legacy PC cannot be bought with FLOSS on it everywhere any time.
There has been much talk about modularity recently. Fedora even has a working group on this topic. Modularity is such a generic term that it is a bit hard to figure out what this is all about, but the wiki page gives some hints: …base module… …docker image… …reduced dependencies… …tooling…
Over the years, I’ve seen a number of attempts to create the first truly use anywhere, idiot-proof Linux PC. And until recently, Chromebooks (anything with ChromeOS) was easily the winner.
Then a PC company known as Endless did something that really surprised me – they released their highly customized version of Ubuntu GNOME into something everyone could try. Will it beat out ChromeOS in terms of access, simplicity and overall value? Let’s take a gander and find out.
A petition launched Friday asks the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) to investigate Microsoft’s aggressive moves to convince and cajole users into upgrading to Windows 10.
The request was launched on Change.org, a popular online petition website, and by early Monday had garnered more than 470 signatures.
An Australian sysadmin frustrated with his business’ sudden loss of performance has sparked a conversation about whether Windows 10 is behaving badly on network connections.
To jump well into the discussion thread that points the finger at Microsoft: “We have had reports now from several people, not all our clients, reporting that their Internet connection is brought to a standstill and the common thread is that they all have Windows 10 machines recently installed.”
Be Free. Use Debian GNU/Linux or other FLOSS operating system.
Database-as-a-service (DBaaS) puts storage and management of structured data in the cloud, offering companies functionality similar to well-known relational database management systems like MySQL, SQL Server and Oracle, with the added flexibility and lower upfront costs of the cloud.
Webmin is an open source web based system configuration application for Linux system administration. With the help of this tool we can manage internal system configuration such as setting up user accounts, disk quotas, services configuration like Apache, DNS, PHP or MySQL, file sharing and much more. Webmin applications is based on Perl module and it uses TCP port 10000 with OpenSSL library for communicating via browser.
Kris Buytaert is known as one of the instigators of the current DevOps movement and organizer of several related conferences, including DevOpsDays and Config Management Camp. He is a long-time Linux and open source consultant who often claims that everything is a freaking DNS problem. You can find him speaking at events and consulting as the CTO (Chief Trolling Officer) at Inuits on everything from Infrastructure as Code to Continuous Delivery.
Without DevOps programs such as Puppet, Chef, and Ansible, the cloud wouldn’t be possible. Now Puppet Labs is trying to work in systems management magic on IBM’s z Systems and LinuxONE.
Automotive suppliers Continental and Hyundai Mobis, electronics group Toshiba and several other companies have joined Automotive Grade Linux (AGL), a project that aims to develop an open-source, Linux-based platform for connected cars.
Earlier this year, AGL announced a new set of codes designed specifically for the automotive industry. The new Linux distribution addresses automotive-specific applications such as navigation, communications, safety, security and infotainment functionality. The Linux Foundation, which promotes the general adoption of the Linux open-source operating system, hopes it will become the de facto standard for the auto industry.
Automotive Grade Linux (AGL), a collaborative open source project developing a Linux-based, open platform for the connected car, today announced that bright box, Continental, ForgeRock, Hyundai MOBIS, Toshiba and Ubiquitous have joined The Linux Foundation and Automotive Grade Linux.
“Our goal is to bring companies from diverse backgrounds and regions together to build an open platform that will drive rapid innovation across the entire automotive industry,” said Dan Cauchy, General Manager of Automotive at The Linux Foundation. “These new members join us from across Europe, Asia and the United States, and will help us continue to develop a global ecosystem for the connected car. We are excited to welcome these members into the AGL community and look forward to our joint collaboration.”
Initial patches were published this week for adding initial NVMe-over-Fabrics support for the Linux kernel as set out by the NVMe 1.2b specification. This target implementation is the basics of making this new specification a reality and one of the first public implementations.
Coming one week after the launch of the first RC build, the second Mesa 12.0.0 3D Graphics Library Release Candidate snapshot is now ready for public testing, as announced today, June 7, 2016, by Collabora’s Emil Velikov.
Ahead of the official Mesa 12.0 debut later this month, Mesa release manager Emil Velikov of Collabora has announced 12.0 Release Candidate 2.
Mesa 12.0 brings massive new features but now in the release candidate phase all of the work is about bug fixing.
Mesa 12.0 RC2 has many i965 driver fixes as among the heavy changes over the past week, some Radeon/RadeonSI fixes, core Mesa fixes, and an assortment of other random work.
Qt 5.7 is right around the corner and it’s coming with many new graphics features, including support for NVIDIA’s DRIVE CX platform.
DRIVE CX is what NVIDIA announced at CES at the start of the year and is the company’s “complete automotive cockpit platform.” DRIVE CX is Tegra based while on the toolkit side it’s seeing good support in Qt 5.7.
The Mir back-end inside SDL2 now has support for the relative mouse mode as is important for some games.
The event was named “Moving to Vulkan : How to make your 3D graphics more explicit” and it was held in the UK on May 26th, but the slides have only recently come online.
Wireshark, the world’s most popular, open-source, cross-platform, and free network protocol analyzer software, which is being used by many security experts for analysis and troubleshooting of network issues, has been updated to version 2.0.4.
Version 1.5 of the libjpeg-turbo JPEG library is now available with more performance optimizations.
Only four days after the release of the first Beta build of the upcoming VirtualBox 5.1 open-source and cross-platform virtualization software, Oracle today, June 7, 2016, announced the availability of the second Beta version for public testing.
VirtualBox 5.1 will be a major release of the widely used virtualization manager that lets computer users run numerous operating systems like FreeBSD, Solaris, Microsoft Windows, or any GNU/Linux distribution on virtual machines for testing or other purposes.
Shotcut is a powerful open-source video editor for Windows, Linux and Mac. It’s quirky in places, not always easy to use, but spend a while learning the basics and you’ll find an array of high-end features to explore.
The program uses the popular FFmpeg to import source files, which means there’s no need to worry about format support: it’ll open just about every video variant that’s ever existed.
There’s also support for capturing resolutions up to 4k from SDI, HDMI, webcam, JACK & Pulse audio, IP stream, X11 screen and Windows DirectShow devices.
Hearts of Iron IV, another installment in Paradox Interactive’s World War II strategy series, has been released on Steam and Paradox Plaza.
Continuing the series traditions, the game promises deep, strategic combat on land, air and sea as well as multiple diplomatic, economic and research options.
I think it’s a really cool game, but it’s a shame the Linux version always seems to be crash happy for me.
I love racing games and I especially love a good combat racer, so Racing Apex looks like it’s right up my street. The developer has confirmed they will be putting the demo on Linux too.
Dear Linux gamers, there’s a new Humble “Staff Picks” Bundle available starting today, June 7, 2016, which brings several awesome games to keep you entertained for a long time.
KNIGHTS is one of those puzzle games with an extremely simple premise that, after some levels, starts to become a challenge. The feeling and aesthetics are very similar to LYNE. Silently released just one week ago, so far it has collected only positive reviews, therefore if you are into puzzle games you definitely should give this one a chance.
This is kinda of amusing in a weird way, in XCavalypse you’re cleaning up a city after a zombie apocalypse with a fleet of excavators.
Also, this game is unlike most of the others and it doesn’t look like it was very well received. Going by overall Steam reviews is doesn’t look great, but I will give it thoughts when it’s out.
Volition, the developer of Saints Row IV is working on a new game called Agents of Mayhem. A GOL supporter asked me to get in touch with them about a Linux version, so I did.
KDE neon User Edition 5.6 is based on the latest version of Plasma 5.6 and intends to showcase the latest KDE technology on a stable foundation. It is a continuously updated installable image that can be used not just for exploration and testing but as the main operating system for people enthusiastic about the latest desktop software.
The KDE project has this morning announced the release of KDE Neon User Edition 5.6, the first major version of this OS spin showcasing the latest KDE components.
KDE Neon has been making good progress since it (re)launched earlier this year as a OS stack based upon Ubuntu but with incorporating all of the bleeding-edge KDE Plasma / Frameworks 5 components. This first major KDE Neon User Edition release incorporates Plasma 5.6.
KDE Plasma 5.7 continues to look more and more like it will be running reasonably well on Wayland with close parity to the KDE stack running on X11.
Plasma 5.7 will ship with a new taskmanager library. One of the reasons to implement a new taskmanager library is the port to Wayland. Our old code base was heavily relying on X11 and didn’t support the concept of multiple windowing systems. You can read more on that in Eike’s blog post about the new task manager. In this blog post I want to focus a little bit on the Wayland side of a task manager.
Matthias Clasen, well known Fedora / GNOME contributor at Red Hat, has written a blog post about the ongoing modularity work in the Linux desktop realm.
Clasen’s blog post covers the continuing modularity of the desktop and the goal to “make it easier to get desktop applications from application developers to users.”
Regardless of the operating system being used, we’re used to the idea that our current OS will become obsolete every few years, and a newer version will be released to replace the current one.
However, some Linux distributions have adopted a different release model. Instead of releasing a new version every year, they use a model called the “Rolling Release Model” to continuously update your operating system. This means that you only have to install your OS once and will always be running the latest version.
Sabayon Sabayon is a Linux distribution that is based on Gentoo. Sabayon takes on some of the characteristics of its parent, providing users with a rolling release distribution that can make use of both binary and source software packages. Recent snapshots of Sabayon offer support for computers running on 64-bit x86 processors along with Raspberry Pi 2 & 3 computers. Perhaps the biggest new feature of Sabayon though is the launch of Sabayon Community Repositories (SCR). These new repositories provide a way for community members to build and distribute software for Sabayon without the necessity of getting their software into Sabayon’s official repositories.
There are seven editions of Sabayon, including the builds for Raspberry Pi computers. There are several desktop editions, a Server edition and a small Minimal edition. I decided to begin my trial with Sabayon’s KDE edition which is a 2.7GB download. Booting from the distribution’s media brings up a menu asking if we would like to run Sabayon’s live desktop, perform an installation, boot to a text console, check the installation media for defects or perform a memory check. Taking the live desktop option loads the KDE desktop. The wallpaper shows a gravel road passing through farmland while a moon rises with the Sabayon logo on it. Icons on the desktop invite us to donate to the distribution, get on-line help and launch the system installer. At the bottom of the display we find the application menu, a task switcher and the system tray.
Thanks to one of our readers, we were able to report last week on the release of the PCLinuxOS 64 2016.06. MATE Edition operating system. However, today we would like to introduce our readers to the PCLinuxOS 64 2016.06 Xfce Edition OS.
PCLinuxOS 64 2016.06 Xfce is a community edition, built around the lightweight Xfce 4.12 deskop environment and powered by a kernel package from the long-term supported (LTS) Linux 4.4 series. Linux kernel 4.4.11 LTS is used in the PCLinuxOS 64 2016.06 Xfce Live ISO images at the moment of the launch.
ROSA Desktop Fresh R7 KDE left a good impression on me.
Even though the initial boot took about 500 Mb of memory, my laptop with 4Gb of RAM was capable of dealing with all the tasks I ran on it in the Live mode of this distribution in a quick and responsive manner. I felt no lags or glitches.
The only minor things that were worth mentioning in this review were strange design of the panel and the ROSA Menu which isn’t to my taste.
Well done, ROSA team, I hope to see your system even more improved in the future.
Manjaro Linux is based onArch Linux and one of the easiest Linux distributions available. Manjaro Linux provides the distro in most major flavors including, XFCE, KDE, Gnome, LXDE, MATE, Cinnamon and more. The team has recently released its stable release Manjaro 16.06 with all the packages updated to their latest versions.
The long-anticipated Manjaro Linux 16.06 ‘Daniella’ is now available for download. This release has arrived with the latest Linux kernel 4.4 (and 10 other kernel options) and other new features. The flagship Xfce edition of community driven Manjaro Linux comes with Xfce 4.12, bringing more polished desktop experience.
The openSUSE project announces the immediate cancellation of the ownCloud Summit that was scheduled to take place during the openSUSE Conference in two weeks.
The summit was scheduled for June 22 – 23.
Given the ownCloud community has forked, openSUSE sought an amicable solution so that both communities could take part in the openSUSE conference. As this was found to not be possible, the openSUSE Board made the decision to cancel the summit.
Yesterday we kicked off a meeting in Stuttgart to discuss Nextcloud and get work done. A first result is the establishment of the new Server repository on Github (and more repositories!) and we’ll share other things on the forums and in Github issues the coming days. The real important news however is that we decided to organize a BBQ!
The latest Scrum sprint of the YaST team was shorter than the average three weeks and also a little bit “under-powered” with more people on vacation or sick leave than usual. The bright side of shorter sprints is that you don’t have to wait three full weeks to get an update on the status. Here you have it!
Five core open source principles–open exchange, participation, meritocracy, community, and release early and often–are outlined in Red Hat’s framework.
In pushing open source projects forward, making good decisions matters, and Red Hat happens to use an in-house tool to help guide its decision making related to its technology projects. It’s called the Open Decision Framework, and consists of the company’s collection of its own best practices for making decisions and leading projects.
Now, the company has announced the release of a community version of the Open Decision Framework. “The framework can help decision-makers communicate transparently, seek out diverse perspectives, collaborate more effectively across distributed teams, and limit unanticipated impacts of business projects and decisions,” the company claims.
In his book, The Open Organization, Jim Whitehurst explains how the open source way of thinking has the power to influence the way organizations operate, not just how they can develop software. As a Senior Brand Explorer at the brand agency New Kind, much of my work involves guiding research projects for technology companies interested in using open source-inspired strategies for communicating and collaborating with customers and community members.
Patrick Volkerding wrote last week that 14.2 may be ready, but alas, more updates landed in Slackware-current Friday and Saturday. The Debian project announced updates 8.5 and 7.11, bringing security and major bug fixes to both branches. Elsewhere, Jesse Smith reviewed Tiny Core 7.1 and Sabayon 16.05 and Gary Newell reviewed 4MLinux 17. Finally, Chris Camacho offered some suggestions for surviving systemd saying, “Maybe Linux will survive the corporate onslaught….”
Regardless of why (and there a number of valid reasons), you might like to avoid using such a large project without so much as a specification or standard behind it. Fortunately there are still a number of options out there if you don’t want a systemdOS clone. I’ll present three options ranging from could do better to plausible and then finally the best in class.
Now that most of the Ubuntu Phone and Ubuntu Tablet owners are enjoying the new features implemented by the Canonical’s Ubuntu Touch developers in the OTA-11 update released last week, it’s time to look forward to the OTA-12.
Canonical already said a few weeks ago that the Ubuntu Touch OTA-12 software update for supported Ubuntu Phone devices, as well as the Ubuntu Tablet, is more about fixes than features, but Łukasz Zemczak’s latest report suggests that the Ubuntu Touch devs are preparing the long anticipated fingerprint reader support.
As promised, the Linux Mint team pushed the Beta release of the upcoming and highly anticipated Linux Mint 18 “Sarah” operating system to the official testing channels for public beta testers.
We reported earlier today, June 7, 2016, that the Beta release of the upcoming Linux Mint 18 “Sarah” operating system has been launched with the usual Cinnamon and MATE editions.
We reported earlier that the Linux Mint developers have released the Beta ISO images of the forthcoming Linux Mint 18 “Sarah” computer operating system, which is available as both Cinnamon and MATE editions.
Are you waiting eagerly for this summer’s Linux Mint 18 release? Well, the Beta release of this Ubuntu 16.04-based operating system is out and you can download the Cinnamon and MATE Editions right now and start testing them.
Ubuntu 16.04 has been out for a while, and it hasn’t been smooth sailing for everyone who has tried to install it. One writer at Freedom Penguin had a terrible time with Ubuntu 16.04, and ended up having to go with Linux Mint instead. He shared his story in a long and detailed post.
Ubuntu MATE project leader Martin Wimpress informed us just a few moments ago about the availability of the MATE 1.14 desktop environment for the Ubuntu MATE 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) operating system.
Not to be outdone by other Raspberry Pi operating systems, an update was pushed for Raspbian in the middle of May. I don’t use Raspbian that much anymore since Ubuntu MATE appeared, in large part because I’m not too wild about its “incompleteness.” That has changed with the latest update. After using it for a couple of weeks, I’ve been extremely happy and have informed other Raspberry Pi users, who like me aren’t too wild about using Raspbian, that they should give the OS another chance.
One of the main themes of this year’s Embedded Linux Conference and OpenIoT Summit was the challenge of bridging the growing number of Internet of Things (IoT) standards. Many speakers were hopeful about the potential for achieving functional interoperability, if not a unifying standard, and there were even calls for a possible merger between two of the largest open source efforts: AllSeen and IoTivity.
Other Linux- and Android-ready SBCs built around the Snapdragon 600 include the Inforce 6410Plus and the Intrinsyc Open-Q 600. Both boards offer Gigabit Ethernet ports, and the Inforce 6410Plus provides SATA.
X-ES launched an XMC/PrPMC mezzanine module, and will soon ship a VPX SBC using quad- and octa-core 64-bit ARM QorIQ SoCs.
Hacker Boards has compiled a fantastic list of 81 Linux single board computers that are priced under $200 the makes for a great reference guide when finding the perfect mini PC for your next project.
To be included in the list the boards must have at least some community and technical support and need to offer open source Linux or Android distributions for download.
Russians are busy developing their own Linux-based mobile operating system to end the monopoly of Google’s Android and Apple’s iOS. Aimed at mass audience, this operating system is being developed by Open Mobile Platform on the top of Sailfish OS.
Smartphone maker and display manufacturer Samsung is believed to launch a pair of smartphones in early 2017, each with a bendable OLED display. According to people familiar with the smartphones’ development (via Bloomberg), the two devices could be unveiled as early as Q1 2017 — potentially at Mobile World Congress in February — and come in two different sizes, similar to that of the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus.
Developer Nick Lee is back with his new hack that allows him to run open source Android operating system on an iPhone. He has made this possible with his specially-crafted iPhone case that also features ports for USB, HDMI, and SD card.
Here is a Good news from China. Xiaomi has launched a new Band of its Smart band series. The news has come from China that it is available to purchase in China from today and soon will be available in India. Hopefully, on 28th of June 2016. Xiaomi has done a tremendous work in healthcare. As we know this is a new field for Information Technology industry and all Information Technology Giants want to take the Advantage of people’s interest in this area.
Android is an open source mobile platform. The openness of Android has been utilised by phone makers across the globe to good effect.
India is one of the biggest smartphone markets right now, with over 90 percent users preferring Android. But it’s shocking that till now not a single technology company from the country has tried to give Android a local touch.
ReactOS is the closest working clone of the proprietary Microsoft Windows OS that currently is available. Its developers are meeting their stated goal of creating a quality operating system that is compatible with applications and drivers written for the Microsoft Windows NT family of operating systems: NT4, 2000, XP, Windows 2003, Vista and Windows 7.
What they have not fully explained is how ReactOS avoids the vulnerabilities that render the outdated OSes unsafe to use online today. The Windows OS security flaws may not be a pressing issue, though, since the developers have created a clone rather than duplicating Windows code.
Open source fans might be drawn to future developments of ReactOS for the same reasons of choice and freedom that draw them to the Linux OS families.
Spreadsheets are a staple for small businesses, data analysts and marketers among others, with most opting for the convenience and familiar interface of Microsoft Excel. But there are many options out there from Google, Apache, Libre and more offering free and open source alternatives.
One of the most common questions I get from people interested in taking a more open, collaborative approach to building their brand and culture is “Where should we start?”
In our work at New Kind, we often help technology companies open up their brand and culture by including employees, customers, and community members on the journey (In fact, our company purpose reads “We bring people together to share in the adventure of creating the future”).
The ninth annual Imagine RIT, the Rochester Institute of Technology’s annual innovation and creativity festival, was held on campus May 7. Each year, about 30,000 people arrive on campus to view student, faculty, and staff demonstrations. Visitors experience everything RIT has to offer through interactive presentations, hands-on demonstrations, exhibitions, and research projects set up throughout campus.
The Elastic stack is a versatile collection of open source software tools that make gathering insights from data easier. Formerly referred to as the ELK stack (in reference to Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana), the growing list of tools that integrate with the platform (such as Beats) have outgrown the acronym but provide ever-growing capability for users and developers alike.
At the upcoming Southeast Linuxfest 2016, I’ll be covering some of the steps to get started using each of these parts of the stack. In this article, we’ll look at each in turn to summarize the capabilities, requirements, and interesting use cases that apply to each.
Firefox 47 was released today bringing a few new features and Asa Dotzler blogged yesterday on the new approach for Firefox 48. Folks just continue to have problems with Microsoft and Windows 10. Some are so frustrated they’ve started a petition and asked for EFF’s help. Back in Linuxville, Jack Germain suggested ReactOS as an alternative to Windows 10 and DarkDuck reviewed Rosa R7 KDE. The openSUSE ownCloud Summit has been cancelled and Doc Searls’ meditation on the next big fight hit the nail right on the head.
In the recent past we have made several improvements to Firefox Accounts that make your browsing better. Those improvements include personalizing your account and the ability to sync passwords, bookmarks and other browsing data between your desktop and mobile devices.
Now, we are making it even easier to access synced tabs directly in your desktop Firefox browser. If you’re logged into your Firefox Account, you will see all open tabs from your smartphone or other computers within the sidebar. In the sidebar you can also search for specific tabs quickly and easily.
In the next few days, Firefox 48 Beta becomes available. If all goes well in our beta testing, we’re about 6 weeks away from shipping the first phase of E10S to Firefox release users with the launch of Firefox 48 on August 2nd.
E10S is short for “Electrolysis”. Similar to how chemists can use the technique called electrolysis to split water into hydrogen and oxygen, we’re using project Electrolysis to split Firefox into a UI process and a content process. Splitting UI from content means that when a web page is devouring your computer’s processor, your tabs and buttons and menus won’t lock up too.
As with most releases since the switch the a rapid release schedule the latest release of Mozilla Firefox brings a modest collection of iterative changes.
MapR Technologies, known for its focus on Hadoop, has announced at this week’s Spark Summit conference a new enterprise-grade Apache Spark distribution. Spark, of course, has drawn billions of dollars of development commitments from organizations including IBM.
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) today kicked off its Discover conference with new infrastructure offerings including an updated Helion cloud stack , OneView management platform and Docker integration.
Personally, I’ll be sticking with the one-two punch of Google Docs and LibreOffice…but I have no need to work with MS Office (as my editor now works with LibreOffice as well). However, it’s reassuring to know, should I have to open an MS Office password protected file (or a file that LibreOffice doesn’t care for), I now have an option.
I have to write about the Typepad total failure. Typepad runs THIS blog. I have used this blog for over 11 years and I have a paid premium account on Typepad. This blog has had over 6 million lifetime visits (thank you to all who have visited us) and my readers have left over 50,000 comments (thank you to all who contribute thoughts to the blog). While I have a formal website – www.tomiahonen.com and plenty of social media sites from Twitter to Linked In (I even have a rarely-used Facebook account) this blog is my digital home. And its always been on Typepad. Typepad is not by any means a perfect tech company, but all tech companies have their stumbles from time to time. What makes Typepad particularly relevant to this blog – the Communities Dominate blog – is that Typepad serves social media experts and providers. They are a business serving BLOGGERS. They power social media. So they are at the heart of the social media world, and they have to know its rules, and behave by it.
Splice Machine is seeking contributors, mentors and sponsors to help support its move to take its dual-engine RDBMS open source.
Open source software is usually free of cost. So how do open source developers and companies make money? Here’s a look at different open source business models, and examples of companies and organizations that have successfully endorsed them.
A devastating magnitude 7.8 earthquake struck Nepal on April 25, 2015, killing more than 9,000 people, injuring thousands more, and leaving an additional 3 million homeless.
Immediately after the earthquake, the government, local and international security forces, and international aid agencies all jumped in to try to help. However, there was a lack of coordination between these groups.
Ever since it was established in 2012, America Makes, or the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute, has stated that their goal was to work with the business and higher education community to develop next-level 3D printing technology. As the United States’ official 3D printing and additive manufacturing accelerator they have brought together more than 160 businesses and colleges and enabled them to collaboratively develop improvements to 3D printing technology, software, materials and processes. They have produced groundbreaking technology that has led to more metal 3D printing in aerospace applications, medical applications, electronics 3D printing and even support structure optimization algorithms. Each year membership in the organization grows, and new and more exciting developments that benefit all of the United States are made.
Have you ever wanted to create an app that can be used on PC, and OS X without the extra effort? What about Android and iOS? Kivy allows you do that with many additional features such as OpenGL ES rendering, custom widgets, and full multi-touch and orientation/tilt support.
PHP is one of the most popular programming languages around the world, and the recent PHP 7 release made this server-side programming language better and more stable than ever.
PHP is widely used in major projects. Facebook, for example, utilizes PHP for maintaining and creating their internal systems. WordPress uses PHP to power its internals, which in return is powering more than 26% of the web. Currently, PHP powers more than 82% of websites (whose server-side programming languages the Web Technology Surveys site is able to track).
Nicola Sturgeon has been ranked as the second most powerful woman in the UK, behind only the Queen.
The first minister is one of six UK representatives in Forbes magazine’s annual list of the world’s most powerful and influential women.
A Scottish government spokesman said the list underlined the importance both of the first minister’s office and the profile of Scotland as a nation.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel topped the list for the sixth year running.
Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton was placed second, with Janet Yellen, chairwoman of the US Federal Reserve, third.
For four years, as Leader of the Opposition, my job was to interrogate Tony Blair every week at Prime Minister’s Questions; a close approximation to trying to nail jelly to a wall.
I used all the techniques ever devised of presenting him with a question demanding a “yes” or “no” answer, where both “yes” and “no” were politically impossible to say. And he employed every means known to a seasoned politician of addressing a question without ever coming down on either side of it.
Even one day when the First Minister of Wales resigned minutes before PMQs – news of which reached me but not him – and I immediately tried to trick him into expressing confidence in that Minister, Blair sniffed the air, smelt the rat, and talked about Wales in general. When it came to obfuscation, he was a class act.
On this subject, Charlie Rose fed McConnell another softball in the form of a middle-school civics query: “Is it a conservative government that the founders established, because they wanted… to make sure that this country didn’t rush into anything?”
An estimated one million people may already die each year because they are resistant to all known antibiotics, and the number could reach 10 million per year and devastate the world economy by 2050 unless key steps are taken, experts from the United Kingdom and South Africa told a press briefing on antimicrobial resistance at United Nations headquarters today.
“It’s already here. This is not a problem for the future,” said Prof. Dame Sally Davies, chief medical officer for England. “This is a real worry.”
The relentless tragedy of narcotic addiction, especially of opiates, across America has overwhelmed already depleted public resources, leaving a trail of devastated communities, families and lives – threatening a new lost generation.
A troubling new investigation by the Guardian has found that at least 33 large cities in the United States may be improperly testing tap water in order to pass FDA regulations on allowable levels of lead. Reporters from the paper looked at 41 cities across 17 different states, and compared local officials’ water testing methods to those suggested by the EPA.
Of the 41 cities studied, 33 were using testing methods that could potentially underestimate the amount of lead present in water, and 21 of those were using the same water testing methods employed by the officials who have now been formally charged in Flint. Due to the age of the infrastructure involved, the paper only looked at large cities east of the Mississippi River, so it’s still completely unknown what standards are being used in the rest of the country.
The attacks have been under way since last Friday and are mainly being used to install porn-related spamming scripts, according to a blog post published Thursday. The underlying vulnerability in WP Mobile Detector came to light on Tuesday in this post. The plugin has since been removed from the official WordPress plugin directory. As of Wednesday, the plugin reportedly had more than 10,000 active installations, and it appears many remained active at the time this post was being prepared.
LifeLock has never been the brightest star in the identity fraud protection constellation. Its own CEO — with his mouth writing checks others would soon be cashing with his credentials — expressed his trust in LifeLock’s service by publishing his Social Security number, leading directly to 13 separate cases of (successful) identity theft.
Beyond that, LifeLock was barely a lock. It didn’t encrypt stored credentials and had a bad habit of ambulance-chasing reported security breaches in hopes of pressuring corporate victims into picking up a year’s worth of coverage for affected customers. This culminated in the FTC ordering it to pay a $12 million fine for its deceptive advertising, scare tactics, and inability to keep its customers’ ID info safe.
Samba 4.4 major branch was launched on March 22, 2016, and it brought support for asynchronous flush requests, several Active Directory (AD) enhancements, a GnuTLS-based backupkey implementation, multiple CTDB (Cluster Trivial Database) improvements, a WINS nsswitch module, as well as experimental SMB3 Multi-Channel support.
On March 24th of this year, 59 printers at Northeastern University in Boston suddenly output white supremacist hate literature, part of a wave of spammed printer incidents reported at Northeastern and on at least a half dozen other campuses.
This should be no surprise to anyone who understands today’s printer technology. Enterprise-class printers have evolved into powerful, networked devices with the same vulnerabilities as anything else on the network. But since, unlike with personal computers, no one sits in front of them all day, the risks they introduce are too often overlooked.
“Many printers still have default passwords, or no passwords at all, or ten are using the same password,” says Michael Howard, HP’s chief security advisor, speaking of what he’s seen in the field. “A printer without password protection is a goldmine for a hacker. One of the breaches we often see is a man-in-the-middle attack, where they take over a printer and divert [incoming documents] to a laptop before they are printed. They can see everything the CEO is printing. So you must encrypt.”
Roughly the size of a soda can, sitting on a bookshelf, and whirring away some 24-hours a day, a relatively innocuous gadget may be turning friends and family away from your home. The elephant in your living room is your Internet-connected security camera, a device people are increasingly using for peace of mind in their homes. But few stop to think about the effect these devices may have on house guests. Should you tell your friends, for instance, that they’re being recorded while you all watch the big game together?
Syrian troops, aided by a Homs-based pro-government militia the ‘Falcons of the Desert’ and under the cover of Russian air support, entered al-Raqqa Province from Hama for the first time in two years on Saturday. The southern half of al-Raqqa province is one of two major strongholds left to Daesh (ISIS, ISIL), the other one being Mosul in northern Iraq. Mosul is much bigger and more important, but al-Raqqa has symbolic importance to Daesh, since it is where the terrorist organization first established itself as a ‘state’ ruling territory. The territory also figures in Daesh’s weird theories about the Judgment Day.
So Gregoire Moutaux, 25, was arrested last month by Ukraine. The French national had a large cache of deadly weapons.
Ukraine Intelligence chief Vasyl Hrytsak said, “The Frenchman spoke negatively of the activities of his government on mass migration of foreigners to France, the spread of Islam and globalisation. He also said he wished to stage a number of terrorist attacks in protest.”
Netanyahu is betraying his job. This man has to go, and soon. We are all tasked with that sacred mission, and especially the Arab citizens.
It’s definitely true we know who to hold responsible for Obamacare. Getting into the Iraq War, too — though there’s far less certainty among the public about who is responsible for the failure to negotiate a SOFA, which led to the withdrawal timeline, and (arguably) to the resurgence of what would become ISIS. Both Obama and Bush get blamed.
But it’s an interesting argument particularly in light of Wittes’ prior dismissal of Conor Friedersdorf and Jennifer Granick’s concerns about drones and surveillance, because on those issues and many more, the Executive is shielded from much political and all legal accountability. Presidents have authorized a vast range of covert action over the years that have led to a great deal of blowback that they by definition cannot be held accountable for. Hell, as recently as 2013, the Executive was stone-walling SSCI member Ron Wyden about what countries we were conducting lethal counterterrorism operations in, and it took years of requests, starting before the Anwar al-Awlaki killing and continuing for some time after it, before Wyden was permitted to see the authorization for that.
No one may doubt who is responsible for Obamacare, but even select oversight committees, and especially voters, simply don’t know all the things they might want to hold a president accountable for.
And on the issues that (I think) Wittes would lump under “national security,” such secrecy, such unilateral power, actually may lead to rash and often stupid decisions. Setting aside what you think about the need for the President to have authority to order preemptive nuclear strikes (the “Bomb Power” that Garry Wills argues created the necessity for such secrecy), with such authority also comes the ability to create significant harms to the US by a thousand cuts of stupid covert action. We helped to create modern Sunni terrorism via such secret authority, after all.
United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon removed Saudi Arabia from a U.N.-blacklist of violators of children’s human rights, after initially placing their Yemen coalition on the list last Thursday. The decision resulted in a massive outcry from rights groups who lambasted Ki-moon’s “flip-flopping.”
Under intense pressure from the Saudi Arabian government, the U.N. Secretary General removed the U.S.-backed, Saudi-led coalition in Yemen from a blacklist of child-killers only 72 hours after the list was made public.
The coalition had been listed in the appendix of the U.N’s annual report on children and armed conflict, under “parties that kill or maim children,” and “parties that engage in attacks on schools and/or hospitals.”
According to the report, at least 785 children were killed and 1,168 injured in Yemen last year alone, 60 percent by coalition airstrikes. The report documents dozens of coalition attacks against Yemeni schools and hospitals.
Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu is defiantly asserting permanent control over the occupied Golan Heights, a determination strengthened by Israel’s extraction of water and now possibly oil from the land, writes Jonathan Marshall.
Should George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Others Be Jailed?
The U.S.-backed Honduran coup ushered in a wave of neoliberal policies that have systematically violated the economic, cultural, and social rights of the nation’s Indigenous people, women, and farmers, while leaving activists and rights defenders—such as the late Berta Cáceres—vulnerable to criminalization and violence.
Such were the findings of a new report, prepared by a coalition of 54 Honduran social movements and rights organizations and presented as an alternative to the official government report submitted to the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which began its 58th session in Geneva on Monday.
“The coup d’etat in 2009 meant an imminent reversal of human rights and a serious blow to the country’s institutions,” states the report (pdf), which is available in Spanish.
While the study does not single out international governments that supported the ouster of the country’s democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya, it comes as former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton prepares to assume the role of Democratic nominee for president. Clinton’s role in the coup has come under increased scrutiny since the assassination of Cáceres, a Honduran Indigenous rights and environmental activist, in March.
The Obama administration does not want peace in Syria. The Russians finally have to admit to themselves that the U.S. is no partner for a continuation of a cease fire, a coordinated attack against the Islamic State and al-Qaeda and for peace in Syria. Indeed, as Lavrov explains, the U.S. has again asked to spare al-Qaeda from Russian air strikes even as two UN Security Council resolutions demand its eradication. Huge supply convoys (vid) from Turkey are again going to the “rebels” who will, as always, share them with al-Qaeda and other terrorists.
The current renewed Syrian Arab Army attack towards Raqqa is being obstructed not only by sandstorms but also by a timely attack of al-Qaeda, Ahrar al Sham and Turkestan Islamist Party forces against government positions in the south Aleppo countryside.
This is Operation “Anakonda 16.” Thirty-one thousand troops, 14,000 of them American, are conducting war games designed to secure an Allied victory in World War III. The exercises involve “100 aircraft, 12 vessels and 3,000 vehicles,” and precede the upcoming NATO summit, which is expected to approve the stationing of yet more troops – mostly Americans – in eastern Europe.
In a familiar muddying of the waters, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has spent the past week talking up peace while fiercely criticising Friday’s summit in France – the only diplomatic initiative on the horizon.
As foreign ministers from 29 nations arrived for a one-day meeting in Paris, Netanyahu dusted off the tired argument that any sign of diplomatic support for Palestinians would encourage from them “extreme demands”.
France hopes the meeting will serve as a prelude to launching a peace process later in the year. French president Francois Hollande said he hoped to achieve a “peace [that] will be solid, sustainable and under international supervision”.
In the last days before the California primary, where Democratic primary polls showed her neck-and-neck with Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton delivered a campaign speech in San Diego. Though her campaign billed it as a “major foreign policy address,” it looked more like a last-ditch attempt to position herself as the Democratic nominee ahead of a potentially embarrassing loss or close finish with Sanders in the nation’s most populous state.
Indeed, most of the address was directed squarely at Donald Trump. It wasn’t a speech on Clinton’s own foreign policy so much as a takedown of the presumptive GOP nominee’s.
Throughout, Clinton contrasted Trump’s often wild and crazy (and not to mention wildly inconsistent) positions with her own claims of having an experienced hand on the tiller (and not to mention on the button). Clinton’s overall point was that Trump is “temperamentally unfit to be president,” and that he’d be incompetent and dangerous as commander in chief.
Much of the critique was a rehash of the GOP candidate’s bizarre and often contradictory statements on the subject. After all, Clinton found, it’s easy to critique Trump’s calls for providing nuclear weapons to Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and other countries. It’s a sure laugh-line to mention Trump’s claim that climate change is a hoax invented by the Chinese, and a guaranteed applause line (especially in a military town like the carefully chosen San Diego) to remind the audience that Trump said that POWs were not necessarily heroes.
Just a few days after blacklisting the Saudi Arabia-led military coalition for killing children in Yemen, the United Nations on Monday removed the group from its tally of armed states that violate children’s rights during conflict.
Amnesty International blasted the UN for “shamefully” caving to pressure to scrub the coalition from the so-called “list of shame” after an annual report found that the Saudi-led, U.S.-backed group was responsible for 60 percent of child deaths and injuries in Yemen in 2015.
“It is unprecedented for the UN to bow to pressure to alter its own published report on children in armed conflict. It is unconscionable that this pressure was brought to bear by one of the very states listed in the report,” said Richard Bennett, representative and head of Amnesty International’s UN Office.
However, even this belief in a “presidential difference” ignores that a President Gore would not have been the bearded, environmental “warrior” he has presented himself as since forfeiting the election. Gore (an opportunistic, protean, and militaristic politician flanked by a frothing hawk for his VP) would have been “commander in chief” and steward of the state and would have therefore wreaked havoc on the world as surely as Clinton did in Yugoslavia, Bush did in Iraq, and Obama did in Libya. As Obama’s drone program indicates, presidential differences here are matters of technique, but because liberals are frequently more concerned with presidential management’s form than content, they do not seem to notice that being a good manager is wholly compatible with being a mass murderer.
Despite a nearly $600 billion military budget, congressional Republicans are demanding even more money for the Pentagon, while rejecting cuts in spending for military bands and resisting emergency funds to fight the Zika virus, notes Mike Lofgren.
Tens of thousands of people have fled southeastern Niger following deadly attacks by Boko Haram insurgents on the town of Bosso in recent days, the United Nations said Tuesday.
The priest Anando Gopal Ganguly was attacked on Tuesday morning by three men, who came on a motorcycle, said Assistant Superintendent of Police Gopinath Kanjilal.
Armed with sharp weapons, the assailants slit 69-year-old Ganguly’s throat around 9:30am while he was on his way to the temple he served.
Kanjilal said that the Ganguly was on his bicycle, when the assailants first hit him on his head with a stick before slaughtering him.
“It seems that militants might be responsible for the killing,” said Kanjilal.
Monitoring group SITE Intelligence reported that Middle East-based Islamic State claimed the murder.
In a statement I never expected to see in print, half of voters said in a survey a presidential candidate should continue to run for America’s highest office even if she is indicted for national security crimes.
For those who want historical markers to look back on, charting decline in civilization and deviations from reality, well, there’s a good one.
The latest Rasmussen Reports survey, taken in late May, finds most voters (65%) believe Hillary Clinton is a lawbreaker, but half of all voters also say a felony indictment shouldn’t stop her campaign for the presidency.
Indonesian land policies have turned rainforest into monoculture plantations. All photographs by Angel L Martínez Cantera
“Our main goal is to preserve the forest according to the customary traditions of our people. If there’s no forest, there’s no Orang Rimba and the other way round,” says Bepak Pengusai, head of customs in arombong, or group area, belonging to the Orang Rimba, an aboriginal people in Sumatra.
Indonesia’s devastating forest fires pose a serious threat to the Orang Rimba habitat. From July to late last year, the fires killed a dozen people and caused respiratory tract infections in half a million more.
For many governments aiming to reduce their import bills and avoid being reliant for fuel on potentially hostile or unstable foreign powers, energy independence is the ultimate goal.
But international economists have published a report warning that it is false to believe the policy will also help to stave off climate change.
In a powerful display of opposition to the fossil fuel economy, activists in Virginia this week are planting traditional “seeds of resistance” along Dominion’s proposed natural gas Atlantic Coast Pipeline route.
The action began Monday in Stuarts Draft, when residents met with anti-pipeline activists and members of national environmental groups to sow the sacred blue corn seeds, which were brought by a member of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska.
“We stand on this common ground that we care about and love,” said Mekasi Horinek Camp, Ponca Nation member and coordinator with Bold Oklahoma, which is part of the anti-pipeline Bold Alliance campaign.
When an oil pipeline now poised to cut through four Midwestern states was first proposed in 2014, the project quickly got pushback from environmentalists and some landowners on the pipeline’s route.
For one group, this piece of fossil fuel infrastructure was a poor investment in a time of human-caused climate change and increasing pollution. For the other, it was a threat to their land and their property rights. Residents thought it was clear from the beginning that Dakota Access, the developer, intended to claim land by condemning it via eminent domain if allowed to, and build a line intended to transport oil from North Dakota’s Bakken Formation to a market hub near Patoka, Illinois.
In the meantime, frontline communities are becoming sacrifice zones where people are sick from toxic water and poisoned air from fracking. Life on Earth is threatened if we don’t take dramatic action to save our global climate from chaos. Yet, even though we must take action to keep fossil fuels in the ground, billions of dollars are being sunk into another 40 years of fossil fuel infrastructure.
Wind and solar power are on an exciting ride. Last year, new renewables for the first time made up more than half of the power capacity that was added around the world. New wind and solar plants, in other words, outstripped all new fossil fuel, hydropower and nuclear power plants. “Renewables are now established around the world as mainstream sources of energy,” states the Renewables 2016 Global Status Report. This is great news for the climate and for the world’s rivers.
Naohiro Masuda, TEPCO Chief of Decommissioning at Fukushima Diiachi Nuclear Power Plant, finally publicly “officially” announced that 600 tons of hot molten core, or corium, is missing (Fukushima Nuclear Plant Operator Says 600 Tons of Melted Fuels is Missing, Epoch Times, May 24, 2016).
A report published by the US Trade Representative at the end of March has indicated that a series of EU regulations that protect people and the environment act as “barriers” to US trade, and questions the need for such provisions.
US based NGO Sierra Club has distilled the “lowlights” from the 2016 report (below) showcasing how the US is targeting climate-friendly laws, as well as regulations banning pesticides, chemicals and GM crops.
As it stands right now, the TPP’s best chance of passing is in the slim window of time between Election Day and Inauguration Day — the so-called lame duck session of Congress. This is really the easiest time for President Obama to push through a massively unpopular trade deal like the TPP without anybody noticing.
The Luxembourg parliament voted in support of a resolution on the EU-Canada deal CETA on Tuesday (June 8), that calls upon the government to seek legal clarification on the investor rights provisions in the agreement. It also demands that CETA is a “mixed deal” requiring ratification in Member State parliaments once these legal irregularities have been addressed.
The vote was overwhelmingly supported by all political parties, with 58 votes in favour and only 2 abstentions from the far left. The resolution refers to the legal opinions of the European Judges Association and the German Association of Judges (Deutscher Richterbund DRB) who have both heavily criticised the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) and the EU Commission’s reform proposal or Investment Court System (ICS). The DRB said in a February statement that an Investment Court System, as proposed by the Commission, had “no legal basis” and was not needed as EU and US states guarantee access to justice and grant effective protection to foreign investors.
Faced with a record-breaking refugee crisis over the past year, some European countries have resorted to strict measures to stem the flow of migrants and asylum seekers arriving at their borders.
Austria, in particular, has made it difficult for refugees to enter the country. In February 2016, for example, the country imposed a daily cap on the number of asylum seekers that could enter from its southern border—limiting it to just 80 a day. (In 2015 the country received 90,000 asylum claims, equivalent to 1% of its population.)
Opinion polls show the leave campaign is gaining, but remain can still win. First things first, however – make sure you are registered before midnight on Tuesday
Corporate sovereignty has become a big issue as a result of its inclusion in TPP and TAFTA/TTIP, but it’s present in hundreds of other trade and investment treaties.The heated discussion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) chapters in those negotiations has led some countries to realize that corporate sovereignty could prove very costly to them one day.
Last week in San Diego, Calif., an Uber driver was charged with 20 counts of sexual assault-related charges stretching back several years, only months after he allegedly raped an intoxicated young woman who sought a ride home. (Uber immediately fired the driver after that incident last winter.) The attack, which was rare but not unprecedented, prompted Uber’s competition, the traditional taxi industry, to demand the Golden State require ride-share drivers undergo police-conducted fingerprinting and criminal background checks—which Uber has fervently opposed.
A new paper on “Neoliberalism: Oversold?” by Jonathan D. Ostry, Prakash Loungani, and Davide Furceri (pdf), is attracting a great deal of publicity these days.
It’s not really because of the arguments in the paper, which are basically some pretty mild criticisms of some aspects of neoliberalism. It’s only because of where the paper appeared— in Finance and Development, a quarterly magazine published by the International Monetary Fund.
But it’s a mistake to assume the IMF has rejected neoliberalism.
A much-criticized group that accredits for-profit colleges announced Monday that it would temporarily stop taking new applications from campuses.
The Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools described the move as an effort to restore “trust and confidence.”
ProPublica and others have detailed serious problems at the organization. As ProPublica reported, students at ACICS-accredited schools graduate at particularly low rates and often can’t pay off their debt.
“Every aspect of the agency must be re-evaluated, fortified and enhanced,” said ACICS’ top executive Anthony Bieda in a press release.
Three months after apologizing for calling poor people “takers,” House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) unveiled his plan to make life harder for them.
Ryan delivered remarks about the plan, entitled A Better Way, at a drug rehab center in Anacostia, an impoverished and heavily black neighborhood of Washington, D.C., as part of a broader rollout of House Republican priorities this week.
Ryan has become the leading voice in Republican lawmakers’ crusade against welfare programs. In the past, he’s blamed poverty on a “culture problem” in “inner cities,” where he says black men are “not even thinking about working or learning the value and the culture of work.” He has also argued that marriage is the cure for poverty, not government programs, and refused to allow any actual poor people testify at his hearings on poverty. He seemed to back away from some of the more racially loaded rhetoric in March, saying he was wrong to refer to people stuck in poverty as “takers.”
Continuing the GOP’s war on the poor, Speaker Paul Ryan and House Republicans unveiled an ostensibly new “anti-poverty” plan on Tuesday, marked by cuts to critical safety-net programs and further austerity.
According to Politico, “much of this latest initiative is repackaged GOP proposals”—and the last time around, those ideas weren’t very popular.
Not so long ago, Social Security was endangered by a “bipartisan” consensus that sought to cut its benefits – already lower than those of comparable countries – as part of a “grand bargain.” President Obama even put a slow-motion benefit cut into one of his proposed budgets, in the form of a reduction in cost-of-living increases.
And nobody talked much about raising taxes on the rich. That, they said, was “politically impossible.”
A Republican plan to dismantle key banking reforms passed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis has been dubbed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) the “Wet Kiss for Wall Street Act.”
Rep. Jeb Hensarling, a Republican from Texas, outlined his proposal—the Financial CHOICE (Creating Hope and Opportunity for Investors, Consumers and Entrepreneurs) Act—in a speech at the Economic Club of New York on Tuesday. The legislation contains “sweeping provisions that effectively constitute a wish list for Republicans,” according to American Banker.
At a moment when the wealthiest one percent own more money than the rest of the world combined, a new report finds that in 2015 the world’s richest people were able to sit back and watch their assets grow by 5.2 percent to a stunning $168 trillion.
Naturally, they fail to mention that not all ‘work’ pays, whereas jobs generally guarantee an income. The problem with jobs is that they sound a lot less glamorous than the more aspirational model of ‘work’, which supposedly makes you frei, and not just in the nazi sense of the word. Thus you’ll be hard pressed to meet anyone who isn’t a filmmaker, IT consultant, or “poet”. Tell people what you actually do for money and they’ll react as if you said “I kill surplus baby animals at a petting zoo with my own bare hands” or “I shoot ping pong balls out of my hoohoo in exchange for tequila shots” – as if that’s somehow worse than “leading a global team of market analysts for a European bank”. People who have jobs can fight for improved working conditions. People who ‘work’ at non-jobs as freelancers, interns or just aspirants in the field are unlikely to challenge the status quo. Thus ‘work’ is heralded as value producing, worthwhile and fulfilling, whereas jobs are for shmucks who can’t compete in the “real world”.
A commonly overlooked but very simple mechanism for promoting decent work in global supply chains is to improve the recovery of unpaid wages.
Yet the AP and other media continued to do so. Why? It’s just blatant bias from the ostensibly neutral mainstream media for the status quo candidate Hillary Clinton.
That should be enough to turn the U.S. population away from these organizations forever. Yet there’s more. In calling the nomination for Hillary, the Associated Press had to get commitments from a few more super delegates. They achieved that feat yesterday evening (mind you, they still haven’t actually voted), and they kept the names anonymous. Yes, you read that right.
As of May 31, Hillary Clinton has 13,221,091 votes to Bernie Sanders’ 10,340,549. Those numbers include the raw vote counts from the caucus states with the exception of Wyoming and several territories which have not released raw vote counts. They do include Washington caucus numbers but not its primary vote counts. Washington’s delegate allocation process is druidic, with candidate preferences calculated to the third decimal point.
As Hillary Clinton finally clinches the Democratic nomination, the big question facing Democrats is: are they now the party of big money and elite special interests or will the Sanders’ revolt live on and grow, write Bill Moyers and Michael Winship.
Poll workers in Los Angeles County are reporting that they are short, in some cases well-short, of the number of Democratic and No Party Preference cross-over Democratic ballots required for their precincts tomorrow under California Elections Code Section 14102 (a)1, (a)2, and (b). Dean C. Logan, L.A. County’s Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk, is dismissive of these claims, however, suggesting that precinct inspectors should be speaking to his office instead of the media and offering a definition of “registered voters” that flies in the face of Federal law and California’s Secretary of State guidance in accordance with Federal law.
So we’re looking at a quandary here where Bernie’s the winner on a moral and even a political basis. He’s made history, and she’s the winner on the mathematical basis. And then you have Trump. So it could be the tightest, most hazardous race in political history and we can’t afford to allow Trump to slither through. So that’s where I’m at.
Bernie Sanders refused to concede the race for the Democratic Party presidential nomination on Tuesday night even as he congratulated his rival Hillary Clinton on her primary wins and thanked his supporters for their determined commitment to the ‘political revolution’ he has championed throughout the hotly contested primary season.
“If this campaign has taught us anything,” he told an enthusiastic and cheering crowd in Santa Monica, California just after 10:30 pm local time, “it has proven that millions of Americans who love this country are prepared to stand up and fight to make this country a much better place.”
When Sanders took the stage, and as of this writing, major news outlets had awarded three of the day’s six contests–New Jersey, New Mexico, and South Dakota–to Clinton, while Sanders was able to claim victories in both Montana and North Dakota.
The U.S. political process, which fancies itself the world’s “gold standard,” is ready to foist on the American people two disdained candidates, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, raising profound doubts about the two-party system, writes Nat Parry.
In a lengthy statement released on his website, Donald Trump defended his racist attacks on the federal district court judge overseeing the fraud case against Trump University. Trump has said the judge, Gonzalo P. Curiel, was not capable of fairly adjudicating the case because of his “Mexican heritage.” Paul Ryan today described Trump’s comments as “textbook racism.”
Leading Republicans have continued to criticize presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump for attacking a Mexican-American judge. Trump has said the judge should recuse himself from a lawsuit against the defunct for-profit Trump University, because his Mexican heritage represents a conflict of interest, since Trump wants to build a wall on the Mexican border. We get a response from Kevin de León, president pro-tem of the California Senate, and Los Angeles city councilmember and former California state legislator Gil Cedillo.
House Speaker Paul Ryan refused to withdraw his endorsement of Donald Trump on Tuesday even as he acknowledged that Trump made “racist” and “indefensible” comments about the Mexican heritage of Gonzalo Curiel, the federal judge overseeing a suit against the defunct Trump University.
In a remarkable 45 seconds captured on video by CNN, Ryan, who is currently the highest-ranking elected official in the Republican party first called Trump’s comments obviously racist and then immediately urged Americans to vote for him anyway.
Testing the endurance of the proverbial ‘camel’s back’ on Tuesday, many mainstream Republicans claimed to have reached their threshold of blatantly discriminatory remarks made by the anointed party nominee, Donald Trump.
Throughout his campaign, the New York billionaire has insulted entire sectors of people, from Mexicans and Muslims to women and people with disabilities. Despite this, the party has widely gotten behind his candidacy.
But the conservative world appears to be in free-fall after Trump defiantly stood by his assertion that the U.S. district court judge presiding over the Trump University case would not give a fair hearing because of his Mexican heritage.
As evidenced by the mid-Tuesday press conference by House Speaker Paul Ryan, many in the party appeared conflicted. While Ryan acknowledged that the remarks were indeed “the textbook definition of racist comments,” he said that he will continue to support Trump for president.
In the months leading up the California primary, all eyes have been focused on the Hillary vs. Bernie cage match. That’s too bad, because there’s another Democrat-on-Democrat struggle going on in the race for the California Assembly that’s full of suspense. It’s another episode in Big Oil’s ongoing fight to roll back the state’s ambitious climate laws.
During the month leading up to Tuesday’s primary, Bernie Sanders essentially turned California into a second home. The senator from Vermont campaigned the same way in the Golden State that he has since the outset of his White House bid: by staging rallies that draw eye-popping crowds.
In California, the feat has been particularly impressive because of the Democratic hopeful’s ability to attract supporters in such big numbers day after day, up and down the state.
Why Clinton’s call for Sanders to fall in line misreads the 2016 race
Twitter blew up on Tuesday after it was revealed that an email sent to Hillary Clinton supporters—one celebrating Monday’s premature and controversial nomination call—contained an image labeled “secret win” which gave many the impression that the campaign was ready to pounce even before the Associated Press and other outlets made their surprise announcements on the eve of Tuesday’s primaries.
Watch the entire discussion below, although the first video is cut off early because of Facebook’s time limit. The second segment, while much shorter, is a sign-off from Stein and the Truthdig staff.
With the Drumpf reality show getting ever more deranged, moronic and in-your-face racist – moving from trashing a judge whose parents happen to be Mexican to a possibly Muslim or female one – the GOP is tap-dancing as fast as it can to simultaneously deplore and support their candidate, haplessly arguing that while their candidate may be a racist dick, he’s their racist dick. As Republicans realize their guy is going to stay the same thin-skinned, babbling, narcissistic, vindictive jerk with the impulse control of a four-year-old, it’s surreal to hear them trying to toe the impossible line between ditching their party and selling their soul. Hence, their blizzard of double-speak: His attacks on Judge Gonzalo Curiel are “textbook racism,” “offensive and wrong,” “un-American”; then again, “I don’t know all the facts,” “I think we’re all sort of used to remarks being made that we don’t expect,” it’s “a more dimensional issue,” “I’m not going to comment about everything he says and doesn’t say (or) we’d never get anything done,” and from Maine’s own Susan Collins, “I continue to hope that Mr. Trump will rethink his position…I continue to believe in redemption.” Yeah, good luck with that.
I have spent my life building bridges and tearing down barriers — not building walls. That’s why I find Donald Trump’s belief that an American-born judge of Mexican descent is incapable of fairly presiding over his case is not only dead wrong, it is un-American.
As the Presidential campaign progressed, I was hoping the rhetoric would tone down and reflect a campaign that was inclusive, thoughtful and principled. While I oppose the Democratic nominee, Donald Trump’s latest statements, in context with past attacks on Hispanics, women and the disabled like me, make it certain that I cannot and will not support my party’s nominee for President regardless of the political impact on my candidacy or the Republican Party.
Racial gerrymandering cases are rarely easy for courts to decide. On the one hand, the Constitution requires courts to treat racial classifications in the law with extraordinary skepticism. On the other, laws such as the Voting Rights Act require states to pay attention to race when they draw legislative maps, and the Constitution gives them some leeway to do so. The Supreme Court’s opinions explaining how to walk the line between these two conflicting concerns are not a model of clarity.
“We are being tested in this moment because there will never another candidate like Bernie Sanders.”
It might be hard to believe, but California is not the only state voting in the presidential primaries on Tuesday.
Contests will also take place in New Jersey, North and South Dakota, New Mexico, and Montana—and could have some impact as Bernie Sanders supporters hold their ground against corporate media claims that Hillary Clinton has already clinched the nomination.
In New Jersey, which has 126 delegates available, polls open at 6am and close at 8pm. It is a closed primary, which means that voters must be registered for the political party holding the contest in order to cast a ballot. However, the state does allow same-day registration. Live results will be available here.
Moving further west, North Dakota will hold an open caucus at 7pm local time, and voters are encouraged to arrive at least an hour early. Those in line by the deadline will still be allowed to caucus. As the NWI Times noted, 2016 marks the first year that both Democratic presidential candidates took the trouble of opening up offices in a state that has not voted blue since 1964, although there are only 23 delegates up for grabs. According to FiveThirtyEight, Sanders is expected to sweep the state by 38 percentage points. Track live results here.
Clinton may take the nomination, but Sanders surely has won the political debate. He started at single digits in the polls and was widely dismissed as a “fringe” candidate. He has astounded even his supporters, winning more than 20 contests, 10 million votes and 1,500 pledged delegates, the most of any true insurgent in modern history. He has captured the support of young voters by record margins. And he did so less with personal charisma than with the power of his ideas and the force of the integrity demonstrated by spurning traditional deep-pocketed donors in favor of grass-roots fundraising. Harvard researchers found that Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 have actually become more progressive over the course of the campaign. Sanders hasn’t merely won a seat at the table, he’s started a sea change in Democratic politics that the party will have to adjust to.
AP Count: Clinton Has Delegates to Win Democratic NominationThe Associated Press (6/6/16) has unilaterally declared Hillary Clinton to be “the Democratic Party’s presumptive nominee for president,” based on the news agency’s own polling of unelected superdelegates.
Superdelegates—who have a role in the Democratic nominating process based on their institutional positions rather than being chosen by voters—do not vote until the Democratic National Convention, to be held on July 25. They can declare their intention to vote for one candidate or another, just as voters can tell pollsters who they intend to vote for before Election Day, but like voters they can (and do) change their mind at any time before the actual voting. Media do not generally call elections weeks before the actual voting based on voters’ intentions.
The timing of AP’s announcement–on the eve of primaries in California, New Jersey, New Mexico, Montana and South Dakota, and caucuses in North Dakota—raises concerns of voter suppression, intentional or not. The six states choose a total of 806 delegates on June 7, making it the second-biggest day in the Democratic primary calendar (after “Super Tuesday,” March 1, when 865 delegates were at stake).
News outlets generally withhold the results of exit polling until voters have finished voting, regardless of how far ahead the leading candidate is, because they don’t want to confuse poll-based speculation with the actual electoral results. AP, it seems, has no such qualms.
Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager laid into the media on Tuesday for allegedly suppressing voter turnout, ripping into news outlets’ calls projecting Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee while reiterating that his candidate would pursue the nomination all the way until next month’s convention.
“Let those people vote and decide before the media tells them that the race is over,” Jeff Weaver told CNN. “What’s the point of suppressing voter turnout in six states across the country to have a quick news hit that could easily have been done tonight?”
Sanders has said that he would do well in California and five other states voting Tuesday if there is a large turnout. Discussing Sanders’ next moves, Weaver noted that the District of Columbia still has its primary next Tuesday.
The Associated Press may have declared Hillary Clinton the Democratic nominee, but Bernie Sanders is still picking up superdelegates.
Democratic National Committeewoman Pat Cotham, a North Carolina superdelegate, said Monday evening she would support Sanders. The endorsement came on the eve of contests in California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota and South Dakota.
Newly released documents from Trump University have inspired another round of questions about the company’s dubious business practices. But the documents also shed light on how presumptive GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump views education — and what education policies he might roll out if he wins the election.
Last night, Associated Press – on a day when nobody voted – surprised everyone by abruptly declaring the Democratic Party primary over and Hillary Clinton the victor. The decree, issued the night before the California primary in which polls show Clinton and Bernie Sanders in a very close race, was based on the media organization’s survey of “superdelegates”: the Democratic Party’s 720 insiders, corporate donors and officials whose votes for the presidential nominee count the same as the actually elected delegates. AP claims that superdelegates who had not previously announced their intentions privately told AP reporters that they intend to vote for Clinton, bringing her over the threshold. AP is concealing the identity of the decisive superdelegates who said this.
Although the Sanders campaign rejected the validity of AP’s declaration – on the ground that the superdelegates do not vote until the convention and he intends to try to persuade them to vote for him – most major media outlets followed the projection and declared Clinton the winner.
The Democrats introduced the super delegate system back in 1982, in order to prevent another populist upsurge in the early 1970s with the grassroots George McGovern campaign; and as a response to another outsider, Jimmy Carter, who turned out to be a disaster for the party in the 1980 election.
The mainstream media has run out screaming headlines and saturation TV coverage on AP’s tally that Hillary Clinton has nailed down the Democratic nomination, but the claims are misleading, reports Joe Lauria.
Rome, London, Washington, Wien: these are different and distant places. Yet it is rather obvious nowadays to connect the dots and read them as just nation-specific symptoms of a worldwide phenomenon. We are witnessing what is increasingly looking like the meltdown of an entire political and economic system which has governed the developed world for at least three decades.
In Italy, the results of yesterday’s election of local city councils surpassed even the expectations of the anti-establishment Five Star Movement. In Rome, the city which has lived for decades almost exclusively off salaries paid by a heavily indebted and inefficient central administration, only one out of ten electors voted for the Democratic Party of the PM, Matteo Renzi.
Despite the acrimony and deep ideological debate raging within the Democratic Party, the vast majority of both Clinton and Sanders supporters know America must defeat Donald Trump. They just vehemently disagree about how to best ensure his loss.
California primary voters can force Democrats to engage productively across the divide if they make the unconventional political move to register the big picture, not simply the dynamics within the Democratic National Committee confines.
As I sat in the San Diego sunshine yesterday listening to Bernie Sanders outside of Qualcomm Stadium, I was struck by the stunning contrast between the senator and Donald Trump, particularly on the issue of race.
Sanders emphasized racial justice, citing the courage of African Americans and their allies who fought against racism and bigotry during Jim Crow. He talked of the thousands of undocumented workers who are ruthlessly exploited, overworked and underpaid, vowing to end the current deportation policies. Sanders seeks to “unite, not divide families.” And he wants to “fundamentally change” the federal government’s oppressive relationship with the Native American community.
There are more people in U.S. prisons than in any other country in the world, Sanders noted. Those imprisoned, he said, are disproportionately African Americans, Latinos and Native Americans. The senator wants to invest in “jobs and education, not jails and incarceration.”
Amid new charges of an “undemocratic” presidential primary, over 60 percent of Democratic voters and Democratic-leaning voters assert that they want the party to hold open nominating contests, an NBC News/Survey Monkey poll released Tuesday found.
A majority of Republicans and voters leaning toward the Republican Party also prefer open primaries and caucuses.
As the number of independent voters has risen in recent years, many voters have argued that closed primaries are disenfranchising a large portion of the population.
In the midst of an intensifying primary, the mainstream media joined as one to announce Hillary Clinton as the presumptive Democratic nominee for President. While she lacks a clear majority of pledged delegates, the expected support of as yet to vote superdelegates has apparently handed her a hard won victory against an impassioned Bernie Sanders and the growing progressive movement propelling him forward.
Indeed, this announced “triumph” comes on the eve of a California primary where Sanders is surging in popularity and attracting hundred of thousands of new registered voters with his calls for no less than a “political revolution.” Rather than racing confidently toward the finish, Clinton is limping with desperate vigor to hold on tightly to her once inevitable coronation as the nominee. Far from celebration, her success is tinged with establishment concerns over how much she has been damaged as a candidate and broader worries over whether this will be ultimately a pyrrhic victory.
The Associated Press and NBC News inappropriately reported Hillary Clinton made history and “clinched” the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. It spurred other media organizations, such as CNN and the New York Times, to follow suit and splash their home pages with big headlines indicating Clinton was the nominee.
In engaging in this act, establishment media improperly influenced five primaries scheduled for June 7, including the California primary, one of the biggest contests in the presidential race thus far. They collectively stooped to a new sycophantic low.
The reports of “clinching” are entirely based on an unofficial survey of superdelegates, which the AP and NBC News has conducted throughout the 2016 election. They both determined Clinton reached the “magic number” needed to clinch, which is 2383 delegates.
But if it is true that history happened, why didn’t Clinton’s own party congratulating her? How come there was no statement from the Democratic National Committee?
As of 12 am ET on June 7, the DNC had released no statement. There was no status update on the DNC’s Facebook page. There was no message sent or retweeted about Clinton making history.
Is that not a bit odd to journalists in the media or do journalists and pundits covering this election have their heads so deep in the Clinton campaign that they do not care to even fake objectivity and fairness anymore?
Techdirt has written plenty of stories about the Chinese government’s attempts to stifle dissent online using a variety of heavy-handed approaches.
But the message came at a time when Western journalists and human rights groups have been speaking out over mounting censorship in the country. Just two weeks ago, Poroshenko banned 17 Russian media executives and journalists from entering Ukraine as part of the fight against Kremlin propaganda or Russia’s “information war.”
The ban issued on May 27 has been widely condemned by Western organizations, even though Ukraine lifted sanctions on 29 foreign journalists in a second decree issued on the same day.
Last week the State Department revealed that an unknown official within its public affairs office ordered the scrubbing of roughly eight minutes from a video of a State press briefing, which included a discussion about negotiations related to the Iran nuclear deal.
In the deleted portion, then-spokesperson Jen Psaki (above) was asked whether her predecessor lied when she said secret bilateral talks with Iran had not yet begun, when later U.S. officials said they were already ongoing at that point.
A few days later, after the news broke of the deletion, Secretary of State John Kerry said that whoever called for deleting the several minutes of video was being “stupid, clumsy and inappropriate.” Kerry emphasized that he intends to find out who was responsible, adding that he didn’t want someone like that working for him.
The genuine and positive forces seeking change in Syria disappeared long ago. James Foley documented the reality in Syria after his illusions were dispelled in Fall 2012. So did the native Aleppan known as Edward Dark. Initially he and his friends supported the uprising but then realized what it meant. While there is an array of jihadi factions, the conflict has crystallized into its essence: a brutal war of aggression with foreign funded mercenaries and international jihadis on one side, and a struggling multi-ethnic, multi-religious Syrian army and allies on the other.
Remember Web Sheriff? That’s the wacky firm that claims it will send DMCA takedowns on your behalf or protect your online reputation by taking down stuff you don’t like. The company is somewhat infamous for being a joke and not doing its job particularly well. A couple of weeks ago we wrote about the company abusing the DMCA to try to get Google to delist stories relating to that “celebrity threesome” media injunction in the UK that has been making news for a few months. We highlighted just how ridiculous this was on many accounts, including using a copyright takedown notice on an issue that wasn’t about copyright at all. And they even tried to take down the company’s own Zendesk request to remove content from Reddit.
Japanese journalists do not face political censorship problems, but are subjected to self-censorship, executive commentator of the Japan Broadcasting Corporation (NHK) Ichiyo Ishikawa told Sputnik on Tuesday.
Internet censorship is possible, and it is very present, Tanjug Director Branka Djukic said in Moscow Tuesday at an international forum titled “The New Era of Journalism: A Farewell to the Mainstream.”
The forum, organised by the Rossiya Segodnya agency, brought together media experts from over 30 countries of the world – the United States, the United Kingdom, France, India, China, Armenia, Egypt, Azerbaijan, the United Arab Emirates and others.
In strict diplomatic terms, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s recent visit to Canada could not be termed a success.
It was the first visit by a Chinese foreign minister in seven years. It was also the first opportunity for the new Liberal government to demonstrate its eagerness to patch up relationships it claims were strained under the Conservatives. Luo Zhaohui, China’s ambassador to Canada, says a lot of important work got done: the launch of a mechanism to improve dialogue; talks on trade and business relations; plans to increase student mobility, fight corruption and “hunt-down and surrender … fugitive offenders.” And, of course, the usual “candid and in-depth exchange of views on sensitive issues…of mutual concern.”
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s scolding of a Canadian reporter for daring to ask a question about human rights in China has made headlines around the world. The unexpected rant reflects China’s attempt to export its own values, especially censorship, to the West.
Minister Wang Yi’s scolding of a Canadian reporter for daring to ask a question about human rights in China has made headlines around the world. The unexpected rant reflects China’s attempt to export its own values, especially censorship, to the West.
Instead of a spontaneous display of anger, the performance was clearly staged. Chinese officials are asked about human rights everywhere they go, and so the question itself should not have been surprising. What was odd was that while the question was directed at Canada’s foreign affairs minister, Stephane Dion, the Chinese minister stepped in to respond.
On June 5 New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law an executive order aimed at the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) Movement. BDS is a non-violent economic and political protest against the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories.
The current aggressive campaign against anybody who speaks out for Palestine is gathering force. It’s most obvious manifestation lies in the ridiculous claims of “anti-semitism” against many left wing or radical campaigners who have worked against all racism their entire lives. As the establishment becomes more desperate to portray any thought or expression outside their neo-con orthodoxy as illegitimate, the related attack on supporters of Palestine becomes increasingly shrill.
Canadians who value free speech – and let’s hope that is all of us – should be deeply troubled by Ottawa’s decision to tell Canada Post to stop carrying a fringe Toronto newspaper. Public Services Minister Judy Foote ordered the postal service to cease delivering Your Ward News, which has been accused of being anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi. Her “interim prohibitory order” gives its editor 10 days to appeal.
Those who have campaigned against the free paper are “ecstatic.” But consider the awful precedent this act of postal censorship sets.
Censorship of media has become a global phenomenon, Michalis Psilos, president and general director of the Athens-Macedonian Press Agency (ANA-MPA), said Tuesday.
Pahlaj Nihalani, the current chairman of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) deserves our collective thanks for exposing just how absurd, arbitrary and abused our film screening regulations are. After a string of decisions that imposed his own dogmatic view of decency, propriety and culture on an unsuspecting public, the CBFC’s decision on Balaji Motion Pictures’ Udta Punjab has shown everyone just how much the board constituted for film certification has operated as a vehicle for film censorship.
Reports that the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has asked for many cuts in Abhishek Chaubey’s Udta Punjab as well as sought the removal of “Punjab” from its title give a complete lie to the government’s pronouncements that it would like to usher in an era of reduced control on films.
Filmmakers including Karan Johar, Mahesh Bhatt, Ram Gopal Varma among others today criticised Censor Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for censoring the content of upcoming film “Udta Punjab”.
Show of hands: who remembers Axl Rose? Last we here at Techdirt checked in on him, Rose was busy suing video games and hassling music bloggers over album leaks. The younger among you may chiefly be familiar with his Axl-ness via a somewhat popular string of internet memes centered on some rather unflattering pictures of the musician taken from a concert in 2010.
[...]
Now, TorrentFreak reached out to Minkevich, who had no idea this takedown blitz was underway. He confirmed that some concerts do indeed make photographers sign these types of agreements, but couldn’t recall if this concert included one or not. Web Sherrif, who certainly should be able to produce the agreement, having taken the lead on the copyright claims, isn’t doing so. When asked, Web Sherrif’s response was instead to insist that even if the photographer had not signed an agreement — leading me to believe he probably didn’t –, that Rose would still be able to claim ownership over the photo.
The FBI doesn’t want to talk about its secret malware, but with over 100 child porn prosecutions tied to it, it’s had to discuss at least a few aspects of its Network Investigative Technique (NIT).
In yet another prosecution — this one actually taking place in Virginia for a change — the FBI is once again struggling to withhold details of its NIT from the defense. Suppression of the evidence likely isn’t an option, as the warrant it obtained in Virginia was actually deployed in Virginia. I’m sure the FBI is as surprised as anybody by this fortuitous coincidence. But the defendant still wants access to more information, as he is looking to challenge the evidence the FBI collected with its Tor-defeating exploit.
The defendant, Edward Matish, has questions about the chain of custody. FBI Special agent Daniel Alfin, who has testified in other Playpen/NIT cases inadvertently admits there could be problems here, considering the FBI does nothing to protect the information it collects from suspect’s computers from being intercepted or altered.
The controversial National Security Letter (NSL) statute could be significantly expanded under two separate bills currently being debated by the Senate. Every year, the FBI issues thousands of NSLs to telephone and Internet companies, demanding records about their customers and gagging the companies from informing the public about these requests. NSLs are inherently dangerous to civil liberties because their use is rarely subject to judicial review. But NSLs are not magic, and they don’t require recipients to do whatever the FBI says. Above all, the type of information available to the FBI with an NSL is quite limited, reflecting the need to tightly control the extrajudicial nature of this controversial power.
A Senate bill published late Monday night includes a new provision that would give the FBI more power to issue secret demands, known as national security letters, to technology, internet, communications, and banking companies for their customers’ information.
The provision, tucked into the Senate Intelligence Authorization Act, would explicitly authorize the FBI to obtain “electronic communication transactional records” for individuals or entities — though it doesn’t define what that means. The bill was passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee last week.
At each stage of this gutting process, Feingold’s effort to end bulk collection got watered down until, with Sessons’ amendments, the Internet dragnet was permitted to operate as it had been. Almost the very same time this happened, NSA’s General Counsel finally admitted that every single record the agency had collected under the dragnet program had violated the category restrictions set back in 2004. Probably 20 days later, Reggie Walton would shut down the dragnet until at least July 2010.
But before that happened, the Administration made what appears to be — now knowing all that we know now — an effort to legalize the illegal Internet dragnet that had replaced the prior illegal Internet dragnet.
Supporters of unregulated corporate facial recognition systems are waging a sneak attack against our nation’s strongest protection of biometric privacy. On one side are business interests seeking to profit by using invasive facial recognition technologies to identify and track vast numbers of people without their consent. On the other side are EFF and many other digital privacy and consumer rights organizations. Our side won the latest round. But the future of biometric privacy will require all of our constant vigilance.
The latest example of successfully working together: privacy advocates sprung into action last month and defeated a bill that would have repealed most of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, a groundbreaking law protecting your biometric data. The bill would have deregulated scans of faces, irises, retinas, and hands, and left in place regulation only of fingerprints and voiceprints. In addition to gutting people’s privacy, it would also have undercut lawsuits pending against Facebook and other companies for violating the original strong law. The bill, filed just before the Memorial Day weekend, appeared set for quick passage before the end of the regular legislative session.
Check Point’s security research team has discovered vulnerabilities in Facebook’s standard online Chat function, and its separately downloaded Messenger app.
The vulnerabilities, if exploited, would allow anyone to essentially take control of any message sent by Chat or Messenger, modify its contents, distribute malware and even insert automation techniques to outsmart security defences.
Since at least 2009, a number of law enforcement agencies in the UK have had access to troves of metadata collected by British signals intelligence outfit GCHQ with the use of a highly secretive spy programme called ‘Milkwhite’.
The previously undisclosed programme was described in documents leaked by former NSA-contractor Edward Snowden and published by The Intercept. It reportedly involves the collection of records belonging to domestic UK citizens – including metadata from social media platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn and chat services such as WhatsApp.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said in a televised address to an international media forum that 80 percent of the US National Security Agency’s (NSA) budget has been privatized as part of the merger between power and big business.
“There is a merger between the corporate organizations and state… 80 percent of the National Security Agency budget is privatized,” Assange said, stressing that the NSA “is the core of the US deep state… There has been a smoothing out between the government and the corporations,” the whistleblower said.
When the Nest smart thermostat was launched back in 2011, you may recall that it was met with an absolute torrent of gushing media adoration, most of it heralding the real arrival of the smart home. That was in part thanks to the fact the company was founded by Tony Fadell and Matt Rogers, both ex-Apple engineers with some expertise in getting the media to fawn robotically over shiny kit. But a parade of high-profile PR failures have plagued the effort since, including several instances where botched firmware updates briefly bricked the device, leaving even the media’s resident internet of things evangelists annoyed.
[...]
There’s also the recent kerfuffle involving Nest acquiring smart home hub manufacturer Revolv in 2014, then effectively bricking a $300 device as of last month (again, without really providing anything to replace it with). Over the last year Nest also started leaking many top employees and there was a notably ugly and public feud with Dropcam co-founder and departing Nest employee Greg Duffy, who blamed Nest’s dysfunction on Fadell’s “tyrant bureaucrat” management style.
On June 4, VICE News published more than 800 pages of declassified NSA documents that shed new light on the contentious issue of whether Edward Snowden raised concerns about the agency’s surveillance programs while he still worked there. Since then, Snowden has alleged there’s additional evidence that has not yet been made public.
The former NSA contractor has long maintained that his 2013 leak of a trove of highly classified documents was a last resort after his efforts to sound the alarm about the agency’s secret spy programs went largely ignored.
The NSA, meanwhile, has rejected Snowden’s narrative, insisting that the closest he got to raising concerns was sending a single email asking a question about the interpretation of legal authorities.
On the first day of this month (June 2016), The Guardian revealed a rift caused in the mid-2000s between MI5 and MI6, Britain’s foreign and domestic intelligence agencies, by MI6′s involvement in the rendition and torture of people suspected of Islamist terrorism. It was good journalism, but it still took ten years for the public to be told of this rift.
I have been an investigative journalist for over three decades. In that time, just about every case of illegality, immorality or incompetence demonstrated by an intelligence agency I can think of has been revealed by investigative journalists working with their inside sources.
Mind you, this was friendly territory – the Cheltenham Science Festival in GCHQ’s home town.
In an attack on ad-blocking software, the Newspaper Association of America filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission last week, asking the agency to ban a variety of functions, including “evading metered subscription systems and paywalls,” and ad substitution. NAA also called into question new business models that aim to replace online advertising. Newspapers are concerned about the effects that ad-blockers may have on their revenues and their ability to understand and market to their readership. But some of what NAA is asking for would threaten important and widely used privacy software, like Tor and EFF’s own Privacy Badger, and chip away at Internet users’ ability to control their own browsing experience.
Much of the privacy protection we need in today’s world can’t happen without technological and legislative solutions, and the ACLU will continue leading the fight for digital security and privacy through our litigation and advocacy efforts. But there are simple steps that everyone can take to improve their digital privacy. While there are many advanced techniques that expert technologists can deploy for much greater security, below are some relatively basic and straightforward steps that will significantly increase your protection against privacy invasions and hacks.
A secret report warned that British spies may have put lives at risk because their surveillance systems were sweeping up more data than could be analyzed, leading them to miss clues to possible security threats.
The concern was sent to top British government officials in an explosive classified document, which outlined methods being developed by the United Kingdom’s domestic intelligence agency to covertly monitor internet communications.
The FBI is expecting a new change in the law that would grant it powers to get a complete picture of a person’s online life. The new change will allow the FBI to access a person’s browsing history and other “electronic communications” data without a warrant in any spy cases or terrorism.
Newly declassified documents show that Edward Snowden was a CIA asset and shine a light on the steps made by the government to discredit his claims that he had raised concerns with the NSA, prior to his leak.
Documents obtained by VICE via an Freedom of Information Act request, although inconclusive, reveal that the extent of internal process that led to the eventual release of an April 2013 email that asked whether an Obama executive order allowing the snooping program could supersede federal statute.
Before he leaked the documents, Snowden said he had repeatedly attempted to raise his concerns inside the NSA about its surveillance of US citizens but claimed the agency had done nothing.
An explosive exposé shows that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden repeatedly tried to raise concerns about illegal mass surveillance, but was ignored.
Hundreds of internal NSA documents declassified and released by journalists prove that claims made by senior officials in the Obama administration and prominent politicians like Hillary Clinton, who accused Snowden of failing to use available whisteblower protections, are false.
VICE News obtained more than 800 pages of documents, including emails, talking points and other records, in response to its long-running Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. These “call into question aspects of the U.S. government’s long-running narrative about Snowden’s time at the NSA.”
Every time the anniversary of the first Snowden leak rolls around, everyone reassesses the damage… or lack thereof. Did Snowden actually make a dent in the surveillance apparatus or did he do little more than hand out cheat sheets to terrorists?
As more time passes, even Snowden’s harshest critics are warming up to the idea that his leaks did more good than harm. Former attorney general Eric Holder, to name one such critic, believes Snowden “performed a public service” by leaking surveillance documents. Of course, this is the sort of thing one can safely say when no longer in the position of having to choose between prosecuting Snowden or dropping the bogus espionage charges.
Over at Lawfare — a site whose writers are almost universally critical of Snowden — one contributor (a former DoD lawyer) sees Snowden’s leaks as beneficial. Jack Goldsmith’s take on the NSA leak fallout finds that Snowden’s actions actually made the NSA a better agency — not just in terms of transparency but in terms of capabilities.
As the video opens we see a gray Pontiac enter the frame, and Bryce’s dad, Matt, put his hand on his son’s knee. His mom, Stacy, folded her arms, clutching a tissue. Tears began to form in both his parents’ eyes, anticipating what everyone else in the room was about to see. Unfazed, Bryce leaned his 6-foot-1-inch frame forward, his eyes focused on the makeshift projector. He knew this piece of evidence absolved him of any wrongdoing.
In the video, Runnels pulls Bryce over and approaches the car. He tells Bryce to get out but doesn’t give a reason. Bryce repeatedly asks if he is under arrest. Runnels says, “You’re under arrest. Get your ass out of the car,” and attempts to pull him out by force. He then tases Bryce for 23 seconds, handcuffs him, drags the boy’s body behind the car, and deliberately drops him face first onto the asphalt road. Runnels may not have known it at the time, but Bryce was going into cardiac arrest. When the loud thud of the drop boomed throughout the courtroom, gasps echoed out. One woman looked down and covered her eyes with her hand. A man said, “Oh, my god.” A police officer with the Kansas City Police Department quickly brought his fist to his mouth, turned to the man next to him, and whispered, “Jesus.” Even those sitting behind the defendant — a few friends, his wife, his family — gasped, as if the recording revealed a truth about Runnels they had never considered.
One of the more interesting things to sneak out around the edges of the FBI’s redaction bars in Yahoo’s document dump of National Security Letters was the sheer amount of information the agency was demanding. The FBI — using letters it writes and approves with no outside oversight — wants all of the following in exchange for a piece of paper backed by nothing but the FBI’s “national security” claims.
Black people are fighting for our right to live while Black.
2010 marked the beginning of a historic period of Black resistance to police terrorism and state-sanctioned violence. Beginning with the murder of Oscar Grant in January 2010 by then-BART police officer Johannes Mehserle, and continuing with the high-profile cases of Trayvon Martin, Jordan Davis, Renisha McBride, Michael Brown, Rekia Boyd, Tamir Rice and too many others, police violence, particularly in poor and Black communities, has taken center stage nationwide.
At the end of 2015, university students across South Africa embarked upon protests, brought campuses to a standstill, interrupted exams, and marched to the seats of government in Cape Town and Pretoria. During these encounters, authorities repeatedly assaulted, tear-gassed and detained students. Throughout, these students appealed to the idea that the post-apartheid order is a rights-based order, and repeatedly insisted that they possessed a “right to protest”. In the face of repressive policing, they condemned the state and university administrators for not recognising this right.
[...]
Students are thus not wrong to state that the “right to protest” is refused recognition in practice—whether by the state, by university leaders, or other authorities. This right has been frustrated by the refusal to countenance disruptive dissent, and by the violent policing of public gatherings. These experiences are also not new or unique to students. Over many years, communities of the poor and dispossessed have taken to the streets in protest, facing increasingly violent practices of policing and political exclusion. They too have been assaulted and arrested, imprisoned and harassed. Some have been murdered, their voices permanently silenced—whether in groups by the state, as at Marikana, or assassinated by shadowy forces, as has happened in Durban and most recently in Bizana. The effect has been to suppress dissent by rendering it dangerous.
Hillary Clinton gave a victory speech Tuesday night positioning herself as the logical conclusion of first women’s rights meeting at Seneca Falls in 1848. Along the way, other milestones have included women gaining the right to vote, in 1919 and the first woman elected to the Senate, in 1932.
But the US was late. Australia, Denmark and Iceland preceded us in granting the vote to women in national, parliamentary elections. The republic of Azerbaijan, a Muslim-majority country, granted the franchise to women in 1918.
Many consumer coffee grinders are another example of a design that physically prevents you from messing up. Even if you wanted to, you could NOT chop your fingers on the blade, because the “on” switch for the grinder is triggered by closing the lid (as opposed to a blender, which leaves its blades easily accessible to stray fingers).
Jasmine Richards, the first black person to ever be convicted for “felony lynching,” will spend the next three months in a California prison, with 18 days already served. During a hearing on Wednesday, Judge Elaine Lu also sentenced Richards to three years of probation.
The F.B.I. has significantly increased its use of stings in terrorism cases, employing agents and informants to pose as jihadists, bomb makers, gun dealers or online “friends” in hundreds of investigations into Americans suspected of supporting the Islamic State, records and interviews show.
Undercover operations, once seen as a last resort, are now used in about two of every three prosecutions involving people suspected of supporting the Islamic State, a sharp rise in the span of just two years, according to a New York Times analysis. Charges have been brought against nearly 90 Americans believed to be linked to the group.
The increase in the number of these secret operations, which put operatives in the middle of purported plots, has come with little public or congressional scrutiny, and the stings rely on F.B.I. guidelines that predate the rise of the Islamic State.
A federal judge on Monday unsealed disturbing dashcam footage of a suburban Kansas City, Missouri, police officer tasering a 17-year-old motorist who became brain damaged after what was billed as a routine traffic stop. That stop subsequently turned into an event of excessive force—resulting in a four-year prison sentence for Officer Timothy Runnels of the Independence Police Department.
The video shows Runnels tase and yank Bryce Masters out of the car and down on the street as Masters howls. The boy was filming the officer with his mobile phone, which the officer flings to the street. “Am I under arrest? Am I under arrest?” the teen is overheard saying before he is stunned and grabbed from the vehicle.
Time and time again, we’ve noted how the broadband industry’s justifications for usage caps just don’t hold water. And while the industry used to falsely claim that caps were necessary due to congestion or to save us all from the bullshit “exaflood,” the industry has slowly but surely stopped using any justification at all for what’s really just glorified rate hikes on uncompetitive markets. These days, big ISPs like AT&T and Comcast looking to impose usage caps either give no justification whatsoever, or pretend they’re doing consumers a favor by providing more “choice and flexibility.”
The draft guidelines are only published in English and this doesn’t make the reading of a technical text easy for non-native English speakers. On the other hand the only way to answer to the consultation is to send an email that doesn’t exceed 2MB and preferably in English, even though nothing is specified concerning the way answers in other languages will be taken into account.
Twenty-seven years ago, Tim Berners-Lee created the World Wide Web as a way for scientists to easily find information. It has since become the world’s most powerful medium for knowledge, communications and commerce — but that doesn’t mean Mr. Berners-Lee is happy with all of the consequences.
“It controls what people see, creates mechanisms for how people interact,” he said of the modern day web. “It’s been great, but spying, blocking sites, repurposing people’s content, taking you to the wrong websites — that completely undermines the spirit of helping people create.”
So on Tuesday, Mr. Berners-Lee gathered in San Francisco with other top computer scientists — including Brewster Kahle, head of the nonprofit Internet Archive and an internet activist — to discuss a new phase for the web.
As we noted last October, Europe passed net neutrality rules that not only don’t really protect net neutrality, but actually give ISPs across the EU’s 28 member countries the green light to violate net neutrality consistently — just as long as ISPs are relatively clever about it. Just like the original, overturned 2010 net neutrality rules in the States, Europe’s new rules (which took effect April 30) are packed with all manner of loopholes giving exemption for “specialized services” and “class-based discrimination,” as well as giving the green light for zero rating.
In a bid to recover ground, U.S. diplomats, along with those from other nations that ostensibly oversee the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), an obscure but important U.N. agency in Geneva, were negotiating furiously to see if they will ever get to read a report on alleged wrongdoing by the agency’s autocratic director general, Francis Gurry, accused among other things of ordering illegal break-ins of his own staffers’ offices.
Gurry himself already has a copy of the full and unredacted report on his own misdeeds– including the names of witnesses who testified against him—in violation not only of whistleblower protection rules but of standard U.N. investigative practices used to ensure witness cooperation.
According to a State Department spokesman, U.S. diplomats in Geneva were still demanding “immediate release” of the report—which WIPO’s 188 member states had ordered up themselves from the U.N.’s Office of Internal Oversight Services, and which was delivered to the chair of WIPO’s General Assembly in February.
Digital technology continues its collision with intellectual property law, this time in BMW’s lawsuit against the online virtual modeling company TurboSquid. TurboSquid sells digital 3D models of various items for use by game developers, architects, visual effects studios, etc.
This case is paradigmatic of a project Mark McKenna and I are working on, which analyzes trademarks in the context of digital goods. BMW complains that TurboSquid’s “marketing of 3-D virtual models” of BMW vehicles infringes BMW’s trademarks, trade dress, and design patents. Specifically, it complains that TurboSquid “markets and tags BMW-trademarked 3-D virtual models of BMW vehicles as suitable for games.”
The RIAA has sent a formal letter to the Public Interest Registry, asking it to suspend Pirate Bay’s .ORG domain. The registry hasn’t complied with the request but has forwarded it to Pirate Bay’s registrar EasyDNS who insist the domain will stay up. So the question now is will the RIAA take the matter to court?
After a 6 year legal battle, Google has emerged victorious against a claim of copyright infringement. Oracle argued that Google had infringed copyright in 37 of their Java application programming interfaces (APIs), by using them in their Android platform. Java is a type of computing language, used to create code. Everyone is free to use the language itself, but the combination of code can be subject to copyright.
Google successfully relied on the fair use defence to refute the claim.
KickassTorrents, the world’s most popular torrent index, is pushing back against the increasing number of ISP blockades. To make it easier for its users to bypass local censorship efforts, KAT’s operators have added a dark web address, hiding the site in the Tor network.
The operators of popular torrent index KickassTorrents have announced the launch of website’s .onion URL. Now, apart from the main service, KAT can also be accessed on the dark web via this address: lsuzvpko6w6hzpnn.onion
Removing the ‘burden’ of quality control
Summary: The erosion of patent quality at the European Patent Office seems ever more evident and inevitable, especially if the UPC becomes a reality (opening doors to software patents) and makes the boards of appeal marginal
NOW that the EPO is in full propaganda mode and there are dedicated hashtags for purchased press coverage I’ve decided to stay home and cover more closely some EPO affairs, in addition to all the other stuff (unrelated to EPO). The EPO is totally out of control. It’s run by lunatics who believe their ‘circle’ can just buy votes, ‘studies’, press ‘coverage’ etc. How far can this go before the EPO implodes or politicians invoke some magic law that can hold Battistelli accountable?
Good explanation of why the EPO management is effectively trying to demolish the boards (a little oversight or accountability) was posted by an anonymous blogger as per information that initially came from IP Kat and angered the EPO management enough to have the site banned (media analysis/sources seem to suggest this was the final straw which did it).
Here is the core of the analysis, which is accompanied by numbers:
This shows that the increase in fees has dramatically affected ex parte appeals, with appeals before the increase averaging at about 1200 a year and in the first full year after the increase amounting to only 864 appeals (a 28% decrease).
The increase in fees has affected inter partes appeals less, with the number of appeals in opposition roughly tracking the number of grants (roughly 2.5% of grants end up with an appeal in opposition).
If a mere 50% increase in appeal fee has resulted in such a drastic change in applicant behaviour, what effect might the huge proposed increase have?
It is to be hoped that the Administrative Council will recognise that an effective appeal system is essential to maintaining quality at the EPO, and will not increase the appeal fee [at all].
“A few thoughts on the effect of the last big increase in appeal fees can be found here,” s/he wrote in IP Kat. The numbers seem to support the hypothesis that fee hikes directly impact the number of appeals. It demonstrates that Battistelli’s plot would squash the boards in the same way the Tories in the UK destroy the NHS, claiming failure or lack of demand (which they themselves created or led to, respectively).
“Well, with lower/declining quality of patents, which is a known issue (see how the EPO accelerates examination under pressure), not many appeals by the applicants would be needed, especially if massive fee hikes are implemented.”One critical comment on the above says: “Perhaps a table of number of grants against number of ex-parte appeals may help (or refusals even). Given the increase in productivity, could there be a simpler link – less refusals = less appeals”
Well, with lower/declining quality of patents, which is a known issue (see how the EPO accelerates examination under pressure), not many appeals by the applicants would be needed, especially if massive fee hikes are implemented. The value of EPs (European Patents) would itself decline, making the relative cost of appeal disproportionately high. This may be good for ‘production’ figures that don’t account for quality and use more convenient (easily-measurable) yardsticks like number of granted patents, repeating the USPTO's mistakes (patent saturation necessarily means deflation). As one person put it this morning, “when it comes to management at the EPO, the dumber, the better.” Under Battistelli it’s all about loyalty (to Battistelli, not to the EPO as an Organisation), not brains or skills. No wonder people are leaving in droves and brain drain is repeatedly being reported to us [1, 2, 3, 4].
“No wonder people are leaving in droves and brain drain is repeatedly being reported to us.”Another new comment says that “private practice are receiving more and more applications for patent attorney positions from EPO examiners.” Here is the full comment: “Rumours – confirmed by some industry sources – are numerous that industry and private practice are receiving more and more applications for patent attorney positions from EPO examiners. While I see more and more advertisements on Linkedin re. recruitment of examiners.”
There is also a discussion there which compares the USPTO and the EPO (not on quality but on staff regulations). The same person says: “Well, that USPTO regulation makes perfect sense. And is a good example for the EPO, if not yet in place. For the interest of applicants, not for the direct interest of the EPO. So still… Conflict of interests of the EPO… outside counsel to SUEPO? Investigative agency hired by the AC to investigate too close family ties at the top of the EPO? I am still very much in the dark what such legitimate interests of the Office may be.”
“On the surface, today’s EPO has a lot of scandals and enough to make it Europe’s leading pariah, but it’s disconnected from oversight so it keeps behaving like a rogue regime, mostly uninterrupted (outside intervention is not sufficiently effective).”Apparently, conflict of interests is absolutely verboten for all staff except Team Battistelli, where people even bring family members to roles with massive salaries. Making this situation ever more comical, it’s these family members who are also then put in charge of identifying issues like conflict of interests (Human Resources).
The EPO. What a house of cards…
The EPO now bans access to sites which are critical of the EPO and at the same time pays the media to say what Battistelli tells the media to say about the EPO. These sponsored/bought articles (by EPO) should in their own right be a huge scandal (waste, press abuse, misleading the public) and as more ‘media partners’ start to issue their puff pieces we kindly ask readers to keep us informed (some of this coverage is not in English). On the surface, today’s EPO has a lot of scandals and enough to make it Europe’s leading pariah, but it’s disconnected from oversight so it keeps behaving like a rogue regime, mostly uninterrupted (outside intervention is not sufficiently effective). The EPC inadvertently created a monster and this monster is called Battistelli. █
RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates
Site Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content
Site Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page
IRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time